Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 4.7vs.GPT-6 Sol

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Sol performs better than Claude Opus 4.7 and is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.7 costs 2.5 times as much.

GPT-6 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
93.5

Claude Opus 4.7

Rank 39

110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

GPT-6 Sol faster
SpeedTokens per second
80

Claude Opus 4.7

111

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$10

Claude Opus 4.7

$4

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
27

Claude Opus 4.7

Rank 597 of 785

73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for

No clear advantage

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

GeneralReasoningCodingMultimodalKnowledgeAgentsHealth (not certain)Finance (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 4.7GPT-6 SolMedian of all ranked models

9511513575CodingGPT-6 SolReasoningGPT-6 SolKnowledgeGPT-6 SolAgentsGPT-6 SolGeneralGPT-6 SolMultimodalGPT-6 SolFinanceslightlyGPT-6 SolHealthslightlyGPT-6 Sol
CodingGPT-6 Sol ahead
Opus 4.792.7Rank 45
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 4.7 84.8 to 100.6, GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6.

AreaOpus 4.7GPT-6 Sol

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 75 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics, Legal.

GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, Opus 4.7 in none.

too little data: 2GPT-6 Sol slightly ahead: 2GPT-6 Sol ahead: 6

Areas in the overall index
GeneralGPT-6 Sol +2884.8 to 113.0
ReasoningGPT-6 Sol +2787.1 to 114.1
CodingGPT-6 Sol +2292.7 to 114.9
MultimodalGPT-6 Sol +1492.5 to 106.9
KnowledgeGPT-6 Sol +1495.9 to 109.8
AgentsGPT-6 Sol +1097.6 to 107.2
Mathematicsonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
Healthleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 2 tests each
Financeleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 6 and 3 tests
Legaltoo little data96.3 to 104.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Searchtoo little data100.4 to 98.6
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Productivityonly GPT-6 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Sol at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6 Sol ahead
Opus 4.7 93.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5 · Gap 8.3 · Test series 3
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6 Sol ahead
Opus 4.7 93.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 SolCoding 92.7 to 114.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 SolMathematics without a score for Opus 4.7, Reasoning 87.1 to 114.1
Facts and researchGPT-6 SolKnowledge 95.9 to 109.8, Search 100.4 to 98.6 (too little data)
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 SolAgents 97.6 to 107.2
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Sol80 to 111 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Opus 4.7
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Sol$10 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning GPT-6 SolFinance 97.4 to 101.3, Legal 96.3 to 104.8 (too little data), Health 99.6 to 104.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6 SolMultimodal 92.5 to 106.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 20 s · $0.05

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
1,966 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0493
Response time
19.9 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.7-opus-20260416
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 4.7

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-6 Sol in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Opus 4.7max93.5

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Claude Opus 4.7: 73 to 27 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 4.7GPT-6 Sol

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7GPT-6 Sol
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better93.5110.5
RankRank 39 of 92Rank 13 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$5$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$25$10above 272,000 tokens: $15
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.049$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second80111
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10027Rank 597 of 78573Rank 3 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026Apr 20, 2026
ReleasedApril 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8

Overall index 99.0, rank 30$5 input and $25 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 4.8
Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
As cheap as GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 4.7B: GPT-6 Sol

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 43.9%GPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 63.7%GPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 51.5%GPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 1,361.7 eloGPT-6 Sol: 1,515.9 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ITBench-AA (SRE)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 46.7%GPT-6 Sol: 49.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 38.5%GPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,558GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,230GPT-6 Sol: 1,175LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,501GPT-6 Sol: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,298GPT-6 Sol: 1,266LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 54.9%GPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 83%GPT-6 Sol: 82%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 78.8%GPT-6 Sol: 82.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 0%GPT-6 Sol: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 23.7%GPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.0%GPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 35.2%GPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 64.5%GPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.4%GPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.5%GPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,546GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,508GPT-6 Sol: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,302GPT-6 Sol: 1,252LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 9.5%GPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 3.3%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 70%GPT-6 Sol: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 80.9%GPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 38.6%GPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 87.0%GPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,577GPT-6 Sol: 1,660LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,537GPT-6 Sol: 1,485LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,333GPT-6 Sol: 1,303LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 0%GPT-6 Sol: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 57.6%GPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 4.588 / 5GPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 57.1%GPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.6%GPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 32.6%GPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,560GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,551GPT-6 Sol: 1,519LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,302GPT-6 Sol: 1,255LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 64.2%GPT-6 Sol: 81.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 36.4%GPT-6 Sol: 23.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 56.4%GPT-6 Sol: 59.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.3%GPT-6 Sol: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 88.3%GPT-6 Sol: 80.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,558GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,489GPT-6 Sol: 1,435LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,331GPT-6 Sol: 1,306LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 66.5%GPT-6 Sol: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.7%GPT-6 Sol: 83.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.6%GPT-6 Sol: 72.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 37.0%GPT-6 Sol: 18.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,510GPT-6 Sol: 1,459LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,311GPT-6 Sol: 1,285LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 20.9%GPT-6 Sol: 16.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 54.3%GPT-6 Sol: 65.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 20.1%GPT-6 Sol: 19.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 88.2%GPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,480GPT-6 Sol: 1,430LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.6%GPT-6 Sol: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.2%GPT-6 Sol: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 65.4%GPT-6 Sol: 53.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 44.7%GPT-6 Sol: 18.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-6 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  5. 5GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  6. 6GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  8. 8GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 9Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
Show all 45 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  2. 11GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  3. 12GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  5. 14GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  8. 17GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  9. 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  11. 20GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  13. 22GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  14. 23Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  16. 25GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  17. 26Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  18. 27GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  19. 28GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  20. 29Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  21. 30GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  22. 31Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  23. 32Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
  24. 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  25. 34Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  26. 35GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  27. 36Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  28. 37GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  29. 38Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  31. 40Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  32. 41Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  34. 43Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  36. 45Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Muse Wonder Full