Skip to main content

Microsoft AIImage modelPreview

MAI-Image-2.6

MAI-Image-2.6 is rank 4 of 21 in the arena rating and rank 28 of 108 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingRank 4 of 21

1,331User voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 28 of 108

68our own rating0 to 100

PriceRank 10 of 28

$0.039per imagelower is better

PopularityRank 185 of 875

45out of 100same as last month

Summary

At $0.039 per image it is fairly cheap; a typical image model costs $0.06.

MAI-Image-2.6 combines text-to-image generation in Microsoft Foundry with precise image-to-image editing. Microsoft documents targeted changes to objects, layouts, and text, motion-blur cleanup, aspect ratios derived from prompt and image inputs, and current Bing results as image context.

Output is PNG, with at least 768 pixels on each side and at most 2,359,296 pixels in total. The published configuration also lists a 32,000-token context window. MAI-Image-2.6 remains in preview, uses proprietary weights, and is tied to Microsoft Foundry. It is not a downloadable local checkpoint.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Character and detailOpen Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039287.

Open source
InfographicOpen Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039317.

Open source
Product photographyOpen Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039292.

Open source
Typography and layoutOpen Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039252.

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 45 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 4

Published benchmarks

Text to image

Text to Image Arena

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

GPT Image 21,187.61 Elo
MAI-Image-2.61,168.32 Elo
Nano Banana 21,141.6 Elo
Muse Image1,127.86 Elo
GPT Image 1.51,123.86 Elo
MAI-Image-2.51,120.06 Elo
Nano Banana Pro1,118.67 Elo
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,109.07 Elo
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,101.17 Elo
Qwen-Image-2.11,045.48 Elo
Krea 2 Large1,035.45 Elo
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro1,031.23 Elo
FLUX.2 Flex1,027.68 Elo
FLUX.2 Max1,020.57 Elo
Ideogram 4.51,015.99 Elo
FLUX.2 Pro1,003.17 Elo
Ideogram 4.01,002.93 Elo
FLUX.2 Klein 9B932.08 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,227.25 Elo

Source: Artificial Analysis
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
30
Methodology and context
AA appearances: 8626. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 6. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-text-to-image-v2.1-2026-11-06-e430d57b5d0b. Source payload hash: e430d57b5d0bf260d6feb60bb7d8fa32da8d7961ec2bd9a9cae58fb015613cf0
Source: Artificial Analysis

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,412.39 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,381.8 points
GPT Image 21,365.33 points
MAI-Image-2.61,323.82 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,291.41 points
Reve 2.11,281.14 points
Nano Banana 21,255.68 points
MAI-Image-2.51,251.47 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,246.55 points
Muse Image1,238.45 points
Nano Banana Pro1,232.1 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,225.65 points
GPT Image 1.51,217.68 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,213.88 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,173.15 points
FLUX.2 Max1,160.58 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,145.47 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,120.68 points
Krea 2 Large1,115.65 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,078.61 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,412.39 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
3,150
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Agentic image generation

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,393.27 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,362.55 points
GPT Image 21,337.71 points
MAI-Image-2.61,316.28 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,287.47 points
Nano Banana 21,257.08 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,240.85 points
GPT Image 1.51,237.12 points
Nano Banana Pro1,236.88 points
Muse Image1,234.77 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,231.48 points
Krea 2 Large1,140.86 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,137.07 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,110.87 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,393.27 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
14
Sample
3,054
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Art

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,410.08 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,387.35 points
GPT Image 21,370.68 points
MAI-Image-2.61,337.7 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,328.25 points
Reve 2.11,290.77 points
MAI-Image-2.51,276.76 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,258.85 points
Muse Image1,258.79 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,255.8 points
Nano Banana 21,239.62 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,234.74 points
GPT Image 1.51,224.81 points
Nano Banana Pro1,224.23 points
FLUX.2 Max1,168.74 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,159.34 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,155.3 points
Krea 2 Large1,122.19 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,116.78 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,078.63 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,410.08 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
5,427
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,456.88 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,427.12 points
GPT Image 21,402.93 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,352.36 points
MAI-Image-2.61,348.71 points
Reve 2.11,309.78 points
Muse Image1,274.79 points
MAI-Image-2.51,268.65 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,263.52 points
Nano Banana 21,260.23 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,256.09 points
GPT Image 1.51,243.95 points
Nano Banana Pro1,243.91 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,234.48 points
FLUX.2 Max1,167.57 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,163.29 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,158.62 points
Krea 2 Large1,118.81 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,118.12 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,063.58 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,456.88 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
14,548
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,415.51 points
GPT Image 21,385.8 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,384.8 points
MAI-Image-2.61,332.9 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,324.96 points
Reve 2.11,315.65 points
Nano Banana 21,267.93 points
MAI-Image-2.51,259.36 points
Muse Image1,258.15 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,248.4 points
Nano Banana Pro1,245.44 points
GPT Image 1.51,237.88 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,237.36 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,236.31 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,172.44 points
FLUX.2 Max1,163.75 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,154.5 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,129.54 points
Krea 2 Large1,110.71 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,070.2 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,415.51 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
11,365
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Overall

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,427.13 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,399.44 points
GPT Image 21,382.1 points
MAI-Image-2.61,330.58 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,317.31 points
Reve 2.11,300.4 points
Muse Image1,268.12 points
Nano Banana 21,257.49 points
MAI-Image-2.51,253 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,250.8 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,249.44 points
Nano Banana Pro1,246.31 points
GPT Image 1.51,236.39 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,226.55 points
FLUX.2 Max1,161.46 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,156.26 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,152.68 points
Krea 2 Large1,115.37 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,114.71 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,069.84 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,427.13 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
38,071
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism

GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,415.95 points
GPT Image 21,379.13 points
MAI-Image-2.61,330.88 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,312.19 points
Reve 2.11,302.1 points
Muse Image1,278.09 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,274.42 points
Nano Banana 21,261.31 points
Nano Banana Pro1,260.39 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,258.64 points
MAI-Image-2.51,250.67 points
GPT Image 1.51,246.79 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,229.66 points
FLUX.2 Max1,160.87 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,151.76 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,145.47 points
Krea 2 Large1,128.88 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,109.06 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,091.05 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,434.4 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
13,227
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Portraits

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,461.22 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,439.29 points
GPT Image 21,426.27 points
MAI-Image-2.61,341.91 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,332.04 points
Reve 2.11,316.59 points
Muse Image1,289.88 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,286.94 points
GPT Image 1.51,258.96 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,256.2 points
Nano Banana Pro1,255.64 points
Nano Banana 21,254.9 points
MAI-Image-2.51,254.78 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,244.1 points
FLUX.2 Max1,156.6 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,144.32 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,143.85 points
Krea 2 Large1,123.58 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,105.31 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,091.81 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,461.22 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
6,728
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,461.65 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,431.87 points
GPT Image 21,424.21 points
MAI-Image-2.61,365.86 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,349.22 points
Reve 2.11,339.46 points
Nano Banana 21,294.44 points
Muse Image1,293.25 points
MAI-Image-2.51,280.73 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,273.63 points
Nano Banana Pro1,270.33 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,254.93 points
GPT Image 1.51,251.47 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,250.12 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,171.57 points
FLUX.2 Max1,165.6 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,154.35 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,134.31 points
Krea 2 Large1,116.42 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,057.76 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,461.65 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
11,642
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source: LMArena

Image editing

Image Editing Arena

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

MAI-Image-2.61,149.25 Elo
GPT Image 21,135.9 Elo
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,129.43 Elo
Muse Image1,128.02 Elo
Nano Banana 21,125.1 Elo
MAI-Image-2.51,124.35 Elo
GPT Image 1.51,116.41 Elo
Nano Banana Pro1,108.99 Elo
Qwen-Image-2.11,080.38 Elo
Ideogram 4.51,066.78 Elo
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro1,056.78 Elo
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,053.63 Elo
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,012.79 Elo
FLUX.2 Pro1,011.07 Elo
FLUX.2 Max998.84 Elo
FLUX.2 Flex995.52 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,199.46 Elo

Source: Artificial Analysis
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
24
Methodology and context
AA appearances: 16994. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 7. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-image-editing-v2.1-2026-11-06-0a4f79bb0933. Source payload hash: 0a4f79bb0933c8ef52ce1327ef382eb3442dab864e254d37ecd3176d39727555
Source: Artificial Analysis

LMArena Image Editing: Agentic image generation

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,536.61 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,491.71 points
GPT Image 21,459.51 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,426.01 points
MAI-Image-2.61,417.96 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,409.2 points
Nano Banana Pro1,404.88 points
Muse Image1,382.3 points
Nano Banana 21,376.8 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,362.02 points
GPT Image 1.51,360.14 points
Ideogram 4.51,298.95 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,212.35 points

higher is betterAs of November 6, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,536.61 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
13
Sample
3,540
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-image_edit-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-4db53937a0d3. Source payload hash: 4db53937a0d39e716e49e4c3fb1b88c68578a094c4339bb7c714dbedfd0a85d0
Source: LMArena

Recorded measurement details

Text to Image Arena (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1168.32
Score
1168.32
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Benchmark version
v2.1
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Confidence interval
12
Lower confidence bound
1156.32
Upper confidence bound
1180.32
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
AA appearances: 8626. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 6. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-text-to-image-v2.1-2026-11-06-e430d57b5d0b. Source payload hash: e430d57b5d0bf260d6feb60bb7d8fa32da8d7961ec2bd9a9cae58fb015613cf0
USD price per 1,000 tokens
38.912
Source Artificial Analysis
Image Editing Arena (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1149.25
Score
1149.25
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Benchmark version
v2.1
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Confidence interval
12
Lower confidence bound
1137.25
Upper confidence bound
1161.25
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
AA appearances: 16994. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 7. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-image-editing-v2.1-2026-11-06-0a4f79bb0933. Source payload hash: 0a4f79bb0933c8ef52ce1327ef382eb3442dab864e254d37ecd3176d39727555
USD price per 1,000 tokens
38.912
Source Artificial Analysis
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1323.821532398057
Score
1323.821532398057
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
7
Sample
3150
Confidence interval
11.497992
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Agentic image generation (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1316.2819871570555
Score
1316.2819871570555
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
3054
Confidence interval
14.021211
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Art (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1337.7010791703217
Score
1337.7010791703217
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Sample
5427
Confidence interval
9.272958
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1348.712690325956
Score
1348.712690325956
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
7
Sample
14548
Confidence interval
7.163311
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1332.9037306127018
Score
1332.9037306127018
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Sample
11365
Confidence interval
7.505434
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1330.5777021594263
Score
1330.5777021594263
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Sample
38071
Confidence interval
5.307988
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1330.8832076367253
Score
1330.8832076367253
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
7
Sample
13227
Confidence interval
7.299082
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1341.9112332873256
Score
1341.9112332873256
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Sample
6728
Confidence interval
8.932251
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1365.860738831856
Score
1365.860738831856
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Sample
11642
Confidence interval
7.589985
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-43df833a690f. Source payload hash: 43df833a690f9454a344fb4d803c0c2ec845d592681e7f95e9ac50f1c0b25d4a
Source LMArena
LMArena Image Editing: Agentic image generation (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1417.9627114262037
Score
1417.9627114262037
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Sample
3540
Confidence interval
13.296753
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-11-06
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-image_edit-5a7e6bb84a93f55df56b198be8e56e53755a216a-4db53937a0d3. Source payload hash: 4db53937a0d39e716e49e4c3fb1b88c68578a094c4339bb7c714dbedfd0a85d0
Source LMArena

Page 1 of 4

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 100 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

MAI-Image-2.6FLUX.2 Klein 9BHunyuanImage 3.0 InstructGPT Image 2FLUX.2 Flex

MAI-Image-2.6 compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT Image 2 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  2. 2Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  3. 3GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  4. 4Reve 2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  5. 5Nano Banana 2 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  6. 6Midjourney V8.2 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  7. 7GPT Image 1.5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  8. 8MAI-Image-2.5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  9. 9Nano Banana Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
Show all 108 comparisons
  1. 10Nano Banana 2 Lite vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  2. 11Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  3. 12Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  4. 13FLUX.2 Max vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  5. 14Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  6. 15MAI-Image-2.5 Flash vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  7. 16HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  8. 17Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  9. 18Seedream 4.0 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  10. 19Krea 2 Large vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  11. 20Luma Uni-1.1 Max vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  12. 21FLUX.2 Flex vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  13. 22Recraft V4.1 Utility vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  14. 23Ideogram 4.0 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  15. 24Wan 2.6 Text to Image vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  16. 25FLUX.2 Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  17. 26HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  18. 27FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  19. 28HiDream-O1-Image vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  20. 29Firefly Image Model 5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  21. 30Midjourney V8.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  22. 31Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  23. 32GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  24. 33MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MAI-Image-2.6 Flash
  25. 34MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Muse Image
  26. 35MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Grok Imagine Image 2.0
  27. 36MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX 3 Image
  28. 37MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX 3 Image Klein
  29. 38MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Nano Banana 2.1
  30. 39MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Ideogram 4.5
  31. 40MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Hy Image 3.5 Preview
  32. 41MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Recraft V4.1
  33. 42MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Recraft V4.1 Flash
  34. 43MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Bria FIBO 2
  35. 44MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Krea 3
  36. 45MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
  37. 46MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 3.0
  38. 47MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Pro
  39. 48MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
  40. 49MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Wan 2.7 Image Pro
  41. 50MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Wan 2.7 Image
  42. 51MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Seedream 5.0 Flash
  43. 52MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SenseNova U1.5 Lite
  44. 53MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kling Image 3.0
  45. 54MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kling Image 3.0 Omni
  46. 55MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Vidu Q2 Image
  47. 56MAI-Image-2.6 vs. GLM-Image
  48. 57MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MiniMax Image-01
  49. 58MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Z-Image Turbo
  50. 59MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  51. 60MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Runway Gen-4 Image
  52. 61MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 3
  53. 62MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4
  54. 63MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra
  55. 64MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium
  56. 65MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo
  57. 66MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Bria FIBO Lite
  58. 67MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
  59. 68MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Seedream 4.5
  60. 69MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Seedream 5.0 Lite
  61. 70MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
  62. 71MAI-Image-2.6 vs. GPT Image 1 Mini
  63. 72MAI-Image-2.6 vs. ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)
  64. 73MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
  65. 74MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 4B
  66. 75MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.2 Dev
  67. 76MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro]
  68. 77MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  69. 78MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.1 [dev]
  70. 79MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
  71. 80MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
  72. 81MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion XL 1.0
  73. 82MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3 Medium
  74. 83MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SDXL Turbo
  75. 84MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion Turbo
  76. 85MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Grok Imagine Image 1.0
  77. 86MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MOSS-Image-Base
  78. 87MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MOSS-Image-SFT
  79. 88MAI-Image-2.6 vs. LLaDA-Image
  80. 89MAI-Image-2.6 vs. LLaDA-Image-Turbo
  81. 90MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Nucleus-Image
  82. 91MAI-Image-2.6 vs. LongCat-Image
  83. 92MAI-Image-2.6 vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT
  84. 93MAI-Image-2.6 vs. OmniGen2
  85. 94MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT
  86. 95MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain
  87. 96MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  88. 97MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
  89. 98MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px
  90. 99MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px
  91. 100MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
  92. 101MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px
  93. 102MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Chroma1-HD
  94. 103MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Chroma1-Flash
  95. 104MAI-Image-2.6 vs. AuraFlow v0.3
  96. 105MAI-Image-2.6 vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
  97. 106MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Lumina-Image 2.0
  98. 107MAI-Image-2.6 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0
  99. 108MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Input and output

Context window
32,000 tokens
no source
Maximum output
2,359,296 pixels
Source: Maximum output

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Proprietary
Source: Weights
Lifecycle
Preview in Microsoft Foundry
Source: Lifecycle

Further details

Image capabilities
Text-to-image generation and precise image-to-image editing
Source: Image capabilities
Editing controls
Target objects, layouts, and text, and clean up motion blur
Source: Editing controls
Output format and size
PNG, at least 768 pixels on each side and at most 2,359,296 pixels in total
Source: Output format and size
Aspect ratio
Can choose the aspect ratio from the prompt and image inputs
Source: Aspect ratio
Web grounding
Can use current Bing Search results as additional image context
Source: Web grounding
API authentication
Microsoft Entra ID or an API key
Source: API authentication

Prices

Representative price
$0.038912 per imageSource
OpenRouter (microsoft/mai-image-2.6)
$0.06 per image (estimated)Source

Frequently asked questions about MAI-Image-2.6

How good is MAI-Image-2.6?

Rank 4 of 21 in the arena rating. Rank 28 of 108 in our own test.

Arena rating from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026

Arena ratingfrom user votes · higher is better
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,427
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,399
GPT Image 21,382
MAI-Image-2.6Rank 4 of 211,331
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,317
Reve 2.11,300
Muse Image1,268
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)69
MAI-Image-2.569
FLUX.2 Max69
MAI-Image-2.6Rank 28 of 10868
GPT Image 1.568
Qwen Image 3.068
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash67

What is MAI-Image-2.6 good at?

Best at Product photography (88 out of 100), weakest at Infographic (61).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

  1. MAI-Image-2.6: Typography and layoutTypography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition62out of 100Rank 45 of 108 in this task
  2. MAI-Image-2.6: Product photographyProduct photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details88out of 100Rank 7 of 108 in this task
  3. MAI-Image-2.6: Character and detailCharacter and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency63out of 100Rank 34 of 108 in this task
  4. MAI-Image-2.6: InfographicInfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization61out of 100Rank 51 of 108 in this task

How much does an image with MAI-Image-2.6 cost?

About $0.039 per image. That is fairly cheap: a typical image model costs $0.06.

Price per imageDollars per image · lower is better
FLUX.2 Pro$0.03
Nano Banana 2 Lite$0.034
Recraft V4.1 Utility$0.035
MAI-Image-2.6Rank 10 of 28$0.039
HiDream-O1-Image$0.04
MAI-Image-2.5$0.048
Grok Imagine Image Quality$0.05

Sources and data date

Show all 24 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
LMArena001

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 1 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 17, 2026. 11 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

exact-serving-revision

Note

The evaluator shows the exact product row but does not disclose an API route or serving checkpoint revision.

Additional sourceMicrosoft AI (retrieved September 24, 2026) · Microsoft Foundry MAI-Image-2.6 catalog · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceImage pricing (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026; November 3, 2026; November 5, 2026; November 6, 2026)
Additional sourceLifecycle data · Microsoft Foundry July and August 2026 updates · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceMicrosoft AI (retrieved September 24, 2026) · Microsoft Foundry MAI image deployment guide · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 23, 2026; October 28, 2026; November 3, 2026; November 5, 2026; November 6, 2026)
Additional sourceLMArena (retrieved November 6, 2026)12
Additional sourceGradually-Bildtest (retrieved November 3, 2026)
Additional sourceArena (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceQuantslant (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceArena.ai Text-to-Image leaderboard (retrieved October 21, 2026; October 23, 2026)
Additional sourceMicrosoft AI (retrieved October 22, 2026)
Additional sourceDesignArena (retrieved October 23, 2026; October 24, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 23, 2026)12
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0