- Home
- LLM comparison
- Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
xAIDeepSeekLLM matchup
Grok 4.7vs.DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Which one is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have enough benchmark results yet. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper: Grok 4.7 costs 13.3 times (input) and 20 times (output) as much.
Grok 4.7
Rank 21
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
not ranked yet
Grok 4.7
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Grok 4.7
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Grok 4.7
Rank 35 of 875
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Rank 21 of 875
Above 200,000 tokens of context, Grok 4.7 costs more: $4 input and $12 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Grok 4.7 for
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash for
No clear advantage
On this page
Where is the difference?
Grok 4.7 is ahead in 1 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Flash in none.
Grok 4.7 ahead: 1too little data: 9
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Grok 4.7

Oct 1, 2026 · 13 s · $0.0072
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- x-ai/grok-4.7
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 1,069 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0072
- Response time
- 13.4 s
- API model reported in response
- x-ai/grok-4.7
- Pinned endpoint
- xAI | x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (1)
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 98 s · $0.0011
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0011
- Response time
- 97.8 s
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Pinned endpoint
- StreamLake | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (3)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Grok 4.7
Unavailable in this round
DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- deepinfra/fp8
- API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Output
- 798 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0001
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is more popular than Grok 4.7: 65 to 61 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Grok 4.7DeepSeek-V4-Flash
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.3 | n/a |
| Rank | Rank 21 of 91 | not ranked yet |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $2above 200,000 tokens: $4 | $0.15 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $6above 200,000 tokens: $12 | $0.30 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 71 | 123 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 61Rank 35 of 875 | 65Rank 21 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 500,000 tokens≈ 750 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Limited access |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 99.7, rank 29. $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens.
Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashOverall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
Grok 4.7 vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Grok 4.7B: DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show 52 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare Grok 4.7 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 2Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
- 3Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 4Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 5GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 6GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 8Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3
- 9Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show all 45 comparisons
- 10Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 11Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 12GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
- 13DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 14Gemini 4 Argon vs. Grok 4.7
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 17Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 18Grok 4.7 vs. Grok 4.5
- 19Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
- 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 21Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Grok 4.7
- 22Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 23DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 24GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 25GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
- 26Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
- 27Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Grok 4.7
- 28GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 29DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 30GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
- 31Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 32Grok 4.7 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 33DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
- 34GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
- 35Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 36Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 37Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 38Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.2
- 39Muse Wonder Full vs. Grok 4.7
- 40Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 41Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 42Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
- 44Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
- 45Muse Wonder vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash