Skip to main content

Arcee AILanguage model

Trinity Mini

Trinity Mini has no overall index value yet because there are too few independent benchmark results.

PopularityRank 575 of 785

28out of 100same as last month

based on search, usage and attention

Summary

Trinity Mini combines 26 billion total parameters with about 3 billion active, a 128K context, and reasoning post-training. Arcee trained the medium variant on roughly 10 trillion tokens with math and coding data. The weights use OpenMDW-1.1, with Transformers and vLLM documented as serving runtimes.

All benchmark results

Every published result with its source, test setup and comparison models.

Show all 8 published benchmark results

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

SimpleQA (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
8.9
Score
8.9
Metric
score as shown
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
SimpleQA; version/settings not stated
Category
general
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Trinity Mini chart values; chart does not specify prompt, sampling settings, run dates or score units.
Context
Scores were read from the publisher's static chart and are not independent reruns; the chart omits a full protocol.
Source Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
MuSR (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
63.49
Score
63.49
Metric
score as shown
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
MuSR; version/settings not stated
Category
general
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Trinity Mini chart values; chart does not specify prompt, sampling settings, run dates or score units.
Context
Scores were read from the publisher's static chart and are not independent reruns; the chart omits a full protocol.
Source Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
MMLU zero-shot (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
84.95
Score
84.95
Metric
zero-shot score as shown
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
MMLU; zero-shot; snapshot not stated
Category
general
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Trinity Mini chart values; chart does not specify prompt, sampling settings, run dates or score units.
Context
Scores were read from the publisher's static chart and are not independent reruns; the chart omits a full protocol.
Source Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Math-500 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
92.1
Score
92.1
Metric
score as shown
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
Math-500; settings not stated
Category
general
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Trinity Mini chart values; chart does not specify prompt, sampling settings, run dates or score units.
Context
Scores were read from the publisher's static chart and are not independent reruns; the chart omits a full protocol.
Source Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
GPQA-Diamond (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
58.55
Score
58.55
Metric
score as shown
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
GPQA-Diamond; settings not stated
Category
general
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Trinity Mini chart values; chart does not specify prompt, sampling settings, run dates or score units.
Context
Scores were read from the publisher's static chart and are not independent reruns; the chart omits a full protocol.
Source Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
BFCL v3 (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
59.67
Score
59.67
Metric
score as shown
Unit
No unit provided
Benchmark version
BFCL v3; metric details not stated
Category
general
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-15
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. Exact Trinity Mini chart values; chart does not specify prompt, sampling settings, run dates or score units.
Context
Scores were read from the publisher's static chart and are not independent reruns; the chart omits a full protocol.
Source Arcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart
n8n Official AI Benchmark (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
56
Score
56
Metric
overall publisher composite score
Unit
points
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
official-leaderboard
Evaluator
Official n8n AI Benchmark
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-19
Methodology
Official benchmark leaderboard. Official n8n AI Benchmark. The publisher says it ranks LLMs by how they work in n8n; the Trinity Mini page states that scores have a maximum of 100 points. The opened sources do not state the workflow mix, aggregation formula, provider/model snapshot, row evaluation date, or sample count.
Context
This is an n8n-published workflow/product-system composite, not an independent isolated-model evaluation. Its aggregation is not reconstructed or rescaled.
Source Official n8n AI Benchmark (unavailable on November 2, 2026) https://n8n.io/ai-benchmark/trinity-mini/
MK-NIAH (@128K) (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.888
Score
0.888
Metric
MK-NIAH score at 128K context
Unit
No unit provided
Category
long-context retrieval
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
vendor-reported
Evaluator
Arcee Trinity Large Technical Report (arXiv:2602.17004v1)
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-10-20
Methodology
Vendor-reported result. The report identifies Trinity Mini (26B total parameters, 3B active) and says its final iteration was trained at sequence length 128K for a 128K target context. It does not state an immutable model commit, benchmark sample count, or detailed scoring protocol.
Context
The published model label matches the assigned Trinity Mini alias, but the report does not identify the immutable released checkpoint; retain this revision-binding caveat for review.
Source Arcee Trinity Large Technical Report (arXiv:2602.17004v1)

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Trinity MiniLlama 3.1 8B 28Phi-3 Medium (14B) 28Qwen 3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 28Trinity Large Thinking 28

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

  1. 1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
26 billion
Source: Parameters
Active parameters
3 billion
Source: Active parameters

Input and output

Context window
131,072 tokens
Source: Context window
Maximum output
131,072 tokens
Source: Maximum output
Inputs
Text
Source: Inputs
Outputs
Text
Source: Outputs
Reasoning
Yes
Source: Reasoning
Tool calling
Yes
Source: Tool calling

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
License
OpenMDW-1.1
Source: License

Frequently asked questions about Trinity Mini

How large is the context window of Trinity Mini?

131,072 tokens. That is how much text Trinity Mini reads at once, about 200 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
GLM-5.1200K
DeepSeek-V3 0324164K
Trinity MiniRank 94 of 103131K
GLM-4.5131K
GPT OSS 120B131K
DeepSeek-V3.2128K
DeepSeek-R1128K

Can I run Trinity Mini locally?

Yes, the weights are open.

Stated by Arcee AI

Open weights
yes
License
OpenMDW-1.1
Parameters
26B
active per token
3B

Sources and data date

Show all 12 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

No active result from the reviewed external evaluators can currently be attributed to this model. Other source evidence remains available below.

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Input

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Output

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 4 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

evaluation-details

Note

The chart does not identify all prompting, sampling, dates or score units. These values remain publisher-reported only.

Additional sourceHugging Face · Arcee AI Trinity Mini model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceArcee Trinity Mini official model-card benchmark chart (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceOfficial n8n AI Benchmark (retrieved October 19, 2026) (unavailable on November 2, 2026) https://n8n.io/ai-benchmark/trinity-mini/
Additional sourceArcee Trinity Large Technical Report (arXiv:2602.17004v1) (retrieved October 20, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 15, 2026)
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0