Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
27
distinct benchmark metrics
5
latest retrieval
2026-10-16

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.8 Flash
AttributeClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedFeb 2026Sep 2, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
ArchitectureNot publishedNot published
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025March 2026
Technical sourcesModel, ContextModel, Knowledge cutoff

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.8 Flash
Price typeClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
API input$5$0.75
API output$25$3.75
Cache read$0.5$0.075
Cache write (5 min.)$6.25Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)$10Not listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Claude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 4.6$5
Gemini 3.8 FlashLower price$0.75
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 4.6$25
Gemini 3.8 FlashLower price$3.75
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 4.6$0.5
Gemini 3.8 FlashLower price$0.075

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.8 Flash
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Claude Opus 4.6AnthropicDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source09/22/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrockLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/26/2026
AnthropicVia OpenRouteranthropicLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/26/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazure/globalLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/26/2026
Claude Platform on AWSVia OpenRouterclaude-on-awsLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/26/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/europe$5.5$27.5Source10/26/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/globalLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/26/2026
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleDirect from developerStandard API$0.75$3.75Source09/22/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global$0.75$3.75Source10/26/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global/priority$1.35$6.75Source10/26/2026
Google AI StudioVia OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio$0.75$3.75Source10/26/2026
Google AI StudioVia OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio/flexLowest listed price: $0.375Lowest listed price: $1.875Source10/26/2026
Google AI StudioVia OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio/priority$1.35$6.75Source10/26/2026

Benchmark index

Benchmark index compared

The index combines independent benchmarks on a scale from 0 to 100. A lead only counts when a model comes first in at least 95% of 200 recalculations with randomly redrawn test families. Otherwise both count as level.

Open the AI leaderboard

Overall index

No overall score yet

Overall index

66.9

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads in 1 of 5 shared areas. 4 areas are tied.

AreaClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
Codingtied43.853.1
Agents48.064.6
Financetied72.972.4
Legaltied71.570.3
Healthtied63.056.8

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 2 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

Claude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.61,537.258
Gemini 3.8 FlashHigher measured value1,584.77
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.6Higher measured value1,294.46
Gemini 3.8 Flash1,289.129
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.6Higher measured value48.244 %
Gemini 3.8 Flash48.135 %
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.6Higher measured value86.738 %
Gemini 3.8 Flash84.496 %
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.657.573 %
Gemini 3.8 FlashHigher measured value78.651 %
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 4.61,546.362
Gemini 3.8 FlashWinner1,584.77
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 4.6No clear lead1,299.232
Gemini 3.8 Flash1,289.129
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to webdev. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.61,538.785
Gemini 3.8 FlashHigher measured value1,593.067
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.61,348.115
Gemini 3.8 FlashHigher measured value1,379.729
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to webdev. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 4.61,542.687
Gemini 3.8 FlashWinner1,593.067
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 4.61,351.953
Gemini 3.8 FlashNo clear lead1,379.729
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
Claude Opus 4.61,537.258
Gemini 3.8 FlashHigher measured value1,584.77

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.8 Flash
Benchmark and taskClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.8 FlashSource
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 20,698 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 10,077 published pairwise votes.
1,537.258
95% confidence interval: ±5.345The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,584.77
95% confidence interval: ±7.59The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 26,853 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 3,792 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,294.46
95% confidence interval: ±6.329The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,289.129
95% confidence interval: ±10.62The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
MedCodeOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Higher measured value48.244 %
48.135 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
MedScribeOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Higher measured value86.738 %
84.496 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Compute: max, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Reasoning: high, Harness: OpenHands, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
57.573 %
Higher measured value78.651 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 10/12/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 19,443 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 10,077 published pairwise votes.
1,546.362
95% confidence interval: ±5.46The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,584.77
95% confidence interval: ±7.59The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 22,304 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 3,792 published pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,299.232
95% confidence interval: ±6.456The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,289.129
95% confidence interval: ±10.62The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to webdev
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 8,068 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 2,015 published pairwise votes.
1,538.785
95% confidence interval: ±9.009The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,593.067
95% confidence interval: ±13.862The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 1,685 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 182 published pairwise votes.
1,348.115
95% confidence interval: ±17.347The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,379.729
95% confidence interval: ±43.521The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to webdev
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 7,930 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 2,015 published pairwise votes.
1,542.687
95% confidence interval: ±8.913The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,593.067
95% confidence interval: ±13.862The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 1,488 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 182 published pairwise votes.
1,351.953
95% confidence interval: ±17.967The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,379.729
95% confidence interval: ±43.521The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 20,698 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 10,077 published pairwise votes.
1,537.258
95% confidence interval: ±5.345The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,584.77
95% confidence interval: ±7.59The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing vision
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 1,731 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 363 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,297.75
95% confidence interval: ±15.034The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,263.378
95% confidence interval: ±32.508The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 19,443 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 10,077 published pairwise votes.
1,546.362
95% confidence interval: ±5.46The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,584.77
95% confidence interval: ±7.59The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing vision
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 1,405 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 363 published pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,309.447
95% confidence interval: ±16.801The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,263.378
95% confidence interval: ±32.508The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-html
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 2,623 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 1,451 published pairwise votes.
1,546.218
95% confidence interval: ±12.521The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,620.104
95% confidence interval: ±17.559The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 7,260 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 979 published pairwise votes.
1,331.371
95% confidence interval: ±8.825The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,333.17
95% confidence interval: ±19.627The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-html
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 2,474 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 1,451 published pairwise votes.
1,558.715
95% confidence interval: ±13.217The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,620.104
95% confidence interval: ±17.559The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 5,999 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 979 published pairwise votes.
1,324.675
95% confidence interval: ±9.238The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,333.17
95% confidence interval: ±19.627The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-react
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 16,319 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 6,460 published pairwise votes.
1,528.416
95% confidence interval: ±5.908The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,576.599
95% confidence interval: ±8.938The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 11,327 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 1,275 published pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,296.058
95% confidence interval: ±8.463The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,285.798
95% confidence interval: ±17.531The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWebdev-react
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 15,177 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 6,460 published pairwise votes.
1,538.872
95% confidence interval: ±6.058The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,576.599
95% confidence interval: ±8.938The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/13/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 9,251 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 1,275 published pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,301.128
95% confidence interval: ±8.811The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,285.798
95% confidence interval: ±17.531The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 3,708 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 526 published pairwise votes.
1,311.92
95% confidence interval: ±10.944The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,336.77
95% confidence interval: ±25.326The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 2,849 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 526 published pairwise votes.
1,324.17
95% confidence interval: ±12.006The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,336.77
95% confidence interval: ±25.326The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOcr
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 19,427 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 2,570 published pairwise votes.
1,312.247
95% confidence interval: ±6.33The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,316.529
95% confidence interval: ±12.271The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOcr
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 4.6: Snapshot: claude-opus-4-6-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.8-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena Vision, style control
Claude Opus 4.6: Arena rating from 15,929 published pairwise votes.Gemini 3.8 Flash: Arena rating from 2,570 published pairwise votes.
1,313.477
95% confidence interval: ±6.575The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,316.529
95% confidence interval: ±12.271The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 10/09/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

SVG short test

One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.

Shared test round: 43b8c5c46830

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6: SVG short test
API reports 0 reasoning tokensTest run: Oct 14, 2026Provider: anthropicAPI model: anthropic/claude-opus-4.6766 output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Unavailable in this round

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.6-opus-20260205
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
85.1 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.8-flash
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.8-flash-20260902
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed
Response time
40.2 s

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Earlier attempts (3)
  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.8 Flash with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison