Skip to main content

AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup

Claude Opus 4.7vs.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash perform about equally well, but Claude Opus 4.7 costs 33.3 times (input) and 41.7 times (output) as much.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
93.5

Claude Opus 4.7

Rank 39

99.7

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 29

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
80

Claude Opus 4.7

176

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$10

Claude Opus 4.7

$0.26

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash more popular
Popularity0 to 100
28

Claude Opus 4.7

Rank 491 of 875

38

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 298 of 875

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for

Health (not certain)

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for

GeneralAgents (not certain)Finance (not certain)Coding (not certain)Legal (not certain)Multimodal (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 4.7DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

105110100Codingslightly DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashAgentsslightly DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGeneralDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMultimodalslightly DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFinanceslightly DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLegalslightly DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashHealthslightly Opus 4.7
CodingDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash slightly ahead
Opus 4.792.8Rank 45
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash98.8Rank 30
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Opus 4.7 84.9 to 100.6, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 91.4 to 106.3.

AreaOpus 4.7DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Reasoning, Mathematics, Knowledge.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is ahead in 1 of 10 areas, Opus 4.7 in none.

Opus 4.7 slightly ahead: 1too little data: 3DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash slightly ahead: 5DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
GeneralDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash +1284.9 to 97.1
Agentsleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashnot certain · 5 and 4 tests
Codingleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashnot certain · 5 and 11 tests
Multimodalleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashnot certain · 2 tests each
Reasoningonly Opus 4.7 has a score
Mathematicsonly DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a score
Knowledgeonly Opus 4.7 has a score
Specialist fields
Financeleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashnot certain · 6 and 5 tests
Legalleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashnot certain · 2 and 3 tests
Healthleaning Opus 4.7not certain · 2 tests each

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecurityonly DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a score
Searchonly Opus 4.7 has a score
Productivityonly DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a score
Educationonly DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxtied
Opus 4.7 93.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 99.7 · Gap 0.5 · Test series 4
Overall index (max vs. max)DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash slightly ahead
Opus 4.7 93.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 99.7

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashCoding 92.8 to 98.8
Maths and data analysisopenMathematics without a score for Opus 4.7, Reasoning without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Facts and researchopenKnowledge without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, Search without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Agents and workflowsleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashAgents 97.6 to 106.4
Fast chat repliesDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash80 to 176 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Opus 4.7
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$10 to $0.26 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsdepends on the partFinance 97.4 to 103.7, Legal 96.3 to 100.8, Health 99.6 to 95.5
Images, screenshots and PDFsleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMultimodal 92.5 to 95.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 20 s · $0.05

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
1,966 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0493
Response time
19.9 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.7-opus-20260416
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 26 s · $0.0049

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,191 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0049
Response time
25.8 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-20260910
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 4.7

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
decart/fp4
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Output
590 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0001
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashmax99.7
Claude Opus 4.7max93.5

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is more popular than Claude Opus 4.7: 38 to 28 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Opus 4.7DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better93.599.7
RankRank 39 of 91Rank 29 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$5$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$25$0.60
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 tests both passed$0.049$0.008
Speed
Tokens per second80176
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10028Rank 491 of 87538Rank 298 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026n/a
ReleasedApril 2026Sep 10, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8

Overall index 99.0, rank 30. $5 input and $25 output per 1M tokens.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Claude Opus 4.8
Successor of DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17. $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens.

Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20. $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Claude Haiku 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 4.7B: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 43.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 35.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 43.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 45.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 63.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 51.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 1,361.69 eloDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,600 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
ITBench-AA (SRE)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 46.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 46.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 38.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 85.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 83.3%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,555DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,619LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,494DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,299DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,261LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 54.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 83%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 78.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 77.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 23.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 26.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 84.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 35.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 64.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 49.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 90%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,558DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,619LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,501DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,298DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,261LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 9.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 3.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 70%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 80.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 38.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 87%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 83.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 80.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,554DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,613LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,495DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,347DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,311LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 57.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 52.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 4.588 / 5DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 4.411 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 57.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 51%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 46.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 32.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 39.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchIssue Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 88.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 88.8%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,546DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,613LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,508DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,336DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,311LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 64.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 72%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 36.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 39%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 56.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 54.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 88.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 86.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchRhetoric Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 78.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 80.1%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,562DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,606LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,536DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,523LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,298DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,254LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 66.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 71.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 37%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 48.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchRule Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 85%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 78%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,577DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,606LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,537DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,523LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,302DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,254LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 20.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 27.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 54.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 50 comparisons
  1. 10Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 12GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 13DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 14Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 16DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  8. 17GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 18DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  10. 19DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  11. 20DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  12. 21Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  13. 22Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  14. 23Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  15. 24DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  17. 26Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  18. 27DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  19. 28GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  20. 29Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  21. 30DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  22. 31Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  23. 32Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  24. 33GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  28. 37Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  29. 38Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  30. 39DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  31. 40DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5
  32. 41DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  34. 43Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
  35. 44Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  36. 45Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  37. 46DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
  38. 47Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
  39. 48GPT-5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  41. 50Muse Wonder Full vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash