Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro vs. FLUX.2 Pro

Compare shared capability tests, arena scores with documented retrieval dates, task-specific image pricing, and verified specifications. Research benchmarks, preference arenas, and our n = 1 samples remain separate.

shared result series
15
shared sample prompts
4
latest arena retrieval
2026-09-22

Change image model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and task-specific pricing

A model can have one price for generating new images and another for editing. Prices therefore remain tied to the corresponding arena configuration.

Specifications and pricing for Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Pro
AttributeQwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Pro
ProviderAlibabaBlack Forest Labs
ReleasedApril 2026November 2025
AccessAPIAPI, Web app
LifecycleNo separate lifecycle noticeNo separate lifecycle notice
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Maximum output2,048 × 2,048 pixels4 Megapixel
Arena configuration2026-04-22Pro
Text-to-image price$75 per 1,000 images$30 per 1,000 images
Editing price$75 per 1,000 images$45 per 1,000 images
Technical sourceModel sourceVerified 2026-08-15Model sourceVerified 2026-09-24
Qwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Pro
Text to Image ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro$75
FLUX.2 ProLower price$30
Image Editing ArenaUSD per 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro$75
FLUX.2 ProLower price$45

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Prompt adherence and specialist tests

Shared capability benchmarks

Both checkpoints completed the same four Gradually sample tasks. For each task, 30 archived first outputs are ranked in three differently ordered, model-blind passes. The published 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. It must still be read as an n = 1 sample per model. No exact shared result from the integrated research benchmarks is available for this pair.

Qwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Pro
Gradually sample test: Typography and layoutMean of three blind ranks across all 30 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro40.2 / 100
FLUX.2 ProHigher blind-rank score49.4 / 100
Gradually sample test: Product photographyMean of three blind ranks across all 30 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher blind-rank score57.5 / 100
FLUX.2 Pro51.7 / 100
Gradually sample test: Character and detailMean of three blind ranks across all 30 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro48.3 / 100
FLUX.2 ProHigher blind-rank score60.9 / 100
Gradually sample test: InfographicMean of three blind ranks across all 30 first outputs, n = 1 each
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher blind-rank score44.8 / 100
FLUX.2 Pro21.8 / 100

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Capability benchmark scores for Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Pro
BenchmarkQwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Pro
Gradually sample test: Typography and layout
40.2 / 100
Mean rank: 18.33 (15 / 20 / 20)
Five rubric scores
Headline: 1.67 / 2
Subline: 1.67 / 2
Text control: 1.67 / 2
Visual brief: 1.67 / 2
Layout: 1 / 2
Higher blind-rank score49.4 / 100
Mean rank: 15.67 (19 / 13 / 15)
Five rubric scores
Headline: 1.67 / 2
Subline: 1.67 / 2
Text control: 1.67 / 2
Visual brief: 1.33 / 2
Layout: 1 / 2
Gradually sample test: Product photography
Higher blind-rank score57.5 / 100
Mean rank: 13.33 (18 / 6 / 16)
Five rubric scores
Subject: 1.67 / 2
Time: 1.67 / 2
Watch details: 1.33 / 2
Photography: 1.67 / 2
Exclusions: 1.67 / 2
51.7 / 100
Mean rank: 15 (17 / 15 / 13)
Five rubric scores
Subject: 1.67 / 2
Time: 1.67 / 2
Watch details: 1.67 / 2
Photography: 1.67 / 2
Exclusions: 1.67 / 2
Gradually sample test: Character and detail
48.3 / 100
Mean rank: 16 (19 / 14 / 15)
Five rubric scores
Scene: 1 / 2
Wardrobe: 1 / 2
Anatomy: 1 / 2
Props: 1 / 2
Environment: 1 / 2
Higher blind-rank score60.9 / 100
Mean rank: 12.33 (15 / 12 / 10)
Five rubric scores
Scene: 1 / 2
Wardrobe: 1 / 2
Anatomy: 1 / 2
Props: 1 / 2
Environment: 1 / 2
Gradually sample test: Infographic
Higher blind-rank score44.8 / 100
Mean rank: 17 (16 / 20 / 15)
Five rubric scores
Title: 1 / 2
Sequence: 1.67 / 2
Labels: 1.67 / 2
Diagram: 1.67 / 2
Clarity: 1 / 2
21.8 / 100
Mean rank: 23.67 (24 / 25 / 22)
Five rubric scores
Title: 1.67 / 2
Sequence: 1.33 / 2
Labels: 0.33 / 2
Diagram: 0.67 / 2
Clarity: 0.67 / 2

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Independent preference tests

Shared arena benchmarks

Artificial Analysis and Arena derive scores from blind comparisons. Raters see outputs for the same prompt and choose the image they prefer. Separate series cover text rendering, photorealism, portraits, art, commercial design, and image editing. Confidence intervals indicate how certain a measured lead is.

11 shared result series
Qwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 Pro
Text to Image ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,030 Elo
FLUX.2 Pro1,001 Elo
Image Editing ArenaBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProNo clear lead1,016 Elo
FLUX.2 Pro1,008 Elo
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modelingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,198.919
FLUX.2 Pro1,147.767
LMArena Text to Image: ArtBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProNo clear lead1,175.631
FLUX.2 Pro1,162.175
LMArena Text to Image: CartoonBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,191.069
FLUX.2 Pro1,160.398
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial designBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,187.349
FLUX.2 Pro1,155.351
LMArena Text to Image: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,191.159
FLUX.2 Pro1,153.926
LMArena Text to Image: PhotorealismBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,205.655
FLUX.2 Pro1,152.003
LMArena Text to Image: PortraitsBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,215.999
FLUX.2 Pro1,144.638
LMArena Text to Image: Text renderingBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,201.077
FLUX.2 Pro1,155.146
LMArena Image Editing: OverallBlind preference from the same prompt, higher is better
Qwen Image 2.0 ProHigher score1,303.653
FLUX.2 Pro1,244.7

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Arena benchmark scores for Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Pro
BenchmarkQwen Image 2.0 ProFLUX.2 ProSource
Text to Image Arena
Higher score1,030 Elo
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±9, 5,988 ratings
1,001 Elo
Rank 39, 95% confidence interval: ±8, 10,492 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-09-22
Image Editing Arena
No clear lead1,016 Elo
Rank 31, 95% confidence interval: ±9, 3,572 ratings
1,008 Elo
Rank 37, 95% confidence interval: ±7, 6,580 ratings
Artificial AnalysisRetrieved 2026-09-22
LMArena Text to Image: 3D modeling
Higher score1,198.919
Rank 17, 95% confidence interval: ±16.58, 1,106 ratings
1,147.767
Rank 32, 95% confidence interval: ±6.08, 18,321 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Art
No clear lead1,175.631
Rank 25, 95% confidence interval: ±13.32, 1,743 ratings
1,162.175
Rank 29, 95% confidence interval: ±5.57, 26,959 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Cartoon
Higher score1,191.069
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±9.16, 4,471 ratings
1,160.398
Rank 30, 95% confidence interval: ±4.43, 70,569 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Commercial design
Higher score1,187.349
Rank 19, 95% confidence interval: ±8.86, 4,497 ratings
1,155.351
Rank 29, 95% confidence interval: ±4.21, 68,394 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Overall
Higher score1,191.159
Rank 18, 95% confidence interval: ±6.06, 12,005 ratings
1,153.926
Rank 28, 95% confidence interval: ±2.96, 188,083 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Photorealism
Higher score1,205.655
Rank 17, 95% confidence interval: ±8.88, 4,846 ratings
1,152.003
Rank 33, 95% confidence interval: ±4.18, 79,531 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Portraits
Higher score1,215.999
Rank 17, 95% confidence interval: ±11.96, 2,303 ratings
1,144.638
Rank 36, 95% confidence interval: ±5.09, 41,905 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Text to Image: Text rendering
Higher score1,201.077
Rank 20, 95% confidence interval: ±9.31, 4,044 ratings
1,155.146
Rank 30, 95% confidence interval: ±4.39, 63,433 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19
LMArena Image Editing: Overall
Higher score1,303.653
Rank 21, 95% confidence interval: ±4.82, 50,820 ratings
1,244.7
Rank 32, 95% confidence interval: ±2.74, 539,449 ratings
LMArenaRetrieved 2026-09-19

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Visual comparison

Sample images

Our images complement preference data, but do not replace it. The prompt, request count, and selection rule match. Provider resolution, quality tier, randomness, and prompt processing remain visible limitations, so this is not a fully controlled laboratory test.

Largely standardized comparison protocol. Both models receive the same archived prompt, exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier, and prompt processing can still differ. These images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency

FLUX.2 Pro, Character and detail
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Character and detail
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Pro
Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:21 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: 05f19da3e2d0eedb17d098c1b21abf8c83c663afa59083f0ce7a67a948e8a263

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: daf42522a323804ef9196abe1efabac816b4b442bec00a91f90b9fdd8d57bae6

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: 9eec1a6900b6031703d2e797b93c2aba6c5f45b4807b560a0bf1e37eac9e20f2

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 8c40a10f47e1407d26ab10f5c9d815e533bce798cf0adf5a9c1e6ddfc3f3584e

Infographic

Numbers, labels, and visual organization

FLUX.2 Pro, Infographic
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Infographic
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Pro
Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:22 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:31 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: 003fbe859de5df62a4f49e3d590c00f5036e208149d81226d1835871fd1e0410

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: 8afcf2a2661e733ceed209087c6253139db63559bce51a1887e280855549ad48

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: ea47f772cdfa26bf21528ae7e09d245eb7a3be7d3185af15cedd7d21acdfbb09

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 9ef85d9cf32f0f9b974eeb0b389c1fbf1403f4e266af0ce98e0ca83da0fe23c1

Product photography

Materials, reflections, and fine details

FLUX.2 Pro, Product photography
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Product photography
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Pro
Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:21 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 12:30 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: b811a440655cae766c039dfc8f9efb1756be5dce63ef22cd95deb1fe7dab6a3a

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: e24ea060a669087c82f55e22cc5b361c6b23fb3f61b55d73b67406147d2a570f

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: 4d9b922f59b329c5ac3532222c8e340e7fdcb1920ce6f03ad9299f25a6beec43

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 96c65fc91b32da0a02970457fbf90c6928e1f7a5b45177fa3ef08f8bc32c9b82

Typography and layout

Legible text, hierarchy, and composition

FLUX.2 Pro, Typography and layout
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, Typography and layout
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro
FLUX.2 Pro
Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:00 PM. Source
FLUX.2 Pro. Provider Together, 1024x1024, n=1, seed=provider random, provider default steps, model ID black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-pro, generated Aug 14, 2026, 2:02 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1, selection rule: first result.

Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, image SHA 256: 4eb4915afa71f6a8c76979dcecadd70beabd3869f11ca092a725fd7b6c87b4f2

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, request SHA 256: dc02f3c7a699f6ddcd1b8a7e82170adae1563e75665d9c3f93965c6a00917ee4

FLUX.2 Pro, image SHA 256: 5a5d8ccd657d7522bc39fdec4b0aecf198b42c282a5aefde9461239dfe5c0396

FLUX.2 Pro, request SHA 256: 3e170f568fe4b6040423f0df065d9227f586d5da3d911a4251bcc368dfe333c0

How to read this comparison

An Elo score is not a verdict on creativity

A higher arena score means this specific configuration was preferred more often in blind comparisons.

Typography, character consistency, local execution, licensing, and price may matter more to your workload than overall visual appeal.

Prices cover 1,000 images at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels using settings documented by Artificial Analysis. Subscriptions and special rates are excluded.

More matchups

Related image model comparisons

Compare Qwen Image 2.0 Pro and FLUX.2 Pro with other important image models under the same evidence rules. Each page shows only exact shared measurements and samples.

View the complete image model comparison