Skip to main content

GPT Image 2vs.Ming-Image-0.1-Design

Which one is better?

We have not tested Ming-Image-0.1-Design ourselves yet. Ming-Image-0.1-Design has no arena rating yet. Ming-Image-0.1-Design has no API price.

Test images

Same task, the first image of each.

GPT Image 2: Typography and layout, first image from the fixed test run
GPT Image 275 out of 100

No image from the four fixed tasks for Ming-Image-0.1-Design yet.The free demo rejected the documented repeats because of its ZeroGPU allowance; a recorder failure leaves one earlier poster outcome unknown. The current remaining demo allowance could not be verified. A local attempt using the official Design weights reached the BF16 transformer on MPS, but was stopped before any image as system-wide memory swapping rose sharply. The original script provides no verified memory-saving execution route for this Mac. Checked November 3, 2026.

Ming-Image-0.1-Designnot tested yet

Result for “Typography and layout”:only GPT Image 2 tested

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

What the rating looks at: Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Missing image run for Ming-Image-0.1-Design

The free demo rejected the documented repeats because of its ZeroGPU allowance; a recorder failure leaves one earlier poster outcome unknown. The current remaining demo allowance could not be verified. A local attempt using the official Design weights reached the BF16 transformer on MPS, but was stopped before any image as system-wide memory swapping rose sharply. The original script provides no verified memory-saving execution route for this Mac. Checked November 3, 2026. Test the exact model version with an available demo allowance or an authorized runtime with sufficient resources.

Documentation

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better
1,382

GPT Image 2

Rank 3 of 21

n/a

Ming-Image-0.1-Design

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better
73

GPT Image 2

Rank 15 of 108

n/a

Ming-Image-0.1-Design

not tested yet

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better
$0.21

GPT Image 2

expensive

n/a

Ming-Image-0.1-Design

no API price

Ranks among the 21 image models with an arena rating and the 108 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

GPT Image 2

Subscription
No OpenAI subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €6.36 a month (ElevenLabs Starter, with limited credits). 61 plans in Germany.
Via API
$0.21 per image, 100 images $21.10.

Ming-Image-0.1-Design

Subscription
n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API
No API price known. Access: API, local.
License
Open weights.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

Arena rating (LMArena) from Nov 6, 2026 · GraduallyBench from Nov 3, 2026 · API prices from Nov 6, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (38 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

KennzahlGPT Image 2Ming-Image-0.1-Design
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better1,382n/a
Arena rankRank 3 of 21n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating106,737n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 10073n/a
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition75n/a
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details89n/a
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency60n/a
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization66n/a
API price
Per imagelower is better$0.21n/a
100 images$21.10n/a
Profile
ReleasedApril 2026n/a
Weightsopen means: runs locallyproprietaryopen
AccessAPI, Web appAPI, local
Parametersnot published6 billion
Largest output4Knot consistently published
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model61n/a

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: GPT Image 2 model source (verified Aug 15, 2026) · Ming-Image-0.1-Design model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for GPT Image 2 and Ming-Image-0.1-Design from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

More comparisons

Compare GPT Image 2 and Ming-Image-0.1-Design with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup