Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

shared result series
0
distinct benchmarks
0
latest retrieval
No data

Change model selection

Specifications

General specifications

Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.

Specifications for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
AttributeGemini 3.8 FlashMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Apr 28, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryOpen Weights
ParametersNot publishedNot published
ArchitectureNot publishedNot published
Context window1,048,576 tokens256,000 tokens
Knowledge cutoffMarch 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Knowledge cutoffModel

Pricing

API pricing compared

The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

API pricing for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
Price typeGemini 3.8 FlashMistral Medium 3.5
API input$0.75$1.5
API output$3.75$7.5
Cache read$0.07Not listed
Cache write (5 min.)Not listedNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified09/02/2026 Source07/30/2026 Source
Gemini 3.8 FlashMistral Medium 3.5
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Gemini 3.8 FlashLower price$0.75
Mistral Medium 3.5$1.5
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
Gemini 3.8 FlashLower price$3.75
Mistral Medium 3.5$7.5

Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie

Pricing by provider

Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.

Provider pricing for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5
ModelProviderPurchase route and tariffInput per 1M tokensOutput per 1M tokensSource
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleDirect from developerStandard API$0.75$3.75Source09/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global$0.75$3.75Source09/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global/flexLowest listed price: $0.375Lowest listed price: $1.875Source09/02/2026
GoogleVia OpenRoutergoogle-vertex/global/priority$1.35$6.75Source09/02/2026
Google AI StudioVia OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio$0.75$3.75Source09/02/2026
Google AI StudioVia OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio/flexLowest listed price: $0.375Lowest listed price: $1.875Source09/02/2026
Google AI StudioVia OpenRoutergoogle-ai-studio/priority$1.35$6.75Source09/02/2026
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIDirect from developerStandard APILowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source07/30/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistralLowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source09/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/eu$1.65$8.25Source09/02/2026
MistralVia OpenRoutermistral/zdrLowest listed price: $1.5Lowest listed price: $7.5Source09/02/2026

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

Capability profile from matched benchmarks

Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.

Not enough directly matched categories for a reliable radar

Only 0 of at least 5 categories have comparable, direct model measurements. The benchmark tables below show the available evidence without filling missing axes.

No directly comparable result series yet

No published benchmark for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 currently matches in version, task, metric, and comparison cohort. We therefore show no estimated or blended values.

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.

More matchups

Compare Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.

View the complete LLM comparison