Head-to-head comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.
- shared result series
- 106
- distinct benchmarks
- 18
- latest retrieval
- 2026-09-04
Change model selection
Specifications
General specifications
Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.
| Attribute | GPT-5.6 Luna | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Released | Jun 26, 2026 | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Open Source |
| Model type | Proprietary | Open Weights |
| Parameters | Not published | 1T, 42B active |
| Architecture | Not published | Mixture of Experts |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Knowledge cutoff | February 16, 2026 | Not published |
| Technical sources | Model, Context, Knowledge cutoff | Model |
Pricing
API pricing compared
The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.
| Price type | GPT-5.6 Luna | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| API input | $0.2 ≤272K / $0.4 >272K | $0.43 |
| API output | $1.2 ≤272K / $1.8 >272K | $0.87 |
| Cache read | $0.02 ≤272K / $0.04 >272K | $0. |
| Cache write (5 min.) | $0.25 ≤272K / $0.5 >272K | Not listed |
| Cache write (1 hr.) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Price verified | 08/11/2026 Source | 07/31/2026 Source |
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Pricing by provider
Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.
| Model | Provider | Purchase route and tariff | Input per 1M tokens | Output per 1M tokens | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | Direct from developerUp to 272,000 context tokens | $0.2 | $1.2 | Source08/11/2026 |
| OpenAI | Direct from developerAbove 272,000 context tokens | $0.4 | $1.8 | Source08/11/2026 | |
| Amazon Bedrock | Via OpenRouteramazon-bedrock/us-east-1 | $0.22 | $1.32 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| Azure | Via OpenRouterazure | $0.2 | $1.2 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| Azure | Via OpenRouterazure/eu | $0.22 | $1.32 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| Azure | Via OpenRouterazure/us | $0.22 | $1.32 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| OpenAI | Via OpenRouteropenai | $0.2 | $1.2 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| OpenAI | Via OpenRouteropenai/fast | $0.4 | $2.4 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| OpenAI | Via OpenRouteropenai/flex | Lowest listed price: $0.1 | Lowest listed price: $0.6 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Xiaomi | Direct from developerStandard API | $0.435 | $0.87 | Source07/31/2026 |
| AtlasCloud | Via OpenRouteratlas-cloud/fp8 | $0.435 | $0.87 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| DeepInfra | Via OpenRouterdeepinfra/fp8 | $0.39 | $1.17 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| DigitalOcean | Via OpenRouterdigitalocean | $0.4 | $1.5 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| GMICloud | Via OpenRoutergmicloud/bf16 | Lowest listed price: $0.3045 | Lowest listed price: $0.609 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| Novita | Via OpenRouternovita | $0.4802 | $0.9605 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| StreamLake | Via OpenRouterstreamlake | $0.522 | $1.044 | Source09/07/2026 | |
| Xiaomi | Via OpenRouterxiaomi/fp8 | $0.435 | $0.87 | Source09/07/2026 |
Performance
Shared benchmarks
Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.
Capability profile from matched benchmarks
Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.
18 matched rows from 17 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 8 of 9 comparable categories.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
| Benchmark and task | GPT-5.6 Luna | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
Code MigrationOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner44.55 % | 21.557 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
CorpFin v2OverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner64.219 % | 61.422 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/12/2026 |
EMBOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner67.116 % | 55.228 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
Finance Agent (v2)OverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner55.044 % | 41.502 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
GPQA DiamondOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner91.666 % | 82.576 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolvedTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: task resolution rateScoring: Higher is better | 1.25 % | Winner2.083 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-passTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: all-pass rateScoring: Higher is better | Winner36.538 % | 15.865 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
LegalBenchOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner84.034 % | 77.129 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverallTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5-pro, Harness: Arena text, style controlGPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 24,433 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Style-controlled Arena rating from 57,416 anonymous pairwise votes. | 1,452.364 95% confidence interval: ±5.03The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | Higher measured value1,468.271 95% confidence interval: ±3.92The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | LMArenaSource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
MedCodeOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner42.391 % | 32.484 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
MedScribeOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner84.391 % | 83.73 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
MMLU-ProOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner86.036 % | 84.595 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
ProofBenchOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner60 % | 22 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
SWE-bench VerifiedOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner93 % | 74 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
TaxEval v2OverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner76.166 % | 73.794 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
Terminal-Bench 2.1OverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is better | Winner79.026 % | 57.303 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
Vals IndexOverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 2Metric: weighted index scoreScoring: Higher is better | Winner59.881 % | 40.974 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
Vibe Code Bench v1.1OverallTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterSettings: Harness: OpenHands | Winner77.055 % | 34.113 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 09/03/2026 |
Code MigrationCLITest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value36.067 % | 13.981 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
CorpFin v2Exact PagesTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value63.52 % | 60.373 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
EMBCompsTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value54.573 % | 47.341 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Finance Agent (v2)AdjustmentsTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value52.027 % | 34.386 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoTTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value92.424 % | 80.808 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LegalBenchConclusion TasksTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value88.864 % | 88.031 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5-pro, Harness: Arena text, style controlGPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,691 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Style-controlled Arena rating from 11,336 anonymous pairwise votes. | 1,461.709 95% confidence interval: ±9.371The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | Higher measured value1,471.792 95% confidence interval: ±6.73The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | LMArenaSource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
MMLU-ProBiologyTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value93.305 % | 92.469 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fixTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value96.392 % | 82.474 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/08/2026 |
TaxEval v2CorrectnessTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value66.558 % | 63.123 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
Terminal-Bench 2.1EasyTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value83.333 % | 75 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Vals IndexCorpFin v2Test detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.2Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value65.035 % | 62.471 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
Code MigrationCOBOLTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value70 % | 44.286 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
CorpFin v2Max Fitting ContextTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value64.103 % | 61.422 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
EMBDataroomTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value83.009 % | 77.965 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Finance Agent (v2)All-PassTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value43.285 % | 28.848 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoTTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value90.909 % | 84.343 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LegalBenchInterpretation TasksTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value82.142 % | 79.497 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LMArena Text, Style ControlChineseTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5-pro, Harness: Arena text, style controlGPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,691 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,151 anonymous pairwise votes. | 1,474.185 95% confidence interval: ±15.484The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | Higher measured value1,511.885 95% confidence interval: ±11.287The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | LMArenaSource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
MMLU-ProBusinessTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value91.001 % | 89.987 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
SWE-bench Verified>4 hoursTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value66.667 % | 33.333 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/08/2026 |
TaxEval v2Stepwise ReasoningTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value85.773 % | 84.464 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
Terminal-Bench 2.1HardTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value70 % | 40 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2Test detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.2Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value55.555 % | 41.243 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
Code MigrationCode QualityTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: mean reviewer code-quality ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | 3.195 / 5 | Higher measured value3.382 / 5 | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
CorpFin v2Shared Max ContextTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value65.035 % | 62.471 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
EMBDCFTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value60.482 % | 43.63 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Finance Agent (v2)ComparablesTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value48.285 % | 40.15 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
LegalBenchIssue TasksTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value88.68 % | 80.173 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LMArena Text, Style ControlCodingTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5-pro, Harness: Arena text, style controlGPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 6,843 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Style-controlled Arena rating from 15,755 anonymous pairwise votes. | 1,497.069 95% confidence interval: ±7.965The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | Higher measured value1,520.349 95% confidence interval: ±6.131The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | LMArenaSource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
MMLU-ProChemistryTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value90.989 % | 90.459 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
SWE-bench Verified1-4 hoursTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value85.714 % | 33.333 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/08/2026 |
Terminal-Bench 2.1MediumTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2.1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value83.636 % | 65.455 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Vals IndexSWE-benchTest detailsNo documented difference in the test setupVersion: 1.2Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is better | Winner93.137 % | 66.667 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
EMBLBOTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value59.306 % | 47.739 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure AnalysisTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value62.836 % | 53.148 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
LegalBenchRhetoric TasksTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value82.747 % | 64.964 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writingTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5-pro, Harness: Arena text, style controlGPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,866 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Style-controlled Arena rating from 10,262 anonymous pairwise votes. | 1,408.317 95% confidence interval: ±9.528The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | Higher measured value1,435.028 95% confidence interval: ±7.065The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | LMArenaSource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
MMLU-ProComputer ScienceTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value89.756 % | 88.049 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
SWE-bench Verified15 min - 1 hourTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value91.954 % | 74.713 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/08/2026 |
Vals IndexTerminal-Bench 2.1Test detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1.2Metric: benchmark scoreScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value79.026 % | 57.303 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
EMBM&ATest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value69.61 % | 64.098 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings AnalysisTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 2Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value74.875 % | 54.614 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/06/2026 |
LegalBenchRule TasksTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value77.736 % | 72.98 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglishTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Snapshot: mimo-v2.5-pro, Harness: Arena text, style controlGPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 10,147 anonymous pairwise votes.MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Style-controlled Arena rating from 24,800 anonymous pairwise votes. | 1,465.717 95% confidence interval: ±6.77The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | Higher measured value1,481.475 95% confidence interval: ±5.077The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result. | LMArenaSource detailsData as of: 09/01/2026 |
MMLU-ProEconomicsTest detailsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerVersion: 1Metric: accuracyScoring: Higher is betterGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Temperature: 1, Top P: 0.95, Output limit: 128,000 tokens | Higher measured value88.033 % | 87.915 % | Vals AISource detailsData as of: 08/09/2026 |
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie | |||
How to read this comparison
Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict
Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.
The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.
Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and MiMo-V2.5-Pro with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.