GLM-Imagevs.FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

Which one is better?

In our own test both are on par. Neither is in the arena. Neither has an API price.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

GLM-Image: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run — GLM-Image50 out of 100

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run — FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra22 out of 100

Result for “Typography and layout”:GLM-Image ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Each test attempt uses the same archived prompt and one request. The first output of that attempt counts. Repeats after technical test failures are disclosed for the affected images. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

GLM-Image: fal, image_size=square_hd; exact native pixels are not request-configurable, n=1, seed=794853230, prompt expansion disabled, Estimated charge reserves 2 MP at Fal's $0.05 per MP rate, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:01 PM. Source

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=3831910390, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 2:50 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

GLM-Image image SHA 256: 3d4fb65e6b8d8aaa9baa9bed4cb79dabe2c672399f5c442c794eb641013686d3

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra image SHA 256: 0b97e1e3f33be2844c06cc18618fea633273ada7e9d6404f9769cdb8403ffbfc

Infographic

GLM-Image: fal, image_size=square_hd; exact native pixels are not request-configurable, n=1, seed=1670252675, prompt expansion disabled, Estimated charge reserves 2 MP at Fal's $0.05 per MP rate, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:02 PM. Source

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=1664027293, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 2:50 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

GLM-Image image SHA 256: 0218fb1367d7eed72594c72413f4bcbc5633b1ace0f4905414c4708c5b199af6

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra image SHA 256: 2c7d24fcda220cf5eff966e1b857f11ad0e561f81ac9e4106ef1b4bd71686637

Product photography

GLM-Image: fal, image_size=square_hd; exact native pixels are not request-configurable, n=1, seed=1515387045, prompt expansion disabled, Estimated charge reserves 2 MP at Fal's $0.05 per MP rate, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 3:00 PM. Source

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=291934417, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 2:49 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

GLM-Image image SHA 256: b5221e770227cfb755aeb6766a4a709b6936e0e0314a0bcbfbcc34db9face315

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra image SHA 256: 7d497c35126a92de69af61e5721158a10f4e2acf88a8526dcdd0f8a9a571e028

Typography and layout

GLM-Image: fal, image_size=square_hd; exact native pixels are not request-configurable, n=1, seed=2105445743, prompt expansion disabled, Estimated charge reserves 2 MP at Fal's $0.05 per MP rate, estimated cost $0.100000, generated Nov 2, 2026, 2:59 PM. Source

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra: fal, aspect ratio 1:1; provider-native resolution, n=1, seed=1909595532, Fal exposes no resolution input; endpoint supports output up to 2K, Prompt enhancement disabled with enhance_prompt=false; default safety tolerance 2, estimated cost $0.060000, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Nov 2, 2026, 2:49 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

GLM-Image image SHA 256: db901c11b4dddacb75b2743d56955ee15cbea541c0924d3c6d8530e91042c815

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra image SHA 256: 0dfeffb6c3489b9ac2e1ae9100793320fa4f5eab779269de7aff3a4b768595f3

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

GLM-Image

not in the arena

n/a

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

GLM-Image

Rank 75 of 108

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

Rank 83 of 108

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

n/a

GLM-Image

no API price

n/a

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

no API price

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

GLM-Image

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API, local.
License: Open weights.

FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

Subscription: No Black Forest Labs subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €9.54 a month (Krea Basic, with limited credits). 12 plans in Germany.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API.
Weights: unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	GLM-Image	FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	35	31
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	50	22
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	9	28
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	51	45
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	30	28
API price
Per imagelower is better	n/a	n/a
100 images	n/a	n/a
Profile
Released	n/a	n/a
Weightsopen means: runs locally	open	unknown
Lifecycle	no notice	Separate Ultra API route / Ultra mode; no independent checkpoint established
Access	API, local	API
Parameters	not published	not published
Largest output	2K	not consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	n/a	12

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: GLM-Image model source (verified Nov 1, 2026) · FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra model source, status source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for GLM-Image and FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

More comparisons

Compare GLM-Image and FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model