Skip to main content

AnthropicMistral AILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.Mistral Medium 3.5

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Mistral Medium 3.5, but costs 2.7 times as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

46.8

Mistral Medium 3.5

Rank 88

Mistral Medium 3.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

144

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$3

Mistral Medium 3.5

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

37

Mistral Medium 3.5

Rank 344 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

KnowledgeReasoningFinanceEducationCodingMathematicsMultimodalHealthLegalGeneralAgents

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5Median of all ranked models

7512517525CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
Mistral Medium 3.551.2Rank 92
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, Mistral Medium 3.5 44.5 to 58.0.

AreaOpus 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 25 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, Mistral Medium 3.5 in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +91131.4 to 40.4
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +88122.5 to 34.6
CodingOpus 5.5 +79129.9 to 51.2
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +75131.8 to 57.0
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +73123.1 to 49.7
GeneralOpus 5.5 +68125.1 to 57.0
AgentsOpus 5.5 +63117.2 to 54.0
Specialist fields
FinanceOpus 5.5 +83121.4 to 38.7
HealthOpus 5.5 +72122.1 to 50.1
LegalOpus 5.5 +70121.5 to 51.9

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationOpus 5.5 +80127.0 to 46.8
Cybersecurityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

highOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 120.4 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5 46.8 · Gap 76.5 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. high)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5 46.8

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 51.2
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 57.0, Reasoning 122.5 to 34.6
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 40.4, Search without a score for Mistral Medium 3.5
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 54.0
Fast chat repliesMistral Medium 3.5106 to 144 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Mistral Medium 3.5
Many requests on a small budgetMistral Medium 3.5$8 to $3 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 38.7, Legal 121.5 to 51.9, Health 122.1 to 50.1
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 49.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 39 s · $0.06

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,128 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0610
Response time
38.7 s
API model reported in response
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5
Pinned endpoint
Mistral | mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5-20260430
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0039

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
mistral
API model
mistralai/mistral-medium-3-5
Output
502 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0039
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Mistral Medium 3.5high46.8

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than Mistral Medium 3.5: 68 to 37 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Mistral Medium 3.5
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.146.8
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 88 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$1.50
Outputwhat the model writes$20$7.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.087
Speed
Tokens per second106144
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78537Rank 344 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Apr 28, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.3

Overall index 107.4, rank 15$1.25 input and $4.25 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Mistral Medium 3.5

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%Mistral Medium 3.5: 5.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%Mistral Medium 3.5: 11.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%Mistral Medium 3.5: 32.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%Mistral Medium 3.5: 9.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,264LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,426LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,200LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%Mistral Medium 3.5: 33.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%Mistral Medium 3.5: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Mistral Medium 3.5: 9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%Mistral Medium 3.5: 72.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%Mistral Medium 3.5: 4.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%Mistral Medium 3.5: 2.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%Mistral Medium 3.5: 5.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%Mistral Medium 3.5: 18.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%Mistral Medium 3.5: 27.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Mistral Medium 3.5: 7.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,308LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,431LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,195LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%Mistral Medium 3.5: 72.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 5.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%Mistral Medium 3.5: 13.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%Mistral Medium 3.5: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%Mistral Medium 3.5: 67.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,254LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,242LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
SAGELinear Algebra · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.5%Mistral Medium 3.5: 64.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%Mistral Medium 3.5: 18.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5Mistral Medium 3.5: 2.987 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.1%Mistral Medium 3.5: 2.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.8%Mistral Medium 3.5: 31.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.8%Mistral Medium 3.5: 9.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,264LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,477LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,284Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,216LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
SAGEPartial Differential Equations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 93.4%Mistral Medium 3.5: 81.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.6%Mistral Medium 3.5: 6.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 9.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 71.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,520Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,400LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,351Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,217LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 73.3%Mistral Medium 3.5: 29.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 82.3%Mistral Medium 3.5: 10.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 42.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%Mistral Medium 3.5: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,516Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,444LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,306Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,215LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.5%Mistral Medium 3.5: 2.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Mistral Medium 3.5: 14.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 26.9%Mistral Medium 3.5: 5.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 74%Mistral Medium 3.5: 66%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,501Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,396LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.9%Mistral Medium 3.5: 24.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 77.9%Mistral Medium 3.5: 10.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%Mistral Medium 3.5: 47.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 42.1%Mistral Medium 3.5: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,530Mistral Medium 3.5: 1,420LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30%Mistral Medium 3.5: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBScratch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.5%Mistral Medium 3.5: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Quantitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Mistral Medium 3.5: 44.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 52 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  25. 34Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  32. 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  33. 42Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  36. 45DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  39. 48DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  40. 49Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  41. 50GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  42. 51GLM-5.2 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  43. 52Mistral Large 4 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5