Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5vs.GPT-6 Luna

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5 performs better than GPT-6 Luna, but costs 50 times as much.

Opus 5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.2

Claude Opus 5

Rank 9

96.3

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 35

GPT-6 Luna faster
SpeedTokens per second
66

Claude Opus 5

101

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$10

Claude Opus 5

$0.20

GPT-6 Luna

about as popular
Popularity0 to 100
63

Claude Opus 5

Rank 23 of 785

60

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 30 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Luna costs more: $0.20 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 5 for

SearchProductivityHealthKnowledgeLegalMultimodalGeneralCodingFinanceAgentsReasoningMathematics

Choose GPT-6 Luna for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5GPT-6 LunaMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingOpus 5ReasoningOpus 5MathematicsOpus 5KnowledgeOpus 5AgentsOpus 5GeneralOpus 5MultimodalOpus 5FinanceOpus 5LegalOpus 5HealthOpus 5
CodingOpus 5 ahead
Opus 5118.0Rank 8
GPT-6 Luna97.5Rank 35
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5 114.4 to 121.6, GPT-6 Luna 94.5 to 100.5.

AreaOpus 5GPT-6 Luna

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Luna in none.

Opus 5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5 +31119.8 to 89.2
MultimodalOpus 5 +23114.9 to 92.0
GeneralOpus 5 +23117.0 to 94.4
CodingOpus 5 +20118.0 to 97.5
AgentsOpus 5 +13112.6 to 99.5
ReasoningOpus 5 +11108.5 to 97.8
MathematicsOpus 5 +9114.2 to 105.5
Specialist fields
HealthOpus 5 +31126.1 to 95.2
LegalOpus 5 +25115.9 to 90.7
FinanceOpus 5 +20118.0 to 98.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
SearchOpus 5 +38121.0 to 83.3
ProductivityOpus 5 +37127.5 to 90.5
Cybersecuritytoo little data115.8 to 101.8
Educationonly GPT-6 Luna has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxOpus 5 ahead
Opus 5 117.2 vs. GPT-6 Luna 96.3 · Gap 18.5 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5 ahead
Opus 5 117.2 vs. GPT-6 Luna 96.3

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5Coding 118.0 to 97.5
Maths and data analysisOpus 5Mathematics 114.2 to 105.5, Reasoning 108.5 to 97.8
Facts and researchOpus 5Knowledge 119.8 to 89.2, Search 121.0 to 83.3
Agents and workflowsOpus 5Agents 112.6 to 99.5
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Luna66 to 101 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 115.8 to 101.8 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Luna$10 to $0.20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5Finance 118.0 to 98.3, Legal 115.9 to 90.7, Health 126.1 to 95.2
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5Multimodal 114.9 to 92.0

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 63 s · $0.14

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,423 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1357
Response time
63 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 47 s · $0.0022

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,493 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0022
Response time
46.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-luna-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Luna in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
GPT-6 Lunamax96.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Both are about as popular: Claude Opus 5 63, GPT-6 Luna 60 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5GPT-6 Luna

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Luna
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.296.3
RankRank 9 of 92Rank 35 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$5$0.10above 272,000 tokens: $0.20
Outputwhat the model writes$25$0.50above 272,000 tokens: $0.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.14$0.003
Speed
Tokens per second66101
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10063Rank 23 of 78560Rank 30 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffMay 2026May 18, 2026
ReleasedJul 24, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Opus 5Claude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna vs. Claude Opus 5.5
As cheap as GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5B: GPT-6 Luna

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 53.8%GPT-6 Luna: 43.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,654.7 eloGPT-6 Luna: 1,337.1 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 37.633 pointsGPT-6 Luna: -8.267 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 60.9%GPT-6 Luna: 39.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Opus 5: 59.4%GPT-6 Luna: 79.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 56.6%GPT-6 Luna: 53.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 79.3%GPT-6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 57.5%GPT-6 Luna: 42.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 50.0%GPT-6 Luna: 42.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 65.4%GPT-6 Luna: 76.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 73.6%GPT-6 Luna: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 58.6%GPT-6 Luna: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 31.2%GPT-6 Luna: 25.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 21.6%GPT-6 Luna: 22.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,729.9 eloGPT-6 Luna: 1,444.5 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 44.8%GPT-6 Luna: 22.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 84.3%GPT-6 Luna: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 55.3%GPT-6 Luna: 30.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,691GPT-6 Luna: 1,579LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,242GPT-6 Luna: 1,160LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,491GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,288GPT-6 Luna: 1,240LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 63.6%GPT-6 Luna: 44.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 91.0%GPT-6 Luna: 83.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 84.7%GPT-6 Luna: 79.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 37.4%GPT-6 Luna: 19.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 3.0%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 99%GPT-6 Luna: 64%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 76.9%GPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 12.2%GPT-6 Luna: 2.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 45.5%GPT-6 Luna: 19.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 49.0%GPT-6 Luna: 12.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 53.5%GPT-6 Luna: 13.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 27.1%GPT-6 Luna: 4.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 28.6%GPT-6 Luna: 8.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 47.9%GPT-6 Luna: 28.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 88.4%GPT-6 Luna: 81.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 43.1%GPT-6 Luna: 17.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 53.3%GPT-6 Luna: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 85.7%GPT-6 Luna: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 75.2%GPT-6 Luna: 70.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 54.6%GPT-6 Luna: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 100.0%GPT-6 Luna: 69.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 65.2%GPT-6 Luna: 37.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,677GPT-6 Luna: 1,595LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,484GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,363GPT-6 Luna: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 41.5%GPT-6 Luna: 8.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 31.1%GPT-6 Luna: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 23.3%GPT-6 Luna: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 33.3%GPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 12.5%GPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 79.3%GPT-6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 87.7%GPT-6 Luna: 71.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 70.0%GPT-6 Luna: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 45%GPT-6 Luna: 65%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 87.7%GPT-6 Luna: 75.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 47.7%GPT-6 Luna: 38.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 87.2%GPT-6 Luna: 39.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 92.7%GPT-6 Luna: 83.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,662GPT-6 Luna: 1,571LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,547GPT-6 Luna: 1,483LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,275GPT-6 Luna: 1,232LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 3.0%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Luna with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  6. 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  8. 8GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 9GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
Show all 71 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  3. 12Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 13GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  5. 14Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  7. 16GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  8. 17GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  10. 19GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  11. 20Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  12. 21Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  13. 22Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  14. 23Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  15. 24Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  16. 25GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3
  18. 27GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  19. 28GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  20. 29Claude Opus 5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  21. 30GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  22. 31Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  24. 33GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  25. 34Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  26. 35GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  29. 38Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.6
  30. 39GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  31. 40GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  33. 42Claude Opus 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  34. 43Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3
  35. 44GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.2
  36. 45Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  37. 46Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  38. 47GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  39. 48GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  41. 50Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  42. 51Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  43. 52Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  44. 53GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3
  45. 54GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
  46. 55Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  47. 56Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  48. 57Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  49. 58GPT-6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5
  50. 59Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  51. 60GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  52. 61GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  53. 62GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  54. 63GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  55. 64GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.5
  56. 65Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  57. 66Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  58. 67GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  59. 68Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  60. 69Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  61. 70Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  62. 71Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra