Skip to main content

Black Forest LabsImage model

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is rank 83 of 108 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingnot rated

n/aUser voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 83 of 108

31our own rating0 to 100

Priceno price

n/aper imagelower is better

PopularityRank 670 of 875

0out of 100first value

Summary

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra is an image model from Black Forest Labs. The current BFL API lists POST /v1/flux-pro-1.1-ultra as the Ultra mode of FLUX1.1 [pro]. It is a selectable service variant, not a proven new checkpoint.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Character and detailOpen Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=3831910390, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
InfographicOpen Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=1664027293, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
Product photographyOpen Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=291934417, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source
Typography and layoutOpen Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra. Archived settings were aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=1909595532, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale).

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 4 published benchmark results

Published benchmarks

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Nano Banana 299.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex98.1 rank points
FLUX 3 Image96 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility95.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image94.1 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite93.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni92.8 rank points
Nano Banana Pro91.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max91.6 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash88.5 rank points
Grok Imagine Image Quality88.2 rank points
Krea 2 Large86.3 rank points
Firefly Image Model 585.7 rank points
Muse Image85.7 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein84.4 rank points
Seedream 4.583.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.582.2 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite82.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro81 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro81 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct78.8 rank points
Krea 377.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.575.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite75.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max75.1 rank points
GPT Image 274.5 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.073.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.172.3 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo71.3 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro71 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.070.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash70.1 rank points
Recraft V4.169.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro68.9 rank points
Bria FIBO 268.5 rank points
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)68.2 rank points
ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)67.9 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini67.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.067.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.167 rank points
Seedream 4.064.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662 rank points
GPT Image 1.559.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview55.8 rank points
Reve 2.153.9 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst53.6 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash53.6 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.153.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image51.4 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base50.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo50.8 rank points
GLM-Image50.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev49.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]45.5 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]42.1 rank points
LongCat-Image41.4 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image41.1 rank points
Z-Image Turbo39.6 rank points
Nucleus-Image38.3 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro38.3 rank points
MiniMax Image-0137.4 rank points
Chroma1-HD36.4 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.5 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro35.5 rank points
Z-Image Base32.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B32.4 rank points
Qwen Image 3.032.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B31.8 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3 Medium30.8 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large30.8 rank points
OmniGen229.6 rank points
Ideogram 4.528.3 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.8 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo25.5 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra21.8 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium21.8 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT21.5 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT21.2 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 420.6 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px20.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]19 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.018.4 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo18.1 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image18.1 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra16.2 rank points
Chroma1-Flash16.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]16.2 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain16.2 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px15.9 rank points
Midjourney V8.114.3 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.012.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.311.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT11.2 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base9 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px8.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo7.8 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 36.9 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.05 rank points
SDXL Turbo3.4 rank points
PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS3.1 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px3.1 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo0 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Product photography

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash90.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large90 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo89.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.189.7 rank points
GPT Image 289.4 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite88.8 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct88.2 rank points
MAI-Image-2.688.2 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT87.9 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image87.9 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite87.2 rank points
Qwen Image 3.087.2 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B86.6 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst86.6 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro86.6 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT85.7 rank points
Bria FIBO 283.8 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite83.5 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro83.2 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.081.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B80.7 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo80.7 rank points
Muse Image80.7 rank points
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)80.7 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash76.9 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro76.9 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein74.8 rank points
Reve 2.173.8 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini73.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview72.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro71.3 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max71 rank points
Recraft V4.171 rank points
MAI-Image-2.570.1 rank points
Nano Banana Pro70.1 rank points
Nano Banana 2.169.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare69.2 rank points
ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)68.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.568.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.067.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex62.6 rank points
Krea 362.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image62 rank points
Nucleus-Image62 rank points
Kling Image 3.060.4 rank points
Luma Uni-1.159.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Max58.6 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro58.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro57.9 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain57.9 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash57.6 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image53.9 rank points
GPT Image 1.552.3 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.550.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.149.5 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]46.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev46.4 rank points
Firefly Image Model 545.8 rank points
Nano Banana 244.9 rank points
Seedream 4.044.2 rank points
Seedream 4.544.2 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni39.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image Quality37.1 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base36.1 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash36.1 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]35.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro35.8 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite35.2 rank points
LLaDA-Image35.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.033.6 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.7 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility32.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image32.4 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image31.1 rank points
MiniMax Image-0129.9 rank points
OmniGen229.9 rank points
Z-Image Turbo29.9 rank points
LongCat-Image29.3 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium29 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]28.7 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra28.3 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo26.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.8 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3 Medium25.9 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]25.5 rank points
Ideogram 4.022.1 rank points
Z-Image Base21.5 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px19 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large16.5 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra15.9 rank points
Chroma1-HD15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS15.9 rank points
Chroma1-Flash15.6 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview15.3 rank points
AuraFlow v0.315 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT15 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 314.6 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo14.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 413.7 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.012.8 rank points
GLM-Image9 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo5.6 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px1.2 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo1.2 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

GPT Image 1.588.8 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro88.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro86.9 rank points
Krea 384.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev81.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni81.6 rank points
Reve 2.180.1 rank points
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)79.4 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image78.5 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro78.2 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex75.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.075.1 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT74.1 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro74.1 rank points
Seedream 4.072.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 572.3 rank points
Z-Image Base71 rank points
Z-Image Turbo71 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite70.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Max70.4 rank points
FLUX 3 Image69.5 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash67.9 rank points
Ideogram 4.567.6 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein66.4 rank points
Nucleus-Image66.4 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility66.4 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT65.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro64.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro64.8 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst64.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare63.2 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image63.2 rank points
MAI-Image-2.662.9 rank points
LLaDA-Image62.6 rank points
Qwen Image 3.061.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B61.1 rank points
Muse Image61.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.060.7 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max60.4 rank points
GPT Image 260.1 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Pro60.1 rank points
Kling Image 3.059.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.058.9 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.558.3 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct57.9 rank points
ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)57 rank points
Nano Banana 2.156.7 rank points
Grok Imagine Image Quality55.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.554.8 rank points
Krea 2 Large54.2 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]52.6 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo52.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 452.3 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash52 rank points
Midjourney V8.151.4 rank points
GLM-Image51.1 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo51.1 rank points
Chroma1-Flash50.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]50.2 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview49.5 rank points
Luma Uni-1.148.6 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite48.6 rank points
Bria FIBO 248.3 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra48 rank points
Recraft V4.148 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo47.7 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite47.4 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3 Medium45.8 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base45.5 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview45.2 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra45.2 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image45.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash42.4 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]39.3 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B38.9 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image38.9 rank points
Nano Banana Pro37.1 rank points
Seedream 4.537.1 rank points
Nano Banana 236.4 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite34.9 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.133.6 rank points
MiniMax Image-0132.7 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT32.4 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium31.1 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini30.8 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo29.9 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.028 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]27.1 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 326.8 rank points
PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS26.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px26.2 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image26.2 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.024.3 rank points
LongCat-Image24.3 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.023.4 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large23.1 rank points
Chroma1-HD16.5 rank points
AuraFlow v0.316.2 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain14 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px8.7 rank points
OmniGen27.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base7.5 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo5 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px4 rank points
SDXL Turbo2.8 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px0.3 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Infographic

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Seedream 5.0 Pro99.1 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst97.2 rank points
GPT Image 2.5 Flare91 rank points
Luma Uni-1.189.4 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo88.8 rank points
Qwen Image 3.088.8 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image Pro88.5 rank points
Muse Image86.3 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Flash86 rank points
Ideogram 4.585.4 rank points
Reve 2.184.7 rank points
Qwen-Image-2.182.9 rank points
ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)82.6 rank points
MAI-Image-2.5 Flash81.3 rank points
SenseNova U1.5 Lite80.4 rank points
Wan 2.7 Image79.4 rank points
Krea 2 Medium Turbo78.8 rank points
Luma Uni-1.1 Max78.8 rank points
Bria FIBO 278.2 rank points
FLUX 3 Image Klein77.3 rank points
Wan 2.6 Text to Image77.3 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 1.076.9 rank points
Grok Imagine Image 2.076.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image-1.576.3 rank points
Krea 2 Large75.7 rank points
MOSS-Image-SFT75.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview74.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro74.5 rank points
Krea 373.8 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Flash73.8 rank points
MAI-Image-2.6 Flash73.5 rank points
Recraft V4.173.2 rank points
Ideogram 4.072.6 rank points
FLUX.2 Dev72 rank points
GPT Image 1.571.7 rank points
Hy Image 3.5 Preview70.7 rank points
MOSS-Image-Base70.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.569.2 rank points
FLUX 3 Image68.5 rank points
Seedream 4.067.3 rank points
GPT Image 266.4 rank points
Nano Banana 2 Lite65.7 rank points
Nano Banana Pro64.8 rank points
Nano Banana 2.164.2 rank points
Recraft V4.1 Utility63.9 rank points
Nano Banana 263.2 rank points
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro62 rank points
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro61.7 rank points
Qwen Image 3.0 Pro61.7 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct61.1 rank points
Grok Imagine Image Quality60.7 rank points
MAI-Image-2.660.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Flex57 rank points
Seedream 5.0 Lite55.8 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [max]53.9 rank points
FLUX.2 Max53.6 rank points
FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]52.6 rank points
Kling Image 3.051.4 rank points
FLUX.2 Pro44.6 rank points
HiDream-O1-Image42.7 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 9B41.7 rank points
FLUX.1 [dev]39.9 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large38.6 rank points
Z-Image Turbo37.4 rank points
Vidu Q2 Image37.1 rank points
LongCat-Image36.8 rank points
HunyuanImage 3.036.1 rank points
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)36.1 rank points
LLaDA-Image-Turbo35.8 rank points
Midjourney V8.135.2 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3 Medium34.3 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT33 rank points
LLaDA-Image32.7 rank points
Runway Gen-4 Image32.4 rank points
GPT Image 1 Mini31.8 rank points
FLUX.2 Klein 4B30.2 rank points
GLM-Image29.9 rank points
Kling Image 3.0 Omni29.6 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra27.7 rank points
Seedream 4.526.5 rank points
MiniMax Image-0125.5 rank points
FLUX1.1 [pro]24 rank points
Z-Image Base24 rank points
Nucleus-Image23.4 rank points
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain23.1 rank points
Chroma1-HD22.4 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium19.9 rank points
Bria FIBO Lite19.6 rank points
OmniGen219 rank points
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo16.8 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Base15.9 rank points
Lumina-Image 2.015.9 rank points
Firefly Image Model 515 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 412.5 rank points
Chroma1-Flash12.1 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra11.8 rank points
Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px10 rank points
Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo8.4 rank points
SDXL Turbo8.4 rank points
SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px7.2 rank points
AuraFlow v0.36.9 rank points
Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px6.9 rank points
BAGEL-7B-MoT5.9 rank points
SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px5.6 rank points
Adobe Firefly Image 35.3 rank points
PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS5.3 rank points
Stable Diffusion XL 1.05 rank points
Stable Diffusion Turbo4.7 rank points

higher is betterAs of November 3, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
rank-score-100
Scale
0-100
Participants
108
Sample
1
Methodology and context
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Recorded measurement details

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
21.8
Score
21.8
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
81
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
84.67
Individual ranks
92, 83, 79
Criterion scores
headline 1.33, subline 1.33, text-control 0.67, visual-brief 1, layout 1
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Product photography (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
28.3
Score
28.3
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
81
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
77.67
Individual ranks
78, 68, 87
Criterion scores
subject 2, time 2, watch-details 1.33, photography 2, exclusions 0.33
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Character and detail (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
45.2
Score
45.2
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
71
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
59.67
Individual ranks
64, 34, 81
Criterion scores
scene 1, wardrobe 1, anatomy 1, props 1, environment 1
Source Gradually-Bildtest
Gradually sample test: Infographic (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
27.7
Score
27.7
Metric
rank-score-100
Unit
rank score
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
79
Sample
1
Source type
gradually-sample-test
Evaluator
gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at
2026-11-03
Methodology
One archived image per model, using the first output of the accepted test attempt. Technical repeats are disclosed for the affected image. All 108 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank
78.33
Individual ranks
62, 88, 85
Criterion scores
title 1.67, sequence 0.33, labels 0.33, diagram 1, clarity 0.33
Source Gradually-Bildtest

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 100 models

Stable Diffusion XL 1.072
Anima Base v1.068
SDXL Turbo63
Stable Diffusion Turbo63
Nano Banana 261
FLUX.2 Max55
Krea 2 Raw54
Nano Banana Pro50
FLUX.2 Pro48
MOSS-Image-SFT46
FLUX.2 Flex46
GPT Image 246
LongCat-Image45
MAI-Image-2.645
FLUX.2 Klein 9B45
PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS44
Janus-Pro-7B44
HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct44
MOSS-Image-Base44
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra0

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

First value from November 5, 2026. The timeline appears from the second week.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  2. 2GPT Image 2 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  3. 3Reve 2.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  4. 4Nano Banana 2 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  5. 5GPT Image 1.5 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  6. 6MAI-Image-2.5 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  7. 7Nano Banana Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  8. 8Nano Banana 2 Lite vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  9. 9Seedream 5.0 Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Show all 107 comparisons
  1. 10Grok Imagine Image Quality vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  2. 11FLUX.2 Max vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  3. 12Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  4. 13MAI-Image-2.5 Flash vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  5. 14HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  6. 15Krea 2 Medium Turbo vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  7. 16Seedream 4.0 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  8. 17Krea 2 Large vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  9. 18Luma Uni-1.1 Max vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  10. 19FLUX.2 Flex vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  11. 20Recraft V4.1 Utility vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  12. 21Ideogram 4.0 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  13. 22Wan 2.6 Text to Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  14. 23FLUX.2 Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  15. 24HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  16. 25FLUX.2 Klein 9B vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  17. 26HiDream-O1-Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  18. 27Firefly Image Model 5 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  19. 28Midjourney V8.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  20. 29Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  21. 30GPT Image 2.5 Flare vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  22. 31Qwen-Image-2.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  23. 32MAI-Image-2.6 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  24. 33MAI-Image-2.6 Flash vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  25. 34Muse Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  26. 35Grok Imagine Image 2.0 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  27. 36FLUX 3 Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  28. 37FLUX 3 Image Klein vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  29. 38Nano Banana 2.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  30. 39Ideogram 4.5 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  31. 40Hy Image 3.5 Preview vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  32. 41Recraft V4.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  33. 42Recraft V4.1 Flash vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  34. 43Bria FIBO 2 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  35. 44Krea 3 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  36. 45Qwen Image 3.0 Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  37. 46Qwen Image 3.0 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  38. 47Qwen Image 2.1 Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  39. 48Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  40. 49Wan 2.7 Image Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  41. 50Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  42. 51Seedream 5.0 Flash vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  43. 52SenseNova U1.5 Lite vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  44. 53Kling Image 3.0 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  45. 54Kling Image 3.0 Omni vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  46. 55Vidu Q2 Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  47. 56GLM-Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  48. 57MiniMax Image-01 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  49. 58Z-Image Turbo vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  50. 59Luma Uni-1.1 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  51. 60Runway Gen-4 Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  52. 61Adobe Firefly Image 3 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  53. 62Adobe Firefly Image 4 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  54. 63Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  55. 64Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  56. 65Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  57. 66Bria FIBO Lite vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  58. 67Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  59. 68Seedream 4.5 vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  60. 69Seedream 5.0 Lite vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  61. 70FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  62. 71GPT Image 1 Mini vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  63. 72ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias) vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  64. 73Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  65. 74FLUX.2 Klein 4B vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  66. 75FLUX.2 Dev vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  67. 76FLUX1.1 [pro] vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  68. 77FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. FLUX.1 [dev]
  69. 78FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]
  70. 79FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [max]
  71. 80FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Stable Diffusion XL 1.0
  72. 81FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Stable Diffusion 3 Medium
  73. 82FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. SDXL Turbo
  74. 83FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Stable Diffusion Turbo
  75. 84FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Grok Imagine Image 1.0
  76. 85FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. MOSS-Image-Base
  77. 86FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. MOSS-Image-SFT
  78. 87FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. LLaDA-Image
  79. 88FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. LLaDA-Image-Turbo
  80. 89FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Nucleus-Image
  81. 90FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. LongCat-Image
  82. 91FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT
  83. 92FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. OmniGen2
  84. 93FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT
  85. 94FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain
  86. 95FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base
  87. 96FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo
  88. 97FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px
  89. 98FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px
  90. 99FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px
  91. 100FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px
  92. 101FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Chroma1-HD
  93. 102FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Chroma1-Flash
  94. 103FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. AuraFlow v0.3
  95. 104FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS
  96. 105FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Lumina-Image 2.0
  97. 106FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. HunyuanImage 3.0
  98. 107FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Subject to limitations. Black Forest Labs describes an optional invisible soft-binding watermark for its image output pipeline. Whether a particular file contains it depends on the output path.
Source: AI watermarking
Watermarking technique
Not known
Source: Watermarking technique
Provenance metadata
C2PA Content Credentials for final images through the BFL API, Playground and BFL-controlled output pipelines. BFL makes no such guarantee for local execution or third-party providers.
Source: Provenance metadata
Labelling reviewed
Nov 5, 2026
Source: Labelling reviewed

Licence and access

Access
API
Source: Access
Lifecycle
Separate Ultra API route / Ultra mode; no independent checkpoint established
Source: Lifecycle

Further details

API route
The current BFL API lists POST /v1/flux-pro-1.1-ultra as the Ultra mode of FLUX1.1 [pro]. It is a selectable service variant, not a proven new checkpoint.
Source: API route

Prices

Choose a price view
fal.ai (fal-ai/flux-pro/v1.1-ultra)
$0.06 per image (estimated)Source

No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.54 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 12 plans in Germany.

Filter plans
PlanMonthly priceNote
Krea Basic≈ €9.54with limited credit
Adobe Firefly Standard€10.98with limited credit
Adobe Firefly Pro€21.99with limited credit
Krea Pro≈ €37.11with limited credit
Adobe Firefly Pro Plus€54.99with limited credit
Krea Max≈ €111.32with limited credit
Krea Business≈ €212.05with limited credit, for teams
Adobe Firefly Premium€219.98with limited credit
Adobe Firefly Premium für Teamsn/awith limited credit, for teams, per seat
Adobe Firefly Pro für Teamsn/awith limited credit, for teams, per seat
Adobe Firefly Pro Plus für Teamsn/awith limited credit, for teams, per seat
Krea Enterprisen/afor enterprises

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

How good is FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra?

Rank 83 of 108 in our own test.

GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
LongCat-Image33
FLUX1.1 [pro]33
MiniMax Image-0131
FLUX1.1 [pro] UltraRank 83 of 10831
LLaDA-Image-Turbo31
Vidu Q2 Image31
Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain28

What is FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra good at?

Best at Character and detail (45 out of 100), weakest at Typography and layout (22).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

  1. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: Typography and layoutTypography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition22out of 100Rank 81 of 108 in this task
  2. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: Product photographyProduct photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details28out of 100Rank 81 of 108 in this task
  3. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: Character and detailCharacter and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency45out of 100Rank 71 of 108 in this task
  4. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: InfographicInfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization28out of 100Rank 79 of 108 in this task

Where can I use FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra?

Not in a Black Forest Labs subscription. Including other providers that makes 12 plans in Germany.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At Black Forest Labs

No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model.

Through other providers

12 plans from 2 providers, from ≈ €9.54 a month (Krea Basic), with limited credits.

Sources and data date

Show all 11 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Additional sourceBlack Forest Labs
Additional sourceLifecycle data (retrieved November 1, 2026) · Lifecycle metadata · Editorial description reviewed November 1, 2026
Additional sourcefal.ai
Additional sourceGradually-Bildtest (retrieved November 3, 2026)
Additional sourceBlack Forest Labs: Content Credentials (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0