Skip to main content

AnthropicMoonshot AILLM matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Kimi K3.1 Pro

Which one is better?

Kimi K3.1 Pro performs better than Claude Haiku 5.5, but costs 20 times as much.

Kimi K3.1 Pro ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

112.9

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Rank 11

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
236

Claude Haiku 5.5

33

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

$4

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Haiku 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

0

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Rank 670 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

No clear advantage

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro for

KnowledgeCodingReasoningMathematicsLegal (not certain)Agents (not certain)General (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

105110115120100CodingKimi K3.1 ProReasoningKimi K3.1 ProMathematicsKimi K3.1 ProKnowledgeKimi K3.1 ProAgentsslightly Kimi K3.1 ProGeneralslightly Kimi K3.1 ProFinancelevelLegalslightly Kimi K3.1 Pro
CodingKimi K3.1 Pro ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
Kimi K3.1 Pro116.1Rank 9
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Kimi K3.1 Pro 109.9 to 122.3.

AreaHaiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal, Health.

Kimi K3.1 Pro is ahead in 4 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.

level: 1too little data: 2Kimi K3.1 Pro slightly ahead: 3Kimi K3.1 Pro ahead: 4

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeKimi K3.1 Pro +2985.5 to 114.7
CodingKimi K3.1 Pro +10106.2 to 116.1
ReasoningKimi K3.1 Pro +8105.2 to 113.4
MathematicsKimi K3.1 Pro +6107.1 to 112.7
Agentsleaning Kimi K3.1 Pronot certain · 4 tests each
Generalleaning Kimi K3.1 Pronot certain · 5 and 4 tests
Multimodalonly Kimi K3.1 Pro has a score
Specialist fields
Legalleaning Kimi K3.1 Pronot certain · 3 and 2 tests
Financelevel104.7 to 106.0
Healthonly Haiku 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecurityonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Haiku 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxKimi K3.1 Pro ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro 112.9 · Gap 9.4 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)Kimi K3.1 Pro ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro 112.9

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeKimi K3.1 ProCoding 106.2 to 116.1
Maths and data analysisKimi K3.1 ProMathematics 107.1 to 112.7, Reasoning 105.2 to 113.4
Facts and researchKimi K3.1 ProKnowledge 85.5 to 114.7
Agents and workflowsleaning Kimi K3.1 ProAgents 106.1 to 111.9
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 33 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Kimi K3.1 Pro
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning Kimi K3.1 ProFinance 104.7 to 106.0, Legal 94.4 to 108.9, Health without a score for Kimi K3.1 Pro
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Kimi K3.1 Pro: 77 to 0 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.4112.9
RankRank 20 of 91Rank 11 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50$2
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50$10
Speed
Tokens per second23633
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10077Rank 3 of 8750Rank 670 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Oct 23, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnon/a
  • Kimi K3.1 Pro, API price listed by Artificial Analysis: $2 input, $10 output, and $0.20 cached input per 1 million tokens. Kimi's official API publishes CNY rates separately. Source
  • Kimi K3.1 Pro, Official API pricing: K3.1 Pro: CNY 13 input, CNY 68 output, CNY 13 cache write, and CNY 1.30 cache hit per million tokens. Source
  • Kimi K3.1 Pro, Highspeed API pricing: CNY 26 input, CNY 136 output, CNY 26 cache write, and CNY 1.30 cache hit per million tokens. Source
  • Kimi K3.1 Pro, International API pricing in USD: The international Kimi platform lists $2 input, $10 output, $2 cache write and $0.20 cache hit per million tokens. Highspeed costs $4/$20/$4/$0.20. Checked October 29, 2026. Separately documented CNY tariffs remain separate observations. Source

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Kimi K3.1 Pro

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 75.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 70%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 11.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 81.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 26.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 91%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 27.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 24.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 63.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 31.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 56%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 62.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 67%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 84.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 29.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 67.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 57.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 86.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 90.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 10%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 40%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 12.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 70%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 59.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 59.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 75.6%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 79.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 86.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 87.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 48.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 75.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 88.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 81.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 27.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 58%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 25%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 58.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 22.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexFinance Agent v2.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 70%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexCivil Negligence · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 66.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 62.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexMysteryMechanism · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 26.1%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
EMB v1.1DCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 64.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 94.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 70.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.7%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 36.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.6%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 81.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 15.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 36.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexTax Agent Bench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 24.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexCriminal · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 60.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexTerminal-Bench-Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 31.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
EMB v1.1LBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.1%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 55.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 71.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 70.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Arbitration International Dispute Resolution · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 10%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 87%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 56.2%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 64.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 11.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro: 23.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  3. 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  4. 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  7. 7Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  9. 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
Show all 43 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  2. 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  3. 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  4. 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  5. 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  6. 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  8. 17Gemini 4 Argon vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  9. 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  10. 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  11. 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  12. 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  13. 22GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  15. 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  17. 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  18. 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  20. 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  21. 30Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  23. 32Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  24. 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  27. 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  28. 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  30. 39Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. GLM-5.3
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  32. 41Muse Wonder Full vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  33. 42GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  34. 43Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro