- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup
Claude Sonnet 4.5vs.GPT-6 Sol
Which one is better?
GPT-6 Sol performs better than Claude Sonnet 4.5 and is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs 1.5 times as much.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Rank 71
GPT-6 Sol
Rank 13
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT-6 Sol
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT-6 Sol
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Rank 102 of 785
GPT-6 Sol
Rank 3 of 785
Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 for
No clear advantage
Choose GPT-6 Sol for
On this page
Where is the difference?
GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 5 of 10 areas, Sonnet 4.5 in none.
too little data: 5GPT-6 Sol ahead: 5
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Oct 1, 2026 · 30 s · $0.04
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 2,710 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0408
- Response time
- 30.2 s
- API model reported in response
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
- Pinned endpoint
- Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.5-sonnet-20250929
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
GPT-6 Sol

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- openai/gpt-6-sol
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 4,389 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0439
- Response time
- 80.5 s
- API model reported in response
- openai/gpt-6-sol
- Pinned endpoint
- OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0105
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- anthropic
- API model
- anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
- Output
- 686 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0105
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
GPT-6 Sol
Unavailable in this round
Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 92 models
4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Claude Sonnet 4.5: 73 to 50 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026
Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-6 Sol
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 65.4 | 110.5 |
| Rank | Rank 71 of 92 | Rank 13 of 92 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $3 | $2above 272,000 tokens: $4 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $15 | $10above 272,000 tokens: $15 |
| Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included) | $0.06 | $0.044 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 59 | 111 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 50Rank 102 of 785 | 73Rank 3 of 785 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 200,000 tokens≈ 300 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | January 2025 | Apr 20, 2026 |
| Released | September 2025 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Availability | Discontinued | Active |
| Open weights | no | no |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 86.4, rank 44$3 input and $15 output per 1M tokens
GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens
Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 SolOverall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens
GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Sonnet 4.5B: GPT-6 Sol
More comparisons
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 3GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 4GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
- 5GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 7Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 8GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
Show all 54 comparisons
- 10Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 11GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 12Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
- 14GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 15GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 16GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 17Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 18GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 19Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 20GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
- 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 22Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 24GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 25Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 26GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
- 27Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 28GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 29Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 30Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 31GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 32Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 33Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 34Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 35Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
- 36Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 37Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 38GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
- 39GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 40Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 41Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 42Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 43Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
- 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 45Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 46GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
- 47Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 48GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
- 49GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 50Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 51Claude Opus 4.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 52GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
- 53Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
- 54Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro