HiDream-O1-Image-1.5vs.Wan 2.7 Image

Which one is better?

In our own test both are on par. Neither is in the arena. Wan 2.7 Image has no API price.

Same task, the first image of each. The task with the biggest difference is preselected.

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run — HiDream-O1-Image-1.544 out of 100

Wan 2.7 Image: Product photography, first image from the fixed test run — Wan 2.7 Image83 out of 100

Result for “Product photography”:Wan 2.7 Image ahead

Prompt given to both modelsCreate a square premium product photograph of a brushed titanium wristwatch standing upright on dark green marble. The watch has a cream dial, thin black hands set to 10:10, twelve distinct hour markers, a realistic crown, and a dark brown leather strap. Soft window light from the left, controlled reflections, shallow depth of field, no text, no logo, no extra objects.

What the rating looks at: Materials, reflections, and fine details.

“Ahead”: better in all three rating rounds. “Slightly ahead”: a higher value, but not in every round.

Test protocol of the images

Both models receive the same archived prompt in exactly one request, and the first result counts. Files are normalized to 1,024 × 1,024 pixels without cropping. Provider resolution, randomness, quality tier and prompt processing can still differ. The images are a practical visual test, not a reconstruction of the arena configuration.

Character and detail

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5: manual, one request, first output, HiDream O1 Image 1.5, 1:1, 2K, n=1, no reference image, no negative prompt, Vivago web, 2 free credits, source 2048x2048, stored 1024x1024 (Lanczos3 downscale), generated Aug 16, 2026, 1:07 PM. Source

Wan 2.7 Image: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=2030081785, estimated cost $0.030000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:22 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 985a75b38642a9f0e5e0c0e0c67f1b7f67780d42bd2168fa24e9a7a7a94b0da6

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 image SHA 256: 99db95d2f6f00dc7f8872b5562b7577a49065a120d15fc54f687ba624fe4cf6e

Wan 2.7 Image image SHA 256: 62258e364ab7627aa6c1d0d4214ad1cc32287ede3b059aec041acf4dcdb20cf4

Infographic

Wan 2.7 Image: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1843752681, estimated cost $0.030000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:22 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: ed65cb4e6a51e2336f8b149ad4cbb16e020f07d527ad94362e719d2dcf91d94f

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 image SHA 256: 073d00d82d82a05c20f9117a18e71e21fe0300fd9f4985608be09726b1ee70a8

Wan 2.7 Image image SHA 256: f5707f29066b971a3c094495e0ff2a1bdd0479aa5c583a2a4d3b607ce7ca0636

Product photography

Wan 2.7 Image: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=1918862783, estimated cost $0.030000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:21 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: c67fd71e91304458a2feef5c91efa8677260fab0c0099a29a2c52cb579f5b2f3

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 image SHA 256: 98de28b81a3551441936ce2ebcc0b418e69e9d5cf6ce8b1dc281bc90b05731dc

Wan 2.7 Image image SHA 256: 6b7d5e90e75158d052d09c570b3af8fbb633ed1e20d9d84b8d23e864aeb446ac

Typography and layout

Wan 2.7 Image: fal, requested 1024x1024, n=1, seed=457490918, estimated cost $0.030000, generated Nov 1, 2026, 9:21 PM. Source

Protocol gradually-image-comparison-v1. Prompt SHA 256: 2e012c3d14ee5dd02203a94f394ca80a5038cdebd6032b25a8b8a221f2255419

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 image SHA 256: db5acbc9b443ea381bf6294997720fa246cf8a199f91d451aa1d7242fc4a348a

Wan 2.7 Image image SHA 256: 60d9602757484b80c9a30506243d50d74d1160ff6998e80ba21aeb99338f5587

The numbers at a glance

Arena ratingfrom votes by users · higher is better

n/a

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

not in the arena

n/a

Wan 2.7 Image

not in the arena

GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100 · higher is better

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

Rank 17 of 74

Wan 2.7 Image

Rank 16 of 74

Price per imagedollars through the API · lower is better

$0.08

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

fairly expensive

n/a

Wan 2.7 Image

no API price

Ranks among the 22 image models with an arena rating and the 74 with a GraduallyBench run; prices compared with 28 models with an API price.

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

Subscription: n/a No plan in Germany names exactly this model.
Via API: $0.08 per image, 100 images $8.

Wan 2.7 Image

Subscription: At Alibaba from ≈ €6.39 a month (Token Plan Individual Lite, with limited credits). Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 12 plans in Germany.
Via API: No API price known. Access: API.
Weights: unknown.

Subscriptions only count plans that name exactly this model. Subscription prices include VAT, API prices are in dollars.

GraduallyBench from Nov 1, 2026 · API prices from Oct 28, 2026 · Subscription database from Sep 29, 2026 (34 days old)

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For ratings only when the gap is clear.

Kennzahl	HiDream-O1-Image-1.5	Wan 2.7 Image
Ratings
Arena ratingfrom votes by users, higher is better	n/a	n/a
Arena rank	n/a	n/a
Arena votesmore votes, a safer rating	n/a	n/a
GraduallyBenchour own rating, 0 to 100	64	65
GraduallyBench by task
Typography and layoutLegible text, hierarchy, and composition	55	74
Product photographyMaterials, reflections, and fine details	44	83
Character and detailAnatomy, clothing, and spatial consistency	83	46
InfographicNumbers, labels, and visual organization	75	56
API price
Per imagelower is better	$0.08	n/a
100 images	$8	n/a
Profile
Released	June 2026	n/a
Weightsopen means: runs locally	proprietary	unknown
Access	API, Web app	API
Parameters	not published	not published
Largest output	2,048 × 2,048 pixels	2K
Plans in Germanynaming exactly this model	n/a	12

API prices for one image at 1,024 × 1,024 pixels according to Artificial Analysis.

Sources: HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 model source (verified Sep 22, 2026) · Wan 2.7 Image model source (verified Nov 1, 2026)

Arena ratings by category

From blind votes on LMArena. “Ahead” means the lead is clear.

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

The stored benchmark database contains no measurement for HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 and Wan 2.7 Image from the same arena and category. Older model versions are not used as substitutes.

Compare another matchup

First image modelSecond image model

More matchups

Compare HiDream-O1-Image-1.5 and Wan 2.7 Image with other important image models.

View the complete image model comparison

Same prompt, two images

The numbers at a glance

HiDream-O1-Image-1.5

Wan 2.7 Image

All data side by side

Arena ratings by category

No shared arena score in the stored snapshot

Compare another matchup

Related image model comparisons