Image modelNo status listed

GPT Image 2

OpenAI

Released: April 2026
Data date: August 15, 2026

Category view

Position within the category

This overview uses only published data from matching cohorts. Missing values never change a rank.

This position gives equal weight to 4 fixed Gradually image tests. One archived first output contributes for each model and task.

Position: Rank 2 of 28
Index score: 71 / 100
Coverage: 4 / 4

Leaderboard

1MAI-Image-2.5 Flash76.6 / 100

2GPT Image 271 / 100

3MAI-Image-2.567.6 / 100

28Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large2.5 / 100

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Measurements

Comparable benchmark results

Each chart contains exactly one source, one measurement series, and one stored comparison cohort. Bars show the position. The measured value appears on the right.

Text to Image Arena

1,371 Elo · Rank 1 of 25

Sample: 14,328 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 21,371 Elo

2.Reve 2.11,322 Elo

3.Nano Banana 21,321 Elo

25.FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,144 Elo

4 of 25 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Artificial AnalysisParticipants: 25

Image Editing Arena

1,257 Elo · Rank 2 of 19

Sample: 18,356 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Reve 2.11,263 Elo

2.GPT Image 21,257 Elo

2.MAI-Image-2.51,257 Elo

4.GPT Image 1.51,251 Elo

19.FLUX.2 Flex1,162 Elo

5 of 19 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Artificial AnalysisParticipants: 19

GenExam Mathematics, strict

50.3% · Rank 3 of 6

Sample: 151 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 256.3%

2.Nano Banana Pro55.6%

3.GPT Image 250.3%

4.GPT Image 1.526.5%

5.FLUX.2 Max6.6%

6.Seedream 4.02.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Physics, strict

79.6% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 113 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 279.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro75.2%

3.Nano Banana 274.3%

4.GPT Image 1.546%

5.FLUX.2 Max8.8%

6.Seedream 4.03.5%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Chemistry, strict

69.5% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 118 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 269.5%

2.Nano Banana Pro60.2%

3.Nano Banana 252.5%

4.GPT Image 1.539%

5.FLUX.2 Max6.8%

6.Seedream 4.05.9%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Biology, strict

89.1% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 156 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 289.1%

2.Nano Banana Pro75.6%

3.Nano Banana 266%

4.GPT Image 1.556.4%

5.Seedream 4.018.6%

6.FLUX.2 Max11.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Geography, strict

84.8% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 66 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 284.8%

2.Nano Banana Pro75.8%

3.Nano Banana 269.7%

4.GPT Image 1.560.6%

5.FLUX.2 Max15.2%

6.Seedream 4.010.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Computer science, strict

73.5% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 102 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 273.5%

2.Nano Banana Pro65.7%

3.Nano Banana 256.9%

4.GPT Image 1.536.3%

5.FLUX.2 Max8.8%

6.Seedream 4.06.9%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Engineering, strict

79.3% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 111 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 279.3%

2.Nano Banana Pro71.2%

3.Nano Banana 267.6%

4.GPT Image 1.544.1%

5.Seedream 4.011.7%

6.FLUX.2 Max10.8%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Economics, strict

83.1% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 77 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro88.3%

2.GPT Image 283.1%

3.Nano Banana 263.6%

4.GPT Image 1.542.9%

5.Seedream 4.05.2%

6.FLUX.2 Max2.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Music, strict

64.6% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 65 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 264.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro61.5%

3.Nano Banana 250.8%

4.GPT Image 1.529.2%

5.FLUX.2 Max6.2%

6.Seedream 4.00%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam History, strict

82.9% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 41 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro97.6%

2.GPT Image 282.9%

2.Nano Banana 282.9%

4.GPT Image 1.551.2%

5.FLUX.2 Max7.3%

5.Seedream 4.07.3%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam overall, strict

74.6% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 1,000 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 274.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro72.7%

3.Nano Banana 264.1%

4.GPT Image 1.543.2%

5.FLUX.2 Max8.5%

6.Seedream 4.07.2%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Mathematics, relaxed

85.2% · Rank 3 of 6

Sample: 151 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 287.8%

2.Nano Banana Pro86.3%

3.GPT Image 285.2%

4.GPT Image 1.565.8%

5.FLUX.2 Max49.1%

6.Seedream 4.039.8%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Physics, relaxed

95.6% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 113 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 295.7%

2.GPT Image 295.6%

3.Nano Banana Pro95.1%

4.GPT Image 1.585.4%

5.FLUX.2 Max63.2%

6.Seedream 4.049%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Chemistry, relaxed

92% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 118 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 292%

2.Nano Banana 290%

3.Nano Banana Pro88.7%

4.GPT Image 1.578.1%

5.FLUX.2 Max54%

6.Seedream 4.046.1%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Biology, relaxed

97.5% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 156 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 297.5%

2.Nano Banana Pro95.9%

3.Nano Banana 295.2%

4.GPT Image 1.591.9%

5.FLUX.2 Max74.5%

6.Seedream 4.071%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Geography, relaxed

97.6% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 66 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 297.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro96.5%

3.Nano Banana 294.8%

4.GPT Image 1.592.5%

5.FLUX.2 Max76.3%

6.Seedream 4.065.1%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Computer science, relaxed

93.3% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 102 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 293.3%

2.Nano Banana Pro91.7%

3.Nano Banana 288.8%

4.GPT Image 1.575.8%

5.FLUX.2 Max56.5%

6.Seedream 4.052.2%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Engineering, relaxed

96.5% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 111 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 296.5%

2.Nano Banana 295.8%

3.Nano Banana Pro95.1%

4.GPT Image 1.586.4%

5.FLUX.2 Max68.9%

6.Seedream 4.060%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Economics, relaxed

97.7% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 77 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 297.7%

2.Nano Banana Pro97.2%

3.Nano Banana 294.2%

4.GPT Image 1.585.5%

5.FLUX.2 Max61.5%

6.Seedream 4.056%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Music, relaxed

89.1% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 65 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro91%

2.GPT Image 289.1%

3.Nano Banana 286.9%

4.GPT Image 1.570.8%

5.FLUX.2 Max47%

6.Seedream 4.034.5%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam History, relaxed

97.1% · Rank 3 of 6

Sample: 41 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro99.9%

2.Nano Banana 297.3%

3.GPT Image 297.1%

4.GPT Image 1.590.9%

5.FLUX.2 Max68%

6.Seedream 4.056.7%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam overall, relaxed

93.8% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 1,000 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 293.8%

2.Nano Banana Pro93.7%

3.Nano Banana 292.6%

4.GPT Image 1.582.3%

5.FLUX.2 Max61.9%

6.Seedream 4.053%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

Qwen Image Bench quality

58.65 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 258.65 points

2.Nano Banana Pro55.67 points

3.GPT Image 1.555.14 points

4.Nano Banana 254.77 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro54.39 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench aesthetics

67.53 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 267.53 points

2.Nano Banana 261.08 points

3.GPT Image 1.560.88 points

4.Nano Banana Pro60.26 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro58.67 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench alignment

65.85 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 265.85 points

2.Nano Banana 262.4 points

3.GPT Image 1.561.72 points

4.Nano Banana Pro61.25 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro59.28 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench real-world fidelity

57.38 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 257.38 points

2.Nano Banana 254.28 points

3.Nano Banana Pro54.07 points

4.GPT Image 1.553.95 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro51.83 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench creative generation

75.23 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 275.23 points

2.Nano Banana 267.05 points

3.GPT Image 1.566.35 points

4.Nano Banana Pro66.23 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro64.94 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench overall

64.69 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 264.69 points

2.Nano Banana 259.82 points

3.GPT Image 1.559.65 points

4.Nano Banana Pro59.45 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro57.84 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

GRADE reasoning

82.2 points · Rank 1 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 282.2 points

2.Nano Banana Pro77.5 points

3.Nano Banana 272.6 points

4.GPT Image 1.554.5 points

5.FLUX.2 Max47.8 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro38.9 points

7.Seedream 4.032.4 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GRADE consistency

94.4 points · Rank 1 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 294.4 points

2.Nano Banana Pro89.5 points

3.Nano Banana 286.4 points

4.GPT Image 1.582.3 points

5.FLUX.2 Max67.2 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro55.5 points

7.Seedream 4.053.2 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GRADE readability

98.8 points · Rank 1 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 298.8 points

2.Nano Banana 295.9 points

3.Nano Banana Pro95.8 points

4.GPT Image 1.590.7 points

5.Seedream 4.077 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro70.3 points

7.FLUX.2 Max68.6 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GRADE accuracy

56 points · Rank 1 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 256 points

2.Nano Banana Pro46.2 points

3.Nano Banana 239.6 points

4.GPT Image 1.516 points

5.FLUX.2 Max11.9 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro4.4 points

7.Seedream 4.03.1 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

35.8 rank points · Rank 20 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.MAI-Image-2.593.8 rank points

18.Seedream 5.0 Pro40.7 rank points

19.Krea 2 Medium Turbo39.5 rank points

20.GPT Image 235.8 rank points

20.Reve 2.135.8 rank points

22.GPT Image 1.533.3 rank points

28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large0 rank points

7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 28 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Gradually sample test: Product photography

95.1 rank points · Rank 1 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.GPT Image 295.1 rank points

2.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash93.8 rank points

3.MAI-Image-2.586.4 rank points

28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large3.7 rank points

4 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

76.6 rank points · Rank 5 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash86.4 rank points

3.FLUX.2 Max80.3 rank points

4.HiDream-O1-Image-1.579 rank points

5.GPT Image 276.6 rank points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro76.6 rank points

7.Recraft V4.1 Utility72.9 rank points

28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large3.7 rank points

7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Gradually sample test: Infographic

76.6 rank points · Rank 7 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.Reve 2.197.5 rank points

5.Krea 2 Medium Turbo82.7 rank points

6.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash80.3 rank points

7.GPT Image 276.6 rank points

8.HiDream-O1-Image-1.574.1 rank points

9.Seedream 4.067.9 rank points

28.Firefly Image Model 51.2 rank points

7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Profile

Specifications and access

Published information about this model. Unknown values are not estimated.

Weights: ProprietarySource
Access: API, WebSource
Maximum output: 4KSource
Benchmark configuration: HighSource
Generator: gpt-image-2Source

Pricing

Published prices

Prices remain tied to their documented unit and source.

Representative price: $0.21 per imageSource
Together AI (openai/gpt-image-2): $0.05 per imageSource

Measurements

Other published benchmarks

The stored dataset does not contain an exactly matching comparison cohort for these values.

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling

1,360.37 points

Rank 1 · 6,635 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Art

1,370.44 points

Rank 1 · 8,762 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon

1,396.03 points

Rank 1 · 28,210 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design

1,389.56 points

Rank 1 · 27,138 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Overall

1,380.47 points

Rank 1 · 69,194 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism

1,378.29 points

Rank 1 · 26,719 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Portraits

1,428.87 points

Rank 1 · 13,521 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering

1,424.05 points

Rank 1 · 26,226 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Image Editing: Multi-image editing

1,454.12 points

Rank 1 · 72,134 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Image Editing: Overall

1,462.8 points

Rank 1 · 199,275 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

Head-to-head comparisons

Compare this model

Each matchup compares this model with exactly one other model from the same category.

GPT Image 2 vs. Reve 2.1

GPT Image 2 vs. Nano Banana 2

GPT Image 2 vs. GPT Image 1.5

GPT Image 2 vs. MAI-Image-2.5

GPT Image 2 vs. Nano Banana Pro

GPT Image 2 vs. Nano Banana 2 Lite

GPT Image 2 vs. Seedream 5.0 Pro

GPT Image 2 vs. Grok Imagine Image Quality

GPT Image 2 vs. FLUX.2 Max

GPT Image 2 vs. Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

GPT Image 2 vs. MAI-Image-2.5 Flash

GPT Image 2 vs. HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

GPT Image 2 vs. Krea 2 Medium Turbo

GPT Image 2 vs. Seedream 4.0

GPT Image 2 vs. Krea 2 Large

GPT Image 2 vs. Luma UNI 1 Max

GPT Image 2 vs. FLUX.2 Flex

GPT Image 2 vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility

GPT Image 2 vs. Ideogram 4.0

GPT Image 2 vs. Wan 2.6 Text to Image

GPT Image 2 vs. FLUX.2 Pro

GPT Image 2 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

GPT Image 2 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B

GPT Image 2 vs. HiDream-O1-Image

GPT Image 2 vs. Firefly Image Model 5

GPT Image 2 vs. Midjourney V8.1

GPT Image 2 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

More models

Models from the same selection

All AI models

Reve 2.1

Reve

Evidence

Primary sources and data date

Every statement links to its underlying documentation or leaderboard.

OpenAISource
Image pricingSource
Together AISource
Artificial Analysis (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
LMArena (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
LMArena (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
GenExam (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
Qwen Image Bench (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
GRADE (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
Gradually-Bildtest (retrieved August 18, 2026)Source