Head-to-head comparison

Nano Banana Pro vs. Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Compare arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Text-to-image generation and image editing are never blended into an artificial overall score.

shared result series

shared sample prompts

2026-08-16

latest arena retrieval

First image modelSecond image model

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Nano Banana Pro and Wan 2.6 Text to Image
Attribute	Nano Banana Pro	Wan 2.6 Text to Image
Provider	Google	Alibaba
Released	November 2025	January 2026
Access	API, Web app	API
Lifecycle	No separate lifecycle notice	No separate lifecycle notice
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Parameters	Not published	Not published
Maximum output	4K	2K
Arena configuration	Gemini 3 Pro Image	Text to Image
Text-to-image price	$134 per 1,000 images	$30 per 1,000 images
Editing price	$134 per 1,000 images	No arena entry
Technical source	Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15	Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15

Nano Banana ProWan 2.6 Text to Image

Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels

Nano Banana Pro$134

Wan 2.6 Text to Image$30Lower price

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

9 shared result series

Nano Banana ProWan 2.6 Text to Image

Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,299 EloHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,212 Elo

Arena Text to Image: 3D modelingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,230.042 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,145.884 arena points

Arena Text to Image: ArtBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,224.748 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,156.609 arena points

Arena Text to Image: CartoonBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,240.574 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,145.336 arena points

Arena Text to Image: Commercial designBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,245.099 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,148.092 arena points

Arena Text to Image: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,245.593 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,135.885 arena points

Arena Text to Image: PhotorealismBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,260.121 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,128.051 arena points

Arena Text to Image: PortraitsBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,258.035 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,122.435 arena points

Arena Text to Image: Text renderingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,269.198 arena pointsHigher arena score

Wan 2.6 Text to Image1,148.761 arena points

Arena benchmark scores for Nano Banana Pro and Wan 2.6 Text to Image
Benchmark	Nano Banana Pro	Wan 2.6 Text to Image	Source
Text to Image Arena	1,299 EloHigher arena score Rank 6, 95% confidence interval: ±9, 13,340 ratings	1,212 Elo Rank 25, 95% confidence interval: ±10, 3,702 ratings	Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-15
Arena Text to Image: 3D modeling	1,230.042 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 7, 95% confidence interval: ±7.01, 13,757 ratings	1,145.884 arena points Rank 31, 95% confidence interval: ±6.43, 17,534 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Art	1,224.748 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 10, 95% confidence interval: ±6.22, 19,671 ratings	1,156.609 arena points Rank 27, 95% confidence interval: ±5.91, 23,269 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Cartoon	1,240.574 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 11, 95% confidence interval: ±4.92, 56,045 ratings	1,145.336 arena points Rank 32, 95% confidence interval: ±4.52, 73,425 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Commercial design	1,245.099 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 9, 95% confidence interval: ±4.81, 50,186 ratings	1,148.092 arena points Rank 31, 95% confidence interval: ±4.37, 69,457 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Overall	1,245.593 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 10, 95% confidence interval: ±3.37, 138,756 ratings	1,135.885 arena points Rank 35, 95% confidence interval: ±3.05, 182,381 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Photorealism	1,260.121 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 7, 95% confidence interval: ±4.77, 59,290 ratings	1,128.051 arena points Rank 39, 95% confidence interval: ±4.4, 74,727 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Portraits	1,258.035 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 11, 95% confidence interval: ±5.76, 31,463 ratings	1,122.435 arena points Rank 44, 95% confidence interval: ±5.31, 40,808 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text to Image: Text rendering	1,269.198 arena pointsHigher arena score Rank 9, 95% confidence interval: ±5.14, 46,529 ratings	1,148.761 arena points Rank 31, 95% confidence interval: ±4.55, 66,011 ratings	ArenaRetrieved 2026-08-16

Visual comparison

Sample images from documented runs

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

Largely standardized comparison protocol. Both models receive the same archived prompt, exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier, and prompt processing can still differ. These images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, Character and detail — Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Nano Banana Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID google/gemini-3-pro-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:20 PM. Source
Wan 2.6 Text to Image. Provider Together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Wan-AI/Wan2.6-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: eed53dcc080d2710e6e890382f6273382a12e2c5b079b8813962bff0c92b5df7

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: 12c91e972a7256b1386b22420c0c84e30b85ac6e07830eea944755e5bd9742fc

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, image SHA 256: cf49d7136a442f4f1c1ae29af99e917aa83bcbf501fdacfe3a13a3b3e74d7f9a

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, request SHA 256: 10c9f29d46b749448e574d11b560a2c20065d9026f1f52a99f09b23b6299c9c5

Infographic

Numbers, labels, and visual organization

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, Infographic — Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: 4ff7d3965d18e197f00647c35d6aed5a86a376c92779ee9e748c598aebafa51d

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: a69a5193f107aac4f7532f021fc4306c0907470f40f984d0b263728e292d8f1b

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, image SHA 256: 28eecbf460194ec047237c35415d934929baee9de9938bdff435cd21a4416435

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, request SHA 256: d9e00f8c778897df69e719c5bf9fa73115d87abeb23d63eec50dc2280f0e29a9

Product photography

Materials, reflections, and fine details

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, Product photography — Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Nano Banana Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID google/gemini-3-pro-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:19 PM. Source
Wan 2.6 Text to Image. Provider Together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Wan-AI/Wan2.6-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:29 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: d50770f426cac7920c9ffdaf210db2f11cdc51a8cf0b7ef52e6cd26850b1de70

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: 92d73f9638fa47ea30f0ceefdeb5eb2ca7d4a018b4b4835463bd0ea29d0495cf

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, image SHA 256: e8dbcfd0ce965814d72d676eddf74f723d476c1f78c5928c7b6efbc4eca4765e

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, request SHA 256: d1539f1db265e5a110b20b8585984ef534d0b89f51e83fd0fc51551832b669d1

Typography and layout

Legible text, hierarchy, and composition

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, Typography and layout — Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Nano Banana Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID google/gemini-3-pro-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:00 PM. Source
Wan 2.6 Text to Image. Provider Together, requested 1280x1280, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Wan-AI/Wan2.6-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:01 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: fc173de00b0df04772321167cfeabb55418d3d016081e7ebfb589c69a629b712

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: d686c572b086aa9f5d019886e8182c8f41c5d35bfb43bc6b6937feccba8a73eb

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, image SHA 256: 7e9557478ee297369d7680b31ab3b23a13c984981c0e0c922ef07372999122a7

Wan 2.6 Text to Image, request SHA 256: 2018571c876690a189c5076c520f09d03dd75a18ad6c52550cd51f854c30aa9d

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Nano Banana Pro and Wan 2.6 Text to Image with other important image models using the same benchmark and sample methodology.

View the complete image model comparison

Nano Banana Pro vs. Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Change image model selection

General specifications and task-specific pricing

Shared arena benchmarks

Sample images from documented runs

Character and detail

Infographic

Product photography

Typography and layout

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

Related image model comparisons