xAIDeepSeekLLM matchup
Grok 4.6vs.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Which one is better?
Grok 4.6 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash perform about equally well, but Grok 4.6 costs 13.3 times (input) and 10 times (output) as much.
102.4
Grok 4.6
Rank 22
99.7
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Rank 29
72
Grok 4.6
176
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
$3
Grok 4.6
$0.26
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
59
Grok 4.6
Rank 42 of 875
38
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Rank 298 of 875
Above 200,000 tokens of context, Grok 4.6 costs more: $4 input and $12 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Grok 4.6 for
GeneralHealthProductivityMultimodalLegal
Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for
Finance (not certain)
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Grok 4.6DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
Codinglevel
Grok 4.6100.9Rank 23
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash98.8Rank 30
Median of ranked models83.7
95 % range: Grok 4.6 97.5 to 104.2, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 91.4 to 106.3.
AreaGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Reasoning, Mathematics, Knowledge.
Grok 4.6 is ahead in 4 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in none.
Grok 4.6 ahead: 4level: 2too little data: 3DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash slightly ahead: 1
Areas in the overall index
GeneralGrok 4.6 +9106.0 to 97.1
MultimodalGrok 4.6 +4100.2 to 95.7
Codinglevel100.9 to 98.8
Agentslevel104.4 to 106.4
Mathematicstoo little data101.5 to 97.3
Reasoningonly Grok 4.6 has a score
Knowledgeonly Grok 4.6 has a score
Specialist fields
HealthGrok 4.6 +5100.4 to 95.5
LegalGrok 4.6 +4104.8 to 100.8
Financeleaning DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashnot certain · 6 and 5 tests
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityGrok 4.6 +5104.5 to 99.7
Cybersecuritytoo little data103.2 to 103.1
Educationonly DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a score
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
TaskBetter choicebased on
Writing and debugging codelevelCoding 100.9 to 98.8
Maths and data analysisopenMathematics 101.5 to 97.3 (too little data), Reasoning without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Facts and researchopenKnowledge without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Agents and workflowslevelAgents 104.4 to 106.4
Fast chat repliesDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash72 to 176 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 103.2 to 103.1 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$3 to $0.26 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsdepends on the partFinance 100.5 to 103.7, Legal 104.8 to 100.8, Health 100.4 to 95.5
Images, screenshots and PDFsGrok 4.6Multimodal 100.2 to 95.7
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Grok 4.6
Oct 1, 2026 · 114 s · $0.05
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- x-ai/grok-4.6
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 7,660 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0462
- Response time
- 113.6 s
- API model reported in response
- x-ai/grok-4.6
- Pinned endpoint
- xAI | x-ai/grok-4.6-20260810
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (1)
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 26 s · $0.0049
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,191 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0049
- Response time
- 25.8 s
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Pinned endpoint
- DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-20260910
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (2)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Grok 4.6
Unavailable in this round
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- decart/fp4
- API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Output
- 590 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0001
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Grok 4.6 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Grok 4.6high102.4
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashmax99.7
Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic: 126.1 · Rank 1 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Carbon, Google DeepMind: 125.7 · Rank 2 · reasoning effort high
Claude Fable 5.1, Anthropic: 123.8 · Rank 3 · reasoning effort max
Claude Sonnet 5.5, Anthropic: 122.8 · Rank 4 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Argon, Google DeepMind: 122.3 · Rank 5 · reasoning effort high
GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI: 121.3 · Rank 6 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6.1 Sol, OpenAI: 119.2 · Rank 7 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder Full, Meta: 118.3 · Rank 8 · reasoning effort max
Claude Opus 5, Anthropic: 117.2 · Rank 9 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder, Meta: 113.4 · Rank 10 · reasoning effort max
Kimi K3.1 Pro, Moonshot AI: 112.9 · Rank 11 · reasoning effort max
Claude Fable 5, Anthropic: 112.5 · Rank 12 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6 Sol, OpenAI: 110.6 · Rank 13 · reasoning effort max
GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI: 108.7 · Rank 14 · reasoning effort max
Muse Spark 1.3, Meta: 107.4 · Rank 15 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.7 Flash, Google: 107.1 · Rank 16 · reasoning effort high
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek: 106.6 · Rank 17 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.8 Flash, Google: 106.5 · Rank 18 · reasoning effort high
Grok 4.6, xAI: 102.4 · Rank 22 · reasoning effort high
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, DeepSeek: 99.7 · Rank 29 · reasoning effort max
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6.1 Sol
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Opus 5
Muse Wonder
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Fable 5
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol
Muse Spark 1.3
Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Grok 4.6
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Grok 4.6 is more popular than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 59 to 38 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Grok 4.6DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 102.4 | 99.7 |
| Rank | Rank 22 of 91 | Rank 29 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $2above 200,000 tokens: $4 | $0.15 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $6above 200,000 tokens: $12 | $0.60 |
| Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 tests both passed | $0.064 | $0.008 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 72 | 176 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 59Rank 42 of 875 | 38Rank 298 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 500,000 tokens≈ 750 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 1, 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Aug 12, 2026 | Sep 10, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | yes |
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Successor of Grok 4.6Grok 4.7
Overall index 103.3, rank 21. $2 input and $6 output per 1M tokens.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Grok 4.7Successor of DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Overall index 106.6, rank 17. $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens.
Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5
Overall index 103.4, rank 20. $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens.
Grok 4.6 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Grok 4.6B: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 72.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 44.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 45.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 67.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 62.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 53.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 66%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65.6%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 47.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 40.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 48.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 86.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 83.3%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,616DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,619LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,455DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,262DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,261LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 44.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 86.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 30.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 51%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 54%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 66.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SkillsBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 55.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 33.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 26.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 17.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 11.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 38.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 29.7%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 14.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 76.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 84.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 29.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 39.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 80.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 59.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 49.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 49.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 17.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 50.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 42.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 62.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 90.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,597DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,613LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,448DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,287DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,311LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 19%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SkillsBenchNo Skills · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 38.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 16.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 6.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 12.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 72.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 82.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 78.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 60%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 55%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 78.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 42.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 63.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.2%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 49%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 35.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 91.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 83.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 80.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,603DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,606LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,497DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,523LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1,257DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,254LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SkillsBenchWith Skills · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 55.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 68.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 52.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 8.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 11.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexMysteryMechanism · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 30.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.2%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 4.077 / 5DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 4.411 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 49.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 51%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.6: 41.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 46.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
More comparisons
Compare Grok 4.6 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 2Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 3GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 4Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 7GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 8GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 9Claude Sonnet 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 46 comparisons
- 10Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 11Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
- 13GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 14DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 15Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 16Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 17DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 18GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 19DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 20DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
- 21DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 22Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 23Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 24Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.6
- 25Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 26Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.6
- 27DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
- 28Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 29DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
- 30GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 31Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 32DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
- 33GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
- 34Grok 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3
- 35Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 36GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 37Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 38Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 39Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 40Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 41DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
- 42DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5
- 43DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
- 44DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
- 45GPT-5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 46Muse Wonder Full vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash