Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6 Solvs.Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, but costs 6.7 times (input) and 4 times (output) as much.

GPT-6 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

73.6

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Rank 57

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite faster
SpeedTokens per second
111

GPT-6 Sol

299

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6 Sol

$0.85

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

43

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Rank 228 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

CodingCybersecurityReasoningGeneralAgentsLegalKnowledgeProductivityHealthFinanceMultimodal

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMedian of all ranked models

8510512565CodingGPT-6 SolReasoningGPT-6 SolKnowledgeGPT-6 SolAgentsGPT-6 SolGeneralGPT-6 SolMultimodalGPT-6 SolFinanceGPT-6 SolLegalGPT-6 SolHealthGPT-6 Sol
CodingGPT-6 Sol ahead
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite70.1Rank 74
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 64.2 to 75.9.

AreaGPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 65 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics.

GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in none.

GPT-6 Sol ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
CodingGPT-6 Sol +45114.9 to 70.1
ReasoningGPT-6 Sol +41114.1 to 72.9
GeneralGPT-6 Sol +39113.0 to 74.5
AgentsGPT-6 Sol +36107.2 to 71.5
KnowledgeGPT-6 Sol +33109.8 to 77.1
MultimodalGPT-6 Sol +24106.9 to 82.7
Mathematicsonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
LegalGPT-6 Sol +33104.8 to 72.0
HealthGPT-6 Sol +31104.8 to 73.7
FinanceGPT-6 Sol +26101.3 to 75.5

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityGPT-6 Sol +44116.4 to 72.6
ProductivityGPT-6 Sol +3199.4 to 68.0
Searchonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Educationonly Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 SolCoding 114.9 to 70.1
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 SolMathematics without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Reasoning 114.1 to 72.9
Facts and researchGPT-6 SolKnowledge 109.8 to 77.1, Search without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 SolAgents 107.2 to 71.5
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite111 to 299 tokens per second
Security analysisGPT-6 SolCybersecurity 116.4 to 72.6
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$4 to $0.85 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6 SolFinance 101.3 to 75.5, Legal 104.8 to 72.0, Health 104.8 to 73.7
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6 SolMultimodal 106.9 to 82.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 2, 2026 · 14 s · $0.01

Test details
Run date
Oct 2, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,414 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0135
Response time
14.3 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite-20260721
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Litehigh73.6

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73 to 43 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

GPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better110.573.6
RankRank 13 of 92Rank 57 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.30
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$2.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.022
Speed
Tokens per second111299
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10073Rank 3 of 78543Rank 228 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 20, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Jul 21, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
Cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6 SolB: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 47.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 13.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,458Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,456LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,266Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,267LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.8%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 5.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 89.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 46.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 41.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,660Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,448Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,454LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,252Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,257LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 70%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 66.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 45.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 57.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 35.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 72.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,406LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,485Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,483LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 34.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 2.652 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 33.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,519Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,502LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,255Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,267LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 81.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 33.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 23.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 59.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 40.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 55.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,435Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,437LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,306Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,290LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 56.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 24.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 72.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 64.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 18.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,459Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,462LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,285Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,282LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 16.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 4.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 65.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 19.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 19.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 68.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,430Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 49.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 32.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 72.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 32.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 53.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 18.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 21.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,463Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,460LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  4. 4GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  6. 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  7. 7GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  8. 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  9. 9GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
Show all 45 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  2. 11GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  3. 12Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  5. 14GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  6. 15GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  7. 16GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  8. 17GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  10. 19Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  11. 20Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  12. 21GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  13. 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  18. 27Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  19. 28GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  20. 29GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  21. 30Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  22. 31GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  23. 32GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  24. 33Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  25. 34GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  26. 35Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  27. 36Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  28. 37GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  29. 38Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  30. 39Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. GLM-5.3
  31. 40Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  32. 41GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  33. 42GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  34. 43Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  35. 44Gemini 4 Argon vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  36. 45GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon