AnthropicAlibabaLLM matchup
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Qwen 3.8 27B
Which one is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 performs better than Qwen 3.8 27B and is cheaper: Qwen 3.8 27B costs 2.4 times (input) and 4.4 times (output) as much.
103.4
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 20
82.8
Qwen 3.8 27B
Rank 50
236
Claude Haiku 5.5
45
Qwen 3.8 27B
$0.20
Claude Haiku 5.5
$0.73
Qwen 3.8 27B
77
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 3 of 875
70
Qwen 3.8 27B
Rank 11 of 875
Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
HealthMathematicsGeneralReasoningCodingCybersecurityAgentsFinanceKnowledge (not certain)Legal (not certain)
Choose Qwen 3.8 27B for
No clear advantage
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Haiku 5.5Qwen 3.8 27B
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
CodingHaiku 5.5 ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
Qwen 3.8 27B83.2Rank 56
Median of ranked models83.7
95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Qwen 3.8 27B 75.5 to 90.9.
AreaHaiku 5.5Qwen 3.8 27B
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.
Haiku 5.5 is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, Qwen 3.8 27B in none.
Haiku 5.5 ahead: 7Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead: 2too little data: 1
Areas in the overall index
MathematicsHaiku 5.5 +26107.1 to 81.0
GeneralHaiku 5.5 +24106.4 to 82.5
ReasoningHaiku 5.5 +23105.2 to 81.8
CodingHaiku 5.5 +23106.2 to 83.2
AgentsHaiku 5.5 +20106.1 to 86.1
Knowledgeleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 2 tests each
Multimodalonly Qwen 3.8 27B has a score
Specialist fields
HealthHaiku 5.5 +34108.9 to 75.3
FinanceHaiku 5.5 +12104.7 to 92.7
Legalleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 3 and 2 tests
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityHaiku 5.5 +23108.6 to 85.8
Productivityonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B at the same effort
Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.
lowHaiku 5.5 slightly ahead
Haiku 5.5 80.8 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B 73.8 · Gap 8.8 · Test series 11
mediumHaiku 5.5 ahead
Haiku 5.5 90.4 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B 77.7 · Gap 14.3 · Test series 11
xhighHaiku 5.5 ahead
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B 82.8 · Gap 20.1 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. xhigh)Haiku 5.5 ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B 82.8
| Effort | Haiku 5.5 | Qwen 3.8 27B | Gap | Verdict | Test series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | 80.8 | 73.8 | 8.8 | Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead | 11 |
| medium | 90.4 | 77.7 | 14.3 | Haiku 5.5 ahead | 11 |
| xhigh | 101.3 | 82.8 | 20.1 | Haiku 5.5 ahead | 11 |
| Overall index (max vs. xhigh) | 103.4 | 82.8 | 20.6 | Haiku 5.5 ahead |
Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
TaskBetter choicebased on
Writing and debugging codeHaiku 5.5Coding 106.2 to 83.2
Maths and data analysisHaiku 5.5Mathematics 107.1 to 81.0, Reasoning 105.2 to 81.8
Facts and researchleaning Haiku 5.5Knowledge 85.5 to 78.5
Agents and workflowsHaiku 5.5Agents 106.1 to 86.1
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 45 tokens per second
Security analysisHaiku 5.5Cybersecurity 108.6 to 85.8
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $0.73 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsHaiku 5.5Finance 104.7 to 92.7, Legal 94.4 to 87.9, Health 108.9 to 75.3
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Qwen 3.8 27B
Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0022
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- alibaba
- API model
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- Output
- 865 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0022
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Earlier tests
This is the lowest documented setting for each provider. It does not make compute comparable across models.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Not tested yet
Qwen 3.8 27B
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 11, 2026 · 119 s · $0.02
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 11, 2026
- API provider
- Alibaba
- Requested API model
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- Reasoning setting
- disabled (enabled: false)
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Reasoning tokens
- 0
- Output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0209
- Response time
- 119.1 s
- API model reported in response
- qwen/qwen3.8-27b
- Pinned endpoint
- Alibaba | qwen/qwen3.8-27b-20260814
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-low-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 27B in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4
Qwen 3.8 27Bxhigh82.8
Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic: 126.1 · Rank 1 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Carbon, Google DeepMind: 125.7 · Rank 2 · reasoning effort high
Claude Fable 5.1, Anthropic: 123.8 · Rank 3 · reasoning effort max
Claude Sonnet 5.5, Anthropic: 122.8 · Rank 4 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Argon, Google DeepMind: 122.3 · Rank 5 · reasoning effort high
GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI: 121.3 · Rank 6 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6.1 Sol, OpenAI: 119.2 · Rank 7 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder Full, Meta: 118.3 · Rank 8 · reasoning effort max
Claude Opus 5, Anthropic: 117.2 · Rank 9 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder, Meta: 113.4 · Rank 10 · reasoning effort max
Kimi K3.1 Pro, Moonshot AI: 112.9 · Rank 11 · reasoning effort max
Claude Fable 5, Anthropic: 112.5 · Rank 12 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6 Sol, OpenAI: 110.6 · Rank 13 · reasoning effort max
GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI: 108.7 · Rank 14 · reasoning effort max
Muse Spark 1.3, Meta: 107.4 · Rank 15 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.7 Flash, Google: 107.1 · Rank 16 · reasoning effort high
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek: 106.6 · Rank 17 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.8 Flash, Google: 106.5 · Rank 18 · reasoning effort high
Claude Haiku 5.5, Anthropic: 103.4 · Rank 20 · reasoning effort max
Qwen 3.8 27B, Alibaba: 82.8 · Rank 50 · reasoning effort xhigh
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6.1 Sol
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Opus 5
Muse Wonder
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Fable 5
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol
Muse Spark 1.3
Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Haiku 5.5
Qwen 3.8 27B
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Qwen 3.8 27B: 77 to 70 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen 3.8 27B
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen 3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.4 | 82.8 |
| Rank | Rank 20 of 91 | Rank 50 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $0.24 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $2.20 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 236 | 45 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 77Rank 3 of 875 | 70Rank 11 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Cheaper than Haiku 5.5MiMo V2.6 Flash
Overall index 98.3, rank 31. $0.14 input and $0.28 output per 1M tokens.
View profileBest model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5
Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Qwen 3.8 27B
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,523.33 eloQwen 3.8 27B: 1,391.36 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 7.833 pointsQwen 3.8 27B: -6.367 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 17.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 39.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 28.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.0%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 4.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%Qwen 3.8 27B: 59.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 14.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 34.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 16.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,521.54 eloQwen 3.8 27B: 1,426.73 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 28.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 15.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 39.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 36.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 28.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 83.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%Qwen 3.8 27B: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 30.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 5.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 64.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,114.41 eloQwen 3.8 27B: 1,269.55 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.167 pointsQwen 3.8 27B: -21.467 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 30.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 18.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 40.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 22.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 30.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 2.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 21.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 5.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 47.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 8.0%Qwen 3.8 27B: 12.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 28.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 11.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 10.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,130.36 eloQwen 3.8 27B: 1,370.26 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 14.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 6.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 31.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50%Qwen 3.8 27B: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 12.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 2.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 0.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,367.13 eloQwen 3.8 27B: 1,371.79 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.167 pointsQwen 3.8 27B: -35.867 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 17.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 40.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 65.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 28.6%Qwen 3.8 27B: 40.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70%Qwen 3.8 27B: 50%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 30.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 16.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.7%Qwen 3.8 27B: 51.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.5%Qwen 3.8 27B: 79.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.9%Qwen 3.8 27B: 36.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 16.1%Qwen 3.8 27B: 11.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 40.4%Qwen 3.8 27B: 34.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 15.2%Qwen 3.8 27B: 12.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,282.5 eloQwen 3.8 27B: 1,388.62 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 16.8%Qwen 3.8 27B: 6.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.3%Qwen 3.8 27B: 48.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
More comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 27B with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 8GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
Show all 43 comparisons
- 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 14Qwen 3.8 27B vs. Mistral Large 4
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
- 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 28DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 30Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 32Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 36Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
- 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
- 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 41Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 42Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra