Skip to main content

Boogu ProjectImage model

Boogu-Image-0.1-Base

Boogu-Image-0.1-Base is rank 103 of 108 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingnot rated

n/aUser voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 103 of 108

10our own rating0 to 100

Priceno price

n/aper imagelower is better

PopularityRank 670 of 875

0out of 100first value

Summary

Boogu-Image-0.1-Base is an image model from Boogu Project. The project describes the weights and demos as a research project, not an official model release or paid API service.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Character and detailOpen Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base@334ad7e5c6343d33308b306127e047b133e86926; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=50, guidance=4.0, seed=895870850114772015; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original Base sampling, no Turbo DMD inference.

Open source
InfographicOpen Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base@334ad7e5c6343d33308b306127e047b133e86926; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=50, guidance=4.0, seed=7796952798756533109; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original Base sampling, no Turbo DMD inference.

Open source
Product photographyOpen Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base@334ad7e5c6343d33308b306127e047b133e86926; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=50, guidance=4.0, seed=6866357448264114469; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original Base sampling, no Turbo DMD inference.

Open source
Typography and layoutOpen Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through manual. Archived settings were local PyTorch 2.11.0, Diffusers 0.38.0; Boogu/Boogu-Image-0.1-Base@334ad7e5c6343d33308b306127e047b133e86926; native 1024x1024, 1:1; one request, first output; steps=50, guidance=4.0, seed=5844980489998903917; mps; native PyTorch fallback is enabled by PYTORCH_ENABLE_MPS_FALLBACK=1; actual CPU operation use is not measured; bfloat16; upstream boogu-project/Boogu-Image@9b327526b1053e1f27f1bd0ae36b20ce2c39cb9e; reviewed MPS device allowlist and empty-reference self-attention only on original CPU SDPA, unchanged arguments and dtype; nonempty attention remains on MPS; no CUDA numeric equivalence claimed; native VAE input saved after scaling and shift, decoded float output finite before native same-size interpolation; native instruction template without rewriting; original Base sampling, no Turbo DMD inference.

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 4 published benchmark results

Published benchmarks

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Nano Banana 299.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex98.1 rank points
FLUX 3 Image96 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility95.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image94.1 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite93.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni92.8 rank points
Nano Banana Pro91.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max91.6 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash88.5 rank points
Krea 2 Large86.3 rank points
Firefly Image Model 585.7 rank points
Muse Image85.7 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein84.4 rank points
Seedream 4.583.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.582.2 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite82.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro81 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro81 rank points
Krea 377.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.575.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite75.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max75.1 rank points
GPT Image 274.5 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.073.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.172.3 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo71.3 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.070.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash70.1 rank points
Recraft V4.169.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro68.9 rank points
Bria FIBO 268.5 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini67.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.067.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.167 rank points
Seedream 4.064.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662 rank points
GPT Image 1.559.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview55.8 rank points
Reve 2.153.9 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst53.6 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash53.6 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.153.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image51.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base50.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo50.8 rank points
GLM-Image50.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev49.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]45.5 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]42.1 rank points
LongCat-Image41.4 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image41.1 rank points
Z-Image Turbo39.6 rank points
Nucleus-Image38.3 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro38.3 rank points
MiniMax Image-0137.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD36.4 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.5 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro35.5 rank points
Z-Image Base32.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B32.4 rank points
Qwen Image 3.032.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B31.8 rank points
OmniGen229.6 rank points
Ideogram 4.528.3 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.8 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra21.8 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT21.5 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 420.6 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px20.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]19 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.018.4 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo18.1 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image18.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash16.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]16.2 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px15.9 rank points
Midjourney V8.114.3 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.012.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.311.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT11.2 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base9 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px8.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo7.8 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 36.9 rank points
SDXL Turbo3.4 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px3.1 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Product photography

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash90.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large90 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo89.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.189.7 rank points
GPT Image 289.4 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite88.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.688.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT87.9 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image87.9 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite87.2 rank points
Qwen Image 3.087.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B86.6 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst86.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro86.6 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT85.7 rank points
Bria FIBO 283.8 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite83.5 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro83.2 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.081.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B80.7 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo80.7 rank points
Muse Image80.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro76.9 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein74.8 rank points
Reve 2.173.8 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini73.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview72.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro71.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max71 rank points
Recraft V4.171 rank points
MAI-Image-2.570.1 rank points
Nano Banana Pro70.1 rank points
Nano Banana 2.169.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare69.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.568.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.067.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex62.6 rank points
Krea 362.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image62 rank points
Nucleus-Image62 rank points
Kling Image 3.060.4 rank points
Luma Uni-1.159.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Max58.6 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro58.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro57.9 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash57.6 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image53.9 rank points
GPT Image 1.552.3 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.550.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.149.5 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]46.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev46.4 rank points
Firefly Image Model 545.8 rank points
Nano Banana 244.9 rank points
Seedream 4.044.2 rank points
Seedream 4.544.2 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni39.9 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base36.1 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash36.1 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]35.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro35.8 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.2 rank points
LLaDA-Image35.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.033.6 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.7 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility32.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image32.4 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image31.1 rank points
MiniMax Image-0129.9 rank points
OmniGen229.9 rank points
Z-Image Turbo29.9 rank points
LongCat-Image29.3 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]28.7 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra28.3 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo26.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.8 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]25.5 rank points
Ideogram 4.022.1 rank points
Z-Image Base21.5 rank points
Chroma1-HD15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
Chroma1-Flash15.6 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview15.3 rank points
AuraFlow v0.315 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 314.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 413.7 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.012.8 rank points
GLM-Image9 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo5.6 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px1.2 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo1.2 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

GPT Image 1.588.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro88.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro86.9 rank points
Krea 384.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev81.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni81.6 rank points
Reve 2.180.1 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image78.5 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro78.2 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex75.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.075.1 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT74.1 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro74.1 rank points
Seedream 4.072.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 572.3 rank points
Z-Image Base71 rank points
Z-Image Turbo71 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite70.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Max70.4 rank points
FLUX 3 Image69.5 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.567.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein66.4 rank points
Nucleus-Image66.4 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility66.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro64.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro64.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst64.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.2 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image63.2 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.061.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B61.1 rank points
Muse Image61.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.060.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max60.4 rank points
GPT Image 260.1 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro60.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.059.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.058.9 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.558.3 rank points
Nano Banana 2.156.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.554.8 rank points
Krea 2 Large54.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]52.6 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo52.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 452.3 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash52 rank points
Midjourney V8.151.4 rank points
GLM-Image51.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash50.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]50.2 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview49.5 rank points
Luma Uni-1.148.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite48.6 rank points
Bria FIBO 248.3 rank points
Recraft V4.148 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo47.7 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite47.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base45.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra45.2 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image45.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash42.4 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]39.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B38.9 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image38.9 rank points
Nano Banana Pro37.1 rank points
Seedream 4.537.1 rank points
Nano Banana 236.4 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite34.9 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.133.6 rank points
MiniMax Image-0132.7 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT32.4 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini30.8 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo29.9 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]27.1 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 326.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.2 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.024.3 rank points
LongCat-Image24.3 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.023.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD16.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.316.2 rank points
OmniGen27.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.5 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Infographic

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Seedream 5.0 Pro99.1 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst97.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare91 rank points
Luma Uni-1.189.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo88.8 rank points
Qwen Image 3.088.8 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro88.5 rank points
Muse Image86.3 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash86 rank points
Ideogram 4.585.4 rank points
Reve 2.184.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.182.9 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash81.3 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite80.4 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image79.4 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo78.8 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max78.8 rank points
Bria FIBO 278.2 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein77.3 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image77.3 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.076.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.076.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.576.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large75.7 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview74.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro74.5 rank points
Krea 373.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash73.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash73.5 rank points
Recraft V4.173.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.072.6 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev72 rank points
GPT Image 1.571.7 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview70.7 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base70.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.569.2 rank points
FLUX 3 Image68.5 rank points
Seedream 4.067.3 rank points
GPT Image 266.4 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite65.7 rank points
Nano Banana Pro64.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.164.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility63.9 rank points
Nano Banana 263.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro62 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro61.7 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro61.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.660.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex57 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite55.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]53.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max53.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]52.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro44.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image42.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B41.7 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]39.9 rank points
Z-Image Turbo37.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image37.1 rank points
LongCat-Image36.8 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.036.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo35.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.135.2 rank points
LLaDA-Image32.7 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.4 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini31.8 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B30.2 rank points
GLM-Image29.9 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni29.6 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra27.7 rank points
Seedream 4.526.5 rank points
MiniMax Image-0125.5 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]24 rank points
Z-Image Base24 rank points
Nucleus-Image23.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD22.4 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite19.6 rank points
OmniGen219 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 515 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 412.5 rank points
Chroma1-Flash12.1 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo8.4 rank points
SDXL Turbo8.4 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px7.2 rank points
AuraFlow v0.36.9 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT5.9 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px5.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 35.3 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Recorded measurement details

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
9
Score
9
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
100
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
98.33
Individual ranks
105, 97, 93
Criterion scores
headline 0.67, subline 0.67, text-control 0.67, visual-brief 1.33, layout 1
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Product photography (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
7.8
Score
7.8
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
103
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
99.67
Individual ranks
102, 96, 101
Criterion scores
subject 1.33, time 1.33, watch-details 1, photography 1.33, exclusions 1.33
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Character and detail (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
7.5
Score
7.5
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
103
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
100
Individual ranks
104, 101, 95
Criterion scores
scene 0.67, wardrobe 1, anatomy 1, props 0.67, environment 1
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Infographic (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
15.9
Score
15.9
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
91
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
91
Individual ranks
93, 89, 91
Criterion scores
title 0.33, sequence 0.33, labels 0.33, diagram 0.33, clarity 0.33
Source Gradually-Bildtest

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 100 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

First value from November 5, 2026. The timeline appears from the second week.

Boogu-Image-0.1-Base compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  2. 2GPT Image 2 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  3. 3Reve 2.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  4. 4Nano Banana 2 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  5. 5GPT Image 1.5 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  6. 6MAI-Image-2.5 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  7. 7Nano Banana Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  8. 8Nano Banana 2 Lite vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  9. 9Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
Show all 107 comparisons
  1. 10Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  2. 11FLUX.2 Max vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  3. 12Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  4. 13MAI-Image-2.5 Flash vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  5. 14HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  6. 15Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  7. 16Seedream 4.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  8. 17Krea 2 Large vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  9. 18Luma Uni-1.1 Max vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  10. 19FLUX.2 Flex vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  11. 20Recraft V4.1 Utility vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  12. 21Ideogram 4.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  13. 22Wan 2.6 Text to Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  14. 23FLUX.2 Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  15. 24HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  16. 25FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  17. 26HiDream-O1-Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  18. 27Firefly Image Model 5 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  19. 28Midjourney V8.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  20. 29Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  21. 30GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  22. 31Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  23. 32MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  24. 33MAI-Image-2.6 Flash vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  25. 34Muse Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  26. 35Grok Imagine Image 2.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  27. 36FLUX 3 Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  28. 37FLUX 3 Image Klein vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  29. 38Nano Banana 2.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  30. 39Ideogram 4.5 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  31. 40Hy Image 3.5 Preview vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  32. 41Recraft V4.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  33. 42Recraft V4.1 Flash vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  34. 43Bria FIBO 2 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  35. 44Krea 3 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  36. 45Qwen Image 3.0 Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  37. 46Qwen Image 3.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  38. 47Qwen Image 2.1 Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  39. 48Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  40. 49Wan 2.7 Image Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  41. 50Wan 2.7 Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  42. 51Seedream 5.0 Flash vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  43. 52SenseNova U1.5 Lite vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  44. 53Kling Image 3.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  45. 54Kling Image 3.0 Omni vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  46. 55Vidu Q2 Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  47. 56GLM-Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  48. 57MiniMax Image-01 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  49. 58Z-Image Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  50. 59Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  51. 60Runway Gen-4 Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  52. 61Adobe Firefly Image 3 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  53. 62Adobe Firefly Image 4 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  54. 63Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  55. 64Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  56. 65Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  57. 66Bria FIBO Lite vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  58. 67Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  59. 68Seedream 4.5 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  60. 69Seedream 5.0 Lite vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  61. 70FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  62. 71GPT Image 1 Mini vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  63. 72ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias) vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  64. 73Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  65. 74FLUX.2 Klein 4B vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  66. 75FLUX.2 Dev vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  67. 76FLUX1.1 [pro] vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  68. 77FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  69. 78FLUX.1 [dev] vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  70. 79FLUX.1 Kontext [pro] vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  71. 80FLUX.1 Kontext [max] vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  72. 81Stable Diffusion XL 1.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  73. 82Stable Diffusion 3 Medium vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  74. 83SDXL Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  75. 84Stable Diffusion Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  76. 85Grok Imagine Image 1.0 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  77. 86MOSS-Image-Base vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  78. 87MOSS-Image-SFT vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  79. 88LLaDA-Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  80. 89LLaDA-Image-Turbo vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  81. 90Nucleus-Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  82. 91LongCat-Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  83. 92BAGEL-7B-MoT vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  84. 93OmniGen2 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  85. 94Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  86. 95Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  87. 96Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
  88. 97Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px
  89. 98Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px
  90. 99Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
  91. 100Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px
  92. 101Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Chroma1-HD
  93. 102Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Chroma1-Flash
  94. 103Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. AuraFlow v0.3
  95. 104Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
  96. 105Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Lumina-Image 2.0
  97. 106Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. HunyuanImage 3.0
  98. 107Boogu-Image-0.1-Base vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
10B
Source: Parameters

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
Access
Local
Source: Access

Further details

Checkpoint
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base, official 10B text-to-image checkpoint.
Source: Checkpoint
Project status
The project describes the weights and demos as a research project, not an official model release or paid API service.
Source: Project status
License
Apache-2.0 according to the project.
Source: License

Frequently asked questions about Boogu-Image-0.1-Base

How good is Boogu-Image-0.1-Base?

Rank 103 of 108 in our own test.

GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
Stable Diffusion XL 1.013
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px13
AuraFlow v0.312
Boogu-Image-0.1-BaseRank 103 of 10810
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo9
SDXL Turbo4
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px4

What is Boogu-Image-0.1-Base good at?

Best at Infographic (16 out of 100), weakest at Character and detail (8).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

  1. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base: Typography and layoutTypography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition9out of 100Rank 100 of 108 in this task
  2. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base: Product photographyProduct photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details8out of 100Rank 103 of 108 in this task
  3. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base: Character and detailCharacter and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency8out of 100Rank 103 of 108 in this task
  4. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base: InfographicInfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization16out of 100Rank 91 of 108 in this task

Sources and data date

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.