Skip to main content

Luma AIImage model

Luma Uni-1.1

Luma Uni-1.1 is rank 33 of 108 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingnot rated

n/aUser voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 33 of 108

66our own rating0 to 100

Priceno price

n/aper imagelower is better

PopularityRank 670 of 875

0out of 100first value

Summary

Luma Uni-1.1 is an image model from Luma AI. Luma identifies Uni-1.1 as served under API ID uni-1 since May 11, 2026.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Character and detailOpen Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through fal with model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/text-to-image. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Fal schema does not expose an output-resolution parameter; require square output of at least 1024px, estimated cost $0.042000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
InfographicOpen Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through fal with model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/text-to-image. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Fal schema does not expose an output-resolution parameter; require square output of at least 1024px, estimated cost $0.042000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
Product photographyOpen Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through fal with model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/text-to-image. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Fal schema does not expose an output-resolution parameter; require square output of at least 1024px, estimated cost $0.042000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
Typography and layoutOpen Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through fal with model ID luma/agent/uni-1/v1/text-to-image. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, n=1, seed=provider random, Fal schema does not expose an output-resolution parameter; require square output of at least 1024px, estimated cost $0.042000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 4 published benchmark results

Published benchmarks

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Nano Banana 299.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex98.1 rank points
FLUX 3 Image96 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility95.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image94.1 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite93.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni92.8 rank points
Nano Banana Pro91.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max91.6 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash88.5 rank points
Krea 2 Large86.3 rank points
Firefly Image Model 585.7 rank points
Muse Image85.7 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein84.4 rank points
Seedream 4.583.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.582.2 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite82.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro81 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro81 rank points
Krea 377.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.575.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite75.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max75.1 rank points
GPT Image 274.5 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.073.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.172.3 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo71.3 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.070.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash70.1 rank points
Recraft V4.169.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro68.9 rank points
Bria FIBO 268.5 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini67.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.067.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.167 rank points
Seedream 4.064.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662 rank points
GPT Image 1.559.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview55.8 rank points
Reve 2.153.9 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst53.6 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash53.6 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.153.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image51.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base50.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo50.8 rank points
GLM-Image50.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev49.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]45.5 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]42.1 rank points
LongCat-Image41.4 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image41.1 rank points
Z-Image Turbo39.6 rank points
Nucleus-Image38.3 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro38.3 rank points
MiniMax Image-0137.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD36.4 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.5 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro35.5 rank points
Z-Image Base32.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B32.4 rank points
Qwen Image 3.032.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B31.8 rank points
OmniGen229.6 rank points
Ideogram 4.528.3 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.8 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra21.8 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT21.5 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 420.6 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px20.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]19 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.018.4 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo18.1 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image18.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash16.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]16.2 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px15.9 rank points
Midjourney V8.114.3 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.012.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.311.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT11.2 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px8.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo7.8 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 36.9 rank points
SDXL Turbo3.4 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px3.1 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Product photography

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash90.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large90 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo89.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.189.7 rank points
GPT Image 289.4 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite88.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.688.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT87.9 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image87.9 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite87.2 rank points
Qwen Image 3.087.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B86.6 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst86.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro86.6 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT85.7 rank points
Bria FIBO 283.8 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite83.5 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro83.2 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.081.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B80.7 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo80.7 rank points
Muse Image80.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro76.9 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein74.8 rank points
Reve 2.173.8 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini73.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview72.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro71.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max71 rank points
Recraft V4.171 rank points
MAI-Image-2.570.1 rank points
Nano Banana Pro70.1 rank points
Nano Banana 2.169.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare69.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.568.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.067.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex62.6 rank points
Krea 362.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image62 rank points
Nucleus-Image62 rank points
Kling Image 3.060.4 rank points
Luma Uni-1.159.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Max58.6 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro58.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro57.9 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash57.6 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image53.9 rank points
GPT Image 1.552.3 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.550.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.149.5 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]46.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev46.4 rank points
Firefly Image Model 545.8 rank points
Nano Banana 244.9 rank points
Seedream 4.044.2 rank points
Seedream 4.544.2 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni39.9 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base36.1 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash36.1 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]35.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro35.8 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.2 rank points
LLaDA-Image35.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.033.6 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.7 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility32.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image32.4 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image31.1 rank points
MiniMax Image-0129.9 rank points
OmniGen229.9 rank points
Z-Image Turbo29.9 rank points
LongCat-Image29.3 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]28.7 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra28.3 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo26.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.8 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]25.5 rank points
Ideogram 4.022.1 rank points
Z-Image Base21.5 rank points
Chroma1-HD15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
Chroma1-Flash15.6 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview15.3 rank points
AuraFlow v0.315 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 314.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 413.7 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.012.8 rank points
GLM-Image9 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo5.6 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px1.2 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo1.2 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

GPT Image 1.588.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro88.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro86.9 rank points
Krea 384.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev81.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni81.6 rank points
Reve 2.180.1 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image78.5 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro78.2 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex75.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.075.1 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT74.1 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro74.1 rank points
Seedream 4.072.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 572.3 rank points
Z-Image Base71 rank points
Z-Image Turbo71 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite70.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Max70.4 rank points
FLUX 3 Image69.5 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.567.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein66.4 rank points
Nucleus-Image66.4 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility66.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro64.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro64.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst64.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.2 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image63.2 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.061.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B61.1 rank points
Muse Image61.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.060.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max60.4 rank points
GPT Image 260.1 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro60.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.059.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.058.9 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.558.3 rank points
Nano Banana 2.156.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.554.8 rank points
Krea 2 Large54.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]52.6 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo52.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 452.3 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash52 rank points
Midjourney V8.151.4 rank points
GLM-Image51.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash50.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]50.2 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview49.5 rank points
Luma Uni-1.148.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite48.6 rank points
Bria FIBO 248.3 rank points
Recraft V4.148 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo47.7 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite47.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base45.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra45.2 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image45.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash42.4 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]39.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B38.9 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image38.9 rank points
Nano Banana Pro37.1 rank points
Seedream 4.537.1 rank points
Nano Banana 236.4 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite34.9 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.133.6 rank points
MiniMax Image-0132.7 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT32.4 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini30.8 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo29.9 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]27.1 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 326.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.2 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.024.3 rank points
LongCat-Image24.3 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.023.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD16.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.316.2 rank points
OmniGen27.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.5 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Infographic

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Seedream 5.0 Pro99.1 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst97.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare91 rank points
Luma Uni-1.189.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo88.8 rank points
Qwen Image 3.088.8 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro88.5 rank points
Muse Image86.3 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash86 rank points
Ideogram 4.585.4 rank points
Reve 2.184.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.182.9 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash81.3 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite80.4 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image79.4 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo78.8 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max78.8 rank points
Bria FIBO 278.2 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein77.3 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image77.3 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.076.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.076.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.576.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large75.7 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview74.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro74.5 rank points
Krea 373.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash73.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash73.5 rank points
Recraft V4.173.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.072.6 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev72 rank points
GPT Image 1.571.7 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview70.7 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base70.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.569.2 rank points
FLUX 3 Image68.5 rank points
Seedream 4.067.3 rank points
GPT Image 266.4 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite65.7 rank points
Nano Banana Pro64.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.164.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility63.9 rank points
Nano Banana 263.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro62 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro61.7 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro61.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.660.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex57 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite55.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]53.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max53.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]52.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro44.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image42.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B41.7 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]39.9 rank points
Z-Image Turbo37.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image37.1 rank points
LongCat-Image36.8 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.036.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo35.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.135.2 rank points
LLaDA-Image32.7 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.4 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini31.8 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B30.2 rank points
GLM-Image29.9 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni29.6 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra27.7 rank points
Seedream 4.526.5 rank points
MiniMax Image-0125.5 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]24 rank points
Z-Image Base24 rank points
Nucleus-Image23.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD22.4 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite19.6 rank points
OmniGen219 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 515 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 412.5 rank points
Chroma1-Flash12.1 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo8.4 rank points
SDXL Turbo8.4 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px7.2 rank points
AuraFlow v0.36.9 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT5.9 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px5.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 35.3 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Recorded measurement details

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
67
Score
67
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
42
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
36.33
Individual ranks
35, 37, 37
Criterion scores
headline 1.33, subline 1.33, text-control 1.33, visual-brief 1.33, layout 1.33
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Product photography (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
59.5
Score
59.5
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
46
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
44.33
Individual ranks
69, 35, 29
Criterion scores
subject 2, time 2, watch-details 1.67, photography 2, exclusions 2
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Character and detail (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
48.6
Score
48.6
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
62
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
56
Individual ranks
29, 81, 58
Criterion scores
scene 1, wardrobe 1, anatomy 1, props 1, environment 1
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Infographic (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
89.4
Score
89.4
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
12.33
Individual ranks
33, 1, 3
Criterion scores
title 1.67, sequence 1, labels 1.67, diagram 1.67, clarity 1.67
Source Gradually-Bildtest

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

First value from November 5, 2026. The timeline appears from the second week.

Luma Uni-1.1 compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  2. 2GPT Image 2 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  3. 3Reve 2.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  4. 4Nano Banana 2 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  5. 5GPT Image 1.5 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  6. 6MAI-Image-2.5 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  7. 7Nano Banana Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  8. 8Nano Banana 2 Lite vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  9. 9Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
Show all 107 comparisons
  1. 10Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  2. 11FLUX.2 Max vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  3. 12Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  4. 13MAI-Image-2.5 Flash vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  5. 14HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  6. 15Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  7. 16Seedream 4.0 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  8. 17Krea 2 Large vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  9. 18Luma Uni-1.1 Max vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  10. 19FLUX.2 Flex vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  11. 20Recraft V4.1 Utility vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  12. 21Ideogram 4.0 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  13. 22Wan 2.6 Text to Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  14. 23FLUX.2 Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  15. 24HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  16. 25FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  17. 26HiDream-O1-Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  18. 27Firefly Image Model 5 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  19. 28Midjourney V8.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  20. 29Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  21. 30GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  22. 31Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  23. 32MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  24. 33MAI-Image-2.6 Flash vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  25. 34Muse Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  26. 35Grok Imagine Image 2.0 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  27. 36FLUX 3 Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  28. 37FLUX 3 Image Klein vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  29. 38Nano Banana 2.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  30. 39Ideogram 4.5 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  31. 40Hy Image 3.5 Preview vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  32. 41Recraft V4.1 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  33. 42Recraft V4.1 Flash vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  34. 43Bria FIBO 2 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  35. 44Krea 3 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  36. 45Qwen Image 3.0 Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  37. 46Qwen Image 3.0 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  38. 47Qwen Image 2.1 Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  39. 48Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  40. 49Wan 2.7 Image Pro vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  41. 50Wan 2.7 Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  42. 51Seedream 5.0 Flash vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  43. 52SenseNova U1.5 Lite vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  44. 53Kling Image 3.0 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  45. 54Kling Image 3.0 Omni vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  46. 55Vidu Q2 Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  47. 56GLM-Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  48. 57MiniMax Image-01 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  49. 58Z-Image Turbo vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  50. 59Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Runway Gen-4 Image
  51. 60Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 3
  52. 61Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4
  53. 62Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra
  54. 63Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium
  55. 64Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo
  56. 65Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Bria FIBO Lite
  57. 66Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
  58. 67Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Seedream 4.5
  59. 68Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Seedream 5.0 Lite
  60. 69Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
  61. 70Luma Uni-1.1 vs. GPT Image 1 Mini
  62. 71Luma Uni-1.1 vs. ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)
  63. 72Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
  64. 73Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 4B
  65. 74Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX.2 Dev
  66. 75Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro]
  67. 76Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  68. 77Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX.1 [dev]
  69. 78Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
  70. 79Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
  71. 80Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Stable Diffusion XL 1.0
  72. 81Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Stable Diffusion 3 Medium
  73. 82Luma Uni-1.1 vs. SDXL Turbo
  74. 83Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Stable Diffusion Turbo
  75. 84Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Grok Imagine Image 1.0
  76. 85Luma Uni-1.1 vs. MOSS-Image-Base
  77. 86Luma Uni-1.1 vs. MOSS-Image-SFT
  78. 87Luma Uni-1.1 vs. LLaDA-Image
  79. 88Luma Uni-1.1 vs. LLaDA-Image-Turbo
  80. 89Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Nucleus-Image
  81. 90Luma Uni-1.1 vs. LongCat-Image
  82. 91Luma Uni-1.1 vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT
  83. 92Luma Uni-1.1 vs. OmniGen2
  84. 93Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT
  85. 94Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain
  86. 95Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  87. 96Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
  88. 97Luma Uni-1.1 vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px
  89. 98Luma Uni-1.1 vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px
  90. 99Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
  91. 100Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px
  92. 101Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Chroma1-HD
  93. 102Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Chroma1-Flash
  94. 103Luma Uni-1.1 vs. AuraFlow v0.3
  95. 104Luma Uni-1.1 vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
  96. 105Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Lumina-Image 2.0
  97. 106Luma Uni-1.1 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0
  98. 107Luma Uni-1.1 vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

API

Native API model ID
uni-1 is the API identifier for the Uni-1.1 standard tier; uni-1-max is a separate higher-quality tier already in the roster.
Source: Native API model ID

Further details

Release context
Luma identifies Uni-1.1 as served under API ID uni-1 since May 11, 2026.
Source: Release context

Prices

Choose a price view
fal.ai (luma/agent/uni-1/v1/text-to-image)
$0.042 per image (estimated)Source

No Luma AI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €19.04 a month (Magnific Premium, with limited credits). 6 plans in Germany.

Filter plans
PlanMonthly priceNote
Magnific Premium€19.04with limited credit
Magnific Premium+€42.84with limited credit
Magnific Business€70.21with limited credit, for teams, per seat
Magnific Pro Starter€104.72with limited credit
Magnific Pro€273.70with limited credit
Magnific Enterprisen/afor enterprises

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Luma Uni-1.1

How good is Luma Uni-1.1?

Rank 33 of 108 in our own test.

GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
Qwen Image 3.068
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash67
Seedream 5.0 Lite67
Luma Uni-1.1Rank 33 of 10866
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)66
Nano Banana Pro66
Nano Banana 2.166

What is Luma Uni-1.1 good at?

Best at Infographic (89 out of 100), weakest at Character and detail (49).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

  1. Luma Uni-1.1: Typography and layoutTypography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition67out of 100Rank 42 of 108 in this task
  2. Luma Uni-1.1: Product photographyProduct photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details60out of 100Rank 46 of 108 in this task
  3. Luma Uni-1.1: Character and detailCharacter and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency49out of 100Rank 62 of 108 in this task
  4. Luma Uni-1.1: InfographicInfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization89out of 100Rank 4 of 108 in this task

Where can I use Luma Uni-1.1?

Not in a Luma AI subscription. Including other providers that makes 6 plans in Germany.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At Luma AI

No Luma AI subscription includes this model.

Through other providers

6 plans from 1 provider, from €19.04 a month (Magnific Premium), with limited credits.

Sources and data date

Show all 10 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.