Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. FLUX.2 Flex

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series
15
shared sample prompts
4
latest arena retrieval
2026-08-26

Change image model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Flex
AttributeQwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Flex
ProviderAlibabaBlack Forest Labs
ReleasedApril 2026November 2025
AccessAPIAPI, Web app
LifecycleNo separate lifecycle noticeNo separate lifecycle notice
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Maximum output2,048 × 2,048 pixels4 Megapixel
Arena configuration2026-04-22Flex
Text-to-image price$75 per 1,000 images$60 per 1,000 images
Editing price$75 per 1,000 images$120 per 1,000 images
Technical sourceModel sourceVerified 2026-08-15Model sourceVerified 2026-08-15
Qwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Flex
Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro$75
FLUX.2 FlexLower price$60
Image Editing ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Qwen Image 2.0 ProLower price$75
FLUX.2 Flex$120

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

Every matchup includes the same four Gradually sample tasks. For each task, one archived first output from every model is ranked in three differently ordered, model-blind passes. The published 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. It must still be read as an n = 1 sample per model. No exact shared result from the integrated research benchmarks is available for this pair.

Qwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Flex
Gradually sample test: Typography and layoutMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro43.2 / 100
FLUX.2 FlexHigher blind-rank score76.6 / 100
Gradually sample test: Product photographyMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro42 / 100
FLUX.2 FlexHigher blind-rank score46.9 / 100
Gradually sample test: Character and detailMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher blind-rank score76.6 / 100
FLUX.2 Flex39.5 / 100
Gradually sample test: InfographicMean of three blind ranks across all 28 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher blind-rank score53.1 / 100
FLUX.2 Flex25.9 / 100

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Capability benchmark scores for Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Flex
BenchmarkQwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Flex
Gradually sample test: Typography and layout
43.2 / 100
Mean rank: 16.33 (16 / 12 / 21)
Five rubric scores
Headline: 1.67 / 2
Subline: 1.67 / 2
Text control: 1.67 / 2
Visual brief: 1.33 / 2
Layout: 1 / 2
Higher blind-rank score76.6 / 100
Mean rank: 7.33 (6 / 10 / 6)
Five rubric scores
Headline: 1.67 / 2
Subline: 1.67 / 2
Text control: 1.67 / 2
Visual brief: 1.33 / 2
Layout: 1 / 2
Gradually sample test: Product photography
42 / 100
Mean rank: 16.67 (16 / 18 / 16)
Five rubric scores
Subject: 1.33 / 2
Time: 1.33 / 2
Watch details: 1.33 / 2
Photography: 1.33 / 2
Exclusions: 1.33 / 2
Higher blind-rank score46.9 / 100
Mean rank: 15.33 (12 / 19 / 15)
Five rubric scores
Subject: 1.33 / 2
Time: 1.33 / 2
Watch details: 1.33 / 2
Photography: 1.33 / 2
Exclusions: 1.33 / 2
Gradually sample test: Character and detail
Higher blind-rank score76.6 / 100
Mean rank: 7.33 (3 / 15 / 4)
Five rubric scores
Scene: 1.33 / 2
Wardrobe: 1.33 / 2
Anatomy: 1 / 2
Props: 1 / 2
Environment: 1.33 / 2
39.5 / 100
Mean rank: 17.33 (27 / 7 / 18)
Five rubric scores
Scene: 1.33 / 2
Wardrobe: 1.33 / 2
Anatomy: 1.33 / 2
Props: 1 / 2
Environment: 1 / 2
Gradually sample test: Infographic
Higher blind-rank score53.1 / 100
Mean rank: 13.67 (12 / 20 / 9)
Five rubric scores
Title: 1 / 2
Sequence: 1.67 / 2
Labels: 1.67 / 2
Diagram: 1.67 / 2
Clarity: 1 / 2
25.9 / 100
Mean rank: 21 (21 / 19 / 23)
Five rubric scores
Title: 1.67 / 2
Sequence: 1 / 2
Labels: 1 / 2
Diagram: 1 / 2
Clarity: 1 / 2

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

11 shared result series
Qwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Flex
Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProNo clear lead1,237 Elo
FLUX.2 Flex1,224 Elo
Image Editing ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProNo clear lead1,164 Elo
FLUX.2 Flex1,162 Elo
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modelingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,198.224
FLUX.2 Flex1,171.967
LMArena Text to Image: ArtBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,176.336
FLUX.2 Flex1,155.954
LMArena Text to Image: CartoonBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,191.217
FLUX.2 Flex1,162.335
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial designBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProNo clear lead1,186.961
FLUX.2 Flex1,173.137
LMArena Text to Image: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,191.147
FLUX.2 Flex1,156.466
LMArena Text to Image: PhotorealismBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,204.823
FLUX.2 Flex1,146.683
LMArena Text to Image: PortraitsBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,215.441
FLUX.2 Flex1,144.533
LMArena Text to Image: Text renderingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,200.737
FLUX.2 Flex1,172.004
LMArena Image Editing: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,303.632
FLUX.2 Flex1,225.217

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Flex
BenchmarkQwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 FlexSource
Text to Image Arena
No clear lead1,237 Elo
Rank 13, 95% confidence interval: ±10, 5,363 ratings
1,224 Elo
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±10, 5,047 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-26
Image Editing Arena
No clear lead1,164 Elo
Rank 36, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 6,142 ratings
1,162 Elo
Rank 37, 95% confidence interval: ±7, 7,847 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling
Higher score1,198.224
Rank 14, 95% confidence interval: ±16.48, 1,113 ratings
1,171.967
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±7.03, 15,066 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Art
Higher score1,176.336
Rank 22, 95% confidence interval: ±13.33, 1,741 ratings
1,155.954
Rank 28, 95% confidence interval: ±6.38, 21,779 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon
Higher score1,191.217
Rank 17, 95% confidence interval: ±9.16, 4,474 ratings
1,162.335
Rank 26, 95% confidence interval: ±5.15, 55,850 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design
No clear lead1,186.961
Rank 16, 95% confidence interval: ±8.87, 4,500 ratings
1,173.137
Rank 21, 95% confidence interval: ±4.95, 55,246 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Overall
Higher score1,191.147
Rank 15, 95% confidence interval: ±6.06, 12,026 ratings
1,156.466
Rank 25, 95% confidence interval: ±3.42, 149,402 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism
Higher score1,204.823
Rank 14, 95% confidence interval: ±8.86, 4,863 ratings
1,146.683
Rank 33, 95% confidence interval: ±4.87, 63,801 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits
Higher score1,215.441
Rank 15, 95% confidence interval: ±11.96, 2,309 ratings
1,144.533
Rank 34, 95% confidence interval: ±5.82, 33,696 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering
Higher score1,200.737
Rank 17, 95% confidence interval: ±9.31, 4,045 ratings
1,172.004
Rank 22, 95% confidence interval: ±5.14, 49,969 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26
LMArena Image Editing: Overall
Higher score1,303.632
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±4.82, 50,798 ratings
1,225.217
Rank 35, 95% confidence interval: ±3.17, 415,933 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-08-26

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

Largely standardized comparison protocol. Both models receive the same archived prompt, exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier, and prompt processing can still differ. These images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency

FLUX.2 Flex, Character and detail
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Character and detail
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Flex
Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:21 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:25 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: 05f19da3e2d0eedb17d098c1b21abf8c83c663afa59083f0ce7a67a948e8a263

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: daf42522a323804ef9196abe1efabac816b4b442bec00a91f90b9fdd8d57bae6

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 43b43d5782192d7284de2b824dd1caaaa6b25032d22fc3f8565d438b137089f3

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: fe5b22589e6505017dc44f4729b1bb60b15820ba3673354d03a69c8b82831953

Infographic

Numbers, labels, and visual organization

FLUX.2 Flex, Infographic
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Infographic
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Flex
Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:22 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:25 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: 003fbe859de5df62a4f49e3d590c00f5036e208149d81226d1835871fd1e0410

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: 8afcf2a2661e733ceed209087c6253139db63559bce51a1887e280855549ad48

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 105f60cdeb71a27021ffff1ad3c0ad919df4e5c74ad83b4628fbd64a8d795a09

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: 11d4ec056332340dc822c82021ef10c6a6aa92de6e44dc931a90b7cbb6f14146

Product photography

Materials, reflections, and fine details

FLUX.2 Flex, Product photography
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Product photography
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Flex
Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:21 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:25 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: b811a440655cae766c039dfc8f9efb1756be5dce63ef22cd95deb1fe7dab6a3a

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: e24ea060a669087c82f55e22cc5b361c6b23fb3f61b55d73b67406147d2a570f

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 9fef39b1500635ddbf78bcb8d3d9a68463ce952aa1fab89d12f6efe023907de7

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: 1c864c5e5d7f1e7008f15466fd0786f801ae94b17939b4f10de9a61c27766a59

Typography and layout

Legible text, hierarchy, and composition

FLUX.2 Flex, Typography and layout
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Typography and layout
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Flex
Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:00 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Flex. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-flex, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:01 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: 4eb4915afa71f6a8c76979dcecadd70beabd3869f11ca092a725fd7b6c87b4f2

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: dc02f3c7a699f6ddcd1b8a7e82170adae1563e75665d9c3f93965c6a00917ee4

FLUX.2 Flex, image SHA 256: 324f87bf898593446a400abb43bd00eee015fa0a1dc160db0f864402fc0b38af

FLUX.2 Flex, request SHA 256: a0aa716f2a302bdfa59820d2e2c27cc56f730e8e2e4d5b64223d29a6979e1475

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Related image model comparisons

Compare Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Flex with other important image models using the same benchmark and sample methodology.

View the complete image model comparison