Skip to main content

LLM Statistics 2026: Key Numbers, Data & Facts

LLM data on model records, parameter counts, context windows, prices, and benchmarks.

FHFinn Hillebrandt
AI Technology
LLM Statistics 2026: Key Numbers, Data & Facts
Links marked with * are affiliate links. If a purchase is made through such links, we receive a commission.

Which LLM is ahead in 2026?

In the Vals Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads at 70.85%, ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 70.18%.

Maybe you aren't hunting for the top scorer anyway. You want to know how many language models exist, what they cost, and how much context they handle.

In this article, you'll find the key LLM statistics for 2026 on providers, prices, parameters, and context windows.

Start with the short version:

TL;DRKey Takeaways
  • Our model catalogue contains 298 records across 36 developer groups. Its newest saved release date is October 26, 2026. The catalogue includes Gemini 4 Argon, which became generally available on October 13.
  • In the Vals Index dated October 27, 2026, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 70.85%, Claude Opus 5.5 70.18%, and Gemini 4 Argon 69.24%. Vals Index v2.1 weights tasks in finance, coding, legal work, and tax by their share of the U.S. economy.
  • Selected API base prices are $0.1 / $0.5 for GPT-6 Luna, $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash, and $4 / $20 for Claude Opus 5.5 per 1 million input and output tokens. Context tiers, introductory offers, and regions change the effective price.
  • Providers publish total and active parameter counts for some open models, including Kimi K3 at 2.8 trillion total and 104 billion. Many hosted models have no official parameter count.
  • Ten million tokens do not always mean a 10-million-token context window. Meta says Llama 4 Scout supports that context length; Qwen-Long processes 10-million-token documents through file upload. Gemini 4 Argon has a shared context window of 1,048,576 tokens across input, thinking, and output. Synchronous responses allow up to 65,536 output tokens; Long Decode can use more of the remaining context budget.

1. How Many Large Language Models Are There in 2026?

This catalogue contains 298 records across 36 developer groups. Gemini 4 Argon was announced on September 30 and became generally available on October 13. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is listed separately in the open-weight directory.

According to the 2026 Stanford AI Index, industry produced more than 90% of notable frontier models in 2025.

2. The Biggest LLM Providers by Model Count

Who leads depends on the yardstick. Here, the number of models in the catalogue sits next to each provider's share of token volume at businesses.

2.1 Catalogue Models by Developer

The chart shows the catalogue models by developer:

OpenAI
43 models
Alibaba
43 models
Google
29 models
Anthropic
25 models
Meta
18 models
Mistral AI
18 models
DeepSeek
14 models
Z.ai
12 models
Source: gradually.ai LLM database
gradually.ai

OpenAI has the largest record set at 43, followed by Alibaba at 43 and Google at 29.

2.2 Token Volume Share at Ramp Businesses

The chart shows each provider's share of token volume among businesses that pay through Ramp:

Anthropic
59.8%
OpenAI
37.2%
xAI
1.5%
Google
1.3%
Source: Ramp AI Index
gradually.ai

Anthropic and OpenAI together account for about 97% of token volume in this slice.

3. Parameters and Architecture: What Providers Disclose

Many providers do not publish parameter counts for their hosted frontier models. For open weights, some providers publish both total and per-token active parameters.

3.1 Total Size of Open Models

Moonshot lists Kimi K3 at 2.8 trillion total and 104 billion, plus 16 selected experts per token. DeepSeek-V3 is listed with 671 billion core parameters and 37 billion; its downloadable weights also contain a separate MTP module that is not part of this core count.

Kimi K3 MoE, 104B active
2.8T
Qwen 3.8 2.4T A95B MoE, 95B active
2.4T
DeepSeek-V4-Pro MoE, 49B active
1.6T
Mistral Large 4 MoE, 52B active
1.05T
Kimi K2.6 MoE, 32B active
1T
GLM-5.3 MoE, 40B active
744B
Mistral Large 3 MoE, 41B active
675B
DeepSeek-V3 MoE, 37B active, separate MTP module excluded
671B
Llama 4 Maverick MoE, 17B active
400B

Most examples in the chart use Mixture-of-Experts architectures. Their active parameter count is smaller than the total size. Our catalogue classifies 111 records as MoE.

Mistral Large 4 is included at the centrally recorded total size. Its launch post reports a rounded 1 trillion total parameters and the versioned model page a more precise 1.05 trillion. Both report 52 billion active parameters.

The interactive table uses the central parameter dataset. Rows marked "estimated" are based on analyses or leaks, not provider disclosures.

Mistral's Small 4 launch post lists 6 billion active parameters per token, or 8 billion including embedding and output layers. Its Hugging Face card says 6.5 billion activated per token, and the table uses that figure. For most current frontier models, the parameter column deliberately reads "unknown":

Legend:

500B+
100-500B
20-100B
5-20B
Under 5B

Showing 298 models

Parameter sizes of known large language models. Published figures and estimates are identified.
Model
Developer
Parameters
MiniMax M2.7
MoE
MiniMax
Unknown
MiniMax M2.5
MoE
MiniMax
Unknown
GLM-4.7
MoE
Z.ai
Unknown
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.5 Instant
OpenAI
Unknown
ChatGPT chat-latest
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.3-Codex
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.3 Instant
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.2
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.1 Instant
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5.1 Thinking
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5 Pro
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
Unknown
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
Unknown
o3
OpenAI
Unknown
o3-pro
OpenAI
Unknown
o3-mini
OpenAI
Unknown
o4-mini
OpenAI
Unknown
o1
OpenAI
Unknown
o1-mini
OpenAI
Unknown
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Unknown
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Unknown
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google DeepMind
Unknown
Gemini 4 Argon
Google DeepMind
Unknown
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 2.5 Flash
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 3 Pro
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 2.0 Flash
MoE
Google
Unknown
Gemini 1.5 Pro
MoE
Google
Unknown
Grok 4.7
xAI
Unknown
Grok 4.6
xAI
Unknown
Grok 4.5
xAI
Unknown
Grok 4.3
xAI
Unknown
Grok 4.20 Reasoning
xAI
Unknown
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
xAI
Unknown
Grok Build 0.1
xAI
Unknown
Grok 4
xAI
Unknown
Grok 3
xAI
Unknown
Grok 2
xAI
Unknown
Qwen 3.7 Max
MoE
Alibaba
Unknown
Seed 1.8
ByteDance
Unknown
Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
Unknown
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta
Unknown
Muse Wonder
Meta
Unknown
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Unknown
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta
Unknown
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
Kuaishou
Unknown
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5
Kuaishou
Unknown
Seed 1.6 Flash
ByteDance
Unknown
Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
Unknown
Seed 2.0 Mini
ByteDance
Unknown
Seed 2.0 Code
ByteDance
Unknown
Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance
Unknown
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Alibaba
Unknown
Qwen 3.7 Plus
MoE
Alibaba
Unknown
Amazon Nova 2 Lite
Amazon
Unknown
Amazon Nova Premier
Amazon
Unknown
Amazon Nova Pro
Amazon
Unknown
Amazon Nova Lite
Amazon
Unknown
Amazon Nova Micro
Amazon
Unknown
Sonar
Perplexity
Unknown
Sonar Pro
Perplexity
Unknown
Sonar Reasoning Pro
Perplexity
Unknown
Sonar Deep Research
Perplexity
Unknown
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
Unknown
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
2.8T*
Kimi K3
MoE(104B active)
Moonshot AI
2.8T
Qwen 3.8 2.4T A95B
MoE(95B active)
Alibaba
2.4T
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
MoE
Alibaba
2.4T
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
2T*
Llama 4 Behemoth
MoE(288B active)
Meta
2T
GPT-4
MoE(220B active)
OpenAI
1.76T*
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
MoE(49B active)
DeepSeek
1.6T
LongCat 2.0
MoE(48B active)
Meituan
1.6T
Mistral Large 4
MoE(52B active)
Mistral AI
1.05T
Ring 2.6 1T
MoE(63B active)
inclusionAI
1T
Kimi K2.5
MoE(32B active)
Moonshot AI
1T
Kimi K2 Thinking
MoE(32B active)
Moonshot AI
1T
Kimi K2 0711
MoE(32B active)
Moonshot AI
1T
Kimi K2 0905
MoE(32B active)
Moonshot AI
1T
Kimi K2.6
MoE(32B active)
Moonshot AI
1T
Kimi K2.7 Code
MoE(32B active)
Moonshot AI
1T
Qwen 3.6 Max-Preview
MoE
Alibaba
1T*
Yi-Large
MoE
01.AI
1T
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MoE(42B active)
Xiaomi
1T
MiMo-V2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed
MoE(42B active)
Xiaomi
1T
Inkling
MoE(41B active)
Thinking Machines Lab
975B
GLM-5.2
MoE(40B active)
Z.ai
744B
GLM-5.3
MoE(40B active)
Z.ai
744B
GLM-5.1
MoE(40B active)
Z.ai
744B
GLM-5
MoE(40B active)
Z.ai
744B
DeepSeek-V3 0324
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
685B
Mistral Large 3
MoE(41B active)
Mistral AI
675B
DeepSeek-V3.1 Terminus
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-V3.2 Exp
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-V3.1
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-R1 0528
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-V3.2
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-V3
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-R1
MoE(37B active)
DeepSeek
671B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
MoE
DeepSeek
552B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MoE(16B active)
DeepSeek
552B*
Nemotron 3 Ultra
MoE(55B active)
NVIDIA
550B
PaLM
Google
540B
Megatron-Turing NLG
NVIDIA
530B
Qwen 3 Coder 480B A35B
MoE(35B active)
Alibaba
480B
MiniMax M1
MoE(45.9B active)
MiniMax
456B
MiniMax-01
MoE(45.9B active)
MiniMax
456B
MiniMax M3
MoE(23B active)
MiniMax
428B
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B
MoE(47B active)
Baidu
424B
Hermes 4 405B
Nous Research
405B
Llama 3.1 405B
Meta
405B
Llama 4 Maverick
MoE(17B active)
Meta
400B
Trinity Large Thinking
MoE(13B active)
Arcee AI
398B
Nex-N2-Pro
MoE(17B active)
Nex AGI
397B
Qwen 3.5 397B A17B
MoE(17B active)
Alibaba
397B
GLM-4.6
MoE(32B active)
Z.ai
355B
GLM-4.5
MoE(32B active)
Z.ai
355B
Nemotron-4 340B
NVIDIA
340B
PaLM 2
Google
340B*
GLM-5.3-Flash
MoE(18B active)
Z.ai
320B
Grok 1
MoE(86B active)
xAI
314B
MiMo-V2.5
MoE(15B active)
Xiaomi
310B
Hy3
MoE(21B active)
Tencent
295B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
MoE(13B active)
DeepSeek
284B
Inkling Small
MoE(12B active)
Thinking Machines Lab
276B
DeepSeek-V2
MoE(21B active)
DeepSeek
236B
Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MoE(22B active)
Alibaba
235B
Qwen 3 235B A22B
MoE(22B active)
Alibaba
235B
Qwen 3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MoE(22B active)
Alibaba
235B
Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B
MoE(22B active)
Alibaba
235B
Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
MoE(22B active)
Alibaba
235B
MiniMax M2.1
MoE(10B active)
MiniMax
230B
MiniMax M2
MoE(10B active)
MiniMax
230B
Seed 1.6
MoE(23B active)
ByteDance
230B
GPT-4o
OpenAI
200B*
Step 3.7 Flash
MoE(11B active)
StepFun
198B
Step 3.5 Flash
MoE(11B active)
StepFun
196.8B
Falcon 180B
TII
180B
BLOOM
BigScience
176B
GPT-3
OpenAI
175B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
175B*
OPT-175B
Meta
175B
Mixtral 8x22B
MoE(39B active)
Mistral AI
141B
LaMDA
Google
137B
DBRX
MoE(36B active)
Databricks
132B
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral AI
128B
Qwen 3.8 Flash
MoE(6B active)
Alibaba
125B
Ling 3.0 Flash
MoE(5.1B active)
inclusionAI
124B
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
123B
Qwen 3.5 122B A10B
MoE(10B active)
Alibaba
122B
Nemotron 3 Super
MoE(12B active)
NVIDIA
120B
Mistral Small 4
MoE(6.5B active)
Mistral AI
119B
Laguna S 2.1
MoE(8B active)
Poolside
118B
GPT OSS 120B
MoE(5.1B active)
OpenAI
117B
Command A
Cohere
111B
Llama 4 Scout
MoE(17B active)
Meta
109B
GLM-4.6V
MoE(12B active)
Z.ai
106B
GLM-4.5 Air
MoE(12B active)
Z.ai
106B
GLM-4.5V
MoE(12B active)
Z.ai
106B
Command R+
Cohere
104B
Solar Pro 3
MoE(12B active)
Upstage
102B
Hunyuan A13B Instruct
MoE(13B active)
Tencent
80B
Qwen 3 Coder Next
MoE(3B active)
Alibaba
80B
Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
MoE(3B active)
Alibaba
80B
Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MoE(3B active)
Alibaba
80B
Qwen 2.5 72B
Alibaba
72.7B
Virtuoso Large
Arcee AI
72B
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B
Alibaba
72B
Hermes 4 70B
Nous Research
70B
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B
DeepSeek
70B
Claude 3 Sonnet
Anthropic
70B*
Llama 3.3 70B
Meta
70B
Llama 3.1 70B
Meta
70B
Llama 3 70B
Meta
70B
Llama 2 70B
Meta
70B
Mixtral 8x7B
MoE(12.9B active)
Mistral AI
46.7B
Falcon 40B
TII
40B
Nex-N2-mini
MoE(3B active)
Nex AGI
35B
Qwen 3.6 35B A3B
MoE(3B active)
Alibaba
35B
Qwen 3.5 35B A3B
MoE(3B active)
Alibaba
35B
Yi-34B
01.AI
34B
Laguna XS 2.1
MoE(3B active)
Poolside
33B
Qwen 3 32B
Alibaba
32.8B
Qwen 3 VL 32B
Alibaba
32.8B
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Alibaba
32.5B
Qwen 2.5 32B
Alibaba
32B
Command R
Cohere
32B
Solar Pro 2
Upstage
31B
Gemma 4 31B
Google
30.7B
Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MoE(3.3B active)
Alibaba
30.5B
Qwen 3 Coder 30B A3B
MoE(3.3B active)
Alibaba
30.5B
Qwen 3 30B A3B
MoE(3.3B active)
Alibaba
30.5B
Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
MoE(3.3B active)
Alibaba
30.5B
Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B
MoE(3.3B active)
Alibaba
30.5B
Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
MoE(3.3B active)
Alibaba
30.5B
Nemotron 3 Nano
MoE(3.5B active)
NVIDIA
30B
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
MoE(3B active)
NVIDIA
30B
GLM-4.7-Flash
MoE(3B active)
Z.ai
30B
Muse Glimmer 30B
Meta
29.6B
Gemma 3 27B
Google
27B
Qwen 3.8 27B
Alibaba
27B
Qwen 3.5 27B
Alibaba
27B
Qwen 3.6 27B
Alibaba
27B
Gemma 2 27B
Google
27B
Gemma 4 26B A4B
MoE(3.8B active)
Google
25.2B
Mistral Small 3.2
Mistral AI
24B
Mistral Small 3.1
Mistral AI
24B
Voxtral Small 24B
Mistral AI
24B
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI
24B
GPT OSS 20B
MoE(3.6B active)
OpenAI
21B
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
20B*
Qwen 3 14B
Alibaba
14.8B
Qwen 2.5 14B
Alibaba
14B
Phi-4
Microsoft
14B
Ministral 3 14B
Mistral AI
13.9B
Nemotron Nano 2 VL 12B
NVIDIA
12.6B
Gemma 3 12B
Google
12B
Mistral Nemo
Mistral AI
12B
Solar Mini
Upstage
10.7B
Qwen 3.5 9B
Alibaba
9B
Gemma 2 9B
Google
9B
Nemotron Nano 2 9B
NVIDIA
9B
Ministral 3 8B
Mistral AI
8.8B
Qwen 3 8B
Alibaba
8.2B
Qwen 3 VL 8B
Alibaba
8.2B
Qwen 3 VL 8B Thinking
Alibaba
8.2B
Granite 4.1 8B
IBM
8B
Gemma 3n E4B
Google
8B
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
8B*
Llama 3.1 8B
Meta
8B
Llama 3 8B
Meta
8B
Ministral 8B
Mistral AI
8B
Qwen 2.5 7B
Alibaba
7.6B
Mistral 7B
Mistral AI
7B
Command R7B
Cohere
7B
Phi-4 Multimodal
Microsoft
5.6B
Gemma 3 4B
Google
4B
Ministral 3 3B
Mistral AI
3.8B
Phi-4 mini
Microsoft
3.8B
Phi-3 mini
Microsoft
3.8B
Gemini Nano 2
Google
3.3B
Llama 3.2 3B
Meta
3.2B
Granite 4.0 H Micro
IBM
3B
Ministral 3B
Mistral AI
3B
Gemma 2 2B
Google
2B
Gemini Nano 1
Google
1.8B
GPT-2
OpenAI
1.5B
Llama 3.2 1B
Meta
1.2B
Qwen 2.5 0.5B
Alibaba
0.5B

Parameter sizes of known large language models. Published figures and estimates are identified.

3.2 Memory Needs for Local Models

For local models, memory matters most. All weights have to sit in RAM, even for Mixture-of-Experts models where only part of the network is active per token. The chart converts total parameters into gigabytes at 4.89 bits per weight (Q4_K_M quantization). Context cache and runtime add a few more gigabytes in practice:

Qwen 3.5 122B A10B 122 B, MoE
74.6 GB
GPT OSS 120B 117 B, MoE
71.6 GB
Gemma 4 31B 30.7 B
18.8 GB
Qwen 3.8 27B 27 B
16.5 GB
Gemma 4 26B A4B 25.2 B, MoE
15.4 GB
Mistral Small 3.2 24 B
14.7 GB
GPT OSS 20B 21 B, MoE
12.8 GB
Qwen 3.5 9B 9 B
5.5 GB
Granite 4.1 8B 8 B
4.9 GB
Source: Model cards, own calculation
gradually.ai

The vendor already ships GPT OSS in its own 4-bit format, so its file size deviates from this calculation.

4. Context Windows: Comparing Provider-Reported Limits

The chart shows the documented context window of eight current models. Llama 4 Scout leads by a wide margin at just over 10 million tokens, while most other top models sit at around one million. Grok 4.7 offers half of that:

Llama 4 Scout
10,485,760 tokens
GPT-6.1 Sol
1,050,000 tokens
Gemini 4 Argon
1,048,576 tokens
Kimi K3
1,048,576 tokens
Claude Opus 5.5
1,000,000 tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5
1,000,000 tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
1,000,000 tokens
Grok 4.7
500,000 tokens
Sources: Provider documentation
gradually.ai

The interactive table combines 339 records from the central dataset. Context limits vary by model, provider, and API endpoint:

Legend:
1M+ Tokens
200K-1M Tokens
100K-200K Tokens
32K-100K Tokens
Under 32K Tokens
Showing 339 models
Context windows by model and provider endpoint. Each model links to its source.
Model
Developer
Context Window
Meta
10.5M
Alibaba
10M
Google
2M
Google
2M
xAI
2M
xAI
2M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
OpenAI
1.1M
Moonshot AI
1M
Meta
1M
Google DeepMind
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
DeepSeek
1M
Moonshot AI
1M
Meta
1M
Meta
1M
Meta
1M
Poolside
1M
OpenAI
1M
OpenAI
1M
OpenAI
1M
Google DeepMind
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
Google
1M
xAI
1M
xAI
1M
xAI
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
Anthropic
1M
DeepSeek
1M
DeepSeek
1M
DeepSeek
1M
MiniMax
1M
Alibaba
1M
Alibaba
1M
Alibaba
1M
Meituan
1M
Thinking Machines Lab
1M
Thinking Machines Lab
1M
Meta
1M
Alibaba
1M
Alibaba
1M
Alibaba
1M
Alibaba
1M
Z.ai
1M
Z.ai
1M
Z.ai
1M
Xiaomi
1M
Xiaomi
1M
Xiaomi
1M
MiniMax
1M
NVIDIA
1M
NVIDIA
1M
NVIDIA
1M
NVIDIA
1M
Amazon
1M
Amazon
1M
Amazon
1M
MiniMax
1M
Mistral AI
524.29K
Upstage
512K
xAI
500K
xAI
500K
xAI
500K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
OpenAI
400K
Amazon
300K
Amazon
300K
Mistral AI
262.14K
Mistral AI
262.14K
Moonshot AI
262.14K
Moonshot AI
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Poolside
262.14K
Nex AGI
262.14K
Nex AGI
262.14K
Tencent
262.14K
Tencent
262.14K
inclusionAI
262.14K
inclusionAI
262.14K
Arcee AI
262.14K
Google
262.14K
Google
262.14K
Mistral AI
262.14K
Mistral AI
262.14K
Mistral AI
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Alibaba
262.14K
Moonshot AI
262.14K
Moonshot AI
262.14K
Moonshot AI
262.14K
xAI
256K
xAI
256K
xAI
256K
Mistral AI
256K
Mistral AI
256K
Alibaba
256K
ByteDance
256K
ByteDance
256K
Kuaishou
256K
Kuaishou
256K
ByteDance
256K
ByteDance
256K
ByteDance
256K
ByteDance
256K
ByteDance
256K
ByteDance
256K
StepFun
256K
StepFun
256K
Cohere
256K
Cohere
256K
AI21 Labs
256K
AI21 Labs
256K
AI21 Labs
256K
MiniMax
245.76K
MiniMax
204.8K
MiniMax
204.8K
MiniMax
204.8K
MiniMax
204.8K
Z.ai
204.8K
Z.ai
204.8K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
Anthropic
200K
OpenAI
200K
OpenAI
200K
OpenAI
200K
OpenAI
200K
OpenAI
200K
Z.ai
200K
Z.ai
200K
Perplexity
200K
Z.ai
200K
01.AI
200K
01.AI
200K
DeepSeek
163.84K
DeepSeek
163.84K
DeepSeek
163.84K
Meta
131.07K
Meta
131.07K
Meta
131.07K
Meta
131.07K
Meta
131.07K
xAI
131.07K
Mistral AI
131.07K
Alibaba
131.07K
Alibaba
131.07K
Alibaba
131.07K
Meta
131.07K
Upstage
131.07K
Baidu
131.07K
IBM
131.07K
IBM
131.07K
Arcee AI
131.07K
Nous Research
131.07K
Nous Research
131.07K
OpenAI
131.07K
OpenAI
131.07K
Mistral AI
131.07K
Mistral AI
131.07K
Moonshot AI
131.07K
Z.ai
131.07K
Z.ai
131.07K
Z.ai
131.07K
Meta
128K
Meta
128K
Meta
128K
Google
128K
Google
128K
Google
128K
xAI
128K
OpenAI
128K
OpenAI
128K
OpenAI
128K
OpenAI
128K
OpenAI
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
Mistral AI
128K
Mistral AI
128K
Mistral AI
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
Alibaba
128K
NVIDIA
128K
NVIDIA
128K
Cohere
128K
Perplexity
128K
Perplexity
128K
Perplexity
128K
DeepSeek
128K
DeepSeek
128K
Alibaba
128K
Cohere
128K
Cohere
128K
Amazon
128K
Microsoft
128K
Microsoft
128K
Microsoft
128K
Microsoft
128K
Microsoft
128K
Microsoft
128K
01.AI
128K
01.AI
128K
Nvidia
128K
Nvidia
128K
Nvidia
128K
Reka
128K
Reka
128K
Reka
128K
Zhipu AI
128K
Zhipu AI
128K
Baidu
128K
Mistral AI
65.54K
Upstage
65.54K
Z.ai
65.54K
Microsoft
64K
Mistral AI
32.77K
Mistral AI
32.77K
Mistral AI
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Upstage
32.77K
Google
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Alibaba
32.77K
Microsoft
32.77K
Databricks
32.77K
Google
32K
Mistral AI
32K
01.AI
32K
Microsoft
16.38K
01.AI
16K
Google
8.19K
Google
8.19K
OpenAI
8.19K
AI21 Labs
8.19K
Zhipu AI
8.19K
Baidu
8K
Cohere
4.1K
Nvidia
4.1K
Stability AI
4.1K
Stability AI
4.1K

Context windows by model and provider endpoint. Each model links to its source.

Meta lists a supported 10.5M-token context window for Llama 4 Scout and says the model was trained with 256,000 tokens. Qwen-Long handles documents up to 10 million tokens through file upload and references. Alibaba's instructions apply only in mainland China's Beijing region.

OpenAI lists a 1,050,000-token context for GPT-6.1 Sol, while Anthropic lists 1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and 1M for Sonnet 5.5.

Mistral documents a 1-million-token limit for Large 4. The central table separately records 524,288 tokens for the OpenRouter endpoint, a different serving configuration. Mistral Small 4 supports 256K tokens, matching its launch announcement and model card.

According to Google's model page, Gemini 4 Argon has a shared context window of 1,048,576 tokens across input, thinking, and output. Synchronous responses allow up to 65,536 output tokens. Long Decode can use more of the remaining context budget, but input and thinking still count toward the shared limit.

For more on the model families, see our overviews of the Claude models and Gemini models.

5. What Does an LLM Cost? Prices per 1 Million Tokens

The chart compares base input prices for selected API models. Values are per 1 million tokens.

GPT-6 Luna Input up to 272,000 tokens; output price $0.50
$0.10 input
Gemini 3.8 Flash output price $3.75
$0.75 input
GPT-6.1 Sol Input up to 272,000 tokens; output price $10.00
$2.00 input
Claude Opus 5.5 output price $20.00
$4.00 input

GPT-6 Luna and GPT-6.1 Sol have higher price tiers above 272,000 input tokens. Google lists Gemini 3.8 Flash's introductory rates of $0.75 input and $3.75 output through December 31, 2026, followed by scheduled standard rates of $1.50 and $7.50 from January 1, 2027.

Alibaba lists Qwen 3.8 Flash in Frankfurt at a regional yuan rate of CNY 0.8 input and CNY 2.7 output per million tokens. Cache pricing and other conditions can differ. For an estimate for your use, see the API cost calculator.

6. LLM Performance Head to Head

Three leaderboards measure different strengths. Vals Index scores agent tasks, the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index rates general model performance, and Vectara's leaderboard tracks the hallucination rate when summarizing.

6.1 Vals Index for Agent Tasks

Vals Index v2.1 combines agent tasks in finance, coding, legal work, and tax, weighting each area by its share of U.S. GDP. The chart shows the snapshot from October 27, 2026. Other models sit between ranks 3 and 7 and are not shown.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Rank 1
70.85%
Claude Opus 5.5 Rank 2
70.18%
Gemini 4 Argon Rank 3, limited access
69.24%
GPT-6.1 Sol Rank 7
63.94%
Source: Vals Index leaderboard and methodology
gradually.ai

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads the index and Gemini 4 Argon ranks third. Google initially rolled it out only to selected cyber defense teams. Google's current model card lists the Gemini app, API, AI Studio, business offerings, Antigravity, and AI Mode as distribution channels; access depends on the specific product.

The gap between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 is 0.67 points, which Vals says is within the usual measurement error of about ±0.9 points.

6.2 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 combines several benchmarks into one overall score. The chart shows each model's best listed configuration, retrieved on October 29, 2026. The leaderboard lists several reasoning settings of the same model separately, so they are not repeated here.

Gemini 4 Carbon setting high
59 points
Claude Opus 5.5 setting max
58 points
GPT-6 Astra setting max
57 points
GPT-6.1 Sol setting max
55 points
Claude Sonnet 5.5 setting max
54 points
GPT-6.1 Terra setting max
51 points
Gemini 4 Argon setting high
50 points
Source: Artificial Analysis
gradually.ai

Gemini 4 Carbon leads with 59 points, and Claude Opus 5.5 follows one point behind. Vals Index and the Artificial Analysis index order the models differently because they weight different tasks.

6.3 Hallucination Rate When Summarizing

Vectara's Hallucination Leaderboard measures how often a model invents content when summarizing a document. Lower is better:

GPT-6 Sol
6.5%
DeepSeek V4 Pro
8.6%
GPT-6 Astra
8.7%
GPT-5.5
9.3%
Claude Opus 5.5
9.9%
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)
10.4%
Kimi K2.6
10.8%
Gemini 4 Argon
12.1%
Source: Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard
gradually.ai

The selection shows current flagship models from the leaderboard. The lowest rates there belong to small models built for summarization, so the list mixes model classes. GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 4 Argon are 5.6 percentage points apart.

7. Open Source vs. Proprietary

Our catalogue classifies 134 records as proprietary and 164 as openly available. Of those, 159 are listed as open weights and 5 as open source.

For March 2026, the Stanford AI Index reports a 3.3% lead (1,503 versus 1,454 rating points) by the top closed model over the top open model on Chatbot Arena.

Six of the ten highest-ranked Arena models were closed in that snapshot. The report compares this with a 0.5% gap in August 2024. Browse open models in our open-source LLM directory.

The chart shows the license classification for the six developer groups with the most records in our catalogue. Proprietary records extend to the left, open ones to the right.

More Proprietary
More open licenses
Mistral AIhighest share of open licenses: 94%
Anthropichighest share of Proprietary: 100%
Proprietary
Open-weights
Open-source
Source: gradually.ai LLM database
gradually.ai

Anthropic has no bar on the right because all Anthropic entries in the catalogue are proprietary.

8. Knowledge Cutoff: How Current Are the Models?

A knowledge cutoff describes the training data date a provider reports for a model. This selection shows provider-reported training cutoffs for six models:

Claude Opus 5.5
June 2026
Claude Sonnet 5.5
June 2026
GPT-6 Luna
May 18, 2026
GPT-6.1 Sol
April 30, 2026
GPT-6 Astra
April 30, 2026
GPT-6 Sol
April 20, 2026

Anthropic lists June 2026 for Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5. OpenAI lists May 18, 2026 for GPT-6 Luna, April 30, 2026 for GPT-6.1 Sol, April 30, 2026 for GPT-6 Astra, and April 20, 2026 for GPT-6 Sol.

9. Selected Releases and the Catalogue Timeline

The timeline shows selected releases with provider announcements. It runs from GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, and GPT-5 through Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 to Gemini 4 Argon and Mistral Large 4. OpenAI records further launches in its API changelog:

May 2024
GPT-4o
OpenAI introduces a model for real-time audio, image, and text processing.
Jan. 2025
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek releases model weights and a technical report under the MIT license.
Aug. 2025
GPT-5
OpenAI introduces GPT-5 as a system with fast and extended reasoning modes.
Sep. 22, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol/Luna
Anthropic introduces Opus 5.5; OpenAI releases GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna.
Sep. 28, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic releases the second model in the Claude 5.5 family.
Sep. 29, 2026
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI releases the API model for complex coding and professional work.
Sep. 30, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon
Google announces Gemini 4 Argon and begins a phased rollout to selected cyber defense teams. Its shared context window is 1,048,576 tokens across input, thinking, and output. Synchronous responses allow up to 65,536 output tokens. Long Decode can use more of the context budget left after input and thinking.
Oct. 6, 2026
Mistral Large 4
Mistral starts a public API preview and announces its weights for the end of October 2026. Hugging Face lists October 31 as the expected date, and the weights are not public until then.

Gemini 4 Argon's saved release date is October 13, the date it became generally available according to the Gemini API release notes.

Spreading every model recorded in the gradually.ai catalog across its release month shows how releases have clustered. The darker a cell, the more models came out that month.

JanFebMarAprMayJun201912020120212022211202312202411553420258661431120263181115816JulAugSepOctNovDecTotal201912020120210202211620231233122024718319482025131111851310920261512148120
New models in the catalog:1-34-78-1011-1415-18
Source: gradually.ai LLM database
gradually.ai

10. Model Status: Active, Deprecated, Legacy

This chart shows our status classification for 102 model records from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI:

102models
Active4241.2%
Deprecated4039.2%
Legacy76.9%
Limited access54.9%
Pro-exclusive22.0%
API only11.0%
Preview32.9%
Open source22.0%
Source: gradually.ai LLM database
gradually.ai

Across these 102 records, the dataset classifies 42 active, 40 deprecated, 7 legacy, 5 with limited access, 2 Pro-exclusive, 1 available through API only, 3 preview, 2 open source. Providers can change status or access, so check current model documentation before integrating a model.

11. Market Position and Conclusion

Bottom line:

For a specific use case, compare the relevant task evaluation, actual input and output rates, context limits, and access together. We also publish separate statistics on OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek.

Frequently Asked Questions

The catalogue used on this page contains 298 model records across 36 developer groups. The catalogue includes Gemini 4 Argon, which became generally available on October 13.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads the Vals Index dated October 27, 2026, at 70.85%. Claude Opus 5.5 scores 70.18%, followed by Gemini 4 Argon at 69.24%. Vals Index v2.1 combines tasks in finance, coding, legal work, and tax, weighted by their share of the U.S. economy.

The chart shows selected standard API prices per 1 million input tokens. GPT-6 Luna costs $0.1 per million input and $0.5 per million output tokens up to 272,000 input tokens; higher tiers apply above that threshold.

Alibaba’s Frankfurt pricing table for Global deployment lists CNY 0.8 per million input and CNY 2.7 per million output tokens for Qwen3.8-Flash. Its separate Model Studio pricing table lists $0.113 and $0.382 for Global deployment. Alibaba publishes the prices in both currencies; cache and promotional rates are listed separately. For more providers and tiers, see the LLM price index.

Our catalogue classifies 134 records as proprietary, 159 as open weights, and 5 as open source. In its 2026 report, the Stanford AI Index compares the top closed and open-weight models on Chatbot Arena. For March 2026, the top closed model led by 3.3%, with Arena ratings of 1,503 versus 1,454, a 49-point difference.

Meta says Llama 4 Scout supports a context window of up to 10 million tokens; it also says the model was trained with 256,000 tokens. Qwen-Long processes documents up to 10 million tokens through file uploads and references, not in a single prompt. Alibaba's instructions apply only to mainland China in the Beijing region. Gemini 4 Argon has a shared context window of 1,048,576 tokens across input, thinking, and output. Synchronous responses allow up to 65,536 output tokens. Long Decode can use more of the remaining context budget, but input and thinking still count toward the shared limit.

Many providers do not publish parameter counts for their hosted frontier models. For some open-weight models, vendors publish both total and active parameters. Moonshot lists 2.8 trillion total parameters and 104 billion active parameters for Kimi K3. DeepSeek launched the V4 Pro API preview on April 24, 2026, then announced general availability on August 13; its official changelog confirms the current status. The vendor lists 1.6 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active parameters for V4 Pro.
FH

Finn Hillebrandt

AI Expert & Blogger

Finn Hillebrandt is the founder of Gradually AI, an SEO and AI expert. He helps online entrepreneurs simplify and automate their processes and marketing with AI. Finn shares his knowledge here on the blog in 50+ articles as well as through the AI Business Club.

Learn more about Finn and the team, follow Finn on LinkedIn, join his Facebook group for ChatGPT, OpenAI & AI Tools or do like 17,500+ others and subscribe to his AI Newsletter with tips, news and offers about AI tools and online business. Also visit his other blog, Blogmojo, which is about WordPress, blogging and SEO.