Skip to main content

AnthropicGoogleLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, but costs 13.3 times (input) and 8 times (output) as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

73.6

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Rank 57

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

299

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.85

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

43

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Rank 228 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

CodingProductivityEducationKnowledgeGeneralReasoningLegalHealthCybersecurityFinanceAgentsMultimodal

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMedian of all ranked models

8510512514565CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite70.1Rank 74
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 64.2 to 75.9.

AreaOpus 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 65 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
CodingOpus 5.5 +60129.9 to 70.1
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +54131.4 to 77.1
GeneralOpus 5.5 +51125.1 to 74.5
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +50122.5 to 72.9
AgentsOpus 5.5 +46117.2 to 71.5
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +40123.1 to 82.7
Mathematicsonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 5.5 +49121.5 to 72.0
HealthOpus 5.5 +48122.1 to 73.7
FinanceOpus 5.5 +46121.4 to 75.5

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +57125.0 to 68.0
EducationOpus 5.5 +55127.0 to 71.9
CybersecurityOpus 5.5 +48120.5 to 72.6
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

highOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 120.4 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 73.6 · Gap 50.5 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. high)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 73.6

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 70.1
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Reasoning 122.5 to 72.9
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 77.1, Search without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 71.5
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite106 to 299 tokens per second
Security analysisOpus 5.5Cybersecurity 120.5 to 72.6
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$8 to $0.85 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 75.5, Legal 121.5 to 72.0, Health 122.1 to 73.7
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 82.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 2, 2026 · 14 s · $0.01

Test details
Run date
Oct 2, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,414 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0135
Response time
14.3 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite-20260721
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Litehigh73.6

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 68 to 43 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.173.6
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 57 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.30
Outputwhat the model writes$20$2.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.022
Speed
Tokens per second106299
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78543Rank 228 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Jul 21, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 47.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 55.7%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 13.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,456LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,267LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.8%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 79.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 5.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 46.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 41.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 24.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 14.1%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,454LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,257LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 82.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 25%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 45%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 57.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 35.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.7%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 72.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,406LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,483LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGELinear Algebra · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 34.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 2.652 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 33.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationIntake Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 31.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,502LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,284Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,267LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 33.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEPartial Differential Equations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 93.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 85.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 40.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,520Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,437LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,351Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,290LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 73.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 24.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 82.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 64.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,516Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,462LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,306Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,282LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 4.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 57 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  7. 16Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  16. 25GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  25. 34Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  32. 41Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  39. 48Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  43. 52Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  44. 53Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  45. 54Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  46. 55Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. GLM-5.3
  47. 56Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  48. 57Gemini 4 Argon vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite