Image modelNo status listed

Nano Banana Pro

Google

Released: November 2025
Data date: August 15, 2026

Category view

Position within the category

This overview uses only published data from matching cohorts. Missing values never change a rank.

This position gives equal weight to 4 fixed Gradually image tests. One archived first output contributes for each model and task.

Position: Rank 9 of 28
Index score: 59.9 / 100
Coverage: 4 / 4

Leaderboard

1MAI-Image-2.5 Flash76.6 / 100

2GPT Image 271 / 100

3MAI-Image-2.567.6 / 100

8HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct60.5 / 100

9Nano Banana Pro59.9 / 100

10Nano Banana 2 Lite59.6 / 100

28Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large2.5 / 100

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Measurements

Comparable benchmark results

Each chart contains exactly one source, one measurement series, and one stored comparison cohort. Bars show the position. The measured value appears on the right.

Text to Image Arena

1,298 Elo · Rank 6 of 25

Sample: 13,840 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 21,371 Elo

4.GPT Image 1.51,310 Elo

5.MAI-Image-2.51,303 Elo

6.Nano Banana Pro1,298 Elo

7.Nano Banana 2 Lite1,288 Elo

8.Seedream 5.0 Pro1,280 Elo

25.FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,144 Elo

7 of 25 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Artificial AnalysisParticipants: 25

Image Editing Arena

1,246 Elo · Rank 7 of 19

Sample: 11,029 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Reve 2.11,263 Elo

5.Nano Banana 21,250 Elo

6.Seedream 5.0 Pro1,248 Elo

7.Nano Banana Pro1,246 Elo

8.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash1,235 Elo

9.Grok Imagine Image Quality1,225 Elo

19.FLUX.2 Flex1,162 Elo

7 of 19 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Artificial AnalysisParticipants: 19

GenExam Mathematics, strict

55.6% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 151 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 256.3%

2.Nano Banana Pro55.6%

3.GPT Image 250.3%

4.GPT Image 1.526.5%

5.FLUX.2 Max6.6%

6.Seedream 4.02.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Physics, strict

75.2% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 113 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 279.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro75.2%

3.Nano Banana 274.3%

4.GPT Image 1.546%

5.FLUX.2 Max8.8%

6.Seedream 4.03.5%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Chemistry, strict

60.2% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 118 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 269.5%

2.Nano Banana Pro60.2%

3.Nano Banana 252.5%

4.GPT Image 1.539%

5.FLUX.2 Max6.8%

6.Seedream 4.05.9%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Biology, strict

75.6% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 156 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 289.1%

2.Nano Banana Pro75.6%

3.Nano Banana 266%

4.GPT Image 1.556.4%

5.Seedream 4.018.6%

6.FLUX.2 Max11.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Geography, strict

75.8% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 66 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 284.8%

2.Nano Banana Pro75.8%

3.Nano Banana 269.7%

4.GPT Image 1.560.6%

5.FLUX.2 Max15.2%

6.Seedream 4.010.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Computer science, strict

65.7% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 102 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 273.5%

2.Nano Banana Pro65.7%

3.Nano Banana 256.9%

4.GPT Image 1.536.3%

5.FLUX.2 Max8.8%

6.Seedream 4.06.9%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Engineering, strict

71.2% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 111 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 279.3%

2.Nano Banana Pro71.2%

3.Nano Banana 267.6%

4.GPT Image 1.544.1%

5.Seedream 4.011.7%

6.FLUX.2 Max10.8%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Economics, strict

88.3% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 77 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro88.3%

2.GPT Image 283.1%

3.Nano Banana 263.6%

4.GPT Image 1.542.9%

5.Seedream 4.05.2%

6.FLUX.2 Max2.6%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Music, strict

61.5% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 65 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 264.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro61.5%

3.Nano Banana 250.8%

4.GPT Image 1.529.2%

5.FLUX.2 Max6.2%

6.Seedream 4.00%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam History, strict

97.6% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 41 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro97.6%

2.GPT Image 282.9%

2.Nano Banana 282.9%

4.GPT Image 1.551.2%

5.FLUX.2 Max7.3%

5.Seedream 4.07.3%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam overall, strict

72.7% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 1,000 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 274.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro72.7%

3.Nano Banana 264.1%

4.GPT Image 1.543.2%

5.FLUX.2 Max8.5%

6.Seedream 4.07.2%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Mathematics, relaxed

86.3% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 151 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 287.8%

2.Nano Banana Pro86.3%

3.GPT Image 285.2%

4.GPT Image 1.565.8%

5.FLUX.2 Max49.1%

6.Seedream 4.039.8%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Physics, relaxed

95.1% · Rank 3 of 6

Sample: 113 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 295.7%

2.GPT Image 295.6%

3.Nano Banana Pro95.1%

4.GPT Image 1.585.4%

5.FLUX.2 Max63.2%

6.Seedream 4.049%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Chemistry, relaxed

88.7% · Rank 3 of 6

Sample: 118 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 292%

2.Nano Banana 290%

3.Nano Banana Pro88.7%

4.GPT Image 1.578.1%

5.FLUX.2 Max54%

6.Seedream 4.046.1%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Biology, relaxed

95.9% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 156 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 297.5%

2.Nano Banana Pro95.9%

3.Nano Banana 295.2%

4.GPT Image 1.591.9%

5.FLUX.2 Max74.5%

6.Seedream 4.071%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Geography, relaxed

96.5% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 66 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 297.6%

2.Nano Banana Pro96.5%

3.Nano Banana 294.8%

4.GPT Image 1.592.5%

5.FLUX.2 Max76.3%

6.Seedream 4.065.1%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Computer science, relaxed

91.7% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 102 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 293.3%

2.Nano Banana Pro91.7%

3.Nano Banana 288.8%

4.GPT Image 1.575.8%

5.FLUX.2 Max56.5%

6.Seedream 4.052.2%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Engineering, relaxed

95.1% · Rank 3 of 6

Sample: 111 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 296.5%

2.Nano Banana 295.8%

3.Nano Banana Pro95.1%

4.GPT Image 1.586.4%

5.FLUX.2 Max68.9%

6.Seedream 4.060%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Economics, relaxed

97.2% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 77 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 297.7%

2.Nano Banana Pro97.2%

3.Nano Banana 294.2%

4.GPT Image 1.585.5%

5.FLUX.2 Max61.5%

6.Seedream 4.056%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam Music, relaxed

91% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 65 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro91%

2.GPT Image 289.1%

3.Nano Banana 286.9%

4.GPT Image 1.570.8%

5.FLUX.2 Max47%

6.Seedream 4.034.5%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam History, relaxed

99.9% · Rank 1 of 6

Sample: 41 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro99.9%

2.Nano Banana 297.3%

3.GPT Image 297.1%

4.GPT Image 1.590.9%

5.FLUX.2 Max68%

6.Seedream 4.056.7%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

GenExam overall, relaxed

93.7% · Rank 2 of 6

Sample: 1,000 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 293.8%

2.Nano Banana Pro93.7%

3.Nano Banana 292.6%

4.GPT Image 1.582.3%

5.FLUX.2 Max61.9%

6.Seedream 4.053%

6 of 6 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 multidisciplinary drawing tasks with reference images and fine-grained scoring points. Strict and relaxed scoring remain separate.

Source: GenExamParticipants: 6

Qwen Image Bench quality

55.67 points · Rank 2 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 258.65 points

2.Nano Banana Pro55.67 points

3.GPT Image 1.555.14 points

4.Nano Banana 254.77 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro54.39 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench aesthetics

60.26 points · Rank 4 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 267.53 points

2.Nano Banana 261.08 points

3.GPT Image 1.560.88 points

4.Nano Banana Pro60.26 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro58.67 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench alignment

61.25 points · Rank 4 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 265.85 points

2.Nano Banana 262.4 points

3.GPT Image 1.561.72 points

4.Nano Banana Pro61.25 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro59.28 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench real-world fidelity

54.07 points · Rank 3 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 257.38 points

2.Nano Banana 254.28 points

3.Nano Banana Pro54.07 points

4.GPT Image 1.553.95 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro51.83 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench creative generation

66.23 points · Rank 4 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 275.23 points

2.Nano Banana 267.05 points

3.GPT Image 1.566.35 points

4.Nano Banana Pro66.23 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro64.94 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

Qwen Image Bench overall

59.45 points · Rank 4 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 264.69 points

2.Nano Banana 259.82 points

3.GPT Image 1.559.65 points

4.Nano Banana Pro59.45 points

5.Qwen Image 2.0 Pro57.84 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 prompts, five top-level dimensions, and 56 detailed facets. Published top-five scores use the same deterministic judge configuration.

Source: Qwen Image BenchParticipants: 5

WISE Verified overall

87.6% · Rank 1 of 4

Sample: 1,000 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro87.6%

2.GPT Image 1.582.5%

3.FLUX.2 Klein 9B44%

4.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large40.4%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

WISE culture

89.75% · Rank 1 of 4

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro89.75%

2.GPT Image 1.589%

3.FLUX.2 Klein 9B49%

3.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large49%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

WISE time

81.67% · Rank 1 of 4

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro81.67%

2.GPT Image 1.569.17%

3.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large40.83%

4.FLUX.2 Klein 9B39.17%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

WISE space

93.33% · Rank 1 of 4

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro93.33%

2.GPT Image 1.588.33%

3.FLUX.2 Klein 9B55%

4.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large44.17%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

WISE biology

81.67% · Rank 1 of 4

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro81.67%

2.GPT Image 1.580%

3.FLUX.2 Klein 9B38.33%

4.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large30%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

WISE physics

86.67% · Rank 1 of 4

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro86.67%

2.GPT Image 1.575.83%

3.FLUX.2 Klein 9B48.33%

4.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large37.5%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

WISE chemistry

87.5% · Rank 1 of 4

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro87.5%

2.GPT Image 1.577.5%

3.FLUX.2 Klein 9B22.5%

4.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large20.83%

4 of 4 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

1,000 knowledge and realism tasks. Binary item judgments are averaged by category, and the overall score follows the published weighting.

Source: WISE VerifiedParticipants: 4

GRADE reasoning

77.5 points · Rank 2 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 282.2 points

2.Nano Banana Pro77.5 points

3.Nano Banana 272.6 points

4.GPT Image 1.554.5 points

5.FLUX.2 Max47.8 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro38.9 points

7.Seedream 4.032.4 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GRADE consistency

89.5 points · Rank 2 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 294.4 points

2.Nano Banana Pro89.5 points

3.Nano Banana 286.4 points

4.GPT Image 1.582.3 points

5.FLUX.2 Max67.2 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro55.5 points

7.Seedream 4.053.2 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GRADE readability

95.8 points · Rank 3 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 298.8 points

2.Nano Banana 295.9 points

3.Nano Banana Pro95.8 points

4.GPT Image 1.590.7 points

5.Seedream 4.077 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro70.3 points

7.FLUX.2 Max68.6 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GRADE accuracy

46.2 points · Rank 2 of 7

Sample: 520 · Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 256 points

2.Nano Banana Pro46.2 points

3.Nano Banana 239.6 points

4.GPT Image 1.516 points

5.FLUX.2 Max11.9 points

6.FLUX.2 Pro4.4 points

7.Seedream 4.03.1 points

7 of 7 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

520 scientific image-editing tasks across ten academic domains. GRADE scores reasoning, consistency, readability, and domain accuracy separately.

Source: GRADEParticipants: 7

GEBench Chinese, single-step

84.5 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro84.5 points

2.GPT Image 1.583.79 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro68.83 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image64.2 points

5.Seedream 4.062.04 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench Chinese, multi-step

68.65 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro68.65 points

2.GPT Image 1.556.97 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro55.07 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image50.11 points

5.Seedream 4.048.64 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench Chinese, fictional app

65.75 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro65.75 points

2.GPT Image 1.560.11 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro58.13 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image52.72 points

5.Seedream 4.049.28 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench Chinese, real app

64.35 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro64.35 points

2.GPT Image 1.555.65 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro55.41 points

4.Seedream 4.050.93 points

5.Wan 2.6 Text to Image50.4 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench Chinese, grounding

64.83 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro64.83 points

2.Wan 2.6 Text to Image59.58 points

3.Seedream 4.053.53 points

4.GPT Image 1.553.33 points

5.FLUX.2 Pro50.24 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench Chinese, overall

69.62 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro69.62 points

2.GPT Image 1.563.22 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro57.54 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image55.4 points

5.Seedream 4.052.88 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench English, single-step

84.32 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro84.32 points

2.GPT Image 1.580.8 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro61 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image60.17 points

5.Seedream 4.053.28 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench English, multi-step

69.51 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro69.51 points

2.GPT Image 1.558.87 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro52.17 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image44.36 points

5.Seedream 4.037.57 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench English, fictional app

46.33 points · Rank 5 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 1.563.68 points

2.FLUX.2 Pro49.92 points

3.Wan 2.6 Text to Image49.55 points

4.Seedream 4.047.92 points

5.Nano Banana Pro46.33 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench English, real app

47.2 points · Rank 3 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 1.558.93 points

2.Seedream 4.049.36 points

3.Nano Banana Pro47.2 points

4.FLUX.2 Pro47.16 points

5.Wan 2.6 Text to Image44.8 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench English, grounding

58.64 points · Rank 1 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro58.64 points

2.Wan 2.6 Text to Image53.36 points

3.GPT Image 1.549.23 points

4.FLUX.2 Pro45.67 points

5.Seedream 4.044.17 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GEBench English, overall

61.2 points · Rank 2 of 5

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.GPT Image 1.563.16 points

2.Nano Banana Pro61.2 points

3.FLUX.2 Pro51.18 points

4.Wan 2.6 Text to Image50.45 points

5.Seedream 4.046.46 points

5 of 5 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

A bilingual graphical-user-interface benchmark. Chinese and English subsets and the single-step, multi-step, fictional-app, real-app, and grounding categories remain separate.

Source: GEBenchParticipants: 5

GenAI-Bench overall preference

1,021 Elo · Rank 3 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 21,073 Elo

2.GPT Image 1.51,047 Elo

3.Nano Banana Pro1,021 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

GenAI-Bench visual quality

1,043 Elo · Rank 2 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 21,129 Elo

2.Nano Banana Pro1,043 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.5975 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Infographics factuality

1,102 Elo · Rank 1 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro1,102 Elo

2.Nano Banana 21,074 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.5985 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

General image editing

1,051 Elo · Rank 1 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro1,051 Elo

2.Nano Banana 21,047 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.5995 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Character editing

1,050 Elo · Rank 1 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro1,050 Elo

2.Nano Banana 21,049 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.51,025 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Creative editing

1,004 Elo · Rank 3 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana 21,031 Elo

2.GPT Image 1.51,017 Elo

3.Nano Banana Pro1,004 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Object and environment editing

1,042 Elo · Rank 1 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro1,042 Elo

2.Nano Banana 21,018 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.5976 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Editing with 1-3 input images

1,056 Elo · Rank 1 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro1,056 Elo

2.Nano Banana 21,016 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.51,014 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Stylization

1,045 Elo · Rank 1 of 3

Data date: August 26, 2026

1.Nano Banana Pro1,045 Elo

2.Nano Banana 21,031 Elo

3.GPT Image 1.5996 Elo

3 of 3 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Google's model card reports Elo scores with uncertainty intervals for text-to-image generation and image editing. These rows use standard Gemini 3.1 Flash Image without tools.

Source: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model cardParticipants: 3

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

93.8 rank points · Rank 1 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.MAI-Image-2.593.8 rank points

1.Nano Banana Pro93.8 rank points

3.Recraft V4.1 Utility92.6 rank points

4.Nano Banana 286.4 rank points

28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large0 rank points

5 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 28 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Gradually sample test: Product photography

82.7 rank points · Rank 4 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.GPT Image 295.1 rank points

2.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash93.8 rank points

3.MAI-Image-2.586.4 rank points

4.Nano Banana Pro82.7 rank points

5.Krea 2 Large81.5 rank points

5.Nano Banana 2 Lite81.5 rank points

28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large3.7 rank points

7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

21 rank points · Rank 24 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.MAI-Image-2.5 Flash86.4 rank points

21.Krea 2 Medium Turbo27.1 rank points

23.MAI-Image-2.524.7 rank points

24.Nano Banana Pro21 rank points

25.Nano Banana 218.5 rank points

26.Nano Banana 2 Lite17.3 rank points

28.Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large3.7 rank points

7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Gradually sample test: Infographic

42 rank points · Rank 17 of 28

Sample: 1 · Data date: August 18, 2026

1.Reve 2.197.5 rank points

14.Nano Banana 249.4 rank points

14.Wan 2.6 Text to Image49.4 rank points

17.Nano Banana Pro42 rank points

17.Recraft V4.1 Utility42 rank points

19.HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct32.1 rank points

28.Firefly Image Model 51.2 rank points

7 of 28 model versions shown in this chart. A higher value ranks first.

Source: Gradually-BildtestParticipants: 28

Profile

Specifications and access

Published information about this model. Unknown values are not estimated.

Weights: ProprietarySource
Access: API, WebSource
Maximum output: 4KSource
Benchmark configuration: Gemini 3 Pro ImageSource
Generator: gemini-3-pro-imageSource

Pricing

Published prices

Prices remain tied to their documented unit and source.

Representative price: $0.13 per imageSource
Together AI (google/gemini-3-pro-image): $0.13 per imageSource

Measurements

Other published benchmarks

The stored dataset does not contain an exactly matching comparison cohort for these values.

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling

1,230.04 points

Rank 7 · 13,757 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Art

1,224.75 points

Rank 10 · 19,671 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon

1,240.57 points

Rank 11 · 56,045 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design

1,245.1 points

Rank 9 · 50,186 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Overall

1,245.59 points

Rank 10 · 138,756 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism

1,260.12 points

Rank 7 · 59,290 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Portraits

1,258.04 points

Rank 11 · 31,463 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering

1,269.2 points

Rank 9 · 46,529 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Image Editing: Multi-image editing

1,363.81 points

Rank 6 · 189,338 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

LMArena Image Editing: Overall

1,389.6 points

Rank 8 · 517,418 samples · Retrieved August 26, 2026

LMArena

Head-to-head comparisons

Compare this model

Each matchup compares this model with exactly one other model from the same category.

Nano Banana Pro vs. GPT Image 2

Nano Banana Pro vs. Reve 2.1

Nano Banana Pro vs. Nano Banana 2

Nano Banana Pro vs. GPT Image 1.5

Nano Banana Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.5

Nano Banana Pro vs. Nano Banana 2 Lite

Nano Banana Pro vs. Seedream 5.0 Pro

Nano Banana Pro vs. Grok Imagine Image Quality

Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX.2 Max

Nano Banana Pro vs. Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

Nano Banana Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.5 Flash

Nano Banana Pro vs. HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

Nano Banana Pro vs. Krea 2 Medium Turbo

Nano Banana Pro vs. Seedream 4.0

Nano Banana Pro vs. Krea 2 Large

Nano Banana Pro vs. Luma UNI 1 Max

Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX.2 Flex

Nano Banana Pro vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility

Nano Banana Pro vs. Ideogram 4.0

Nano Banana Pro vs. Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX.2 Pro

Nano Banana Pro vs. HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B

Nano Banana Pro vs. HiDream-O1-Image

Nano Banana Pro vs. Firefly Image Model 5

Nano Banana Pro vs. Midjourney V8.1

Nano Banana Pro vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

More models

Models from the same selection

All AI models

MAI-Image-2.5

Microsoft AI

Nano Banana 2 Lite

Google

Evidence

Primary sources and data date

Every statement links to its underlying documentation or leaderboard.

GoogleSource
Image pricingSource
Together AISource
Artificial Analysis (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
LMArena (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
LMArena (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
GenExam (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
Qwen Image Bench (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
WISE Verified (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
GRADE (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
GEBench (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image model card (retrieved August 26, 2026)Source
Gradually-Bildtest (retrieved August 18, 2026)Source