Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.Gemini 3.8 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.8 Flash, but costs 2.7 times as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

106.4

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Rank 20

Gemini 3.8 Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

74

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$1.50

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

88

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Rank 1 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

MathematicsCodingGeneralEducationKnowledgeAgentsReasoningHealthMultimodalLegal (not certain)

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash for

ProductivityFinance (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.8 FlashMedian of all ranked models

10011012013090CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinanceslightlyGemini 3.8FlashLegalslightlyGPT-6.1 SolHealthGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
Gemini 3.8 Flash99.9Rank 32
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, Gemini 3.8 Flash 97.2 to 102.6.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.8 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 8 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.8 Flash in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 8GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 1Gemini 3.8 Flash slightly ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +24124.1 to 99.9
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +21120.6 to 99.9
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +16119.0 to 102.9
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +11123.7 to 113.1
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +9112.0 to 103.0
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +9122.7 to 114.1
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +6118.0 to 112.1
Specialist fields
HealthGPT-6.1 Sol +9110.2 to 101.6
Financeleaning Gemini 3.8 Flashnot certain · 5 and 7 tests
Legalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 3 and 4 tests

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationGPT-6.1 Sol +14119.9 to 106.0
ProductivityGemini 3.8 Flash +3100.7 to 103.7
Cybersecuritytoo little data93.0 to 85.7
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowtied
1.2 points gap across 3 shared test series
mediumGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
12.5 points gap across 12 shared test series
highGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
15.0 points gap across 12 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. high)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash 106.4

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 99.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 99.9, Reasoning 122.7 to 114.1
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 113.1, Search without a score for Gemini 3.8 Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 103.0
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.8 Flash54 to 74 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 93.0 to 85.7 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.8 Flash$4 to $1.50 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsdepends on the partFinance 105.8 to 111.8, Legal 107.0 to 101.3, Health 110.2 to 101.6
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 112.1

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 40 s · $0.03

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0307
Response time
40.2 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.8-flash-20260902
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.8 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.8 Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.8 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.5106.4
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 20 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.75
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$3.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.047$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second5474
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a88Rank 1 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026March 2026
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Sep 2, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Gemini 3.8 FlashMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: Gemini 3.8 Flash

AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,468.5 eloGemini 3.8 Flash: 1,203.0 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 41.0 pointsGemini 3.8 Flash: 23.3 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 60.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 50.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 49.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 55.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Access to Justice BenchmarkOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 67.1%Vals AIAs of 11/10/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 59.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 77.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 43.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 61.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 36.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 18.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 32.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 21.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,520.5 eloGemini 3.8 Flash: 1,445.4 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 12.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 51.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 33.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 67.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 63.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,583LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,497LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,293LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 48.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 84.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 85.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 48%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 88.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 43.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 32.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 51.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 19.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 8.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 10.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 60.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.0%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 35.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 74.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 27.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 61.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 54.0%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 92.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 22.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 55.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 47%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,608LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,485LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.8 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 3Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  8. 8Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 9GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
Show all 80 comparisons
  1. 10Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 12GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 13Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
  5. 14GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  6. 15GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 16Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  8. 17GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  9. 18Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  10. 19Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  11. 20Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  12. 21Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  14. 23Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  16. 25Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  17. 26GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  18. 27Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.6
  19. 28Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  21. 30Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  22. 31Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  24. 33GPT-5.4 mini vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  25. 34GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  26. 35Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  27. 36Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  28. 37Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  29. 38Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  30. 39GPT-5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  32. 41Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  34. 43Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  37. 46GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  39. 48Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  42. 51GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  45. 54GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  46. 55GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  48. 57Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  49. 58GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  50. 59Gemini 4 Argon vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  51. 60Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  52. 61Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  53. 62GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  54. 63Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  55. 64GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  56. 65Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  57. 66GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  58. 67Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  59. 68GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  60. 69Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  61. 70GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  62. 71GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  63. 72Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  64. 73GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  65. 74GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  66. 75GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  67. 76Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  68. 77GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  69. 78GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  70. 79Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  71. 80Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol