Skip to main content

AnthropicGoogleLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.Gemini 3.7 Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

107.1

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Rank 16

SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

n/a

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

n/a

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

52

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Rank 79 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

CodingMathematicsCybersecurityGeneralKnowledgeLegalFinanceHealthMultimodalReasoningAgents (not certain)

Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5Gemini 3.7 FlashMedian of all ranked models

11013015090CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5Agentsslightly Opus5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
Gemini 3.7 Flash97.7Rank 33
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, Gemini 3.7 Flash 93.5 to 101.8.

AreaOpus 5.5Gemini 3.7 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.7 Flash in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 9Opus 5.5 slightly ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
CodingOpus 5.5 +32129.9 to 97.7
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +31131.8 to 100.6
GeneralOpus 5.5 +21125.1 to 104.2
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +20131.4 to 110.9
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +13123.1 to 109.7
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +7122.5 to 116.0
Agentsleaning Opus 5.5not certain · 5 and 3 tests
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 5.5 +18121.5 to 103.3
FinanceOpus 5.5 +17121.4 to 104.6
HealthOpus 5.5 +16122.1 to 105.9

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityOpus 5.5 +24120.5 to 96.8
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 97.7
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 100.6, Reasoning 122.5 to 116.0
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 110.9, Search without a score for Gemini 3.7 Flash
Agents and workflowsleaning Opus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 110.9
Security analysisOpus 5.5Cybersecurity 120.5 to 96.8
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 104.6, Legal 121.5 to 103.3, Health 122.1 to 105.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 109.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 29 s · $0.03

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.7-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0307
Response time
28.8 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.7-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.7-flash-20260813
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than Gemini 3.7 Flash: 68 to 52 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.7 Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1107.1
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 16 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4n/a
Outputwhat the model writes$20n/a
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.12$0.042
Speed
Tokens per second106n/a
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78552Rank 79 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026March 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 13, 2026
AvailabilityActiveDiscontinued
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.8 Flash

Overall index 106.5, rank 18$0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Gemini 3.7 Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 34.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 43.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 59.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 34.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,590LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,490LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,295LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 53.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 58%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 4.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 22.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 12.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 23.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 74.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 54.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 72.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,591LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,485LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 9.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 13.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 68.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 25%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 47.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 85.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,599LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,547LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,320LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 4.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 46.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 22.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5Gemini 3.7 Flash: 3.664 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 66.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 50.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 60.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,586LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,520LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,284Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,287LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 68.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 30.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 12.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 52.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 59.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 89.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,590LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,520Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,490LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,351Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,309LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 57 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  25. 34Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  31. 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  32. 41Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  33. 42GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  37. 46Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  38. 47GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  43. 52Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  44. 53Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  45. 54GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  46. 55Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  47. 56Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  48. 57Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite