LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling
1,198.22 points
Rank 14 · 1,113 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaImage modelNo status listed
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
Alibaba
- Released
- April 2026
- Data date
- August 15, 2026
Category view
Position within the category
This overview uses only published data from matching cohorts. Missing values never change a rank.
This position gives equal weight to 4 fixed Gradually image tests. One archived first output contributes for each model and task.
- Position
- Rank 15 of 28
- Index score
- 53.7 / 100
- Coverage
- 4 / 4
Leaderboard
1MAI-Image-2.5 Flash76.6 / 100
2GPT Image 271 / 100
3MAI-Image-2.567.6 / 100
14Reve 2.154.3 / 100
15Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model53.7 / 100
16Ideogram 4.051.9 / 100
28Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large2.5 / 100
Measurements
Comparable benchmark results
Each chart contains exactly one source, one measurement series, and one stored comparison cohort. Bars show the position. The measured value appears on the right.
Text to Image Arena
1,237 Elo · Rank 9 of 25
Sample: 5,363 · Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 21,371 Elo
7.Nano Banana 2 Lite1,288 Elo
8.Seedream 5.0 Pro1,280 Elo
9.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model1,237 Elo
10.Grok Imagine Image Quality1,235 Elo
11.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash1,229 Elo
25.FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,144 Elo
7 of 25 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
Source: Artificial AnalysisParticipants: 25
Image Editing Arena
1,164 Elo · Rank 18 of 19
Sample: 6,142 · Data date: August 26, 2026
1.Reve 2.11,263 Elo
16.FLUX.2 Pro1,170 Elo
17.FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,166 Elo
18.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model1,164 Elo
19.FLUX.2 Flex1,162 Elo
5 of 19 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
Source: Artificial AnalysisParticipants: 19
Qwen Image Bench quality
54.39 points · Rank 5 of 5
Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 258.65 points
2.Nano Banana Pro55.67 points
3.GPT Image 1.555.14 points
4.Nano Banana 254.77 points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model54.39 points
5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.
Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5
Qwen Image Bench aesthetics
58.67 points · Rank 5 of 5
Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 267.53 points
2.Nano Banana 261.08 points
3.GPT Image 1.560.88 points
4.Nano Banana Pro60.26 points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model58.67 points
5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.
Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5
Qwen Image Bench alignment
59.28 points · Rank 5 of 5
Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 265.85 points
2.Nano Banana 262.4 points
3.GPT Image 1.561.72 points
4.Nano Banana Pro61.25 points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model59.28 points
5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.
Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5
Qwen Image Bench real-world fidelity
51.83 points · Rank 5 of 5
Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 257.38 points
2.Nano Banana 254.28 points
3.Nano Banana Pro54.07 points
4.GPT Image 1.553.95 points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model51.83 points
5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.
Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5
Qwen Image Bench creative generation
64.94 points · Rank 5 of 5
Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 275.23 points
2.Nano Banana 267.05 points
3.GPT Image 1.566.35 points
4.Nano Banana Pro66.23 points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model64.94 points
5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.
Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5
Qwen Image Bench overall
57.84 points · Rank 5 of 5
Data date: August 26, 2026
1.GPT Image 264.69 points
2.Nano Banana 259.82 points
3.GPT Image 1.559.65 points
4.Nano Banana Pro59.45 points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model57.84 points
5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.
Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5
Gradually sample test: Typography and layout
43.2 rank points · Rank 17 of 28
Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026
1.MAI-Image-2.593.8 rank points
15.Ideogram 4.045.7 rank points
15.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash45.7 rank points
17.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model43.2 rank points
18.Seedream 5.0 Pro40.7 rank points
19.Krea 2 Medium Turbo39.5 rank points
28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large0 rank points
7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 28 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28
Gradually sample test: Product photography
42 rank points · Rank 17 of 28
Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026
1.GPT Image 295.1 rank points
15.FLUX.2 Flex46.9 rank points
16.FLUX.2 Pro43.2 rank points
17.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model42 rank points
18.Midjourney V8.140.7 rank points
19.GPT Image 1.537 rank points
28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large3.7 rank points
7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 28 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28
Gradually sample test: Character and detail
76.6 rank points · Rank 5 of 28
Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026
1.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash86.4 rank points
4.HiDream-O1-Image-1.579 rank points
5.GPT Image 276.6 rank points
5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model76.6 rank points
7.Recraft V4.1 Utility72.9 rank points
8.FLUX.2 Pro70.4 rank points
28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large3.7 rank points
7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 28 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28
Gradually sample test: Infographic
53.1 rank points · Rank 13 of 28
Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026
1.Reve 2.197.5 rank points
11.Luma UNI 1 Max64.2 rank points
12.Nano Banana 2 Lite58 rank points
13.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Current model53.1 rank points
14.GPT Image 1.549.4 rank points
14.Nano Banana 249.4 rank points
28.Firefly Image Model 51.2 rank points
7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.
One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 28 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28
Profile
Specifications and access
Published information about this model. Unknown values are not estimated.
Pricing
Published prices
Prices remain tied to their documented unit and source.
Measurements
Other published benchmarks
The stored dataset does not contain an exactly matching comparison cohort for these values.
LMArena Text to Image: Art
1,176.34 points
Rank 22 · 1,741 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Text to Image: Cartoon
1,191.22 points
Rank 17 · 4,474 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Text to Image: Commercial design
1,186.96 points
Rank 16 · 4,500 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Text to Image: Overall
1,191.15 points
Rank 15 · 12,026 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Text to Image: Photorealism
1,204.82 points
Rank 14 · 4,863 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Text to Image: Portraits
1,215.44 points
Rank 15 · 2,309 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Text to Image: Text rendering
1,200.74 points
Rank 17 · 4,045 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaLMArena Image Editing: Overall
1,303.63 points
Rank 19 · 50,798 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026
LMArenaHead-to-head comparisons
Compare this model
Each matchup compares this model with exactly one other model from the same category.
More models
Models from the same selection
All AI models
Evidence
Primary sources and data date
Every statement links to its underlying documentation or leaderboard.