Skip to main content

Microsoft AIImage modelPreview

MAI-Image-2.6

MAI-Image-2.6 is rank 4 of 21 in the arena rating and rank 28 of 108 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingRank 4 of 21

1,329User voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 28 of 108

68our own rating0 to 100

PriceRank 10 of 28

$0.039per imagelower is better

PopularityRank 185 of 875

45out of 100same as last month

Summary

At $0.039 per image it is fairly cheap; a typical image model costs $0.06.

MAI-Image-2.6 combines text-to-image generation in Microsoft Foundry with precise image-to-image editing. Microsoft documents targeted changes to objects, layouts, and text, motion-blur cleanup, aspect ratios derived from prompt and image inputs, and current Bing results as image context.

Output is PNG, with at least 768 pixels on each side and at most 2,359,296 pixels in total. The published configuration also lists a 32,000-token context window. MAI-Image-2.6 remains in preview, uses proprietary weights, and is tied to Microsoft Foundry. It is not a downloadable local checkpoint.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Character and detailOpen Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039287.

Open source
InfographicOpen Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039317.

Open source
Product photographyOpen Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039292.

Open source
Typography and layoutOpen Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through openrouter with model ID microsoft/mai-image-2.6. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1, provider default resolution, received 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, actual cost $0.039252.

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 41 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 4

Published benchmarks

Text to image

Text to Image Arena

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

GPT Image 21,188.55 Elo
MAI-Image-2.61,166.73 Elo
Nano Banana 21,140.04 Elo
Muse Image1,126.51 Elo
GPT Image 1.51,122.98 Elo
MAI-Image-2.51,118.46 Elo
Nano Banana Pro1,117.96 Elo
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,106.52 Elo
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,101.34 Elo
Qwen-Image-2.11,043.13 Elo
Krea 2 Large1,034.15 Elo
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro1,030.07 Elo
FLUX.2 Flex1,026.13 Elo
FLUX.2 Max1,020.74 Elo
Ideogram 4.51,016.15 Elo
FLUX.2 Pro1,002.84 Elo
Ideogram 4.01,002.25 Elo
FLUX.2 Klein 9B929.74 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,222.56 Elo

Source: Artificial Analysis
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
30
Methodology and context
AA appearances: 8395. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 6. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-text-to-image-v2.1-2026-11-03-b02bfcda6707. Source payload hash: b02bfcda6707b185b316c6b1c2e00ef9efe82010f1e2f2903d32096adb7e1cd9
Source: Artificial Analysis

LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,416.06 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,378.01 points
GPT Image 21,362.88 points
MAI-Image-2.61,325.39 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,291.64 points
Reve 2.11,280.92 points
Nano Banana 21,254.79 points
MAI-Image-2.51,251.32 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,247.62 points
Muse Image1,238.77 points
Nano Banana Pro1,232.98 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,225.57 points
GPT Image 1.51,217.58 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,213.34 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,172.95 points
FLUX.2 Max1,160.31 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,144.63 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,121.95 points
Krea 2 Large1,115.16 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,078.47 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,416.06 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
2,821
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Agentic image generation

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,396.62 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,358.45 points
GPT Image 21,338.59 points
MAI-Image-2.61,313.89 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,285.91 points
Nano Banana 21,256.3 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,241.22 points
GPT Image 1.51,236.53 points
Muse Image1,236.35 points
Nano Banana Pro1,234.68 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,230.55 points
Krea 2 Large1,143.91 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,136.63 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,110.85 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,396.62 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
14
Sample
2,359
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Art

GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,386.82 points
GPT Image 21,369.63 points
MAI-Image-2.61,337.16 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,326.14 points
Reve 2.11,290.95 points
MAI-Image-2.51,276.56 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,259.09 points
Muse Image1,257.69 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,255.76 points
Nano Banana 21,240.58 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,234.02 points
GPT Image 1.51,224.88 points
Nano Banana Pro1,223.81 points
FLUX.2 Max1,168.71 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,159.46 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,155.25 points
Krea 2 Large1,123.59 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,116.18 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,078.57 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,408.7 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
4,856
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,456.05 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,430.72 points
GPT Image 21,402.35 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,352.28 points
MAI-Image-2.61,348.23 points
Reve 2.11,309.62 points
Muse Image1,275.92 points
MAI-Image-2.51,268.84 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,264.27 points
Nano Banana 21,259.12 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,256.28 points
GPT Image 1.51,243.84 points
Nano Banana Pro1,243.18 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,233.67 points
FLUX.2 Max1,167.46 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,163.21 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,158.68 points
Krea 2 Large1,119.32 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,118.17 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,063.56 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,456.05 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
13,098
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,418.65 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,386.73 points
GPT Image 21,385.11 points
MAI-Image-2.61,331.62 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,325.93 points
Reve 2.11,315.28 points
Nano Banana 21,267.45 points
MAI-Image-2.51,259.29 points
Muse Image1,259.08 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,248.33 points
Nano Banana Pro1,245.72 points
GPT Image 1.51,237.8 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,237.63 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,235.73 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,172.42 points
FLUX.2 Max1,163.76 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,154.32 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,129.14 points
Krea 2 Large1,110.75 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,070.23 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,418.65 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
10,174
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Overall

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,427.39 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,401.27 points
GPT Image 21,381.28 points
MAI-Image-2.61,328.65 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,316.57 points
Reve 2.11,300.12 points
Muse Image1,268.83 points
Nano Banana 21,256.98 points
MAI-Image-2.51,253 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,250.44 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,249.44 points
Nano Banana Pro1,246.19 points
GPT Image 1.51,236.25 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,225.11 points
FLUX.2 Max1,161.4 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,156.21 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,152.7 points
Krea 2 Large1,115.21 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,114.76 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,069.79 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,427.39 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
34,596
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,432.65 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,414.92 points
GPT Image 21,378.3 points
MAI-Image-2.61,329.8 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,311.03 points
Reve 2.11,301.89 points
Muse Image1,280.83 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,273.76 points
Nano Banana 21,261.86 points
Nano Banana Pro1,260.53 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,258.76 points
MAI-Image-2.51,250.53 points
GPT Image 1.51,246.82 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,226.53 points
FLUX.2 Max1,160.89 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,151.41 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,145.43 points
Krea 2 Large1,128.62 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,109.13 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,090.95 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,432.65 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
12,022
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Portraits

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,461.04 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,438.88 points
GPT Image 21,425.97 points
MAI-Image-2.61,338.94 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,331.53 points
Reve 2.11,316.28 points
Muse Image1,293.55 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,286.27 points
GPT Image 1.51,259.26 points
Nano Banana 21,256.64 points
Nano Banana Pro1,256.22 points
MAI-Image-2.51,254.66 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,251.64 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,244.36 points
FLUX.2 Max1,156.6 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,143.86 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,143.83 points
Krea 2 Large1,122.8 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,105.43 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,091.81 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,461.04 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
6,165
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,465.68 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,435.32 points
GPT Image 21,423.28 points
MAI-Image-2.61,364.74 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,349.28 points
Reve 2.11,339.17 points
Nano Banana 21,293.57 points
Muse Image1,293.25 points
MAI-Image-2.51,280.64 points
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,273.68 points
Nano Banana Pro1,270.84 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,254.68 points
GPT Image 1.51,251.49 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,250.45 points
FLUX.2 Flex1,171.52 points
FLUX.2 Max1,165.47 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,154.74 points
HiDream-O1-Image1,133.86 points
Krea 2 Large1,116.56 points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,057.75 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,465.68 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
10,580
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source: LMArena

Image editing

Image Editing Arena

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

MAI-Image-2.61,150.73 Elo
GPT Image 21,136.54 Elo
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,129.33 Elo
Muse Image1,129.11 Elo
MAI-Image-2.51,126.67 Elo
Nano Banana 21,124.08 Elo
GPT Image 1.51,118.78 Elo
Nano Banana Pro1,108.9 Elo
Qwen-Image-2.11,081.38 Elo
Ideogram 4.51,068.66 Elo
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro1,058.03 Elo
Nano Banana 2 Lite1,055.27 Elo
FLUX.2 Klein 9B1,015.61 Elo
FLUX.2 Pro1,013.07 Elo
FLUX.2 Flex1,001.91 Elo
FLUX.2 Max998.74 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,199.48 Elo

Source: Artificial Analysis
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
24
Methodology and context
AA appearances: 16713. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 7. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-image-editing-v2.1-2026-11-03-3c9ca7a083ad. Source payload hash: 3c9ca7a083ada0be4f50daced49cc4d1282114c6ba75a56557795b4ea75aa6f5
Source: Artificial Analysis

LMArena Image Editing: Agentic image generation

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,528.73 points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,495.45 points
GPT Image 21,458.81 points
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,431.88 points
MAI-Image-2.61,416.16 points
Nano Banana Pro1,409.95 points
Seedream 5.0 Pro1,409.44 points
Muse Image1,393.39 points
Nano Banana 21,377.25 points
Qwen-Image-2.11,367.91 points
GPT Image 1.51,358.38 points
Ideogram 4.51,295.89 points
FLUX.2 Pro1,215.6 points

higher is betterAs of October 28, 2026Scale: 0 points - 1,528.73 points

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
arena-score
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
13
Sample
2,807
Methodology and context
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-image_edit-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-efe70ea24802. Source payload hash: efe70ea24802bd2e7db887a8fc6562f6c29ecdda5c404685383a91e28cc6f17d
Source: LMArena

Recorded measurement details

Text to Image Arena (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1166.73
Score
1166.73
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Benchmark version
v2.1
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Confidence interval
12
Lower confidence bound
1154.73
Upper confidence bound
1178.73
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
AA appearances: 8395. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 6. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-text-to-image-v2.1-2026-11-03-b02bfcda6707. Source payload hash: b02bfcda6707b185b316c6b1c2e00ef9efe82010f1e2f2903d32096adb7e1cd9
USD price per 1,000 tokens
38.912
Source Artificial Analysis
Image Editing Arena (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1150.73
Score
1150.73
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Benchmark version
v2.1
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
6
Confidence interval
12
Lower confidence bound
1138.73
Upper confidence bound
1162.73
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
AA appearances: 16713. This count does not establish an independent sample. Lower rank: 4. Upper rank: 7. Source model ID: 5d931c2e-797e-406e-8eb9-83ce18b5710c. Evidence capture ID: aa-image-image-editing-v2.1-2026-11-03-3c9ca7a083ad. Source payload hash: 3c9ca7a083ada0be4f50daced49cc4d1282114c6ba75a56557795b4ea75aa6f5
USD price per 1,000 tokens
38.912
Source Artificial Analysis
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1325.3875978614046
Score
1325.3875978614046
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
2821
Confidence interval
11.853953
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Agentic image generation (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1313.8927024061827
Score
1313.8927024061827
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
2359
Confidence interval
15.437993
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Art (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1337.1640445169219
Score
1337.1640445169219
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
4856
Confidence interval
9.59299
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1348.2308823920966
Score
1348.2308823920966
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
13098
Confidence interval
7.269105
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1331.6184354347004
Score
1331.6184354347004
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
10174
Confidence interval
7.674673
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1328.6451815813434
Score
1328.6451815813434
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
34596
Confidence interval
5.380031
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1329.79568329776
Score
1329.79568329776
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
12022
Confidence interval
7.422004
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1338.942943482015
Score
1338.942943482015
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
6165
Confidence interval
9.151663
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1364.743687664083
Score
1364.743687664083
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
10580
Confidence interval
7.779766
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-text_to_image-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-32972b5ffdc5. Source payload hash: 32972b5ffdc597e97f4dc7e2bad6b89fd6020216e049e066a6dbc55f74233037
Source LMArena
LMArena Image Editing: Agentic image generation (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1416.15967495405
Score
1416.15967495405
Metric
arena-score
Unit
score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
2807
Confidence interval
14.35863
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
LMArena
Retrieved at
2026-10-28
Methodology
Evidence capture ID: lmarena-image_edit-6852ae7aa7c105ff8cf86bb1551d1b1fd52f9dd3-efe70ea24802. Source payload hash: efe70ea24802bd2e7db887a8fc6562f6c29ecdda5c404685383a91e28cc6f17d
Source LMArena

Page 1 of 4

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 100 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

MAI-Image-2.6FLUX.2 Klein 9BHunyuanImage 3.0 InstructGPT Image 2FLUX.2 Flex

MAI-Image-2.6 compared

Compare with another model

Predecessor and successor

  • No predecessor recorded for MAI-Image-2.6
  • MAI-Image-2.6 has no successor yet

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT Image 2 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  2. 2Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  3. 3GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  4. 4Reve 2.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  5. 5Nano Banana 2 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  6. 6Midjourney V8.2 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  7. 7GPT Image 1.5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  8. 8MAI-Image-2.5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  9. 9Nano Banana Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
Show all 139 comparisons
  1. 10Nano Banana 2 Lite vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  2. 11Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  3. 12Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  4. 13FLUX.2 Max vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  5. 14Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  6. 15MAI-Image-2.5 Flash vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  7. 16HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  8. 17Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  9. 18Seedream 4.0 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  10. 19Krea 2 Large vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  11. 20Luma Uni-1.1 Max vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  12. 21FLUX.2 Flex vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  13. 22Recraft V4.1 Utility vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  14. 23Ideogram 4.0 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  15. 24Wan 2.6 Text to Image vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  16. 25FLUX.2 Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  17. 26HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  18. 27FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  19. 28HiDream-O1-Image vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  20. 29Firefly Image Model 5 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  21. 30Midjourney V8.1 vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  22. 31Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  23. 32GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. MAI-Image-2.6
  24. 33MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MAI-Image-2.6 Flash
  25. 34MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Muse Image
  26. 35MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Grok Imagine Image 2.0
  27. 36MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX 3 Image
  28. 37MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX 3 Image Klein
  29. 38MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Nano Banana 2.1
  30. 39MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Ideogram 4.5
  31. 40MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Hy Image 3.5 Preview
  32. 41MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Ming-Image-0.1-Design
  33. 42MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Recraft V4.1
  34. 43MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Recraft V4.1 Flash
  35. 44MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Bria FIBO 2
  36. 45MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Krea 3
  37. 46MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro
  38. 47MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 3.0
  39. 48MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Pro
  40. 49MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
  41. 50MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Wan 2.7 Image Pro
  42. 51MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Wan 2.7 Image
  43. 52MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Seedream 5.0 Flash
  44. 53MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SenseNova U1.5 Lite
  45. 54MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kling Image 3.0
  46. 55MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kling Image 3.0 Omni
  47. 56MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Vidu Q2 Image
  48. 57MAI-Image-2.6 vs. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Pro
  49. 58MAI-Image-2.6 vs. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash
  50. 59MAI-Image-2.6 vs. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite
  51. 60MAI-Image-2.6 vs. GLM-Image
  52. 61MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MiniMax Image-01
  53. 62MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Z-Image Turbo
  54. 63MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Luma Uni-1.1
  55. 64MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Runway Gen-4 Image
  56. 65MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Runway Gen-4 Image Turbo
  57. 66MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Leonardo Phoenix 1.0
  58. 67MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Leonardo Lucid Origin
  59. 68MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Leonardo Lucid Realism
  60. 69MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 3
  61. 70MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4
  62. 71MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra
  63. 72MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium
  64. 73MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo
  65. 74MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash
  66. 75MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Xingliu Star-3
  67. 76MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MiracleVision V6
  68. 77MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Hy Image 3.0
  69. 78MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Bria FIBO Lite
  70. 79MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Mystic 2.5
  71. 80MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Mystic 2.5 Flexible
  72. 81MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Mystic 2.5 Fluid
  73. 82MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro
  74. 83MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Seedream 4.5
  75. 84MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Seedream 5.0 Lite
  76. 85MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kling Image O1
  77. 86MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Image Core
  78. 87MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Image Ultra
  79. 88MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview
  80. 89MAI-Image-2.6 vs. GPT Image 1 Mini
  81. 90MAI-Image-2.6 vs. ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)
  82. 91MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
  83. 92MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.2 Klein 4B
  84. 93MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.2 Dev
  85. 94MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro]
  86. 95MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  87. 96MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.1 [dev]
  88. 97MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
  89. 98MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
  90. 99MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion XL 1.0
  91. 100MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion 3 Medium
  92. 101MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SDXL Turbo
  93. 102MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Stable Diffusion Turbo
  94. 103MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Midjourney V7
  95. 104MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Niji 7
  96. 105MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Grok Imagine Image 1.0
  97. 106MAI-Image-2.6 vs. HUMAIN Image 1
  98. 107MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MOSS-Image-Base
  99. 108MAI-Image-2.6 vs. MOSS-Image-SFT
  100. 109MAI-Image-2.6 vs. LLaDA-Image
  101. 110MAI-Image-2.6 vs. LLaDA-Image-Turbo
  102. 111MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Nucleus-Image
  103. 112MAI-Image-2.6 vs. LongCat-Image
  104. 113MAI-Image-2.6 vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT
  105. 114MAI-Image-2.6 vs. OmniGen2
  106. 115MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Emu3.5-Image
  107. 116MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT
  108. 117MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain
  109. 118MAI-Image-2.6 vs. NextStep-1.1
  110. 119MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  111. 120MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
  112. 121MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px
  113. 122MAI-Image-2.6 vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px
  114. 123MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
  115. 124MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px
  116. 125MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Chroma1-HD
  117. 126MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Chroma1-Flash
  118. 127MAI-Image-2.6 vs. AuraFlow v0.3
  119. 128MAI-Image-2.6 vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
  120. 129MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Lumina-Image 2.0
  121. 130MAI-Image-2.6 vs. HART-0.7B-1024px
  122. 131MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Janus-Pro-1B
  123. 132MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Janus-Pro-7B
  124. 133MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Show-o2-1.5B-HQ
  125. 134MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Kandinsky 3.1
  126. 135MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Anima Base v1.0
  127. 136MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Krea 2 Raw
  128. 137MAI-Image-2.6 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0
  129. 138MAI-Image-2.6 vs. HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct Distil
  130. 139MAI-Image-2.6 vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Input and output

Context window
32,000 tokens
no source
Maximum output
2,359,296 pixels
Source: Maximum output

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Proprietary
Source: Weights
Lifecycle
Preview in Microsoft Foundry
Source: Lifecycle

Further details

Image capabilities
Text-to-image generation and precise image-to-image editing
Source: Image capabilities
Editing controls
Target objects, layouts, and text, and clean up motion blur
Source: Editing controls
Output format and size
PNG, at least 768 pixels on each side and at most 2,359,296 pixels in total
Source: Output format and size
Aspect ratio
Can choose the aspect ratio from the prompt and image inputs
Source: Aspect ratio
Web grounding
Can use current Bing Search results as additional image context
Source: Web grounding
API authentication
Microsoft Entra ID or an API key
Source: API authentication

Prices

Representative price
$0.038912 per imageSource
OpenRouter (microsoft/mai-image-2.6)
$0.06 per image (estimated)Source

Frequently asked questions about MAI-Image-2.6

How good is MAI-Image-2.6?

Rank 4 of 21 in the arena rating. Rank 28 of 108 in our own test.

Arena rating from Oct 28, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026

Arena ratingfrom user votes · higher is better
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1,427
GPT Image 2.5 Flare1,401
GPT Image 21,381
MAI-Image-2.6Rank 4 of 211,329
Grok Imagine Image 2.01,317
Reve 2.11,300
Muse Image1,269
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)69
MAI-Image-2.569
FLUX.2 Max69
MAI-Image-2.6Rank 28 of 10868
GPT Image 1.568
Qwen Image 3.068
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash67

What is MAI-Image-2.6 good at?

Best at Product photography (88 out of 100), weakest at Infographic (61).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

  1. MAI-Image-2.6: Typography and layoutTypography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition62out of 100Rank 45 of 108 in this task
  2. MAI-Image-2.6: Product photographyProduct photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details88out of 100Rank 7 of 108 in this task
  3. MAI-Image-2.6: Character and detailCharacter and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency63out of 100Rank 34 of 108 in this task
  4. MAI-Image-2.6: InfographicInfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization61out of 100Rank 51 of 108 in this task

How much does an image with MAI-Image-2.6 cost?

About $0.039 per image. That is fairly cheap: a typical image model costs $0.06.

Price per imageDollars per image · lower is better
FLUX.2 Pro$0.03
Nano Banana 2 Lite$0.034
Recraft V4.1 Utility$0.035
MAI-Image-2.6Rank 10 of 28$0.039
HiDream-O1-Image$0.04
MAI-Image-2.5$0.048
Grok Imagine Image Quality$0.05

Sources and data date

Show all 24 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
LMArena001

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 1 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 17, 2026. 11 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

exact-serving-revision

Note

The evaluator shows the exact product row but does not disclose an API route or serving checkpoint revision.

Additional sourceMicrosoft AI (retrieved September 24, 2026) · Microsoft Foundry MAI-Image-2.6 catalog · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceImage pricing (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026; November 3, 2026)
Additional sourceLifecycle data · Microsoft Foundry July and August 2026 updates · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceMicrosoft AI (retrieved September 24, 2026) · Microsoft Foundry MAI image deployment guide · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 23, 2026; October 28, 2026; November 3, 2026)
Additional sourceLMArena (retrieved October 28, 2026)12
Additional sourceGradually-Bildtest (retrieved November 3, 2026)
Additional sourceArena (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceQuantslant (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional sourceArena.ai Text-to-Image leaderboard (retrieved October 21, 2026; October 23, 2026)
Additional sourceMicrosoft AI (retrieved October 22, 2026)
Additional sourceDesignArena (retrieved October 23, 2026; October 24, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 23, 2026)12
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0