Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Kimi K2.6

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
0
distinct benchmarks
0
latest retrieval
No data

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.6
AttributeClaude Opus 4.8Kimi K2.6
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
ReleasedMay 2026Apr 20, 2026
AvailabilityLegacyActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot published1T, 32B active
ArchitectureNot publishedMixture of Experts
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Knowledge cutoffModel, Context

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.6
Price typeClaude Opus 4.8Kimi K2.6
API input$5$0.95
API output$25$4
Cache read$0.5$0.16
Cache write (5 min.)$6.25Not listed
Cache write (1 hr.)$10Not listed
Price verified07/30/2026 Source07/30/2026 Source
Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K2.6
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 4.8$5
Kimi K2.6Lower price$0.95
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 4.8$25
Kimi K2.6Lower price$4
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Claude Opus 4.8$0.5
Kimi K2.6Lower price$0.16

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

No provider tariff for Claude Opus 4.8 is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.

Provider pricing for Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.6
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Claude Opus 4.8AnthropicDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $5Lowest listed price: $25Source07/30/2026
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIDirect from developerStandard API$0.95$4Source07/30/2026
AtlasCloudVia OpenRouteratlas-cloud/int4$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
BaiduVia OpenRouterbaidu/fp4Lowest listed price: $0.5795Lowest listed price: $2.44Source09/12/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fp4#1$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
BaseTenVia OpenRouterbaseten/fp4#2$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
ChutesVia OpenRouterchutes/int4$0.58$3.4Source09/12/2026
CloudflareVia OpenRoutercloudflare$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
CoreWeaveVia OpenRoutercoreweave/fp4$0.65$3.41Source09/12/2026
CrusoeVia OpenRoutercrusoe/bf16$0.7$3.5Source09/12/2026
DecartVia OpenRouterdecart/fp4$0.5865$2.4696Source09/12/2026
DeepInfraVia OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp4$0.75$3.5Source09/12/2026
DigitalOceanVia OpenRouterdigitalocean$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
FireworksVia OpenRouterfireworks$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
GMICloudVia OpenRoutergmicloud/fp8$0.855$3.6Source09/12/2026
InceptronVia OpenRouterinceptron/int4$0.5895$2.45Source09/12/2026
Moonshot AIVia OpenRoutermoonshotai/int4$0.95$4Source09/12/2026
NovitaVia OpenRouternovita$0.8$3.4Source09/12/2026
ParasailVia OpenRouterparasail/int4$0.75$3.5Source09/12/2026
PhalaVia OpenRouterphala$1.09$4.6Source09/12/2026
SiliconFlowVia OpenRoutersiliconflow/fp8$0.77$3.4Source09/12/2026
StreamLakeVia OpenRouterstreamlake/fp8$0.5985$2.52Source09/12/2026
VeniceVia OpenRoutervenice/int4$0.75$3.5Source09/12/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

No directly comparable result series yet

No published benchmark for Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.6 currently matches in version, task, metric, and comparison cohort. We therefore show no estimated or blended values.

Our model tests

Community tests you can inspect

Compare how the models respond to the same prompt. Each test shows the first attempt, with no subsequent fixes to the generated code. These results do not contribute to an overall score.

Pelican on a bicycle

A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Claude Opus 4.8

Not tested yet

Kimi K2.6

API access was unavailable for this run. The model was not evaluated.

First attempt
Run date
7 Sept 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6
Pinned endpoint
Moonshot AI | moonshotai/kimi-k2.6-20260420
Reasoning setting
high
Temperature
Provider default
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Not run

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Prompt and test conditions

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens

Task origin (Simon Willison)

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.6 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison