Head-to-head comparison

Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX.2 Pro

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series: 32
shared sample prompts: 4
latest arena retrieval: 2026-08-26

First image modelSecond image model

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Nano Banana Pro and FLUX.2 Pro
Attribute	Nano Banana Pro	FLUX.2 Pro
Provider	Google	Black Forest Labs
Released	November 2025	November 2025
Access	API, Web app	API, Web app
Lifecycle	No separate lifecycle notice	No separate lifecycle notice
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Parameters	Not published	Not published
Maximum output	4K	4 Megapixel
Arena configuration	Gemini 3 Pro Image	Pro
Text-to-image price	$134 per 1,000 images	$30 per 1,000 images
Editing price	$134 per 1,000 images	$45 per 1,000 images
Technical source	Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15	Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15

Nano Banana ProFLUX.2 Pro

Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels

Nano Banana Pro$134

FLUX.2 Pro$30

Image Editing ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels

Nano Banana Pro$134

FLUX.2 Pro$45

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

Every matchup includes the same four Gradually sample tasks. For each task, one archived first output from every model is ranked in three differently ordered, model-blind passes. The published 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. It must still be read as an n = 1 sample per model. This pair also shares 16 results from published research benchmarks.

Nano Banana ProFLUX.2 Pro

Gradually sample test: Typography and layoutMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Nano Banana Pro93.8 / 100

FLUX.2 Pro50.6 / 100

Gradually sample test: Product photographyMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Nano Banana Pro82.7 / 100

FLUX.2 Pro43.2 / 100

Gradually sample test: Character and detailMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Nano Banana Pro21 / 100

FLUX.2 Pro70.4 / 100

Gradually sample test: InfographicMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each

Nano Banana Pro42 / 100

FLUX.2 Pro24.7 / 100

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Capability benchmark scores for Nano Banana Pro and FLUX.2 Pro
Benchmark	Nano Banana Pro	FLUX.2 Pro
GRADE reasoning	Higher benchmark score77.5 / 100	38.9 / 100
GRADE consistency	Higher benchmark score89.5 / 100	55.5 / 100
GRADE readability	Higher benchmark score95.8 / 100	70.3 / 100
GRADE accuracy	Higher benchmark score46.2 / 100	4.4 / 100
GEBench Chinese, single-step	Higher benchmark score84.5 / 100	68.83 / 100
GEBench Chinese, multi-step	Higher benchmark score68.65 / 100	55.07 / 100
GEBench Chinese, fictional app	Higher benchmark score65.75 / 100	58.13 / 100
GEBench Chinese, real app	Higher benchmark score64.35 / 100	55.41 / 100
GEBench Chinese, grounding	Higher benchmark score64.83 / 100	50.24 / 100
GEBench Chinese, overall	Higher benchmark score69.62 / 100	57.54 / 100
GEBench English, single-step	Higher benchmark score84.32 / 100	61 / 100
GEBench English, multi-step	Higher benchmark score69.51 / 100	52.17 / 100
GEBench English, fictional app	46.33 / 100	Higher benchmark score49.92 / 100
GEBench English, real app	Higher benchmark score47.2 / 100	47.16 / 100
GEBench English, grounding	Higher benchmark score58.64 / 100	45.67 / 100
GEBench English, overall	Higher benchmark score61.2 / 100	51.18 / 100
Gradually sample test: Typography and layout	Higher blind-rank score93.8 / 100 Mean rank: 2.67 (5 / 1 / 2) Five rubric scores Headline: 1.67 / 2 Subline: 1.67 / 2 Text control: 1.67 / 2 Visual brief: 1.33 / 2 Layout: 1.33 / 2	50.6 / 100 Mean rank: 14.33 (11 / 22 / 10) Five rubric scores Headline: 1.67 / 2 Subline: 1.67 / 2 Text control: 1.67 / 2 Visual brief: 1 / 2 Layout: 1.33 / 2
Gradually sample test: Product photography	Higher blind-rank score82.7 / 100 Mean rank: 5.67 (7 / 8 / 2) Five rubric scores Subject: 1.33 / 2 Time: 1.33 / 2 Watch details: 1.33 / 2 Photography: 1.33 / 2 Exclusions: 1.33 / 2	43.2 / 100 Mean rank: 16.33 (13 / 22 / 14) Five rubric scores Subject: 1.33 / 2 Time: 1.33 / 2 Watch details: 1.33 / 2 Photography: 1.33 / 2 Exclusions: 1.33 / 2
Gradually sample test: Character and detail	21 / 100 Mean rank: 22.33 (20 / 24 / 23) Five rubric scores Scene: 1.33 / 2 Wardrobe: 1.33 / 2 Anatomy: 1 / 2 Props: 0.33 / 2 Environment: 1 / 2	Higher blind-rank score70.4 / 100 Mean rank: 9 (13 / 1 / 13) Five rubric scores Scene: 1.33 / 2 Wardrobe: 1.33 / 2 Anatomy: 1.33 / 2 Props: 1.33 / 2 Environment: 1.33 / 2
Gradually sample test: Infographic	Higher blind-rank score42 / 100 Mean rank: 16.67 (17 / 16 / 17) Five rubric scores Title: 1.67 / 2 Sequence: 1.67 / 2 Labels: 1 / 2 Diagram: 1.67 / 2 Clarity: 1 / 2	24.7 / 100 Mean rank: 21.33 (20 / 23 / 21) Five rubric scores Title: 1.67 / 2 Sequence: 1 / 2 Labels: 0.67 / 2 Diagram: 0.67 / 2 Clarity: 1 / 2
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

12 shared result series

Nano Banana ProFLUX.2 Pro

Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,298 Elo

FLUX.2 Pro1,208 Elo

Image Editing ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,246 Elo

FLUX.2 Pro1,170 Elo

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modelingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,230.042

FLUX.2 Pro1,149.387

LMArena Text to Image: ArtBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,224.748

FLUX.2 Pro1,163.048

LMArena Text to Image: CartoonBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,240.574

FLUX.2 Pro1,161.019

LMArena Text to Image: Commercial designBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,245.099

FLUX.2 Pro1,156.46

LMArena Text to Image: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,245.593

FLUX.2 Pro1,154.786

LMArena Text to Image: PhotorealismBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,260.121

FLUX.2 Pro1,151.499

LMArena Text to Image: PortraitsBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,258.035

FLUX.2 Pro1,146.513

LMArena Text to Image: Text renderingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,269.198

FLUX.2 Pro1,156.451

LMArena Image Editing: Multi-image editingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,363.811

FLUX.2 Pro1,238.237

LMArena Image Editing: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better

Nano Banana Pro1,389.596

FLUX.2 Pro1,244.295

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Nano Banana Pro and FLUX.2 Pro
Benchmark	Nano Banana Pro	FLUX.2 Pro	Source
Text to Image Arena	Higher score1,298 Elo Rank 7, 95% confidence interval: ±9, 13,840 ratings	1,208 Elo Rank 31, 95% confidence interval: ±9, 8,915 ratings	Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-26
Image Editing Arena	Higher score1,246 Elo Rank 10, 95% confidence interval: ±7, 11,029 ratings	1,170 Elo Rank 33, 95% confidence interval: ±7, 11,529 ratings	Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling	Higher score1,230.042 Rank 7, 95% confidence interval: ±7.01, 13,757 ratings	1,149.387 Rank 28, 95% confidence interval: ±6.29, 17,241 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Art	Higher score1,224.748 Rank 10, 95% confidence interval: ±6.22, 19,671 ratings	1,163.048 Rank 26, 95% confidence interval: ±5.76, 25,069 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon	Higher score1,240.574 Rank 11, 95% confidence interval: ±4.92, 56,045 ratings	1,161.019 Rank 27, 95% confidence interval: ±4.57, 66,010 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design	Higher score1,245.099 Rank 9, 95% confidence interval: ±4.81, 50,186 ratings	1,156.46 Rank 26, 95% confidence interval: ±4.31, 64,392 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Overall	Higher score1,245.593 Rank 10, 95% confidence interval: ±3.37, 138,756 ratings	1,154.786 Rank 26, 95% confidence interval: ±3.06, 175,196 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism	Higher score1,260.121 Rank 7, 95% confidence interval: ±4.77, 59,290 ratings	1,151.499 Rank 30, 95% confidence interval: ±4.29, 74,515 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits	Higher score1,258.035 Rank 11, 95% confidence interval: ±5.76, 31,463 ratings	1,146.513 Rank 31, 95% confidence interval: ±5.23, 39,262 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering	Higher score1,269.198 Rank 9, 95% confidence interval: ±5.14, 46,529 ratings	1,156.451 Rank 27, 95% confidence interval: ±4.5, 59,326 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Image Editing: Multi-image editing	Higher score1,363.811 Rank 6, 95% confidence interval: ±3.91, 189,338 ratings	1,238.237 Rank 20, 95% confidence interval: ±3.8, 171,464 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Image Editing: Overall	Higher score1,389.596 Rank 8, 95% confidence interval: ±2.85, 517,418 ratings	1,244.295 Rank 30, 95% confidence interval: ±2.8, 497,149 ratings	LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

Largely standardized comparison protocol. Both models receive the same archived prompt, exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier, and prompt processing can still differ. These images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Nano Banana Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID google/gemini-3-pro-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:20 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: eed53dcc080d2710e6e890382f6273382a12e2c5b079b8813962bff0c92b5df7

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: 12c91e972a7256b1386b22420c0c84e30b85ac6e07830eea944755e5bd9742fc

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: 9eec1a6900b6031703d2e797b93c2aba6c5f45b4807b560a0bf1e37eac9e20f2

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 8c40a10f47e1407d26ab10f5c9d815e533bce798cf0adf5a9c1e6ddfc3f3584e

Infographic

Numbers, labels, and visual organization

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: 4ff7d3965d18e197f00647c35d6aed5a86a376c92779ee9e748c598aebafa51d

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: a69a5193f107aac4f7532f021fc4306c0907470f40f984d0b263728e292d8f1b

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: ea47f772cdfa26bf21528ae7e09d245eb7a3be7d3185af15cedd7d21acdfbb09

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 9ef85d9cf32f0f9b974eeb0b389c1fbf1403f4e266af0ce98e0ca83da0fe23c1

Product photography

Materials, reflections, and fine details

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Nano Banana Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID google/gemini-3-pro-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:19 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: d50770f426cac7920c9ffdaf210db2f11cdc51a8cf0b7ef52e6cd26850b1de70

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: 92d73f9638fa47ea30f0ceefdeb5eb2ca7d4a018b4b4835463bd0ea29d0495cf

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: 4d9b922f59b329c5ac3532222c8e340e7fdcb1920ce6f03ad9299f25a6beec43

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 96c65fc91b32da0a02970457fbf90c6928e1f7a5b45177fa3ef08f8bc32c9b82

Typography and layout

Legible text, hierarchy, and composition

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Nano Banana Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID google/gemini-3-pro-image, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:00 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:02 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Nano Banana Pro, image SHA 256: fc173de00b0df04772321167cfeabb55418d3d016081e7ebfb589c69a629b712

Nano Banana Pro, request SHA 256: d686c572b086aa9f5d019886e8182c8f41c5d35bfb43bc6b6937feccba8a73eb

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: 5a5d8ccd657d7522bc39fdec4b0aecf198b42c282a5aefde9461239dfe5c0396

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 3e170f568fe4b6040423f0df065d9227f586d5da3d911a4251bcc368dfe333c0

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Nano Banana Pro and FLUX.2 Pro with other important image models using the same benchmark and sample methodology.

View the complete image model comparison

Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX.2 Pro

Change image model selection

General specifications and task-specific pricing

Shared capability benchmarks

Shared arena benchmarks

Sample images

Character and detail

Infographic

Product photography

Typography and layout

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

Related image model comparisons