PixVerseVideo model
PixVerse V5.6
In image to video, PixVerse V5.6 is in place 15 of 21, with text only in place 16. A 5 s clip costs about $0.23.
1,299Arena ratinghigher is better
1,240Arena ratinghigher is better
$0.23$0.045 per secondlower is better
n/alongest single cliphigher is better
26out of 100same as last month
Summary
At $0.045 per second of video it is cheap; a typical video model costs $0.12.
New in PixVerse V5.6 is the combination of native audio with a fixed matrix of resolution, duration, and audio configuration. The proprietary model runs through API and web access and reaches 1080p.
That combination also determines the credit tier. Several short durations are available, and audio changes the price within the V5.6 matrix.
PixVerse V5.6 benchmarks
Image to video arena
How people rate generated videos in blind comparisons, Elo points · higher is better
20 of 21 models
as of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena
Text to video arena
How people rate generated videos in blind comparisons, Elo points · higher is better
20 of 23 models
as of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena
Show all 24 individual results from 10 sources
Page 1 of 2
Published benchmarks
LMArena Text to Video
Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.
higher is betterAs of November 5, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,516 Elo
Methodology and context
- Metric
- elo-rating
- Scale
- No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
- Participants
- 23
- Sample
- 32,434
LMArena Image to Video
Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.
higher is betterAs of November 5, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,495 Elo
Methodology and context
- Metric
- elo-rating
- Scale
- No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
- Participants
- 21
- Sample
- 126,710
Measurements without matching peer values
These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.
vidbenchmark blind video benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 1036
- Score
- 1036
- Metric
- Blind same-prompt human pairwise Elo
- Unit
- elo
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
vidbenchmark eight-axis model scores (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 63
- Score
- 63
- Metric
- Prompt adherence score (0-100 source score)
- Unit
- points
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation-quality
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
vidbenchmark eight-axis model scores (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 65
- Score
- 65
- Metric
- Motion realism score (0-100 source score)
- Unit
- points
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation-quality
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
vidbenchmark eight-axis model scores (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 60
- Score
- 60
- Metric
- Character consistency score (0-100 source score)
- Unit
- points
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation-quality
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
vidbenchmark eight-axis model scores (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 59
- Score
- 59
- Metric
- Temporal coherence score (0-100 source score)
- Unit
- points
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation-quality
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
vidbenchmark eight-axis model scores (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 61
- Score
- 61
- Metric
- Lip-sync accuracy score (0-100 source score)
- Unit
- points
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation-quality
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
vidbenchmark eight-axis model scores (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 63
- Score
- 63
- Metric
- Native audio quality score (0-100 source score)
- Unit
- points
- Benchmark version
- vidbenchmark dataset snapshot (2026-08-04)
- Category
- video-generation-quality
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- vidbenchmark
- Status
- active
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-16
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact source model entry pixverse-v5-6 (PixVerse V5.6). Methodology describes blind same-prompt human pairwise voting and a shared duration/resolution target; the exact global target and this row’s realized output setting are not stated. The dataset lists maxDurationSeconds=8, maxResolution=1080p, which are model limits, not the proven test settings. Data snapshot is 2026-08-04.
- Context
- The website claims weekly reruns, but the downloaded dataset says updatedAt=2026-08-04. No sample count, vote count, confidence interval, or test resolution is published in this JSON. Do not treat the model maximum as the tested resolution, or compare this unspecified task directly with T2V/I2V-specific boards. The methodology page discloses affiliate revenue.
Rapidata Physics human preference Elo (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 961
- Score
- 961
- Metric
- Overall equal-weight Elo across blind and with-reference leaderboards
- Unit
- elo
- Benchmark version
- Rapidata Physics Benchmark, README revision 5f99e9587b9d04017e8d3effe682af2385f78061
- Category
- image-to-video-physics-overall
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Confidence interval
- 25
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- Rapidata Physics Benchmark dataset card
- Status
- superseded
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-17
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact displayed model label Pixverse V5.6, with capitalization differing from profile PixVerse V5.6. Image-to-video uses the Physics-IQ switch frame and scene description; 65 scenarios, four generated videos per scenario, about five seconds each. Humans rate realism pairwise. The published overall Elo equally weights ratings with and without the reference recording. Output resolution is not stated.
- Context
- The source gives the exact displayed label but no immutable serving revision, output resolution, or model-specific vote denominator. The displayed ± is defined as a 95% confidence interval.
Rapidata Physics human preference Elo (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 942
- Score
- 942
- Metric
- With-reference Elo, realism choice with the real continuation shown
- Unit
- elo
- Benchmark version
- Rapidata Physics Benchmark, README revision 5f99e9587b9d04017e8d3effe682af2385f78061
- Category
- image-to-video-physics-with-reference
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Confidence interval
- 36
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- Rapidata Physics Benchmark dataset card
- Status
- superseded
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-17
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact displayed model label Pixverse V5.6, with capitalization differing from profile PixVerse V5.6. Image-to-video uses the Physics-IQ switch frame and scene description; 65 scenarios, four generated videos per scenario, about five seconds each. Human pairwise realism ratings show the real continuation above the candidate videos. Output resolution is not stated.
- Context
- The source gives the exact displayed label but no immutable serving revision, output resolution, or model-specific vote denominator. The displayed ± is defined as a 95% confidence interval.
Rapidata Physics human preference Elo (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 981
- Score
- 981
- Metric
- Blind Elo, realism choice without showing the real continuation
- Unit
- elo
- Benchmark version
- Rapidata Physics Benchmark, README revision 5f99e9587b9d04017e8d3effe682af2385f78061
- Category
- image-to-video-physics-blind
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Confidence interval
- 36
- Source type
- independent-evaluator
- Evaluator
- Rapidata Physics Benchmark dataset card
- Status
- superseded
- Retrieved at
- 2026-10-17
- Methodology
- Independent evaluation. Exact displayed model label Pixverse V5.6, with capitalization differing from profile PixVerse V5.6. Image-to-video uses the Physics-IQ switch frame and scene description; 65 scenarios, four generated videos per scenario, about five seconds each. Human pairwise realism ratings do not show the real continuation. Output resolution is not stated.
- Context
- The source gives the exact displayed label but no immutable serving revision, output resolution, or model-specific vote denominator. The displayed ± is defined as a 95% confidence interval.
Recorded measurement details
LMArena Text to Video: LMArena Text to Video (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 1240
- Score
- 1240
- Metric
- elo-rating
- Unit
- Elo
- Task
- lmarena-text-to-video
- Task label
- LMArena Text to Video
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source rank
- 26
- Sample
- 32434
- Lower confidence bound
- 1229
- Upper confidence bound
- 1251
- Retrieved at
- 2026-11-05
LMArena Image to Video: LMArena Image to Video (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
- Source value
- 1299
- Score
- 1299
- Metric
- elo-rating
- Unit
- Elo
- Task
- lmarena-image-to-video
- Task label
- LMArena Image to Video
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Source rank
- 25
- Sample
- 126710
- Lower confidence bound
- 1292
- Upper confidence bound
- 1306
- Retrieved at
- 2026-11-05
Page 1 of 2
Video sample from our test
This video exists as a documented run for the exact model version. Playback is muted.
Motion and physical consistency
This sample tests Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections.
Prompt and settings
Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.
Generated through fal.ai with model fal-ai/pixverse/v5.6/text-to-video. Archived settings were 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed provider random, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","aspect_ratio":"16:9","resolution":"720p","duration":"5","generate_audio_switch":false,"thinking_type":"disabled"}, configured price estimate $0.45.
Popularity compared
How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.
Popularity index
0 to 100, higher is more popular
20 of 98 models
As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
PixVerse V5.6Wan 2.2 A14BWan 2.6Sora 2 ProGrok Imagine Video 1.5
PixVerse V5.6 compared
Compare with another model
The most popular comparisons
- 1Gemini Omni Flash vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 2FLUX.3 Video vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 3Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 4Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 5MiniMax H3 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 6Sora 2 Pro vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 7Sora 2 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 8Veo 3.1 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 9Veo 3.1 Fast vs. PixVerse V5.6
Show all 48 comparisons
- 10Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 11Grok Imagine Video vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 12Wan 2.7 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 13Wan 2.6 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 14Runway Gen-4.5 vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 15Kling 3.0 Pro vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 16Kling 2.6 Pro vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 17Vidu Q3 Pro vs. PixVerse V5.6
- 18PixVerse V5.6 vs. Hailuo 2.3
- 19PixVerse V5.6 vs. LTX-2 19B
- 20PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 2.2 A14B
- 21PixVerse V5.6 vs. HunyuanVideo 1.5
- 22PixVerse V5.6 vs. Pika 2.2
- 23PixVerse V5.6 vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
- 24PixVerse V5.6 vs. Muse Video
- 25PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 3.0
- 26PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 3.0 Prime
- 27PixVerse V5.6 vs. HappyHorse 1.0
- 28PixVerse V5.6 vs. HappyHorse 1.1
- 29PixVerse V5.6 vs. PixVerse V6
- 30PixVerse V5.6 vs. PixVerse C1
- 31PixVerse V5.6 vs. Seedance 2.0 Fast
- 32PixVerse V5.6 vs. Seedance 2.0 Mini
- 33PixVerse V5.6 vs. Vidu Q3 Turbo
- 34PixVerse V5.6 vs. Vidu Q2
- 35PixVerse V5.6 vs. Vidu Q1
- 36PixVerse V5.6 vs. Kling 4.0
- 37PixVerse V5.6 vs. Kling 3.0 Standard API
- 38PixVerse V5.6 vs. Kling Video O1
- 39PixVerse V5.6 vs. Hailuo 2.3 Fast
- 40PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 2.5 Preview
- 41PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 2.6 I2V Flash
- 42PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B
- 43PixVerse V5.6 vs. Wan 2.2 I2V A14B
- 44PixVerse V5.6 vs. HunyuanVideo 1.0 T2V
- 45PixVerse V5.6 vs. HunyuanVideo I2V 1.0
- 46PixVerse V5.6 vs. Ray 3.2
- 47PixVerse V5.6 vs. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite
- 48PixVerse V5.6 vs. LTX-2.5
All specifications
Input and output
Watermarking and provenance
AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.
- AI watermarking
- Unknown
- no source
- Watermarking technique
- Not known
- no source
Licence and access
Prices
No PixVerse subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 7 plans in Germany.
| Plan | Monthly price | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Poe Basic | €6.83 | with limited credit |
| Recraft Pro | ≈ €21.20 | with limited credit |
| Recraft Teams | ≈ €23.33 | with limited credit, for teams, per seat |
| Poe Plus | €27.36 | with limited credit |
| Poe Pro | €68.41 | with limited credit |
| Poe Advanced | €136.84 | with limited credit |
| Poe Max | €342.11 | with limited credit |
Frequently asked questions about PixVerse V5.6
How good is PixVerse V5.6?
Rank 16 of 23 in the text-to-video arena rating. With a start image: rank 15 of 21.
LMArena, as of Sep 22, 2026
How much does a video with PixVerse V5.6 cost?
About $0.23 for a 5 s clip, $0.045 per second of video. That is cheap.
Where can I use PixVerse V5.6?
Not in a PixVerse subscription. Including other providers that makes 7 plans in Germany.
Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT
At PixVerse
No PixVerse subscription includes this model.
Through other providers
7 plans from 2 providers, from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic), with limited credits.
Sources and data date
Show all 24 sources
Benchmark sources at a glance
Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.
| Evaluator | Test series | Composite indices | Recorded active measurements |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 2 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.
| Type | Evidence and data date |
|---|---|
| Research status | Research date October 16, 2026. 20 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | wiro-video-models-exact-row Note The inspected Wiro leaderboard has no exact model-version route. Nearby variants were not transferred. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | arena-video-edit-exact-row Note The inspected Video Edit table has no exact model-version row. T2V and I2V values were not reused. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | vabench-exact-model-row Note VABench has no exact model row. Sora 2 was not transferred to Sora 2 Pro or other models. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | artificial-analysis-t2v-exact-row Note No exact model version or resolution was found in the inspected Artificial Analysis table. |
| Not found in the inspected sources | artificial-analysis-i2v-exact-row Note No exact model version or resolution was found in the inspected Artificial Analysis table. |
| Unresolved | vbench-current-public-leaderboard Note The current VBench leaderboard is embedded in a dynamic Hugging Face iframe and was not retrievable; current scores remain unresolved. |
| Unresolved | vidbenchmark-performance-axes Note The source publishes speed-to-first-frame and cost-efficiency axes, but its inspected methodology does not define them as measured performance results or disclose units, direction, or a scoring formula. They are omitted. Model limits, maximum resolution, and list prices are not quality measurements. |
| Not published | immutable-serving-revision Note The dataset names Pixverse V5.6 but does not publish an immutable serving revision. |
| Not published | output-resolution Note The dataset describes the input image and clip duration but does not state generated output resolution. |
| Not published | model-specific-vote-denominator Note The dataset reports an approximate global vote total, not a model-specific vote denominator. |
| Additional source | PixVerse · PixVerse V5.6 user guide · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026 |
| Additional source | Video pricing · PixVerse platform pricing · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026 |
| Additional source | fal.ai |
| Additional source | LMArena (retrieved November 5, 2026)12 |
| Additional source | vidbenchmark (retrieved October 16, 2026) |
| Additional source | Rapidata Physics Benchmark dataset card (retrieved October 17, 2026) |
| Additional source | VIBE AI Video Model Benchmarks (retrieved October 17, 2026) |
| Additional source | Arena Video Image-to-Video (retrieved September 21, 2026; October 16, 2026; October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026) |
| Additional source | Arena Video Text-to-Video (retrieved September 21, 2026; October 16, 2026; October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026) |
| Additional source | Rapidata I2V Physics benchmark (retrieved October 22, 2026; October 28, 2026) |
| Additional source | Rapidata I2V Realism benchmark (retrieved October 22, 2026; October 28, 2026) |
| Additional source | Rapidata Relative Camera Movement (retrieved October 28, 2026) |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 16, 2026)123 |
| Additional source | Model metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)12 |
| Additional source | OpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0 |
| Additional source | Vercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0 |
| Additional source | Ollama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index |
| Additional source | Replicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index |
| Additional source | Google Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US |
| Additional source | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |