Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.GPT-5.4 mini

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than GPT-5.4 mini, but costs 5.3 times (input) and 4.4 times (output) as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

75.6

GPT-5.4 mini

Rank 56

GPT-5.4 mini faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

191

GPT-5.4 mini

GPT-5.4 mini cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$1.69

GPT-5.4 mini

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

59

GPT-5.4 mini

Rank 38 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

KnowledgeCodingLegalReasoningMultimodalFinanceGeneralAgents

Choose GPT-5.4 mini for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5GPT-5.4 miniMedian of all ranked models

8510512514565CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
GPT-5.4 mini75.8Rank 65
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, GPT-5.4 mini 71.9 to 79.8.

AreaOpus 5.5GPT-5.4 mini

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 65 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics, Health.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 8 of 10 areas, GPT-5.4 mini in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 8too little data: 2

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +56131.4 to 74.9
CodingOpus 5.5 +54129.9 to 75.8
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +48122.5 to 74.3
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +47123.1 to 76.5
GeneralOpus 5.5 +45125.1 to 80.4
AgentsOpus 5.5 +38117.2 to 79.0
Mathematicsonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 5.5 +48121.5 to 73.1
FinanceOpus 5.5 +46121.4 to 75.7
Healthonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecurityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 75.8
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics without a score for GPT-5.4 mini, Reasoning 122.5 to 74.3
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 74.9, Search without a score for GPT-5.4 mini
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 79.0
Fast chat repliesGPT-5.4 mini106 to 191 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for GPT-5.4 mini
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-5.4 mini$8 to $1.69 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 75.7, Legal 121.5 to 73.1, Health without a score for GPT-5.4 mini
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 76.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-5.4 mini

GPT-5.4 mini: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 2, 2026 · 14 s · $0.01

Test details
Run date
Oct 2, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-5.4-mini
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,142 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0142
Response time
13.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-5.4-mini
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.4-mini-20260317
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-5.4 mini

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.4 mini in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
GPT-5.4 minixhigh75.6

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than GPT-5.4 mini: 68 to 59 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.4 mini

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5.4 mini
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.175.6
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 56 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.75
Outputwhat the model writes$20$4.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 1 original-protocol task both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.071$0.014
Speed
Tokens per second106191
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78559Rank 38 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages400,000 tokens≈ 600 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Aug 31, 2025
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Mar 17, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than GPT-5.4 miniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: GPT-5.4 mini

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%GPT-5.4 mini: 12.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%GPT-5.4 mini: 12.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810GPT-5.4 mini: 1,397LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509GPT-5.4 mini: 1,447LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293GPT-5.4 mini: 1,250LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GPT-5.4 mini: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%GPT-5.4 mini: 8.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-5.4 mini: 2.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%GPT-5.4 mini: 48.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%GPT-5.4 mini: 8.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%GPT-5.4 mini: 40.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-5.4 mini: 15.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GPT-5.4 mini: 1,419LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495GPT-5.4 mini: 1,459LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287GPT-5.4 mini: 1,226LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%GPT-5.4 mini: 3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60%GPT-5.4 mini: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 27.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%GPT-5.4 mini: 48.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%GPT-5.4 mini: 32.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%GPT-5.4 mini: 69.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860GPT-5.4 mini: 1,386LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574GPT-5.4 mini: 1,474LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330GPT-5.4 mini: 1,283LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GPT-5.4 mini: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%GPT-5.4 mini: 32.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75%GPT-5.4 mini: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5GPT-5.4 mini: 3.053 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.1%GPT-5.4 mini: 40.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.8%GPT-5.4 mini: 40.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.8%GPT-5.4 mini: 11.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810GPT-5.4 mini: 1,397LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551GPT-5.4 mini: 1,495LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,284GPT-5.4 mini: 1,248LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.6%GPT-5.4 mini: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.8%GPT-5.4 mini: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 41.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 48.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 71.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,520GPT-5.4 mini: 1,402LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,351GPT-5.4 mini: 1,291LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 73.3%GPT-5.4 mini: 38.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 29.6%GPT-5.4 mini: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 82.3%GPT-5.4 mini: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 65.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%GPT-5.4 mini: 14.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,516GPT-5.4 mini: 1,450LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,306GPT-5.4 mini: 1,262LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.5%GPT-5.4 mini: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.4%GPT-5.4 mini: 2.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 26.9%GPT-5.4 mini: 19.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 74.0%GPT-5.4 mini: 67.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,501GPT-5.4 mini: 1,409LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.9%GPT-5.4 mini: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Security · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-5.4 mini: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 77.9%GPT-5.4 mini: 50.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%GPT-5.4 mini: 46.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 42.1%GPT-5.4 mini: 13.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.4 mini with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
Show all 53 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  25. 34GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  31. 40GPT-5.4 mini vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  32. 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  33. 42Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  39. 48GPT-5.4 mini vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  43. 52Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-5.4 mini