Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6 Solvs.Gemini 3.8 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.8 Flash perform about equally well, but GPT-6 Sol costs 2.7 times as much.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

106.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Rank 18

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
111

GPT-6 Sol

115

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6 Sol

$1.50

Gemini 3.8 Flash

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

61

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Rank 25 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

CybersecurityMathematicsCodingAgentsGeneral (not certain)

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash for

ProductivityFinance (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6 SolGemini 3.8 FlashMedian of all ranked models

10011012090CodingGPT-6 SolReasoninglevelMathematicsGPT-6 SolKnowledgelevelAgentsGPT-6 SolGeneralslightlyGPT-6 SolMultimodallevelFinanceslightlyGemini 3.8FlashHealthlevel
CodingGPT-6 Sol ahead
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Gemini 3.8 Flash99.9Rank 27
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6, Gemini 3.8 Flash 97.4 to 102.3.

AreaGPT-6 SolGemini 3.8 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Legal.

GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 3 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.8 Flash in none.

GPT-6 Sol ahead: 3GPT-6 Sol slightly ahead: 1level: 4too little data: 1Gemini 3.8 Flash slightly ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsGPT-6 Sol +17117.5 to 100.4
CodingGPT-6 Sol +15114.9 to 99.9
AgentsGPT-6 Sol +4107.2 to 103.2
Generalleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 5 tests each
Multimodallevel106.9 to 109.4
Knowledgelevel109.8 to 111.6
Reasoninglevel114.1 to 113.0
Specialist fields
Financeleaning Gemini 3.8 Flashnot certain · 3 and 7 tests
Healthlevel104.8 to 102.8
Legaltoo little data104.8 to 102.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityGPT-6 Sol +19116.4 to 97.1
ProductivityGemini 3.8 Flash +599.4 to 104.3
Searchonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Educationonly Gemini 3.8 Flash has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 SolCoding 114.9 to 99.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 SolMathematics 117.5 to 100.4, Reasoning 114.1 to 113.0
Facts and researchlevelKnowledge 109.8 to 111.6, Search without a score for Gemini 3.8 Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 SolAgents 107.2 to 103.2
Fast chat repliesabout the same111 to 115 tokens per second
Security analysisGPT-6 SolCybersecurity 116.4 to 97.1
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.8 Flash$4 to $1.50 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning Gemini 3.8 FlashFinance 101.3 to 111.3, Legal 104.8 to 102.1 (too little data), Health 104.8 to 102.8
Images, screenshots and PDFslevelMultimodal 106.9 to 109.4

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 40 s · $0.03

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0307
Response time
40.2 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.8-flash-20260902
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.8 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Gemini 3.8 Flash: 73 to 61 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

GPT-6 SolGemini 3.8 Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6 SolGemini 3.8 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better110.5106.5
RankRank 13 of 92Rank 18 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.75
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$3.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second111115
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10073Rank 3 of 78561Rank 25 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 20, 2026March 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 2, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
Cheaper than Gemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6 SolB: Gemini 3.8 Flash

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 74.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 43.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 61.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6 Sol: 1,403.8 eloGemini 3.8 Flash: 1,445.4 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 82.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,583LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,458Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,496LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,266Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,291LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 48.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 84.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 85.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 48%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 32.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 44.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 8.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 45.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 35.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 35.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 89.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 100.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 55.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 47.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,612LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,448Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,482LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,252Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,276LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 14.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 57.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 25%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 74.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 84.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 71.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 70.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 68.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 66.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 86.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 49.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 79.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 61.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 87.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,660Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,593LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,485Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,536LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,333LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 41.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 22.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexMysteryMechanism · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Gemini 3.8 Flash: 3.742 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 63.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 52.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 68.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 53.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 41.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,577LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,519Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,530LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,255Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.8 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 6GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  7. 7GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
Show all 68 comparisons
  1. 10Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  2. 11GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 12Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  5. 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 15Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 16GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  8. 17GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  9. 18Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  10. 19Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  11. 20Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  12. 21GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  14. 23GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  15. 24Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  17. 26GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  18. 27Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  19. 28GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  20. 29GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  21. 30Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  22. 31GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  23. 32GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  24. 33GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  25. 34Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  27. 36GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  28. 37Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  29. 38Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.6
  30. 39GPT-5.4 mini vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  31. 40GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  33. 42Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  37. 46GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  38. 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  39. 48GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  40. 49GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  41. 50Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  42. 51Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  43. 52Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  44. 53GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  45. 54GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  46. 55Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  47. 56GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  48. 57GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  49. 58Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  50. 59Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  51. 60GPT-5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  52. 61GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  53. 62Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  54. 63Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  55. 64GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  56. 65GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  57. 66Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  58. 67Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  59. 68GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon