Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
236
distinct benchmarks
34
latest retrieval
2026-09-29

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3
AttributeClaude Opus 5Kimi K3
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
ReleasedJul 24, 2026Jul 16, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published2.8T, 104B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Knowledge cutoffMay 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Knowledge cutoffModel

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3
Price typeClaude Opus 5Kimi K3
API input$5$3
API output$25$15
Cache read$0.5$0.3
Cache write (5 min.)$6.25Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)$10Not listed
Price verified09/22/2026 Source09/22/2026 Source
Claude Opus 5Kimi K3
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 5$5
Kimi K3Lower price$3
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 5$25
Kimi K3Lower price$15
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 5$0.5
Kimi K3Lower price$0.3

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Claude Opus 5AnthropicDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source09/22/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrockLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/02/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/eu-west-1$5.5$27.5Source10/02/2026
Amazon BedrockVia OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/us-east-1$5.5$27.5Source10/02/2026
AnthropicVia OpenRouteranthropicLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/02/2026
AnthropicVia OpenRouteranthropic/fast$10$50Source10/02/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazure/globalLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/02/2026
AzureVia OpenRouterazure/us$5.5$27.5Source10/02/2026
Claude Platform on AWSVia OpenRouterclaude-on-awsLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/europe$5.5$27.5Source10/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/globalLowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source10/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/us$5.5$27.5Source10/02/2026
Kimi K3Moonshot AIDirect from developerStandard API$3$15Source09/22/2026
AkashMLVia OpenRouterakashml/fp4$3$15Source10/02/2026
AlibabaVia OpenRouteralibaba$3.45$17.25Source10/02/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fp8$3$15Source10/02/2026
ChutesVia OpenRouterchutes/mxfp4$3$15Source10/02/2026
DecartVia OpenRouterdecart/mxfp4$3$15Source10/02/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/bf16$2.85$14.25Source10/02/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$2.55$12.95Source10/02/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks$3$15Source10/02/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks/fast$4.5$22.5Source10/02/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks/us$4.5$22.5Source10/02/2026
InferenceNetVia OpenRouterinference-net/fp4Lowest listed price: $1.34$13Source10/02/2026
MakoraVia OpenRoutermakora$2.04$12.75Source10/02/2026
ModalVia OpenRoutermodal/mxfp4$3$15Source10/02/2026
Moonshot AIVia OpenRoutermoonshotai/mxfp4$3$15Source10/02/2026
MorphVia OpenRoutermorph/fp8$1.35$11.357Source10/02/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/fp4$3$15Source10/02/2026
PhalaVia OpenRouterphala$2.25$11.25Source10/02/2026
RelaceVia OpenRouterrelace/fp4$1.8Lowest listed price: $11.2Source10/02/2026
Sail ResearchVia OpenRoutersail-research/fp4$2.8$14Source10/02/2026
TogetherVia OpenRoutertogether$2.7$13.5Source10/02/2026
WaferVia OpenRouterwafer$1.4417$14Source10/02/2026
WaferVia OpenRouterwafer/us$2.8$14Source10/02/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

255075100CodingReasoningMathematicsKnowledgeFinanceLegalAgentic tasksMultimodal
Claude Opus 5
Kimi K3
Coding: 99.9 / 70.5 (9 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 99.9 / 99.7 (2 benchmark families)
Mathematics: 100 / 93.7 (2 benchmark families)
Knowledge: 99.8 / 98 (2 benchmark families)
Finance: 99.8 / 94.9 (7 benchmark families)
Legal: 90.2 / 94.7 (4 benchmark families)
Agentic tasks: 100 / 75.7 (2 benchmark families)
Multimodal: 100 / 98.1 (1 benchmark family)

68 matched rows from 33 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 14 comparable categories.

Claude Opus 5Kimi K3
AlmanBench v0.1Accepted cases. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner94.947 %
Kimi K390.962 %
BioMysteryBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner79.259 %
Kimi K371.481 %
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner57.473 %
Kimi K316.099 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner73.194 %
Kimi K371.562 %
CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 565.357 %
Kimi K3Winner75.238 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner73.556 %
Kimi K366.399 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner58.633 %
Kimi K354.36 %
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner93.434 %
Kimi K392.929 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 56.667 %
Kimi K3Winner10.833 %
IOIOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner84.333 %
Kimi K348.944 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner55.288 %
Kimi K344.231 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
Claude Opus 5Winner86.974 %
Kimi K386.016 %

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Benchmark scores for Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3
Benchmark and taskClaude Opus 5Kimi K3Source
AlmanBench v0.1Accepted cases
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: v0.1, results commit f34ddbfMetric: accepted casesScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Reasoning: max1,029 public tasks with one direct run per row. The target is the Alman language specification.
Winner94.947 %
90.962 %
Alman Institut
Source details
Data as of: 08/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: Terminus 2
Winner79.259 %
71.481 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Code MigrationOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner57.473 %
16.099 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
CorpFin v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner73.194 %
71.562 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/12/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
65.357 %
Winner75.238 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
EMBOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner73.556 %
66.399 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner58.633 %
54.36 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
GPQA DiamondOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner93.434 %
92.929 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is better
6.667 %
Winner10.833 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
IOIOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner84.333 %
48.944 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is better
Winner55.288 %
44.231 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LegalBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner86.974 %
86.016 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner89.033 %
87.185 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
Kimi K3: Snapshot: kimi-k3-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena text, style control
Claude Opus 5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 55,063 anonymous pairwise votes.Kimi K3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 26,400 anonymous pairwise votes.
Higher measured value1,491.077
95% confidence interval: ±3.89The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,487.964
95% confidence interval: ±4.866The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
MedCodeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner63.57 %
48.884 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MedScribeOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner90.985 %
87.958 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
MMLU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner91.591 %
87.973 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MMMU-ProOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner89.884 %
88.15 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
MortgageTaxOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner72.059 %
66.336 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
ProgramBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner3 %
2 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
ProofBenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner99 %
87 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/28/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner76.928 %
68.268 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
SAGEOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
49.426 %
Winner54.26 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/26/2026
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner97 %
93.4 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner75.06 %
68.672 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
TaxEval v2Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
75.143 %
Winner75.716 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/01/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner84.644 %
80.899 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 4.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner45.455 %
12.626 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Terminal-Bench ScienceOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 0.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better
Winner22.857 %
2.857 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: progressScoring: Higher is better
Winner18.833 %
10.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/14/2026
Vals IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner67.213 %
57.813 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
Vals Multimodal IndexOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better
Winner73.896 %
73.42 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/11/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.0Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner28.533 %
18.244 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/22/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands
Winner88.404 %
84.963 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 09/27/2026
CorpFin v2Exact Pages
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
68.648 %
Higher measured value69.347 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
81.356 %
Higher measured value83.051 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/03/2026
EMBComps
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value75.171 %
72.685 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Kimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value54.617 %
51.461 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoT
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
92.424 %
Higher measured value93.434 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: criteria pass rateScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
No direct winner87.319 %
No direct winner87.319 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/07/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value65.152 %
54.545 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value91.56 %
90.733 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Easy
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value99.068 %
98.758 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena text, style control
Kimi K3: Snapshot: kimi-k3-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena text, style control
Claude Opus 5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 26,760 anonymous pairwise votes.Kimi K3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 26,400 anonymous pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,488.172
95% confidence interval: ±5.082The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,487.964
95% confidence interval: ±4.866The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026
MMLU-ProBiology
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value95.676 %
93.863 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
MortgageTaxNumerical Extraction
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value81.399 %
78.855 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value41.5 %
17.5 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
SAGEAutomata
Test details
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
32.54 %
Winner44.048 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fix
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value98.454 %
92.268 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/08/2026
TaxEval v2Correctness
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
61.979 %
Higher measured value65.331 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1Easy
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Compute: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Kimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value100 %
91.667 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPProgress efficiency
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: progressScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Kimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value11.947 %
4.072 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/05/2026
Vals IndexCorpFin v2
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.2Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value74.942 %
72.611 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
Vals Multimodal IndexCorpFin v2
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.2Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value74.942 %
72.611 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
CorpFin v2Max Fitting Context
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value75.991 %
72.727 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
0 %
Higher measured value75 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/03/2026
EMBDataroom
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value87.681 %
85.13 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Compute: max, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Kimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value47.708 %
41.69 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoT
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value94.444 %
92.424 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolved
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
No direct winner0 %
No direct winner0 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/07/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: weighted partial-credit scoreScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value92.676 %
90.731 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/06/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value85.84 %
82.612 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
LiveCodeBench v6Hard
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterKimi K3: Temperature: 1, Output limit: 262,144 tokens
Higher measured value77.429 %
74.286 %
Vals AI
Source details
Data as of: 08/09/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
Test details
Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterClaude Opus 5: Snapshot: claude-opus-5-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
Kimi K3: Snapshot: kimi-k3-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena text, style control
Claude Opus 5: Style-controlled Arena rating from 10,655 anonymous pairwise votes.Kimi K3: Style-controlled Arena rating from 5,149 anonymous pairwise votes.
1,486.354
95% confidence interval: ±7.021The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
Higher measured value1,489.173
95% confidence interval: ±8.766The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena
Source details
Data as of: 09/25/2026

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Our model tests

Our tests

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the first attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Opus 5

The API response was not fully received. The model was not evaluated.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Kimi K3

API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.

Reasoning (requested): high

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
moonshotai/kimi-k3
Reasoning setting
high
Pinned endpoint
Moonshot AI | moonshotai/kimi-k3-20260715
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison