Skip to main content

ReveImage modelDeprecated

Reve 2.1

Reve 2.1 is rank 6 of 21 in the arena rating and rank 13 of 108 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingRank 6 of 21

1,300User voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 13 of 108

73our own rating0 to 100

Priceno price

n/aper imagelower is better

PopularityRank 541 of 875

24out of 100same as last month

Summary

Reve 2.1 is distinguished by combining hierarchy planning, complex scenes, foreign-language text rendering, and native 4K output. It targets posters, infographics, and dense compositions where layout and spatial relationships need to hold together.

At launch, Reve 2.1 offered web and API workflows for creation and editing. Reve’s API has been unavailable since August 14, 2026, and new image creation ended after September 27, 2026.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Character and detailOpen Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were Official Reve web app; Reve 2.1; chat creation; one request; 1:1 requested in prompt; first of two results; free plan; 2026-08-14; https://app.reve.com/model, source 4096x4096, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
InfographicOpen Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were Official Reve web app; Reve 2.1; chat creation; one request; 1:1 requested in prompt; first of two results; free plan; 2026-08-14; https://app.reve.com/model, source 4096x4096, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
Product photographyOpen Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were Official Reve web app; Reve 2.1; chat creation; one request; 1:1 requested in prompt; first of two results; free plan; 2026-08-14; https://app.reve.com/model, source 4096x4096, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
Typography and layoutOpen Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were Official Reve web app; Reve 2.1; chat creation; one request; 1:1 requested in prompt; first of two results; free plan; 2026-08-14; https://app.reve.com/model, source 4096x4096, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 30 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 3

Published benchmarks

Text to image

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,412.39 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,381.8 points
GPT Image 21,365.33 points
MAI-Image-2.61,323.82 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,291.41 points
Reve 2.11,281.14 points
Nano Banana 21,255.68 points
MAI-Image-2.51,251.47 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,246.55 points
Muse Image1,238.45 points
Nano Banana Pro1,232.1 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,225.65 points
GPT Image 1.51,217.68 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,213.88 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,173.15 points
FLUX.2 Max1,160.58 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,145.47 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,120.68 points
Krea 2 Large1,115.65 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,078.61 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,412.39 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
774
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Art

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,410.08 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,387.35 points
GPT Image 21,370.68 points
MAI-Image-2.61,337.7 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,328.25 points
Reve 2.11,290.77 points
MAI-Image-2.51,276.76 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,258.85 points
Muse Image1,258.79 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,255.8 points
Nano Banana 21,239.62 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,234.74 points
GPT Image 1.51,224.81 points
Nano Banana Pro1,224.23 points
FLUX.2 Max1,168.74 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,159.34 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,155.3 points
Krea 2 Large1,122.19 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,116.78 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,078.63 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,410.08 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
1,184
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,456.88 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,427.12 points
GPT Image 21,402.93 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,352.36 points
MAI-Image-2.61,348.71 points
Reve 2.11,309.78 points
Muse Image1,274.79 points
MAI-Image-2.51,268.65 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,263.52 points
Nano Banana 21,260.23 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,256.09 points
GPT Image 1.51,243.95 points
Nano Banana Pro1,243.91 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,234.48 points
FLUX.2 Max1,167.57 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,163.29 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,158.62 points
Krea 2 Large1,118.81 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,118.12 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,063.58 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,456.88 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
3,186
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,415.51 points
GPT Image 21,385.8 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,384.8 points
MAI-Image-2.61,332.9 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,324.96 points
Reve 2.11,315.65 points
Nano Banana 21,267.93 points
MAI-Image-2.51,259.36 points
Muse Image1,258.15 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,248.4 points
Nano Banana Pro1,245.44 points
GPT Image 1.51,237.88 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,237.36 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,236.31 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,172.44 points
FLUX.2 Max1,163.75 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,154.5 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,129.54 points
Krea 2 Large1,110.71 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,070.2 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,415.51 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
2,960
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Overall

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,427.13 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,399.44 points
GPT Image 21,382.1 points
MAI-Image-2.61,330.58 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,317.31 points
Reve 2.11,300.4 points
Muse Image1,268.12 points
Nano Banana 21,257.49 points
MAI-Image-2.51,253 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,250.8 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,249.44 points
Nano Banana Pro1,246.31 points
GPT Image 1.51,236.39 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,226.55 points
FLUX.2 Max1,161.46 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,156.26 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,152.68 points
Krea 2 Large1,115.37 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,114.71 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,069.84 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,427.13 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
8,237
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism

GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,415.95 points
GPT Image 21,379.13 points
MAI-Image-2.61,330.88 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,312.19 points
Reve 2.11,302.1 points
Muse Image1,278.09 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,274.42 points
Nano Banana 21,261.31 points
Nano Banana Pro1,260.39 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,258.64 points
MAI-Image-2.51,250.67 points
GPT Image 1.51,246.79 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,229.66 points
FLUX.2 Max1,160.87 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,151.76 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,145.47 points
Krea 2 Large1,128.88 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,109.06 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,091.05 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,434.4 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
3,312
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Portraits

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,461.22 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,439.29 points
GPT Image 21,426.27 points
MAI-Image-2.61,341.91 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,332.04 points
Reve 2.11,316.59 points
Muse Image1,289.88 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,286.94 points
GPT Image 1.51,258.96 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,256.2 points
Nano Banana Pro1,255.64 points
Nano Banana 21,254.9 points
MAI-Image-2.51,254.78 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,244.1 points
FLUX.2 Max1,156.6 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,144.32 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,143.85 points
Krea 2 Large1,123.58 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,105.31 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,091.81 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,461.22 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
1,651
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,461.65 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,431.87 points
GPT Image 21,424.21 points
MAI-Image-2.61,365.86 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,349.22 points
Reve 2.11,339.46 points
Nano Banana 21,294.44 points
Muse Image1,293.25 points
MAI-Image-2.51,280.73 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,273.63 points
Nano Banana Pro1,270.33 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,254.93 points
GPT Image 1.51,251.47 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,250.12 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,171.57 points
FLUX.2 Max1,165.6 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,154.35 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,134.31 points
Krea 2 Large1,116.42 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,057.76 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,461.65 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
2,741
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Image Editing: Overall

GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,482.13 points
GPT Image 21,460.09 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,438.04 points
MAI-Image-2.61,426.31 points
MAI-Image-2.51,400.28 points
Muse Image1,399.39 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,390.94 points
Nano Banana Pro1,390.2 points
Nano Banana 21,386.55 points
Reve 2.11,373.54 points
GPT Image 1.51,367.95 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,363.71 points
Ideogram 4.51,346.64 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,312.98 points
FLUX.2 Max1,261.49 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,248.1 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,224.55 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,224.37 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,517.3 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
20,797
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-image_edit-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-4db53937a0d3. Source payload hash: 4db53937a0d39e716e49e4c3fb1b88c68578a094c4339bb7c714dbedfd0a85d0
Source: LMArena

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Nano Banana 299.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex98.1 rank points
FLUX 3 Image96 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility95.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image94.1 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite93.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni92.8 rank points
Nano Banana Pro91.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max91.6 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash88.5 rank points
Krea 2 Large86.3 rank points
Firefly Image Model 585.7 rank points
Muse Image85.7 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein84.4 rank points
Seedream 4.583.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.582.2 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite82.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro81 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro81 rank points
Krea 377.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.575.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite75.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max75.1 rank points
GPT Image 274.5 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.073.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.172.3 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo71.3 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.070.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash70.1 rank points
Recraft V4.169.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro68.9 rank points
Bria FIBO 268.5 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini67.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.067.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.167 rank points
Seedream 4.064.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662 rank points
GPT Image 1.559.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview55.8 rank points
Reve 2.153.9 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst53.6 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash53.6 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.153.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image51.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base50.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo50.8 rank points
GLM-Image50.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev49.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]45.5 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]42.1 rank points
LongCat-Image41.4 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image41.1 rank points
Z-Image Turbo39.6 rank points
Nucleus-Image38.3 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro38.3 rank points
MiniMax Image-0137.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD36.4 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.5 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro35.5 rank points
Z-Image Base32.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B32.4 rank points
Qwen Image 3.032.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B31.8 rank points
OmniGen229.6 rank points
Ideogram 4.528.3 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.8 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra21.8 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT21.5 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 420.6 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px20.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]19 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.018.4 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo18.1 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image18.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash16.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]16.2 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px15.9 rank points
Midjourney V8.114.3 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.012.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.311.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT11.2 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px8.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo7.8 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 36.9 rank points
SDXL Turbo3.4 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px3.1 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Product photography

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash90.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large90 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo89.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.189.7 rank points
GPT Image 289.4 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite88.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.688.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT87.9 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image87.9 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite87.2 rank points
Qwen Image 3.087.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B86.6 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst86.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro86.6 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT85.7 rank points
Bria FIBO 283.8 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite83.5 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro83.2 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.081.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B80.7 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo80.7 rank points
Muse Image80.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro76.9 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein74.8 rank points
Reve 2.173.8 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini73.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview72.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro71.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max71 rank points
Recraft V4.171 rank points
MAI-Image-2.570.1 rank points
Nano Banana Pro70.1 rank points
Nano Banana 2.169.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare69.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.568.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.067.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex62.6 rank points
Krea 362.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image62 rank points
Nucleus-Image62 rank points
Kling Image 3.060.4 rank points
Luma Uni-1.159.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Max58.6 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro58.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro57.9 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash57.6 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image53.9 rank points
GPT Image 1.552.3 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.550.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.149.5 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]46.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev46.4 rank points
Firefly Image Model 545.8 rank points
Nano Banana 244.9 rank points
Seedream 4.044.2 rank points
Seedream 4.544.2 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni39.9 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base36.1 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash36.1 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]35.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro35.8 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.2 rank points
LLaDA-Image35.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.033.6 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.7 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility32.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image32.4 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image31.1 rank points
MiniMax Image-0129.9 rank points
OmniGen229.9 rank points
Z-Image Turbo29.9 rank points
LongCat-Image29.3 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]28.7 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra28.3 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo26.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.8 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]25.5 rank points
Ideogram 4.022.1 rank points
Z-Image Base21.5 rank points
Chroma1-HD15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
Chroma1-Flash15.6 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview15.3 rank points
AuraFlow v0.315 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 314.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 413.7 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.012.8 rank points
GLM-Image9 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo5.6 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px1.2 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo1.2 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

GPT Image 1.588.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro88.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro86.9 rank points
Krea 384.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev81.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni81.6 rank points
Reve 2.180.1 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image78.5 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro78.2 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex75.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.075.1 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT74.1 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro74.1 rank points
Seedream 4.072.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 572.3 rank points
Z-Image Base71 rank points
Z-Image Turbo71 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite70.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Max70.4 rank points
FLUX 3 Image69.5 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.567.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein66.4 rank points
Nucleus-Image66.4 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility66.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro64.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro64.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst64.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.2 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image63.2 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.061.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B61.1 rank points
Muse Image61.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.060.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max60.4 rank points
GPT Image 260.1 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro60.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.059.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.058.9 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.558.3 rank points
Nano Banana 2.156.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.554.8 rank points
Krea 2 Large54.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]52.6 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo52.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 452.3 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash52 rank points
Midjourney V8.151.4 rank points
GLM-Image51.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash50.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]50.2 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview49.5 rank points
Luma Uni-1.148.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite48.6 rank points
Bria FIBO 248.3 rank points
Recraft V4.148 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo47.7 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite47.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base45.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra45.2 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image45.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash42.4 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]39.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B38.9 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image38.9 rank points
Nano Banana Pro37.1 rank points
Seedream 4.537.1 rank points
Nano Banana 236.4 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite34.9 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.133.6 rank points
MiniMax Image-0132.7 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT32.4 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini30.8 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo29.9 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]27.1 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 326.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.2 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.024.3 rank points
LongCat-Image24.3 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.023.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD16.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.316.2 rank points
OmniGen27.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.5 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Recorded measurement details

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1281.1430107472531
Score
1281.1430107472531
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
9
Sample
774
Confidence interval
21.258073
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Art (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1290.7736854882994
Score
1290.7736854882994
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
8
Sample
1184
Confidence interval
16.64501
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1309.7801339406155
Score
1309.7801339406155
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
9
Sample
3186
Confidence interval
10.929387
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1315.6464587328196
Score
1315.6464587328196
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
9
Sample
2960
Confidence interval
11.177973
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1300.4032610657325
Score
1300.4032610657325
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
9
Sample
8237
Confidence interval
7.507466
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1302.10408720634
Score
1302.10408720634
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
9
Sample
3312
Confidence interval
10.736066
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1316.586744143772
Score
1316.586744143772
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
10
Sample
1651
Confidence interval
14.750117
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1339.4642757512688
Score
1339.4642757512688
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
9
Sample
2741
Confidence interval
11.751994
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Image Editing: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1373.5354708336167
Score
1373.5354708336167
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
20
Sample
20797
Confidence interval
6.051109
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-image_edit-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-4db53937a0d3. Source payload hash: 4db53937a0d39e716e49e4c3fb1b88c68578a094c4339bb7c714dbedfd0a85d0
Source LMArena
Gradually sample test: Typography and layout (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
53.9
Score
53.9
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
49
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
50.33
Individual ranks
44, 55, 52
Criterion scores
headline 1.33, subline 1.33, text-control 1.33, visual-brief 1, layout 1.33
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Product photography (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
73.8
Score
73.8
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
28
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
29
Individual ranks
24, 29, 34
Criterion scores
subject 2, time 2, watch-details 2, photography 2, exclusions 2
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Character and detail (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
80.1
Score
80.1
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
7
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
22.33
Individual ranks
15, 44, 8
Criterion scores
scene 1, wardrobe 1.33, anatomy 1, props 1.33, environment 1
Source Gradually-Bildtest

Page 1 of 3

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 100 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Reve 2.1Ideogram 4.0Seedream 4.0Krea 2 Medium TurboLuma Uni-1.1 Max

Reve 2.1 compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT Image 2 vs. Reve 2.1
  2. 2GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. Reve 2.1
  3. 3Reve 2.1 vs. Nano Banana 2
  4. 4Reve 2.1 vs. Midjourney V8.2
  5. 5Reve 2.1 vs. GPT Image 1.5
  6. 6Reve 2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.5
  7. 7Reve 2.1 vs. Nano Banana Pro
  8. 8Reve 2.1 vs. Nano Banana 2 Lite
  9. 9Reve 2.1 vs. Seedream 5.0 Pro
Show all 108 comparisons
  1. 10Reve 2.1 vs. Grok Imagine Image Quality
  2. 11Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Max
  3. 12Reve 2.1 vs. Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
  4. 13Reve 2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.5 Flash
  5. 14Reve 2.1 vs. HiDream-O1-Image-1.5
  6. 15Reve 2.1 vs. Krea 2 Medium Turbo
  7. 16Reve 2.1 vs. Seedream 4.0
  8. 17Reve 2.1 vs. Krea 2 Large
  9. 18Reve 2.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1 Max
  10. 19Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Flex
  11. 20Reve 2.1 vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility
  12. 21Reve 2.1 vs. Ideogram 4.0
  13. 22Reve 2.1 vs. Wan 2.6 Text to Image
  14. 23Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Pro
  15. 24Reve 2.1 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct
  16. 25Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B
  17. 26Reve 2.1 vs. HiDream-O1-Image
  18. 27Reve 2.1 vs. Firefly Image Model 5
  19. 28Reve 2.1 vs. Midjourney V8.1
  20. 29Reve 2.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large
  21. 30Reve 2.1 vs. GPT Image 2.5 Flare
  22. 31Reve 2.1 vs. Qwen-Image-2.1
  23. 32Reve 2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  24. 33Reve 2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6 Flash
  25. 34Reve 2.1 vs. Muse Image
  26. 35Reve 2.1 vs. Grok Imagine Image 2.0
  27. 36Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX 3 Image
  28. 37Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX 3 Image Klein
  29. 38Reve 2.1 vs. Nano Banana 2.1
  30. 39Reve 2.1 vs. Ideogram 4.5
  31. 40Reve 2.1 vs. Hy Image 3.5 Preview
  32. 41Reve 2.1 vs. Recraft V4.1
  33. 42Reve 2.1 vs. Recraft V4.1 Flash
  34. 43Reve 2.1 vs. Bria FIBO 2
  35. 44Reve 2.1 vs. Krea 3
  36. 45Reve 2.1 vs. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
  37. 46Reve 2.1 vs. Qwen Image 3.0
  38. 47Reve 2.1 vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Pro
  39. 48Reve 2.1 vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
  40. 49Reve 2.1 vs. Wan 2.7 Image Pro
  41. 50Reve 2.1 vs. Wan 2.7 Image
  42. 51Reve 2.1 vs. Seedream 5.0 Flash
  43. 52Reve 2.1 vs. SenseNova U1.5 Lite
  44. 53Reve 2.1 vs. Kling Image 3.0
  45. 54Reve 2.1 vs. Kling Image 3.0 Omni
  46. 55Reve 2.1 vs. Vidu Q2 Image
  47. 56Reve 2.1 vs. GLM-Image
  48. 57Reve 2.1 vs. MiniMax Image-01
  49. 58Reve 2.1 vs. Z-Image Turbo
  50. 59Reve 2.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  51. 60Reve 2.1 vs. Runway Gen-4 Image
  52. 61Reve 2.1 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 3
  53. 62Reve 2.1 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4
  54. 63Reve 2.1 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra
  55. 64Reve 2.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium
  56. 65Reve 2.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo
  57. 66Reve 2.1 vs. Bria FIBO Lite
  58. 67Reve 2.1 vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
  59. 68Reve 2.1 vs. Seedream 4.5
  60. 69Reve 2.1 vs. Seedream 5.0 Lite
  61. 70Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
  62. 71Reve 2.1 vs. GPT Image 1 Mini
  63. 72Reve 2.1 vs. ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)
  64. 73Reve 2.1 vs. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
  65. 74Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 4B
  66. 75Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.2 Dev
  67. 76Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro]
  68. 77Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  69. 78Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.1 [dev]
  70. 79Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
  71. 80Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
  72. 81Reve 2.1 vs. Stable Diffusion XL 1.0
  73. 82Reve 2.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3 Medium
  74. 83Reve 2.1 vs. SDXL Turbo
  75. 84Reve 2.1 vs. Stable Diffusion Turbo
  76. 85Reve 2.1 vs. Grok Imagine Image 1.0
  77. 86Reve 2.1 vs. MOSS-Image-Base
  78. 87Reve 2.1 vs. MOSS-Image-SFT
  79. 88Reve 2.1 vs. LLaDA-Image
  80. 89Reve 2.1 vs. LLaDA-Image-Turbo
  81. 90Reve 2.1 vs. Nucleus-Image
  82. 91Reve 2.1 vs. LongCat-Image
  83. 92Reve 2.1 vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT
  84. 93Reve 2.1 vs. OmniGen2
  85. 94Reve 2.1 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT
  86. 95Reve 2.1 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain
  87. 96Reve 2.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  88. 97Reve 2.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
  89. 98Reve 2.1 vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px
  90. 99Reve 2.1 vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px
  91. 100Reve 2.1 vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
  92. 101Reve 2.1 vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px
  93. 102Reve 2.1 vs. Chroma1-HD
  94. 103Reve 2.1 vs. Chroma1-Flash
  95. 104Reve 2.1 vs. AuraFlow v0.3
  96. 105Reve 2.1 vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
  97. 106Reve 2.1 vs. Lumina-Image 2.0
  98. 107Reve 2.1 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0
  99. 108Reve 2.1 vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Input and output

Maximum output
4K
Source: Maximum output

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Proprietary
Source: Weights
Lifecycle
Retired; no new image or video generation after September 27, 2026. Existing assets can be downloaded until October 31, 2026
Source: Lifecycle

Further details

API shutdown
August 14, 2026
Source: API shutdown

Prices

No Reve subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €12.72 a month (Recraft Basic, with limited credits). 3 plans in Germany.

Filter plans
PlanMonthly priceNote
Recraft Basic≈ €12.72with limited credit
Recraft Pro≈ €21.20with limited credit
Recraft Teams≈ €23.33with limited credit, for teams, per seat

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Reve 2.1

How good is Reve 2.1?

Rank 6 of 21 in the arena rating. Rank 13 of 108 in our own test.

Arena rating from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026

Arena ratingfrom user votes · higher is better
GPT Image 21,382
MAI-Image-2.61,331
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,317
Reve 2.1Rank 6 of 211,300
Muse Image1,268
Nano Banana 21,257
MAI-Image-2.51,253
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
FLUX 3 Image74
FLUX.2 Flex73
Grok Imagine Image 1.073
Reve 2.1Rank 13 of 10873
SenseNova U1.5 Lite73
GPT Image 273
Grok Imagine Image 2.073

What is Reve 2.1 good at?

Best at Infographic (85 out of 100), weakest at Typography and layout (54).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

  1. Reve 2.1: Typography and layoutTypography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition54out of 100Rank 49 of 108 in this task
  2. Reve 2.1: Product photographyProduct photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details74out of 100Rank 28 of 108 in this task
  3. Reve 2.1: Character and detailCharacter and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency80out of 100Rank 7 of 108 in this task
  4. Reve 2.1: InfographicInfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization85out of 100Rank 11 of 108 in this task

Where can I use Reve 2.1?

Not in a Reve subscription. Including other providers that makes 3 plans in Germany.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At Reve

No Reve subscription includes this model.

Through other providers

3 plans from 1 provider, from ≈ €12.72 a month (Recraft Basic), with limited credits.

Sources and data date

Show all 21 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 16, 2026. 8 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

immutable-serving-weights

Note

ImageBench names route fal/reve/2.1; the CSV and README do not establish the exact checkpoint or immutable served weights.

Not published

generation-configuration-and-date

Note

The pinned aggregate CSV and README do not give this row's generation parameters, output resolution, or model-specific execution date.

Not published

category-and-eps-denominators

Note

Only the 192-prompt overall and pass-rate population is explicit. The aggregate sources provide no metric-specific N for EPS or category rates, so none is inferred from the total image count.

Not published

exact-serving-configuration

Original wording

The source does not disclose immutable serving revision, image resolution, seed, or other generation settings.

Additional sourceReve · Reve 2.1 launch announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceLifecycle data · Reve asset download guidance · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceReve (retrieved August 15, 2026) · Reve API help · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceLMArena (retrieved November 6, 2026)12
Additional sourceGradually-Bildtest (retrieved November 3, 2026)
Additional sourceImageBench (retrieved October 16, 2026)
Additional sourceRapidata benchmark.ai (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceMassing Labs ArchViz Arena (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceFirst Page Sage (retrieved October 22, 2026)
Additional sourceRapidata text-to-image human feedback benchmark (retrieved October 22, 2026)
Additional sourceBenchmark.ai Image Benchmark (built by Rapidata) (retrieved October 23, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 16, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceReve API launch announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0