Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
24
distinct benchmarks
24
latest retrieval
2026-09-29

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3-Flash
AttributeKimi K3GLM-5.3-Flash
ProviderMoonshot AIZ.ai
ReleasedJul 16, 2026Aug 26, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Model typeOpen WeightsOpen Weights
Parameters2.8T, 104B active320B, 18B active
ArchitectureMixture of ExpertsMixture of Experts
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published
Technical sourcesModelModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Price typeKimi K3GLM-5.3-Flash
API input$3$0.15
API output$15$0.5
Cache read$0.3$0.03
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Kimi K3GLM-5.3-Flash
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Kimi K3$3
GLM-5.3-FlashLower price$0.15
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Kimi K3$15
GLM-5.3-FlashLower price$0.5
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Kimi K3$0.3
GLM-5.3-FlashLower price$0.03

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3-Flash
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Kimi K3Moonshot AIDirect from developerStandard API$3$15Source09/22/2026
AkashMLVia OpenRouterakashml/fp4$1.2$14Source10/15/2026
AlibabaVia OpenRouteralibaba$3.45$17.25Source10/15/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/us-east-2$3$15Source10/15/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fp8$3$15Source10/15/2026
ChutesVia OpenRouterchutes/mxfp4$1.85Lowest listed price: $9.5Source10/15/2026
DecartVia OpenRouterdecart/mxfp4$2.13$10.65Source10/15/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/mxfp4$2.85$14.25Source10/15/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$2.55$12.95Source10/15/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks$3$15Source10/15/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks/fast$4.5$22.5Source10/15/2026
InferenceNetVia OpenRouterinference-net/fast$2.49$15Source10/15/2026
InferenceNetVia OpenRouterinference-net/fp4$0.45$15Source10/15/2026
MakoraVia OpenRoutermakora/fp4$1.53$12.75Source10/15/2026
ModalVia OpenRoutermodal/mxfp4$3$15Source10/15/2026
Moonshot AIVia OpenRoutermoonshotai/mxfp4$3$15Source10/15/2026
MorphVia OpenRoutermorph/fp8$0.8$14.9Source10/15/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fast$3$15Source10/15/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fp4$2.6$13Source10/15/2026
PhalaVia OpenRouterphala$2.55$12.75Source10/15/2026
RelaceVia OpenRouterrelace/fp4$0.32$14Source10/15/2026
Sail ResearchVia OpenRoutersail-research/fp4$0.84$13.5Source10/15/2026
TogetherVia OpenRoutertogether$3$15Source10/15/2026
WaferVia OpenRouterwaferLowest listed price: $0.29$24Source10/15/2026
WaferVia OpenRouterwafer/us$0.33$14.9Source10/15/2026
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.aiDirect from developerStandard API$0.15$0.5Source09/22/2026
AtlasCloudVia OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
CoreWeaveVia OpenRoutercoreweave/nvfp4$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
CrusoeVia OpenRoutercrusoe/fp4$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
DecartVia OpenRouterdecart/fp4$0.093$0.31Source10/15/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp4$0.075$0.25Source10/15/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$0.1312$0.4375Source10/15/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks/us$0.225$0.75Source10/15/2026
FriendliVia OpenRouterfriendli$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
InceptronVia OpenRouterinceptron/fp8$0.108$0.55Source10/15/2026
InferenceNetVia OpenRouterinference-net/fp4$0.083$0.15Source10/15/2026
MakoraVia OpenRoutermakora$0.14$0.47Source10/15/2026
ModalVia OpenRoutermodal/nvfp4$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
MorphVia OpenRoutermorph/fp8$0.074$1Source10/15/2026
Near AIVia OpenRouternear-ai/fp8$0.08$0.5Source10/15/2026
NextBitVia OpenRouternextbit/fp4$0.19$0.6Source10/15/2026
NovitaVia OpenRouternovita/fp8$0.084$0.28Source10/15/2026
OpenInferenceVia OpenRouteropen-inference/fp4Lowest listed price: $0.036$0.9Source10/15/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fast$0.1875$0.625Source10/15/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fp4$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
RekaVia OpenRouterreka$0.06$1.6Source10/15/2026
RelaceVia OpenRouterrelace$0.04$0.5Source10/15/2026
Sail ResearchVia OpenRoutersail-research/fp4$0.045$0.6Source10/15/2026
Sail ResearchVia OpenRoutersail-research/us$0.045$0.6Source10/15/2026
SiliconFlowVia OpenRoutersiliconflow/fp8$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
StreamLakeVia OpenRouterstreamlake/fp8$0.0435Lowest listed price: $0.145Source10/15/2026
TogetherVia OpenRoutertogether$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026
WaferVia OpenRouterwafer$0.12$0.5Source10/15/2026
Z.AIVia OpenRouterz-ai/fp8$0.15$0.5Source10/15/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

255075100CodingReasoningMathematicsKnowledgeFinanceLegalAgentic tasksMultimodal
Kimi K3
GLM-5.3-Flash
Coding: 92 / 76.9 (8 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 100 / 92.9 (1 benchmark family)
Mathematics: 100 / 24.1 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 100 / 97.8 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 98.5 / 93.6 (4 benchmark families)
Legal: 99.3 / 86.4 (3 benchmark families)
Agentic tasks: 100 / 77.8 (1 benchmark family)
Multimodal: 100 / 97.6 (1 benchmark family)

24 matched rows from 23 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 12 comparable categories.

Kimi K3GLM-5.3-Flash
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K316.099 %
GLM-5.3-FlashWinner20.515 %
CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner75.238 %
GLM-5.3-Flash67.857 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner66.399 %
GLM-5.3-Flash55.932 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K354.36 %
GLM-5.3-FlashWinner57.85 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner92.929 %
GLM-5.3-Flash86.364 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner10.833 %
GLM-5.3-Flash6.667 %
IOIOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K348.944 %
GLM-5.3-FlashWinner52.5 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K344.231 %
GLM-5.3-FlashWinner45.192 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner86.016 %
GLM-5.3-Flash83.928 %
LiveCodeBench v6Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner87.185 %
GLM-5.3-Flash80.51 %
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K387.958 %
GLM-5.3-FlashWinner88.936 %
MMLU-ProOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Kimi K3Winner87.973 %
GLM-5.3-Flash86.059 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3-Flash
Benchmark and taskKimi K3GLM-5.3-FlashSource
Code MigrationOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
16.099 %
Winner20.515 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner75.238 %
67.857 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
EMBOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner66.399 %
55.932 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
54.36 %
Winner57.85 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
GPQA DiamondOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner92.929 %
86.364 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is better
Winner10.833 %
6.667 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
IOIOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
48.944 %
Winner52.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is better
44.231 %
Winner45.192 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LegalBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner86.016 %
83.928 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner87.185 %
80.51 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MedScribeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
87.958 %
Winner88.936 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MMLU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner87.973 %
86.059 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MMMU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner88.15 %
86.012 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
ProgramBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner2 %
0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
ProofBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner87 %
21 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/28/2026
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner93.4 %
92 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner68.672 %
61.956 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
TaxEval v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner75.716 %
75.593 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner80.899 %
62.921 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
12.626 %
Winner19.697 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner2.857 %
0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vals IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner57.813 %
47.216 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner18.244 %
16.033 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/22/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner84.963 %
30.759 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

SVG short test

One SVG prompt and fixed output settings. Captures are shown only with 0 reported reasoning tokens or documented lack of reasoning controls. Identical test conditions do not make the models' internal compute identical.

Shared test round: 4ae5d8eeb9a9

Kimi K3

Kimi K3: SVG short test
API reports 0 reasoning tokensTest run: Oct 12, 2026Provider: chutes/mxfp4API model: moonshotai/kimi-k3566 output tokens

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Kimi K3

Kimi K3: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
moonshotai/kimi-k3
API model reported in response
moonshotai/kimi-k3
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Moonshot AI | moonshotai/kimi-k3-20260715
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
173.4 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Reasoning (requested): high

Current attempt
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
API model reported in response
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating
Response time
49.7 s

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3-Flash with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison