Skip to main content

OpenAIDeepSeekLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, but costs 13.3 times (input) and 16.7 times (output) as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

100.0

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 33

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

118

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$0.26

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

87

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 3 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

MathematicsEducationMultimodalCodingHealthGeneral (not certain)Legal (not certain)Agents (not certain)

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for

Cybersecurity

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMedian of all ranked models

10512514585CodingGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolAgentsslightlyGPT-6.1 SolGeneralslightlyGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinancelevelLegalslightlyGPT-6.1 SolHealthGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash98.9Rank 34
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 91.2 to 106.7.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 85 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Reasoning, Knowledge.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 4 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 4GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 3level: 1too little data: 2

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +28124.1 to 96.4
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +23118.0 to 95.0
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +22120.6 to 98.9
Generalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 7 and 6 tests
Agentsleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 4 tests each
Reasoningonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Knowledgeonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
HealthGPT-6.1 Sol +16110.2 to 93.9
Legalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 3 tests each
Financelevel105.8 to 103.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationGPT-6.1 Sol +24119.9 to 96.3
CybersecurityDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash +1493.0 to 107.1
Productivitytoo little data100.7 to 100.0
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead
14.6 points gap across 4 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 100.0

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 98.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 96.4, Reasoning without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Facts and researchopenKnowledge without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, Search without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Agents and workflowsleaning GPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 107.9
Fast chat repliesDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash54 to 118 tokens per second
Security analysisDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashCybersecurity 93.0 to 107.1
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$4 to $0.26 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 103.8, Legal 107.0 to 101.9, Health 110.2 to 93.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 95.0

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 26 s · $0.0049

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,191 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0049
Response time
25.8 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-20260910
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
decart/fp4
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Output
590 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0001
Test round
43b8c5c46830

GPT-6.1 Sol and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashmax100.0

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.5100.0
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 33 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$0.60
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.047$0.008
Speed
Tokens per second54118
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a87Rank 3 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Sep 10, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 107.1, rank 18$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 35.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Access to Justice BenchmarkOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 11/10/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 45.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 77.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 58.9%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 72.8%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 49.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 44.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,607.7 eloDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,600.0 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/10/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 67.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65.6%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 40.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,621LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,475LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,263LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 77.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 54%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 43.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 26.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 29.7%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 84.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 74.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 47.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 68.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 49.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 66.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.7%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 22.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 42.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,618LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,479LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,330LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 92.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 91.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 56.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 60.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 60.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 89.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 78.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1COBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 92.5%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 0.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 87 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 11DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  3. 12GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  4. 13DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  5. 14Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 15DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 16DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 17Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 18GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  10. 19DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  11. 20DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  12. 21DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  14. 23Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  15. 24GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  16. 25DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5
  17. 26DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  18. 27Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  19. 28DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  20. 29GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  21. 30Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  22. 31Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  24. 33Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  25. 34Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  26. 35GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  27. 36DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  28. 37Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  29. 38DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  31. 40GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  32. 41Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  34. 43DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  37. 46Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  38. 47Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  42. 51Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  45. 54GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  46. 55GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  47. 56GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  48. 57GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  49. 58GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  51. 60Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  52. 61GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  53. 62DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  54. 63GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  55. 64Muse Wonder vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  56. 65Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  57. 66Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  58. 67GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  59. 68Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  60. 69Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  61. 70GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  62. 71Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  63. 72GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  64. 73Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  65. 74GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  66. 75Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  67. 76GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  68. 77GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  69. 78Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  70. 79GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  71. 80GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  72. 81GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  73. 82Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  74. 83GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  75. 84GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  76. 85Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  77. 86Gemini 4 Carbon vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  78. 87Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol