Skip to main content

ByteDanceVideo model

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p

In image to video, Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p is in place 4 of 21, with text only in place 5. A 5 s clip costs about $0.76.

Image to videoRank 4 of 21

1,475Arena ratinghigher is better

Text to videoRank 5 of 23

1,479Arena ratinghigher is better

5 s clipRank 16 of 19

$0.76$0.15 per secondlower is better

Clip lengthRank 13 of 63

15slongest single cliphigher is better

PopularityRank 461 of 875

30out of 100same as last month

Summary

At $0.15 per second of video it is expensive; a typical video model costs $0.12.

What is distinctive about Seedance 2.0 is its unified audio-video architecture for text, images, audio, and video. References can guide performance, lighting, shadows, and camera movement; the 720p profile generates up to 15 seconds.

The later Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p adds 30-second clips, more reference inputs, and tighter editing control. Seedance 2.0 remains the separate shorter 720p configuration.

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p benchmarks

Image to video arena

How people rate generated videos in blind comparisons, Elo points · higher is better

20 of 21 models

MiniMax H31,495
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,488
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,477
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,475
Gemini Omni Flash1,465
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,456
FLUX.3 Video1,449
Wan 2.71,428
Grok Imagine Video1,415
Veo 3.11,398
Veo 3.1 Fast1,385
Vidu Q3 Pro1,363
Kling 3.0 Pro1,354
Wan 2.61,310
PixVerse V5.61,299
Kling 2.6 Pro1,294
Hailuo 2.31,262
HunyuanVideo 1.51,198
Wan 2.2 A14B1,170
LTX-2 19B1,159

as of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena

Text to video arena

How people rate generated videos in blind comparisons, Elo points · higher is better

20 of 23 models

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,516
Gemini Omni Flash1,513
FLUX.3 Video1,493
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,492
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,479
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,474
MiniMax H31,460
Muse Video1,456
Sora 2 Pro1,368
Veo 3.11,364
Veo 3.1 Fast1,362
Sora 21,343
Grok Imagine Video1,342
Wan 2.71,337
Wan 2.61,327
PixVerse V5.61,240
Runway Gen-4.51,225
Kling 2.6 Pro1,216
Hailuo 2.31,206
HunyuanVideo 1.51,169

as of September 22, 2026 · Source: LMArena

Show all 70 individual results from 12 sources

Page 1 of 6

Published benchmarks

LMArena Text to Video

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,516 Elo
Gemini Omni Flash1,513 Elo
FLUX.3 Video1,493 Elo
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,492 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,479 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,474 Elo
MiniMax H31,460 Elo
Muse Video1,456 Elo
Sora 2 Pro1,368 Elo
Veo 3.11,364 Elo
Veo 3.1 Fast1,362 Elo
Sora 21,343 Elo
Grok Imagine Video1,342 Elo
Wan 2.71,337 Elo
Wan 2.61,327 Elo
PixVerse V5.61,240 Elo
Runway Gen-4.51,225 Elo
Kling 2.6 Pro1,216 Elo
Hailuo 2.31,206 Elo
HunyuanVideo 1.51,169 Elo
LTX-2 19B1,154 Elo
Wan 2.2 A14B1,132 Elo
Pika 2.21,009 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 5, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,516 Elo

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
23
Sample
56,318
Source: LMArena

LMArena Image to Video

Elo ratings summarize pairwise comparisons within this leaderboard. They are not percentages. The scale does not express absolute quality or linear gaps between models.

MiniMax H31,495 Elo
Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash1,488 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,477 Elo
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p1,475 Elo
Gemini Omni Flash1,465 Elo
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,456 Elo
FLUX.3 Video1,449 Elo
Wan 2.71,428 Elo
Grok Imagine Video1,415 Elo
Veo 3.11,398 Elo
Veo 3.1 Fast1,385 Elo
Vidu Q3 Pro1,363 Elo
Kling 3.0 Pro1,354 Elo
Wan 2.61,310 Elo
PixVerse V5.61,299 Elo
Kling 2.6 Pro1,294 Elo
Hailuo 2.31,262 Elo
HunyuanVideo 1.51,198 Elo
Wan 2.2 A14B1,170 Elo
LTX-2 19B1,159 Elo
Pika 2.2997 Elo

higher is betterAs of November 5, 2026Scale: 0 Elo - 1,495 Elo

Source: LMArena
gradually.ai
Methodology and context
Metric
elo-rating
Scale
No upper bound is documented. The chart spans the recorded values and zero.
Participants
21
Sample
121,427
Source: LMArena

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
41.2
Score
41.2
Metric
Acc_QA (question-answer accuracy)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 37 (shared 80-case set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
80
Lower confidence bound
35.4
Upper confidence bound
46.6
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
39.8
Score
39.8
Metric
Score_PR (Acc_QA^0.8 × s_dyn^0.2)
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 37 (shared 80-case set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
80
Lower confidence bound
34.2
Upper confidence bound
45.6
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
59.4
Score
59.4
Metric
S(v), VLM-judged video quality weighted 0.4 reasoning, 0.3 temporal consistency, 0.3 aesthetics
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 37 (shared 80-case set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
80
Lower confidence bound
52.2
Upper confidence bound
66.3
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
43.2
Score
43.2
Metric
Score_PR, World-Knowledge
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 38 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
21
Confidence interval
8.6
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
35.9
Score
35.9
Metric
Score_PR, Human-Centric
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 38 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
9
Confidence interval
19.9
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
31.7
Score
31.7
Metric
Score_PR, Logic-Reasoning
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 38 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
27
Confidence interval
10
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
47.6
Score
47.6
Metric
Score_PR, Information-Based
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 38 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
23
Confidence interval
10.5
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
70.4
Score
70.4
Metric
S(v), World-Knowledge
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 39 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
21
Confidence interval
12.2
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
83.9
Score
83.9
Metric
S(v), Human-Centric
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 39 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
9
Confidence interval
16.8
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
WorldReasonBench (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
56.7
Score
56.7
Metric
S(v), Logic-Reasoning
Unit
%
Benchmark version
arXiv:2605.10434v1, Appendix Table 39 (shared evaluation set)
Direction
Higher is better
Sample
22
Confidence interval
12.2
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-18
Methodology
Independent evaluation. WorldReasonBench cross-model shared evaluation set behind Table 2. The exact source row is Seedance2.0, classified as a closed-source generator accessed via a commercial API. The paper does not identify the endpoint, revision, request parameters, tested output resolution, or duration.
Context
The source names the model but does not specify its API endpoint or tested output resolution; do not interpret this row as a verified 720p-only result.
Source WorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1)

Recorded measurement details

LMArena Text to Video: LMArena Text to Video (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1479
Score
1479
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Task
lmarena-text-to-video
Task label
LMArena Text to Video
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
56318
Lower confidence bound
1471
Upper confidence bound
1487
Retrieved at
2026-11-05
Source LMArena
LMArena Image to Video: LMArena Image to Video (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1475
Score
1475
Metric
elo-rating
Unit
Elo
Task
lmarena-image-to-video
Task label
LMArena Image to Video
Direction
Higher is better
Source rank
5
Sample
121427
Lower confidence bound
1468
Upper confidence bound
1482
Retrieved at
2026-11-05
Source LMArena

Page 1 of 6

What Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p can do

“n/a” means the provider does not state it or we have not sourced it yet. That is not a “no”.

Text to videoyesSource
Image to videoyesSource
Referencesn/a
AudioyesSource
Runs locallynoSource
Extendn/a
Start and end framen/a
Max. resolution720pSource

Video sample from our test

This video exists as a documented run for the exact model version. Playback is muted.

Motion and physical consistency

This sample tests Anatomy, object consistency, camera tracking, rain, and reflections.

Open video at original sizeOpen source
Prompt and settings

Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.

Generated through fal.ai with model bytedance/seedance-2.0/text-to-video. Archived settings were 16:9, one request, first output, requested 5 s, seed 1986745451, request {"prompt":"Generate exactly one continuous five-second 16:9 cinematic video. A fictional bicycle courier in a mustard-yellow raincoat rides a red city bicycle from left to right across a rain-wet Hamburg street at blue hour for the entire clip. The camera tracks her smoothly at waist height. Both hands remain visible on the handlebars, the bicycle geometry stays physically correct, and a transparent umbrella fixed to the bicycle moves naturally in the wind. Wet-street reflections and raindrops follow realistic physics. No cuts, no slow motion, no text, no logos, no subtitles, and no audio.","resolution":"720p","duration":"5","aspect_ratio":"16:9","generate_audio":false}, configured price estimate $1.52.

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 98 models

LTX-2.570
MiniMax H366
Muse Video62
Sora 259
Wan 2.1 T2V 14B54
Wan 2.1 T2V 1.3B54
Runway Gen-4.553
Hy-Nomas53
Wan 2.1 I2V 14B53
Veo 3.150
Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B46
FLUX.3 Video45
LTX-2 19B45
Open-Sora 2.044
Wan 2.2 I2V A14B43
Gemini Omni Flash43
SkyReels V2 T2V 14B42
Grok Imagine Video42
Mochi 1 Preview39
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p30

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720pHunyuanVideo 1.5Wan 2.7Kling 2.6 ProVeo 3.1 Fast

Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p compared

Compare with another model

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Kling 3.0 Pro
  2. 2Gemini Omni Flash vs. Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p
  3. 3FLUX.3 Video vs. Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p
  4. 4Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. MiniMax H3
  5. 5Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Sora 2 Pro
  6. 6Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Sora 2
  7. 7Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Veo 3.1
  8. 8Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Veo 3.1 Fast
  9. 9Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Grok Imagine Video 1.5
Show all 47 comparisons
  1. 10Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Grok Imagine Video
  2. 11Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.7
  3. 12Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.6
  4. 13Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Runway Gen-4.5
  5. 14Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Kling 2.6 Pro
  6. 15Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Vidu Q3 Pro
  7. 16Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. PixVerse V5.6
  8. 17Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Hailuo 2.3
  9. 18Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. LTX-2 19B
  10. 19Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.2 A14B
  11. 20Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. HunyuanVideo 1.5
  12. 21Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Pika 2.2
  13. 22Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash
  14. 23Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Muse Video
  15. 24Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 3.0
  16. 25Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 3.0 Prime
  17. 26Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. HappyHorse 1.0
  18. 27Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. HappyHorse 1.1
  19. 28Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. PixVerse V6
  20. 29Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. PixVerse C1
  21. 30Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Seedance 2.0 Fast
  22. 31Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Seedance 2.0 Mini
  23. 32Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Vidu Q3 Turbo
  24. 33Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Vidu Q2
  25. 34Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Vidu Q1
  26. 35Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Kling 4.0
  27. 36Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Kling 3.0 Standard API
  28. 37Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Kling Video O1
  29. 38Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Hailuo 2.3 Fast
  30. 39Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.5 Preview
  31. 40Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.6 I2V Flash
  32. 41Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.2 TI2V 5B
  33. 42Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Wan 2.2 I2V A14B
  34. 43Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. HunyuanVideo 1.0 T2V
  35. 44Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. HunyuanVideo I2V 1.0
  36. 45Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Ray 3.2
  37. 46Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite
  38. 47Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p vs. LTX-2.5

All specifications

Input and output

Maximum resolution
720p
Source: Maximum resolution
Maximum duration
15 s
Source: Maximum duration
Native audio
Yes
Source: Native audio

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source
Visible watermark
In the BytePlus API, a visible ‘AI Generated’ label in the lower right is optional. The watermark parameter is off by default.
Source 1: Visible watermarkSource 2: Visible watermark
Labelling reviewed
Nov 5, 2026
Source 1: Labelling reviewedSource 2: Labelling reviewed

Licence and access

Weights
Proprietary
Source: Weights
Access
API, Web
Source: Access

Prices

Representative price
$0.15 per second ($0.76 per 5 s clip)Source
fal.ai (bytedance/seedance-2.0/text-to-video)
$1.52 per request (estimated)Source

Frequently asked questions about Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p

How good is Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p?

Rank 5 of 23 in the text-to-video arena rating. With a start image: rank 4 of 21.

LMArena, as of Sep 22, 2026

Arena ratingtext to video, from user votes · higher is better
Gemini Omni Flash1,513
FLUX.3 Video1,493
Grok Imagine Video 1.51,492
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720pRank 5 of 231,479
Dreamina Seedance 2.5 720p1,474
MiniMax H31,460
Muse Video1,456

How much does a video with Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p cost?

About $0.76 for a 5 s clip, $0.15 per second of video. That is expensive.

Price per seconddollars per second of video · lower is better
Kling 2.6 Pro$0.14
Wan 2.7$0.15
Wan 2.6$0.15
Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720pRank 16 of 19$0.15
Kling 3.0 Pro$0.17
FLUX.3 Video$0.17
Veo 3.1$0.40

How long can a video with Dreamina Seedance 2.0 720p be?

Up to 15 seconds in one go. Resolution: 720p.

According to ByteDance

Price
$0.15 per second$0.76 per 5 s clip
Longest clip
15s
Resolution
720p
Audio
yes, generated natively
Open weights
no

Sources and data date

Show all 31 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
Artificial Analysis003
LMArena003

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 6 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.

TypeEvidence and data date
Research statusResearch date October 16, 2026. 20 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not found in the inspected sources

vabench-exact-model-row

Note

VABench has no exact model row. Sora 2 was not transferred to Sora 2 Pro or other models.

Unresolved

vbench-current-public-leaderboard

Note

The current VBench leaderboard is embedded in a dynamic Hugging Face iframe and was not retrievable; current scores remain unresolved.

Unresolved

vidbenchmark-exact-row

Note

Dataset has Seedance 2.0 but only lists maximum resolution 1080p; its shared test resolution is not published, so no exact 720p result was attached.

Not published

CaliBench per-scene denominator

Note

Table 9 reports 32 planned unique seeds per scene/model but does not publish a valid scored output count for each cell; the marked unreliable Pendulum cell is omitted.

Not published

serving-route-and-output-settings

Original wording

The paper identifies Seedance2.0 and commercial-API access, but does not report the exact API route, revision, request settings, output resolution, or duration.

Additional sourceByteDance · ByteDance Seedance 2.0 model page · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceVideo pricing
Additional sourcefal.ai
Additional sourceLMArena (retrieved November 5, 2026)12
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis AA-Video-T2V v2.1 (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis AA-Video-I2V v1.1 (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceVideo Models by Wiro AI (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArena Video Edit (retrieved October 16, 2026)
Additional sourceCaliBench, Table 9 (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceByteDance Seed, Seedance 2.0: Advancing Video Generation for World Complexity, Table 1 (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceWorldReasonBench: Human-Aligned Stress Testing of Video Generators as Future World-State Predictors (arXiv:2605.10434v1) (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceAV-Phys Bench research paper (retrieved October 21, 2026)
Additional sourceArena Video Image-to-Video (retrieved September 21, 2026; October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceArena Video Text-to-Video (retrieved September 21, 2026; October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 16, 2026)123
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)12
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional sourceBytePlus: Video generation API (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceBytePlus: Seedance video models (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional sourceByteDance Seedance 2.5 announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0