Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Nano Banana Pro vs. MAI-Image-2.6 Flash

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series
2
shared sample prompts
0
latest arena retrieval
2026-09-22

Change image model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Nano Banana Pro and MAI-Image-2.6 Flash
AttributeNano Banana ProMAI-Image-2.6 Flash
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft AI
ReleasedNovember 2025July 31, 2026
AccessAPI, Web appAPI
LifecycleNo separate lifecycle noticePreview in Microsoft Foundry Status source
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Maximum output4K2,359,296 pixels
Arena configurationGemini 3 Pro ImageNo separate configuration named
Text-to-image price$134 per 1,000 images$19.5 per 1,000 images
Editing price$134 per 1,000 images$19.5 per 1,000 images
Technical sourceModel sourceVerified 2026-08-15Model sourceVerified 2026-09-24
Nano Banana ProMAI-Image-2.6 Flash
Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Nano Banana Pro$134
MAI-Image-2.6 FlashLower price$19.5
Image Editing ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Nano Banana Pro$134
MAI-Image-2.6 FlashLower price$19.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

These exact checkpoints have not both completed the fixed Gradually sample protocol. Earlier checkpoints do not substitute for them. No exact shared result from the integrated research benchmarks is available for this pair.

No shared Gradually ranking yet

A score appears only after both exact checkpoints complete all four fixed prompts and the same blind evaluation.

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

2 shared result series
Nano Banana ProMAI-Image-2.6 Flash
Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Nano Banana ProTie1,100 Elo
MAI-Image-2.6 FlashTie1,100 Elo
Image Editing ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Nano Banana Pro1,096 Elo
MAI-Image-2.6 FlashHigher score1,124 Elo

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Nano Banana Pro and MAI-Image-2.6 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana ProMAI-Image-2.6 FlashSource
Text to Image Arena
Tie1,100 Elo
Rank 10, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 15,977 ratings
Tie1,100 Elo
Rank 11, 95% confidence interval: ±10, 5,636 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-09-22
Image Editing Arena
1,096 Elo
Rank 13, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 13,170 ratings
Higher score1,124 Elo
Rank 4, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 10,342 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-09-22

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

No shared documented run yet

The fixed test suite covers typography, product photography, character details, and an infographic. A prompt appears only after both models have a verifiable first run.

Missing image run for MAI-Image-2.6 Flash

Missing prompts. Typography and layout, Product photography, Character and detail, Infographic.

No results with the four fixed test prompts are available for this model yet.

Next step. Run the four fixed prompts with this model, archive the first outputs, and evaluate them blind.

Documentation

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Nano Banana Pro and MAI-Image-2.6 Flash with other important image models under the same evidence rules. Each page shows only exact shared measurements and samples.

View the complete image model comparison