Skip to main content

ByteDanceVideo model

Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p

In image to video, Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p is in place 3 of 21, with text only in place 6.

Image to videoRank 3 of 21

1,477Arena ratinghigher is better

Text to videoRank 6 of 23

1,474Arena ratinghigher is better

Clip lengthRank 1 of 63

30slongest single cliphigher is better

PopularityRank 632 of 875

12out of 100same as last month

Summary

New in Seedance 2.5 are 30-second audio-video clips, multiple extension rounds, and smoother transitions between scenes. A single run can use up to 30 images, 10 video clips, and 10 audio clips as references.

Timestamp-level editing, green-screen control, and camera-perspective control extend the shared audio-video architecture beyond Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p. Web access was available at launch, with API access announced as forthcoming.

Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p benchmarks

Image to video arena

How people rate generated videos in blind comparisons, Elo points · higher is better

20 of 21 models

MiniMax H31,495
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,488
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,477
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,475
Gemini Omni Flash1,465
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,456
FLUX.3 Video1,449
Wan 2.71,428
Grok Imagine Video1,415
Veo 3.11,398
Veo 3.1 Fast1,385
Vidu Q3 Pro1,363
Kling 3.0 Pro1,354
Wan 2.61,310
PixVerse V5.61,299
Kling 2.6 Pro1,294
Hailuo 2.31,262
HunyuanVideo 1.51,198
Wan 2.2 A14B1,170
LTX-2 19B1,159

as of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena

Text to video arena

How people rate generated videos in blind comparisons, Elo points · higher is better

20 of 23 models

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,516
Gemini Omni Flash1,513
FLUX.3 Video1,493
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,492
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,479
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,474
MiniMax H31,460
Muse Video1,456
Sora 2 Pro1,368
Veo 3.11,364
Veo 3.1 Fast1,362
Sora 21,343
Grok Imagine Video1,342
Wan 2.71,337
Wan 2.61,327
PixVerse V5.61,240
Runway Gen-4.51,225
Kling 2.6 Pro1,216
Hailuo 2.31,206
HunyuanVideo 1.51,169

as of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena

Show all 19 individual results from 10 sources

Page 1 of 2

Published benchmarks

LMArena Text to Video

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,516 Elo
Gemini Omni Flash1,513 Elo
FLUX.3 Video1,493 Elo
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,492 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,479 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,474 Elo
MiniMax H31,460 Elo
Muse Video1,456 Elo
Sora 2 Pro1,368 Elo
Veo 3.11,364 Elo
Veo 3.1 Fast1,362 Elo
Sora 21,343 Elo
Grok Imagine Video1,342 Elo
Wan 2.71,337 Elo
Wan 2.61,327 Elo
PixVerse V5.61,240 Elo
Runway Gen-4.51,225 Elo
Kling 2.6 Pro1,216 Elo
Hailuo 2.31,206 Elo
HunyuanVideo 1.51,169 Elo
LTX-2 19B1,154 Elo
Wan 2.2 A14B1,132 Elo
Pika 2.21,009 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 5, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,516 Elo

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
23
Sample
8,001
Source: LMArena

LMArena Image to Video

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

MiniMax H31,495 Elo
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,488 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,477 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,475 Elo
Gemini Omni Flash1,465 Elo
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,456 Elo
FLUX.3 Video1,449 Elo
Wan 2.71,428 Elo
Grok Imagine Video1,415 Elo
Veo 3.11,398 Elo
Veo 3.1 Fast1,385 Elo
Vidu Q3 Pro1,363 Elo
Kling 3.0 Pro1,354 Elo
Wan 2.61,310 Elo
PixVerse V5.61,299 Elo
Kling 2.6 Pro1,294 Elo
Hailuo 2.31,262 Elo
HunyuanVideo 1.51,198 Elo
Wan 2.2 A14B1,170 Elo
LTX-2 19B1,159 Elo
Pika 2.2997 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 5, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,495 Elo

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
15,729
Source: LMArena

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

Physics-IQ Verified (I2V) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
42.43
Score
42.43
Metric
Physical-understanding score on the source's 0-100% scale; the leaderboard reporting convention expresses the aggregate as mean ± standard deviation
Unit
%
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
community-reported
Evaluator
Google DeepMind Physics-IQ Verified Leaderboard (community-submitted entry)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Community-reported result. Physics-IQ Verified leaderboard, image-to-video (i2v) input type, entry name Seedance 2.5 with a link to ByteDance's official Seedance 2.5 page. The README defines 100% as the best possible score. Entry date: 2026-09-27. The row has no `op` marker; under the README convention, unmarked rows use model-specific best-practice prompts (`bpp`) based on a custom templater for each model. The exact prompt text/template is not stated. This entry's serving/API route, output resolution, actual run count, and cell denominator are not stated.
Context
This row was contributed to the official leaderboard via pull request 85; the README does not indicate that the benchmark authors independently generated or evaluated the submission. It links the row to the product page but does not expose the actual output resolution or serving route. The assigned profile's 720p value is a maximum capability, not evidence that this entry was rendered at 720p. The source row reports `42.43 ± 0.76`; the README defines the leaderboard's displayed ± as standard deviation and describes a four-run mean ± standard-deviation reporting setup, while also accepting single-run submissions. This row does not state its actual run count or cell denominator, so neither an exact N nor a confidence interval is inferred. The row has no `op` marker and therefore follows the leaderboard's model-specific `bpp` default, but its exact prompt text/template is not published.
Source Google DeepMind Physics-IQ Verified Leaderboard (community-submitted entry)
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.67
Score
3.67
Metric
Weighted overall AI-judge quality score (0-5)
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
64
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.24
Score
3.24
Metric
Prompt adherence AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 21%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.55
Score
3.55
Metric
Motion and consistency AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 19%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.8
Score
3.8
Metric
Camera and framing AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 12%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
4.09
Score
4.09
Metric
Quality and detail AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 11%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
4.2
Score
4.2
Metric
Look and lighting AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 9%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.56
Score
3.56
Metric
Realism and physics AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 8%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.75
Score
3.75
Metric
Text rendering AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 10%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI
Video Models AI-judge benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
3.98
Score
3.98
Metric
Audio AI-judge criterion score (0-5); rubric weight 10%
Unit
points
Benchmark version
Video Models leaderboard updated 2026-10-15
Category
video-generation
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Video Models by Wiro AI
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-16
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Wiro API route bytedance/seedance-2-5. Published method states one API run per prompt using model defaults, first successful output, a 5-second duration target, and the resolution closest to 720p. This route documentation lists 4-30s; 480p or 720p; maximum 720p. The CSV does not expose the exact per-prompt overrides or criterion-specific denominators.
Context
Wiro AI is a commercial model gateway. Scores use its weighted 0-5 AI-judge rubric, not a blind human pairwise preference panel. No per-criterion N or confidence interval is published. This is task-specific AI-judge evidence, not broad independent quality proof.
Source Video Models by Wiro AI

Recorded measurement details

LMArena Text to Video: LMArena Text to Video (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1474
Score
1474
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Task
lmarena-text-to-video
Task label
LMArena Text to Video
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
7
Sample
8001
Lower confidence bound
1465
Upper confidence bound
1483
Retrieved at
2026-11-05
Source LMArena
LMArena Image to Video: LMArena Image to Video (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1477
Score
1477
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Task
lmarena-image-to-video
Task label
LMArena Image to Video
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
4
Sample
15729
Lower confidence bound
1470
Upper confidence bound
1484
Retrieved at
2026-11-05
Source LMArena

Page 1 of 2

What Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p can do

“n/a” means the provider does not state it or we have not sourced it yet. That is not a “no”.

Text to videoyesSource
Image to videoyesSource
Referencesn/a
AudioyesSource
Runs locallynoSource
Extendn/a
Start and end framen/a
Max. resolution720pSource

Video sample from our test

This video exists as a documented run for the exact model version. Playback is muted.

Motion and physical consistency

This sample tests Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections.

Open video at original sizeOpen source
Prompt and settings

Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.

Generated through fal.ai with model bytedance/seedance-2.5/text-to-video. Archived settings were 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed 587599925, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","resolution":"720p","duration":"5","aspect_ratio":"16:9","generate_audio":false}, configured price estimate $2.31.

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 98 models

LTX-2.570
MiniMax H366
Muse Video62
Sora 259
Wan 2.1 T2V 14B54
Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B54
Runway Gen-4.553
Hy-Nomas53
Wan 2.1 I2V 14B53
Veo 3.150
Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B46
FLUX.3 Video45
LTX-2 19B45
Open-Sora 2.044
Wan 2.2 I2V A14B43
Gemini Omni Flash43
SkyReels V2 T2V 14B42
Grok Imagine Video42
Mochi 1 Preview39
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p12

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720pPika 2.2Kling 3.0 ProHailuo 2.3Kling 4.0

Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Veo 3.1
  2. 2FLUX.3 Video vs. Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p
  3. 3Gemini Omni Flash vs. Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p
  4. 4Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Sora 2 Pro
  5. 5Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. MiniMax H3
  6. 6Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Sora 2
  7. 7Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Veo 3.1 Fast
  8. 8Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Grok Imagine Video 1.5
  9. 9Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Grok Imagine Video
Show all 47 comparisons
  1. 10Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.7
  2. 11Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.6
  3. 12Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Runway Gen-4.5
  4. 13Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Kling 3.0 Pro
  5. 14Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Kling 2.6 Pro
  6. 15Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Vidu Q3 Pro
  7. 16Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. PixVerse V5.6
  8. 17Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Hailuo 2.3
  9. 18Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. LTX-2 19B
  10. 19Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.2 A14B
  11. 20Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. HunyuanVideo 1.5
  12. 21Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Pika 2.2
  13. 22Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
  14. 23Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Muse Video
  15. 24Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 3.0
  16. 25Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 3.0 Prime
  17. 26Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. HappyHorse 1.0
  18. 27Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. HappyHorse 1.1
  19. 28Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. PixVerse V6
  20. 29Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. PixVerse C1
  21. 30Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Seedance 2.0 Fast
  22. 31Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Seedance 2.0 Mini
  23. 32Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Vidu Q3 Turbo
  24. 33Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Vidu Q2
  25. 34Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Vidu Q1
  26. 35Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Kling 4.0
  27. 36Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Kling 3.0 Standard API
  28. 37Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Kling Video O1
  29. 38Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Hailuo 2.3 Fast
  30. 39Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.5 Preview
  31. 40Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.6 I2V Flash
  32. 41Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B
  33. 42Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Wan 2.2 I2V A14B
  34. 43Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. HunyuanVideo 1.0 T2V
  35. 44Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. HunyuanVideo I2V 1.0
  36. 45Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Ray 3.2
  37. 46Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite
  38. 47Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p vs. LTX-2.5

All specifications

Input and output

Maximum resolution
720p
Source: Maximum resolution
Maximum duration
30 s
Source: Maximum duration
Native audio
Yes
Source: Native audio

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source
Visible watermark
In the BytePlus API, a visible ‘AI Generated’ label in the lower right is optional. The watermark parameter is off by default.
Source 1: Visible watermarkSource 2: Visible watermark
Labelling reviewed
Nov 5, 2026
Source 1: Labelling reviewedSource 2: Labelling reviewed

Licence and access

Weights
Proprietary
Source: Weights
Access
API, Web
Source: Access

Further details

Ark API model ID
doubao-seedance-2-5-260628 for text-to-video and image-to-video; separate API access and regional eligibility required
Source: Ark API model ID

Prices

Choose a price view
fal.ai (bytedance/seedance-2.5/text-to-video)
$2.31 per request (estimated)Source

No ByteDance subscription includes this model. Through other providers from €19.04 a month (Magnific Premium, with limited credits). 5 plans in Germany.

Filter plans
PlanMonthly priceNote
Magnific Premium€19.04with limited credit
Magnific Premium+€42.84with limited credit
Magnific Business€70.21with limited credit, for teams, per seat
Magnific Pro Starter€104.72with limited credit
Magnific Enterprisen/afor enterprises

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p

How good is Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p?

Rank 6 of 23 in the text-to-video arena rating. With a start image: rank 3 of 21.

LMArena, as of Sep 22, 2026

Arena ratingtext to video, from user votes · higher is better
FLUX.3 Video1,493
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,492
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,479
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720pRank 6 of 231,474
MiniMax H31,460
Muse Video1,456
Sora 2 Pro1,368

How long can a video with Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p be?

Up to 30 seconds in one go. Resolution: 720p.

According to ByteDance

Longest clip
30s
Resolution
720p
Audio
yes, generated natively
Open weights
no

Where can I use Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p?

Not in a ByteDance subscription. Including other providers that makes 5 plans in Germany.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At ByteDance

No ByteDance subscription includes this model.

Through other providers

5 plans from 1 provider, from €19.04 a month (Magnific Premium), with limited credits.

Sources and data date

Show all 26 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
Artificial Analysis002
LMArena003

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 5 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 16, 2026. 16 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Unresolved

dreamina-seedance-2-5-720p-aa-resolution-attribution

Note

Both AA boards list Dreamina Seedance 2.5 but disclose no tested output resolution. The profile is explicitly 720p, so those rows are not attributed without confirmation that the evaluated mode is 720p.

Not found in the inspected sources

vabench-exact-model-row

Note

VABench has no exact model row. Sora 2 was not transferred to Sora 2 Pro or other models.

Not found in the inspected sources

artificial-analysis-t2v-exact-row

Note

No exact model version or resolution was found in the inspected Artificial Analysis table.

Not found in the inspected sources

artificial-analysis-i2v-exact-row

Note

No exact model version or resolution was found in the inspected Artificial Analysis table.

Unresolved

vbench-current-public-leaderboard

Note

The current VBench leaderboard is embedded in a dynamic Hugging Face iframe and was not retrievable; current scores remain unresolved.

Not found in the inspected sources

vidbenchmark-exact-row

Note

No exact model id is present in the 2026-08-04 dataset; similarly named variants were not transferred.

Additional sourceByteDance · ByteDance Seedance 2.5 announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceByteDance (retrieved November 1, 2026)
Additional sourcefal.ai
Additional sourceLMArena (retrieved November 5, 2026)12
Additional sourceVideo Models by Wiro AI (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArena Video Edit (retrieved October 16, 2026)
Additional sourceGoogle DeepMind Physics-IQ Verified Leaderboard (community-submitted entry) (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceArena Video Image-to-Video (retrieved September 21, 2026; October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArena Video Text-to-Video (retrieved September 21, 2026; October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis AA-Video-I2V v2.1 (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis AA-Video-T2V v2.1 (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceRapidata Relative Camera Movement (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 16, 2026)123
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceBytePlus: Video generation API (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceBytePlus: Seedance video models (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0