Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5vs.GPT-5.6 Terra

Which one is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra perform about equally well, but GPT-5.6 Terra costs 20 times (input) and 24 times (output) as much.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

100.7

GPT-5.6 Terra

Rank 26

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
236

Claude Haiku 5.5

100

GPT-5.6 Terra

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

$4.50

GPT-5.6 Terra

Haiku 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

64

GPT-5.6 Terra

Rank 22 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-5.6 Terra costs more: $4 input and $18 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

HealthEducationMathematicsCybersecurityProductivityAgents (not certain)General (not certain)

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for

Legal (not certain)Knowledge (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

105110100CodinglevelReasoninglevelMathematicsHaiku 5.5Knowledgeslightly GPT-5.6 TerraAgentsslightly Haiku 5.5Generalslightly Haiku 5.5FinancelevelLegalslightly GPT-5.6 TerraHealthHaiku 5.5
Codinglevel
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
GPT-5.6 Terra104.0Rank 21
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, GPT-5.6 Terra 98.6 to 109.3.

AreaHaiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Haiku 5.5 is ahead in 2 of 10 areas, GPT-5.6 Terra in none.

Haiku 5.5 ahead: 2Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead: 2level: 3too little data: 1GPT-5.6 Terra slightly ahead: 2

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsHaiku 5.5 +5107.1 to 101.7
Knowledgeleaning GPT-5.6 Terranot certain · 2 tests each
Agentsleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 4 and 6 tests
Generalleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 5 and 4 tests
Codinglevel106.2 to 104.0
Reasoninglevel105.2 to 103.5
Multimodalonly GPT-5.6 Terra has a score
Specialist fields
HealthHaiku 5.5 +12108.9 to 96.6
Legalleaning GPT-5.6 Terranot certain · 3 and 2 tests
Financelevel104.7 to 101.7

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationHaiku 5.5 +8109.6 to 102.0
CybersecurityHaiku 5.5 +4108.6 to 104.2
ProductivityHaiku 5.5 +3101.8 to 98.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxHaiku 5.5 slightly ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra 100.7 · Gap 4.7 · Test series 10
Overall index (max vs. max)level
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra 100.7

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codelevelCoding 106.2 to 104.0
Maths and data analysisHaiku 5.5Mathematics 107.1 to 101.7, Reasoning 105.2 to 103.5
Facts and researchleaning GPT-5.6 TerraKnowledge 85.5 to 91.1
Agents and workflowsleaning Haiku 5.5Agents 106.1 to 100.9
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 100 tokens per second
Security analysisHaiku 5.5Cybersecurity 108.6 to 104.2
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $4.50 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsdepends on the partFinance 104.7 to 101.7, Legal 94.4 to 101.6, Health 108.9 to 96.6
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Not tested yet

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 65 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,373 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0405
Response time
64.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.6-terra-20260709
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-5.6 Terra

Unavailable in this round

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4
GPT-5.6 Terramax100.7

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than GPT-5.6 Terra: 77 to 64 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.4100.7
RankRank 20 of 91Rank 26 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50$12above 272,000 tokens: $18
Speed
Tokens per second236100
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10077Rank 3 of 87564Rank 22 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Feb 16, 2026
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Jul 9, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-6.1 Terra

Overall index 105.2, rank 19. $1 input and $5 output per 1M tokens.

Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: GPT-5.6 Terra

AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,574.12 eloGPT-5.6 Terra: 1,333.13 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 12.3 pointsGPT-5.6 Terra: -9.267 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 41.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 91.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 59.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 50.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 72.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%GPT-5.6 Terra: 66.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 34.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 23.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 20.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 24.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,424.29 eloGPT-5.6 Terra: 1,387.34 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 28.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 87.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,425GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,467LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 43.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 82.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%GPT-5.6 Terra: 74%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 62.4%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 87%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 9.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 30%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 32.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 35.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 22.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%GPT-5.6 Terra: 10%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 20.0%GPT-5.6 Terra: 13.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 14.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 74.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 41.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 39.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 90.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 49.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,521.54 eloGPT-5.6 Terra: 1,455.13 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 85%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50%GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,435GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,466LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 15%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 91.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 89.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 26.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 30.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 39.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 40.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 91.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70%GPT-5.6 Terra: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 82.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 42.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,130.36 eloGPT-5.6 Terra: 1,117.03 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 77.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 88.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 88.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,468GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,516LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGELinear Algebra · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 86.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 79.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 9.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 64.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 25%GPT-5.6 Terra: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 34.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 42.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 2GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  4. 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  6. 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 9GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
Show all 45 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  3. 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  4. 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  5. 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 15GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  7. 16GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  9. 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  10. 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  11. 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  12. 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  13. 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  15. 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  17. 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  18. 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  20. 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  21. 30Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  23. 32GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  24. 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  27. 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  28. 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  29. 38Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  31. 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  33. 42Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  34. 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  35. 44Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra