AlibabaImage model

Wan 2.7 Image

Wan 2.7 Image is rank 16 of 74 in our GraduallyBench test.

Arena ratingnot rated

n/aUser voteshigher is better

GraduallyBenchRank 16 of 74

65our own rating0 to 100

Priceno price

n/aper imagelower is better

Summary

Wan 2.7 Image is an image model from Alibaba. Standard is a separate model ID with T2I up to 2K; Pro supports T2I up to 4K.

Image samples from our tests

These images come from documented single requests with an archived prompt. They complement measurements but do not replace a controlled laboratory test.

Open Character and detail at original size

Character and detail

This sample tests Anatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency.

Prompt and settings

Create a square cinematic full-body portrait of a fictional bicycle courier waiting under a transparent umbrella at a rainy tram stop in Hamburg at blue hour. She wears a mustard raincoat, navy trousers, red sneakers, a silver helmet, and carries a teal messenger bag. Keep both hands visible, render the bicycle correctly, use realistic wet-street reflections, and include no readable brand names.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/wan/v2.7/text-to-image. Archived settings were requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=2030081785, estimated cost $0.030000.

Open source

Open Infographic at original size

Infographic

This sample tests Numbers, labels, and visual organization.

Prompt and settings

Create a square German infographic titled SO FUNKTIONIERT PHOTOSYNTHESE. Show exactly four numbered steps in this order: 1 LICHT, 2 WASSER, 3 CO₂, 4 ZUCKER + SAUERSTOFF. Use a clean editorial science style with one plant cross-section, simple arrows, high contrast, legible labels, and no other text.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/wan/v2.7/text-to-image. Archived settings were requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1843752681, estimated cost $0.030000.

Open source

Open Product photography at original size

Product photography

This sample tests Materials, reflections, and fine details.

Prompt and settings

Create a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/wan/v2.7/text-to-image. Archived settings were requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1918862783, estimated cost $0.030000.

Open source

Open Typography and layout at original size

Typography and layout

This sample tests Legible text, hierarchy, and composition.

Prompt and settings

Create a square editorial poster for an imaginary night train called MONDFALTER. Show the exact German headline MONDFALTER and the exact subline BERLIN NACH LISSABON. Use a restrained midnight-blue and warm-cream palette, one stylized moth, strong Swiss-grid typography, generous negative space, and no additional words or logos.

Generated through fal with model ID fal-ai/wan/v2.7/text-to-image. Archived settings were requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=457490918, estimated cost $0.030000.

Open source

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 4 published benchmark results

Published benchmarks

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Krea 398.2 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Flash95.9 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility91.3 rank points

FLUX 3 Image Klein86.3 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 2.085.8 rank points

MAI-Image-2.583.6 rank points

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct81.7 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image Pro81.7 rank points

Ideogram 4.079 rank points

Nano Banana 277.6 rank points

Kling Image 3.0 Omni76.7 rank points

Muse Image76.3 rank points

Grok Imagine Image Quality75.8 rank points

Nano Banana Pro75.8 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro75.8 rank points

Krea 2 Large75.3 rank points

Firefly Image Model 574.4 rank points

FLUX 3 Image74.4 rank points

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro73.5 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image73.5 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 1.073.1 rank points

FLUX.2 Flex71.2 rank points

FLUX.2 Pro70.8 rank points

Nano Banana 2 Lite70.3 rank points

Bria FIBO 268.9 rank points

Krea 2 Medium Turbo68.5 rank points

FLUX.2 Max68 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Pro67.1 rank points

MAI-Image-2.5 Flash65.8 rank points

Luma Uni-1.164.4 rank points

Luma Uni-1.1 Max63 rank points

FLUX.2 Dev61.2 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Flash60.7 rank points

Nano Banana 2.159.8 rank points

GPT Image 1.558 rank points

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)57.5 rank points

Recraft V4.156.6 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image-1.555.2 rank points

Z-Image Turbo53.9 rank points

Reve 2.153 rank points

Qwen-Image-2.150.2 rank points

GPT Image 249.3 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Flare48.4 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst47.5 rank points

GPT Image 1 Mini46.6 rank points

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash42.5 rank points

MAI-Image-2.638.8 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo38.8 rank points

Seedream 4.035.6 rank points

Runway Gen-4 Image31.5 rank points

Wan 2.6 Text to Image30.1 rank points

Bria FIBO Lite29.7 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Pro29.2 rank points

Kling Image 3.026.5 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]25.1 rank points

Z-Image Base24.7 rank points

FLUX1.1 [pro]23.7 rank points

Qwen Image 3.022.8 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 9B21.9 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 4B21 rank points

MiniMax Image-0118.7 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium17.4 rank points

Ideogram 4.515.5 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]13.7 rank points

MOSS-Image-SFT12.8 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large11 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 410.5 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra8.7 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image8.2 rank points

Midjourney V8.18.2 rank points

FLUX.1 [dev]7.3 rank points

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px2.3 rank points

Lumina-Image 2.01.4 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 30.5 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

MAI-Image-2.5

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

Grok Imagine Image Quality

Nano Banana Pro

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Krea 2 Large

Firefly Image Model 5

FLUX 3 Image

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image

Grok Imagine Image 1.0

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

Ideogram 4.5

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

MOSS-Image-SFT

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Adobe Firefly Image 4

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra

HiDream-O1-Image

Midjourney V8.1

FLUX.1 [dev]

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Lumina-Image 2.0

Adobe Firefly Image 3

higher is betterAs of November 1, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

gradually.ai

Methodology and context

Metric: rank-score-100
Scale: 0-100
Participants: 74
Sample: 1
Methodology and context: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Product photography

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst93.2 rank points

MAI-Image-2.5 Flash92.2 rank points

Muse Image89.5 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 1.088.6 rank points

GPT Image 287.2 rank points

Krea 2 Large87.2 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Pro86.8 rank points

Qwen Image 3.086.3 rank points

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash84 rank points

Krea 383.6 rank points

MAI-Image-2.683.6 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo83.6 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image82.6 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Pro81.7 rank points

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct80.4 rank points

Nano Banana 2.179.9 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image Pro79.9 rank points

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)76.7 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 2.075.8 rank points

Nano Banana 2 Lite74 rank points

Recraft V4.173.1 rank points

Qwen-Image-2.172.2 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 9B71.7 rank points

Nano Banana Pro71.7 rank points

Krea 2 Medium Turbo67.1 rank points

Reve 2.166.7 rank points

Bria FIBO 259.4 rank points

Ideogram 4.558.9 rank points

Luma Uni-1.158.9 rank points

MAI-Image-2.558.9 rank points

MOSS-Image-SFT57.5 rank points

FLUX.2 Flex56.2 rank points

Luma Uni-1.1 Max56.2 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 4B54.3 rank points

FLUX.2 Max52.1 rank points

Bria FIBO Lite50.2 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Flash48.9 rank points

FLUX.2 Pro47 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Flash47 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image-1.543.8 rank points

GPT Image 1 Mini43.4 rank points

FLUX 3 Image42.9 rank points

FLUX 3 Image Klein42.9 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro42 rank points

FLUX.2 Dev40.2 rank points

FLUX.1 [dev]39.7 rank points

Kling Image 3.039.3 rank points

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro39.3 rank points

Nano Banana 238.8 rank points

GPT Image 1.537.9 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Flare37.9 rank points

Wan 2.6 Text to Image37.9 rank points

Midjourney V8.136.5 rank points

Seedream 4.031.1 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility30.1 rank points

Z-Image Turbo28.3 rank points

Firefly Image Model 524.2 rank points

FLUX1.1 [pro]21.9 rank points

Kling Image 3.0 Omni21.5 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]21 rank points

Grok Imagine Image Quality21 rank points

Runway Gen-4 Image19.6 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image19.2 rank points

Z-Image Base15.1 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large13.7 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium12.8 rank points

MiniMax Image-0111.9 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]9.1 rank points

Ideogram 4.08.2 rank points

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px8.2 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra5.9 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 45 rank points

Lumina-Image 2.03.7 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 31.4 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

MAI-Image-2.5 Flash

Muse Image

Grok Imagine Image 1.0

Wan 2.7 Image

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

Nano Banana 2.1

Wan 2.7 Image Pro

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Firefly Image Model 5

FLUX1.1 [pro]

Kling Image 3.0 Omni

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

Grok Imagine Image Quality

Runway Gen-4 Image

HiDream-O1-Image

Z-Image Base

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

MiniMax Image-01

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

Ideogram 4.0

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra

Adobe Firefly Image 4

Lumina-Image 2.0

Adobe Firefly Image 3

higher is betterAs of November 1, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

gradually.ai

Methodology and context

Metric: rank-score-100
Scale: 0-100
Participants: 74
Sample: 1
Methodology and context: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Character and detail

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Firefly Image Model 586.8 rank points

MAI-Image-2.5 Flash86.3 rank points

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro85.8 rank points

FLUX.2 Pro85.4 rank points

FLUX.2 Max84.5 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image-1.583.1 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Pro82.6 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Flare82.2 rank points

FLUX 3 Image Klein81.7 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility78.5 rank points

Krea 378.1 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst74.4 rank points

FLUX 3 Image72.6 rank points

Wan 2.6 Text to Image72.6 rank points

Grok Imagine Image Quality68 rank points

Ideogram 4.568 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image Pro68 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Pro67.1 rank points

Nano Banana 2.166.7 rank points

GPT Image 1.564.4 rank points

Luma Uni-1.1 Max64.4 rank points

Muse Image63.9 rank points

Ideogram 4.062.1 rank points

Nano Banana 262.1 rank points

GPT Image 260.7 rank points

FLUX.2 Dev60.3 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 9B59.4 rank points

Qwen Image 3.059.4 rank points

FLUX.2 Flex58 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 2.057.1 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 1.056.6 rank points

MAI-Image-2.556.6 rank points

Bria FIBO Lite55.2 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]54.8 rank points

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)54.3 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo53 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 4B52.5 rank points

Bria FIBO 249.3 rank points

Luma Uni-1.147.9 rank points

Nano Banana Pro46.6 rank points

Z-Image Base46.6 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 446.1 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro46.1 rank points

Z-Image Turbo46.1 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image45.7 rank points

MAI-Image-2.643.8 rank points

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct42.9 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra42.5 rank points

Reve 2.142 rank points

FLUX.1 [dev]39.7 rank points

Seedream 4.039.7 rank points

Krea 2 Medium Turbo37.9 rank points

Recraft V4.137 rank points

FLUX1.1 [pro]35.6 rank points

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash35.6 rank points

Kling Image 3.0 Omni35.2 rank points

Nano Banana 2 Lite35.2 rank points

Krea 2 Large34.2 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Flash34.2 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image26.9 rank points

MiniMax Image-0123.3 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large23.3 rank points

Runway Gen-4 Image22.4 rank points

Kling Image 3.021.9 rank points

Midjourney V8.121.9 rank points

Qwen-Image-2.121 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Flash21 rank points

Lumina-Image 2.017.4 rank points

MOSS-Image-SFT17.4 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium15.5 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 38.7 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]8.7 rank points

GPT Image 1 Mini7.8 rank points

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px5.5 rank points

Firefly Image Model 5

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

FLUX 3 Image

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Grok Imagine Image Quality

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Grok Imagine Image 1.0

MAI-Image-2.5

Bria FIBO Lite

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Adobe Firefly Image 4

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Z-Image Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image

MAI-Image-2.6

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

Adobe Firefly Image 3

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

GPT Image 1 Mini

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

higher is betterAs of November 1, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

gradually.ai

Methodology and context

Metric: rank-score-100
Scale: 0-100
Participants: 74
Sample: 1
Methodology and context: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Infographic

The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank from model-blind comparison rounds. One archived first output contributes per model. This remains an n = 1 sample.

Luma Uni-1.195.4 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo93.2 rank points

MAI-Image-2.5 Flash91.8 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst91.3 rank points

Qwen Image 3.091.3 rank points

Reve 2.190.4 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Pro86.8 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 1.084.9 rank points

Ideogram 4.084.9 rank points

Krea 2 Large84.9 rank points

Krea 384.9 rank points

Qwen-Image-2.182.2 rank points

Ideogram 4.581.7 rank points

Seedream 5.0 Flash78.5 rank points

GPT Image 278.1 rank points

Grok Imagine Image 2.077.6 rank points

FLUX.2 Dev74.9 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image-1.574.9 rank points

MOSS-Image-SFT74.9 rank points

FLUX 3 Image Klein73.5 rank points

Krea 2 Medium Turbo73.1 rank points

Nano Banana 2.170.8 rank points

Bria FIBO 269.9 rank points

Luma Uni-1.1 Max69.4 rank points

Seedream 4.068.9 rank points

GPT Image 2.5 Flare65.8 rank points

Muse Image65.8 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro62.1 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image Pro61.6 rank points

Recraft V4.161.2 rank points

Wan 2.6 Text to Image60.3 rank points

FLUX 3 Image58.9 rank points

MAI-Image-2.6 Flash58.9 rank points

Wan 2.7 Image56.2 rank points

GPT Image 1.555.7 rank points

Nano Banana 2 Lite55.2 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Flash55.2 rank points

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct51.1 rank points

MAI-Image-2.549.8 rank points

Recraft V4.1 Utility48.9 rank points

Qwen Image 2.0 Pro48.4 rank points

FLUX.2 Max47.9 rank points

Nano Banana Pro47.9 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [max]43.8 rank points

Nano Banana 243.4 rank points

FLUX.2 Flex40.6 rank points

MAI-Image-2.640.2 rank points

FLUX.2 Pro37.4 rank points

FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]32.9 rank points

Grok Imagine Image Quality30.6 rank points

FLUX.1 [dev]27.4 rank points

Runway Gen-4 Image26.9 rank points

Kling Image 3.026.5 rank points

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)26.5 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 9B26 rank points

Qwen Image 2.1 Pro26 rank points

HiDream-O1-Image25.1 rank points

Midjourney V8.123.7 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large23.3 rank points

Z-Image Turbo20.5 rank points

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium19.6 rank points

FLUX.2 Klein 4B19.2 rank points

Kling Image 3.0 Omni17.8 rank points

FLUX1.1 [pro]17.4 rank points

Z-Image Base10 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra8.2 rank points

MiniMax Image-018.2 rank points

GPT Image 1 Mini7.8 rank points

Bria FIBO Lite7.3 rank points

Lumina-Image 2.06.4 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 45 rank points

Firefly Image Model 55 rank points

Adobe Firefly Image 34.1 rank points

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px3.7 rank points

Luma Uni-1.1

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

MAI-Image-2.5 Flash

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Qwen Image 3.0

Reve 2.1

Seedream 5.0 Pro

Grok Imagine Image 1.0

Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Wan 2.7 Image Pro

Recraft V4.1

Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Wan 2.7 Image

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

Grok Imagine Image Quality

FLUX.1 [dev]

Runway Gen-4 Image

Kling Image 3.0

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Z-Image Turbo

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra

Adobe Firefly Image 4

Firefly Image Model 5

Adobe Firefly Image 3

Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

higher is betterAs of November 1, 2026Scale: 0 rank points - 100 rank points

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

gradually.ai

Methodology and context

Metric: rank-score-100
Scale: 0-100
Participants: 74
Sample: 1
Methodology and context: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.

Source: Gradually-Bildtest

Recorded measurement details

Gradually sample test: Typography and layout (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 73.5
Score: 73.5
Metric: rank-score-100
Unit: rank score
Direction: Higher is better
Source rank: 19
Sample: 1
Source type: gradually-sample-test
Evaluator: gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at: 2026-11-01
Methodology: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank: 20.33
Individual ranks: 12, 13, 36
Criterion scores: headline 1.67, subline 1.67, text-control 1.67, visual-brief 1.67, layout 1.67

Source Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Product photography (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 82.6
Score: 82.6
Metric: rank-score-100
Unit: rank score
Direction: Higher is better
Source rank: 13
Sample: 1
Source type: gradually-sample-test
Evaluator: gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at: 2026-11-01
Methodology: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank: 13.67
Individual ranks: 20, 17, 4
Criterion scores: subject 1.33, time 1.33, watch-details 1.33, photography 1.33, exclusions 1.33

Source Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Character and detail (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 45.7
Score: 45.7
Metric: rank-score-100
Unit: rank score
Direction: Higher is better
Source rank: 45
Sample: 1
Source type: gradually-sample-test
Evaluator: gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at: 2026-11-01
Methodology: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank: 40.67
Individual ranks: 47, 10, 65
Criterion scores: scene 2, wardrobe 2, anatomy 1.67, props 1.33, environment 1

Source Gradually-Bildtest

Gradually sample test: Infographic (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 56.2
Score: 56.2
Metric: rank-score-100
Unit: rank score
Direction: Higher is better
Source rank: 34
Sample: 1
Source type: gradually-sample-test
Evaluator: gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Retrieved at: 2026-11-01
Methodology: One archived, unfiltered first output per model. All 74 images are ranked in three model-blind orderings. The 0-100 value normalizes the mean rank. This remains an n = 1 sample, and an automated judge may have visual preferences of its own.
Mean rank: 33
Individual ranks: 42, 27, 30
Criterion scores: title 1.67, sequence 1.67, labels 1.33, diagram 1, clarity 1

Source Gradually-Bildtest

Head-to-head comparisons

Wan 2.7 Image vs. GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Wan 2.7 Image vs. GPT Image 2

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Reve 2.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Nano Banana 2

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Midjourney V8.2

Wan 2.7 Image vs. GPT Image 1.5

Show all comparisons (139)

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MAI-Image-2.5

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Nano Banana Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Nano Banana 2 Lite

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Seedream 5.0 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Grok Imagine Image Quality

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Max

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Qwen Image 2.0 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MAI-Image-2.5 Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Krea 2 Medium Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Seedream 4.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Krea 2 Large

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1 Max

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Flex

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Ideogram 4.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Wan 2.6 Text to Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HiDream-O1-Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Firefly Image Model 5

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Midjourney V8.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Wan 2.7 Image vs. GPT Image 2.5 Flare

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Qwen-Image-2.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MAI-Image-2.6

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MAI-Image-2.6 Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Muse Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Grok Imagine Image 2.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX 3 Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX 3 Image Klein

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Nano Banana 2.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Ideogram 4.5

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Hy Image 3.5 Preview

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Ming-Image-0.1-Design

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Recraft V4.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Recraft V4.1 Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Bria FIBO 2

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Krea 3

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Qwen Image 3.0 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Qwen Image 3.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Wan 2.7 Image Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Seedream 5.0 Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. SenseNova U1.5 Lite

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Kling Image 3.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Kling Image 3.0 Omni

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Vidu Q2 Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. WAND-Vega-Image 1.0 Lite

Wan 2.7 Image vs. GLM-Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MiniMax Image-01

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Z-Image Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Luma Uni-1.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Runway Gen-4 Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Runway Gen-4 Image Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Leonardo Phoenix 1.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Leonardo Lucid Origin

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Leonardo Lucid Realism

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Adobe Firefly Image 3

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Adobe Firefly Image 4 Ultra

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Xingliu Star-3

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MiracleVision V6

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Hy Image 3.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Bria FIBO Lite

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Mystic 2.5

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Mystic 2.5 Flexible

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Mystic 2.5 Fluid

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Recraft V4.1 Utility Pro

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Seedream 4.5

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Seedream 5.0 Lite

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Kling Image O1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Image Core

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Image Ultra

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Klein 9B Preview

Wan 2.7 Image vs. GPT Image 1 Mini

Wan 2.7 Image vs. ChatGPT Image Latest (API-Alias)

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Klein 4B

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.2 Dev

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro]

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.1 [dev]

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [pro]

Wan 2.7 Image vs. FLUX.1 Kontext [max]

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion XL 1.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion 3 Medium

Wan 2.7 Image vs. SDXL Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Stable Diffusion Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Midjourney V7

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Niji 7

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Grok Imagine Image 1.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HUMAIN Image 1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MOSS-Image-Base

Wan 2.7 Image vs. MOSS-Image-SFT

Wan 2.7 Image vs. LLaDA-Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. LLaDA-Image-Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Nucleus-Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. LongCat-Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. BAGEL-7B-MoT

Wan 2.7 Image vs. OmniGen2

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Emu3.5-Image

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-SFT

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Kandinsky-5.0-T2I-Lite-Pretrain

Wan 2.7 Image vs. NextStep-1.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Base

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Boogu-Image-0.1-Turbo

Wan 2.7 Image vs. SANA-1.5 1.6B 1024px

Wan 2.7 Image vs. SANA-1.5 4.8B 1024px

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Sana-Sprint 0.6B 1024px

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Sana-Sprint 1.6B 1024px

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Chroma1-HD

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Chroma1-Flash

Wan 2.7 Image vs. AuraFlow v0.3

Wan 2.7 Image vs. PixArt-Sigma-XL-2-1024-MS

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Lumina-Image 2.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HART-0.7B-1024px

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Janus-Pro-1B

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Janus-Pro-7B

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Show-o2-1.5B-HQ

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Kandinsky 3.1

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Anima Base v1.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Krea 2 Raw

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HunyuanImage 3.0

Wan 2.7 Image vs. HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct Distil

Wan 2.7 Image vs. Z-Image Base

All specifications

Input and output

Maximum output: 2K; Source: Maximum output

Licence and access

Access: API; Source: Access

API

Native API model ID: wan2.7-image; a distinct faster API model choice alongside Pro.; Source: Native API model ID

Further details

Distinction: Standard is a separate model ID with T2I up to 2K; Pro supports T2I up to 4K.; Source: Distinction

Prices

PricesSubscriptions

fal.ai (fal-ai/wan/v2.7/text-to-image): $0.03 per image (estimated)Source

At Alibaba from ≈ €6.39 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite, with limited credits). Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 12 plans in Germany.

Plan	Monthly price	Note
Token Plan Individual LiteAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €6.39	developer's own plan, with limited credit
Token Plan Individual EssentialAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €10.65	developer's own plan, with limited credit
Token Plan Individual StandardAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €19.17	developer's own plan, with limited credit
Token Plan Team Team Standard SeatAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €21.30	developer's own plan, with limited credit, for teams, per seat
Token Plan Individual ProAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €72.43	developer's own plan, with limited credit
Token Plan Team Team Pro SeatAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €79.89	developer's own plan, with limited credit, for teams, per seat
Token Plan Team Team Max SeatAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)	≈ €213.03	developer's own plan, with limited credit, for teams, per seat
Poe Basic	€6.83	with limited credit
Poe Plus	€27.36	with limited credit
Poe Pro	€68.41	with limited credit
Poe Advanced	€136.84	with limited credit
Poe Max	€342.11	with limited credit

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Wan 2.7 Image

How good is Wan 2.7 Image?

Rank 16 of 74 in our own test.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo67

Luma Uni-1.167

Qwen Image 3.065

Wan 2.7 ImageRank 16 of 7465

HiDream-O1-Image-1.564

HunyuanImage 3.0 Instruct64

Luma Uni-1.1 Max63

What is Wan 2.7 Image good at?

Best at Product photography (83 out of 100), weakest at Character and detail (46).

GraduallyBench, one image per task

Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition74out of 100Rank 19 of 74 in this task
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details83out of 100Rank 13 of 74 in this task
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency46out of 100Rank 45 of 74 in this task
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization56out of 100Rank 34 of 74 in this task

Where can I use Wan 2.7 Image?

At Alibaba with a subscription from ≈ €6.39 a month. Including other providers that makes 12 plans in Germany.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At Alibaba

7 plans, from ≈ €6.39 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite).

Through other providers

5 plans from 1 provider, from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic), with limited credits.

Sources and data date

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

Type	Evidence and data date
Additional source	Alibaba (retrieved November 1, 2026) · Alibaba · Editorial description reviewed November 1, 2026
Additional source	fal.ai
Additional source	Gradually-Bildtest (retrieved November 1, 2026)