Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash

Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.

196

shared result series

24

distinct benchmarks

2026-08-16

latest retrieval

Change model selection

Specifications and cost

General specifications and standard API pricing

Undisclosed parameter counts and knowledge cutoffs stay marked as unavailable. The table shows direct standard token pricing, including documented context tiers. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.

Specifications and API pricing for GPT-5.6 Luna and Gemini 3.6 Flash
AttributeGPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
ReleasedJun 26, 2026Jul 21, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Model typeProprietaryProprietary
ParametersNot publishedNot published
ArchitectureNot publishedNot published
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Knowledge cutoffFebruary 16, 2026Not published
Technical sourcesModel, Context, Knowledge cutoffModel
API pricing per 1M tokens
API input$0.2 ≤272K / $0.4 >272K$0.75
API output$1.2 ≤272K / $1.8 >272K$3.75
Cache read$0.02 ≤272K / $0.04 >272K$0.07
Cache write (5 min.)$0.25 ≤272K / $0.5 >272KNot listed
Cache write (1 hr.)Not listedNot listed
Price verified08/11/2026Source08/16/2026Source
GPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.6 Flash
API inputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.2Lower price
Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.75
API outputUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.6 Luna$1.2Lower price
Gemini 3.6 Flash$3.75
Cache readUSD per 1M tokens, base tier
GPT-5.6 Luna$0.02Lower price
Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.075

Performance

Shared benchmarks

Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.

196 shared result series
GPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.6 Flash
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-5.6 Luna1,450.561 arena points
Gemini 3.6 Flash1,484.488 arena pointsHigher measured value
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna44.55 %Winner
Gemini 3.6 Flash30.928 %
CorpFin v2Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna64.219 %Winner
Gemini 3.6 Flash63.326 %
CyberBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna83.898 %Winner
Gemini 3.6 Flash48.514 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna67.116 %Winner
Gemini 3.6 Flash65.411 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna55.044 %
Gemini 3.6 Flash56.296 %Winner
GPQA DiamondOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna91.666 %
Gemini 3.6 Flash93.434 %Winner
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna1.25 %
Gemini 3.6 Flash3.333 %Winner
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna36.538 %Winner
Gemini 3.6 Flash25 %
LegalBenchOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna84.034 %
Gemini 3.6 Flash86.705 %Winner
MedCodeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna42.391 %
Gemini 3.6 Flash53.153 %Winner
MedScribeOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-5.6 Luna84.391 %Winner
Gemini 3.6 Flash79.661 %
Benchmark scores for GPT-5.6 Luna and Gemini 3.6 Flash
Benchmark and taskGPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.6 FlashComparabilitySource
Arena Text, Style ControlOverall
1,450.561 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±5.636The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,484.488 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±5.891The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:overallTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.6-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 16,419 anonymous pairwise votes.Gemini 3.6 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 13,693 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationOverall
44.55 %Winner
30.928 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-16-107652dc6bfcRetrieved 2026-08-16
CorpFin v2Overall
64.219 %Winner
63.326 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-16-45bbf84f57abRetrieved 2026-08-16
CyberBenchOverall
83.898 %Winner
48.514 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-cyberbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-03Import ID: vals-cyber-2026-08-16-702acaee9aa9Retrieved 2026-08-16
EMBOverall
67.116 %Winner
65.411 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-emb:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-emb-2026-08-16-68d5d1d47a97Retrieved 2026-08-16
Finance Agent (v2)Overall
55.044 %
56.296 %Winner
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-16-8853da43085dRetrieved 2026-08-16
GPQA DiamondOverall
91.666 %
93.434 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-16-7f8363eaa2dbRetrieved 2026-08-16
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved
1.25 %
3.333 %Winner
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-16-bae90566df2fRetrieved 2026-08-16
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass
36.538 %Winner
25 %
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-16-af296c00ecaaRetrieved 2026-08-16
LegalBenchOverall
84.034 %
86.705 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-16-d5b3b1b2b5c8Retrieved 2026-08-16
MedCodeOverall
42.391 %
53.153 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medcode:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medcode-2026-08-16-524f7f474eacRetrieved 2026-08-16
MedScribeOverall
84.391 %Winner
79.661 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-medscribe:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-medscribe-2026-08-16-c385354a7e62Retrieved 2026-08-16
MMLU-ProOverall
86.036 %
89.276 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-16-e14d5bb3a34cRetrieved 2026-08-16
MMMU-ProOverall
85.029 %
88.382 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmmu:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmmu-2026-08-16-37c9a8c7e21fRetrieved 2026-08-16
MortgageTaxOverall
67.29 %
67.608 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mortgage-tax:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-mortgage_tax-2026-08-16-e78c985dbb1cRetrieved 2026-08-16
ProgramBenchOverall
0 %Tie
0 %Tie
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceTieGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-16-08d9727662ddRetrieved 2026-08-16
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall
61.164 %Winner
56.563 %
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-snap:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-public-benefits-bench-2026-08-16-7ce68123c502Retrieved 2026-08-16
SAGEOverall
44.22 %
48.686 %Winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: Gemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-16-a416dd25affbRetrieved 2026-08-16
SWE-bench VerifiedOverall
93 %Winner
79.6 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-16-c133071b8167Retrieved 2026-08-16
TaxEval v2Overall
76.166 %Winner
74.857 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-16-5bbd495dac53Retrieved 2026-08-16
Terminal-Bench 2.1Overall
79.026 %Winner
73.783 %
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-16-b3f38c18bea4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Vals IndexOverall
59.881 %Winner
55.354 %
2weighted index scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-14Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-16-ab641d89d6edRetrieved 2026-08-16
Vals Multimodal IndexOverall
69.058 %Winner
65.077 %
1.2weighted index scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-multimodal-index:1.2:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: No further settings disclosed
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-11Import ID: vals-vals_multimodal_index-2026-08-16-9f3ebb221408Retrieved 2026-08-16
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall
77.055 %Winner
64.005 %
1.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-vibe-code-bench:1.1:overallNo documented setup differenceWinner: GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna: Harness: OpenHands
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Harness: OpenHands
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-13Import ID: vals-vibe-code-2026-08-16-a73c9770bcc4Retrieved 2026-08-16
Arena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance
1,465.32 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±11.098The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,485.032 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±12.069The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:industry_business_and_management_and_financial_operationsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.6-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 3,171 anonymous pairwise votes.Gemini 3.6 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 2,650 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCLI
36.067 %Higher measured value
19.332 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cliTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Exact Pages
63.52 %Higher measured value
61.072 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:exact_pagesTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
CyberBenchPatch
79.661 %
84.746 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-cyberbench:1:patchTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-03Import ID: vals-cyber-2026-08-11-1f20498a3dc1Retrieved 2026-08-11
EMBComps
54.573 %
70.019 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-emb:1:compsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-emb-2026-08-11-e3c855e236e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments
52.027 %
53.608 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:adjustmentsTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondFew-Shot CoT
92.424 %No direct winner
92.424 %No direct winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_few_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Criteria passed
85.145 %Higher measured value
79.71 %
1criteria pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:criteria_pass_rate__antitrust_competitionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass
48.485 %Higher measured value
31.818 %
1all-pass rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:administrative_regulatoryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks
88.864 %
91.081 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:conclusion_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBiology
93.305 %
94.7 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:biologyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
MortgageTaxNumerical Extraction
75.596 %
76.789 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mortgage-tax:1:numerical_extractionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mortgage_tax-2026-08-11-5ea6eef3e482Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved
9 %Higher measured value
2.5 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:almostTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SAGEAutomata
31.35 %
34.92 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:automataTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-11-f1f79f6d8af3Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified<15 min fix
96.392 %Higher measured value
87.113 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:<15 min fixTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Correctness
66.558 %Higher measured value
63.532 %
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:correctnessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Easy
83.333 %
100 %Higher measured value
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:easyTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexCorpFin v2
65.035 %Higher measured value
63.52 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:corp_fin_v2Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals Multimodal IndexCorpFin v2
65.035 %Higher measured value
63.52 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-multimodal-index:1.2:corp_fin_v2Test setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_multimodal_index-2026-08-11-fa704862df19Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlChinese
1,485.14 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±18.537The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,540.655 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±20.919The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:chineseTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.6-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 1,179 anonymous pairwise votes.Gemini 3.6 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 834 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCOBOL
70 %Higher measured value
65.714 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:cobolTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11
CorpFin v2Max Fitting Context
64.103 %
65.385 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-corp-fin-v2:2:max_fitting_contextTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-corp_fin_v2-2026-08-11-d9e58d191cd9Retrieved 2026-08-11
CyberBenchPoC
88.136 %Higher measured value
12.281 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-cyberbench:1:pocTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: No further settings disclosed
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-03Import ID: vals-cyber-2026-08-11-1f20498a3dc1Retrieved 2026-08-11
EMBDataroom
83.009 %Higher measured value
72.965 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-emb:1:dataroomTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-emb-2026-08-11-e3c855e236e4Retrieved 2026-08-11
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass
43.285 %
44.634 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-finance-agent-v2:2:all_passTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-fabv2-2026-08-11-3e5c93a1857cRetrieved 2026-08-11
GPQA DiamondZero-Shot CoT
90.909 %
94.444 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-gpqa:1:diamond_zero_shot_cotTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-gpqa-2026-08-11-d3325290a404Retrieved 2026-08-11
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkAntitrust Competition · Task fully resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1task resolution rateHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-agent-benchmark:1:antitrust_competitionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-07Import ID: vals-hlab-2026-08-11-ea11b6e53414Retrieved 2026-08-11
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit
87.513 %Higher measured value
83.517 %
1weighted partial-credit scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-research:1:weighted_pass__administrative_regulatoryTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-legal_research-2026-08-11-326cf7aaca58Retrieved 2026-08-11
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks
82.142 %
83.894 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-legal-bench:1:interpretation_tasksTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-legal_bench-2026-08-11-836e5e44618eRetrieved 2026-08-11
MMLU-ProBusiness
91.001 %
92.776 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mmlu-pro:1:businessTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mmlu_pro-2026-08-11-b8e53828d746Retrieved 2026-08-11
MortgageTaxSemantic Extraction
58.983 %Higher measured value
58.426 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-mortgage-tax:1:semantic_extractionTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-mortgage_tax-2026-08-11-5ea6eef3e482Retrieved 2026-08-11
ProgramBenchFully Resolved
0 %No direct winner
0 %No direct winner
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-programbench:1:strictTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-programbench-2026-08-11-b6f8959fbdfeRetrieved 2026-08-11
SAGECalculus
64.506 %
75.309 %Higher measured value
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-sage:1:calculusTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 30,000 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-sage-2026-08-11-f1f79f6d8af3Retrieved 2026-08-11
SWE-bench Verified>4 hours
66.667 %Higher measured value
33.333 %
1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-swebench:1:>4 hoursTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-08Import ID: vals-swebench-2026-08-11-a6212cd857d8Retrieved 2026-08-11
TaxEval v2Stepwise Reasoning
85.773 %
86.182 %Higher measured value
2accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-tax-eval-v2:2:stepwise_reasoningTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-tax_eval_v2-2026-08-11-d05a40bf446fRetrieved 2026-08-11
Terminal-Bench 2.1Hard
70 %Higher measured value
64.444 %
2.1accuracyHigher is betterCohort: vals-terminal-bench-2-1:2.1:hardTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-06Import ID: vals-terminal-bench-2-1-2026-08-11-8f0ebd72a609Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals IndexFinance Agent v2
55.555 %Higher measured value
55.302 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-index:1.2:finance_agentTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_index-2026-08-11-e79d08d59249Retrieved 2026-08-11
Vals Multimodal IndexFinance Agent v2
55.555 %Higher measured value
55.302 %
1.2benchmark scoreHigher is betterCohort: vals-vals-multimodal-index:1.2:finance_agentTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-vals_multimodal_index-2026-08-11-fa704862df19Retrieved 2026-08-11
Arena Text, Style ControlCoding
1,498.496 arena points
95% confidence interval: ±9.171The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
1,522.164 arena pointsHigher measured value
95% confidence interval: ±9.711The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval and model configuration are part of the result.
style-control-v1style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingHigher is betterCohort: lmarena-text-style-control:2026-08-12:codingTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Snapshot: gpt-5.6-luna-xhigh, Reasoning: xhigh, Harness: Arena text, style control
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Snapshot: gemini-3.6-flash-high, Reasoning: high, Harness: Arena text, style control
GPT-5.6 Luna: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,743 anonymous pairwise votes.Gemini 3.6 Flash: Style-controlled Arena rating from 4,171 anonymous pairwise votes.
ArenaType: Official benchmark leaderboardLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-12Import ID: lmarena-eeedf9209373a7f9b324bfb839e7b02fedacd1e5-1611ed64f3f1Retrieved 2026-08-16
Code MigrationCode Quality
3.195 / 5
3.299 / 5Higher measured value
1mean reviewer code-quality ratingHigher is betterCohort: vals-code-migration:1:code_qualityTest setup not documented as identicalNo direct winnerGPT-5.6 Luna: Reasoning: max, Output limit: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Reasoning: high, Temperature: 1, Output limit: 65,536 tokens
Vals AIType: Independent evaluationLeaderboard updated: 2026-08-09Import ID: vals-code-migration-2026-08-11-3a2d5ce718a3Retrieved 2026-08-11

The table shows 64 diversified result series from 196 shared results. This prevents one benchmark with many subtasks from crowding out every other test.

How to read this comparison

Winning one benchmark is not an overall verdict

Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.

Prices use official API rates per 1M tokens. Web subscriptions and cloud platform surcharges can differ.

Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.