- Home
- LLM comparison
- GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
OpenAIDeepSeekLLM matchup
GPT-6 Solvs.DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Which one is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have enough benchmark results yet. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper: GPT-6 Sol costs 14.3 times (input) and 35.7 times (output) as much.
GPT-6 Sol
Rank 13
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
not ranked yet
GPT-6 Sol
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
GPT-6 Sol
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
GPT-6 Sol
Rank 3 of 785
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Rank 17 of 785
Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.
Choose GPT-6 Sol for
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash for
No clear advantage
On this page
Where is the difference?
GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 1 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Flash in none.
GPT-6 Sol ahead: 1too little data: 9
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
GPT-6 Sol

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- openai/gpt-6-sol
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 4,389 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0439
- Response time
- 80.5 s
- API model reported in response
- openai/gpt-6-sol
- Pinned endpoint
- OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 98 s · $0.0011
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0011
- Response time
- 97.8 s
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Pinned endpoint
- StreamLake | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (3)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
GPT-6 Sol
Unavailable in this round
DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- deepinfra/fp8
- API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Output
- 798 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0001
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
GPT-6 Sol is more popular than DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 73 to 64 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026
GPT-6 SolDeepSeek-V4-Flash
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 110.5 | n/a |
| Rank | Rank 13 of 92 | not ranked yet |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $2above 272,000 tokens: $4 | $0.14 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $10above 272,000 tokens: $15 | $0.28 |
| Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included) | $0.044 | $0.002 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 111 | 123 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 73Rank 3 of 785 | 64Rank 17 of 785 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 20, 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Limited access |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GPT-6.1 SolOverall index 99.7, rank 29$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashOverall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens
GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: GPT-6 SolB: DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show 24 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare GPT-6 Sol and DeepSeek-V4-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 4GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 5GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
- 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 7GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 8DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 9GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show all 60 comparisons
- 10DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 11GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 12DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 13Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 14Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 15GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 16Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 17Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 18GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
- 19GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 21DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
- 22GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 23GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 24GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 25GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 26Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 27GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
- 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 30GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 31Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 32GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
- 33Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 34Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 35GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 36GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 37Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 38Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 39DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3
- 40GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 41GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 42Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 43DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
- 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
- 45GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 46Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 47GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 48DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
- 49Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 50GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
- 51Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 52DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 53DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
- 54Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 55GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
- 56GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 57Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 58GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 59GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
- 60DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro