Skip to main content

AnthropicLLM matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Claude Fable 5.1

Is the higher price worth it?

Claude Fable 5.1 performs better than Claude Haiku 5.5, but costs 100 times as much.

Fable 5.1 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

123.8

Claude Fable 5.1

Rank 3

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
236

Claude Haiku 5.5

88

Claude Fable 5.1

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

$20

Claude Fable 5.1

Haiku 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

56

Claude Fable 5.1

Rank 59 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

No clear advantage

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for

KnowledgeLegalProductivityMathematicsCodingFinanceGeneralCybersecurityHealthReasoningAgents

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Haiku 5.5Fable 5.1

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130140100CodingFable 5.1ReasoningFable 5.1MathematicsFable 5.1KnowledgeFable 5.1AgentsFable 5.1GeneralFable 5.1FinanceFable 5.1LegalFable 5.1HealthFable 5.1
CodingFable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
Fable 5.1122.8Rank 5
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Fable 5.1 117.1 to 128.5.

AreaHaiku 5.5Fable 5.1

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Fable 5.1 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.

too little data: 1Fable 5.1 ahead: 9

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeFable 5.1 +4285.5 to 127.2
MathematicsFable 5.1 +23107.1 to 130.2
CodingFable 5.1 +17106.2 to 122.8
GeneralFable 5.1 +16106.4 to 122.5
ReasoningFable 5.1 +11105.2 to 116.3
AgentsFable 5.1 +8106.1 to 114.5
Multimodalonly Fable 5.1 has a score
Specialist fields
LegalFable 5.1 +3594.4 to 129.7
FinanceFable 5.1 +16104.7 to 121.0
HealthFable 5.1 +14108.9 to 122.9

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityFable 5.1 +27101.8 to 128.7
CybersecurityFable 5.1 +15108.6 to 123.5
Educationonly Haiku 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowFable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5 80.8 vs. Fable 5.1 113.1 · Gap 28.5 · Test series 10
mediumFable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5 90.4 vs. Fable 5.1 117.1 · Gap 23.1 · Test series 10
highFable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5 96.6 vs. Fable 5.1 120.7 · Gap 20.2 · Test series 10
xhighFable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. Fable 5.1 123.8 · Gap 18.4 · Test series 10
maxFable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Fable 5.1 123.8 · Gap 13.9 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)Fable 5.1 ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Fable 5.1 123.8

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeFable 5.1Coding 106.2 to 122.8
Maths and data analysisFable 5.1Mathematics 107.1 to 130.2, Reasoning 105.2 to 116.3
Facts and researchFable 5.1Knowledge 85.5 to 127.2
Agents and workflowsFable 5.1Agents 106.1 to 114.5
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 88 tokens per second
Security analysisFable 5.1Cybersecurity 108.6 to 123.5
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsFable 5.1Finance 104.7 to 121.0, Legal 94.4 to 129.7, Health 108.9 to 122.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Not tested yet

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 27 s · $0.11

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,198 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1102
Response time
27 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-fable-5.1-20260831
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Fable 5.1

Unavailable in this round

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Claude Fable 5.1: 77 to 56 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.1

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.1
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.4123.8
RankRank 20 of 91Rank 3 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50$10
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50$50
Speed
Tokens per second23688
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10077Rank 3 of 87556Rank 59 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026June 2026
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Sep 1, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Claude Fable 5.1

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%Claude Fable 5.1: 54.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 70.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 58.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.8%Claude Fable 5.1: 75.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%Claude Fable 5.1: 90.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%Claude Fable 5.1: 55.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589Claude Fable 5.1: 1,746LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,425Claude Fable 5.1: 1,504LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 91.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 47.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%Claude Fable 5.1: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%Claude Fable 5.1: 74.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 22.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44%Claude Fable 5.1: 61.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Claude Fable 5.1: 49.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%Claude Fable 5.1: 58.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Claude Fable 5.1: 40%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20.4%Claude Fable 5.1: 28%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%Claude Fable 5.1: 90.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 52.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%Claude Fable 5.1: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%Claude Fable 5.1: 82.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 82%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%Claude Fable 5.1: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 16%Claude Fable 5.1: 26.3%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50%Claude Fable 5.1: 68.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,568Claude Fable 5.1: 1,683LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,435Claude Fable 5.1: 1,487LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 36.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 64.2%Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20%Claude Fable 5.1: 60%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Claude Fable 5.1: 25%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70%Claude Fable 5.1: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 86.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.8%Claude Fable 5.1: 88.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.9%Claude Fable 5.1: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.6%Claude Fable 5.1: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.3%Claude Fable 5.1: 87.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 88.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 92.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,608Claude Fable 5.1: 1,792LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,468Claude Fable 5.1: 1,565LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Claude Fable 5.1: 7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 22.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalCarbon · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 24.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 70.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 25%Claude Fable 5.1: 66.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Claude Fable 5.1: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.825 / 5Claude Fable 5.1: 4.513 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 55.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 69.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1DCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.1%Claude Fable 5.1: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.3%Claude Fable 5.1: 46%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationIntake Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.7%Claude Fable 5.1: 58.9%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.8%Claude Fable 5.1: 85.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.2%Claude Fable 5.1: 62.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589Claude Fable 5.1: 1,746LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,489Claude Fable 5.1: 1,537LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  3. 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  6. 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  9. 9Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra
Show all 51 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  2. 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  4. 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  6. 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  7. 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  8. 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  9. 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  10. 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  11. 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  12. 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  13. 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  15. 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  17. 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  18. 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  19. 28Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
  20. 29Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  21. 30Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  22. 31Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  23. 32Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  24. 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  27. 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  28. 37Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  30. 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  31. 40Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  32. 41Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  34. 43Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Mistral Large 4
  35. 44Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  37. 46Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  38. 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  39. 48Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  40. 49Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  41. 50Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Muse Wonder
  42. 51Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon