Skip to main content

The Best Open Source LLMs: 120+ Models Compared

Sortable directory of 120+ open source LLMs with benchmarks, licenses, API prices, and context windows. Plus: how to run free LLMs locally on your PC.

FHFinn Hillebrandt
AI Technology
The Best Open Source LLMs: 120+ Models Compared
Links marked with * are affiliate links. If a purchase is made through such links, we receive a commission.

Open source LLMs are one of the most important AI trends of 2026.

And for good reason:

Open source models were long significantly weaker than proprietary models. But by spring 2026 they have caught up, especially out of Chinese labs:

DeepSeek V4 Pro (released April 24, 2026), GLM-5.1 from Z.ai, Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI, and Qwen3.5 from Alibaba can compete with the best proprietary LLMs like Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, or Gemini 3.1 Pro, and even beat them on specific benchmarks like SWE-Bench Pro and HumanEval. The new proprietary reference point for Terminal-Bench 2.1 is GPT-5.6 Sol (limited preview since June 26, 2026, ~20 OpenAI partners including Codex CLI) at 88.8%, Sol Ultra at 91.9%. Comparable open-source Terminal-Bench 2.1 scores have not been published yet.

In this article, you'll find a sortable, filterable directory of 120+ open source LLMs, including benchmark scores, licenses, API prices, context windows, and capabilities (as of July 2026).

Additionally, I'll show you how to easily and freely use open LLMs on your own computer (without needing to program or use the terminal).

TL;DRKey Takeaways
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T MoE, MIT, April 2026), Kimi K2.6 (1T MoE), and GLM-5.1 from Z.ai lead the April 2026 rankings, with GLM-5.1 topping SWE-Bench Pro at 58.4%
  • 120+ open source LLMs in a filterable, sortable directory, from MIT and Apache 2.0 through to restricted research-only licenses. Columns like prices, context, and capabilities can be toggled individually
  • Chinese labs (DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, Z.ai, Alibaba) hold most top positions; the 2025 leaders (GPT-OSS-120B, DeepSeek R1, Qwen3-235B, Llama 4) are still solid but no longer at the top
  • Local usage possible with tools like Ollama, LM Studio, or GPT4All, but the new top models need serious hardware (multi-GPU or quantized variants for consumer rigs)

All Open Source LLMs at a Glance

The directory contains every open-weights model from the models.dev catalog plus curated classics, sorted by release date by default. Use "Columns" to reveal more data, such as modalities, knowledge cutoff, max output, or the number of API providers:

127 of 127 models

Ornith 1.0 31B
DeepReinforce31B256KMITJun 2026
DeepReinforce35B256K75.6%SWE-Bench VerifiedMITJun 2026
DeepReinforce397B256K82.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedMITJun 2026
DeepReinforce9B256K69.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedMITJun 2026
Z.ai1M91.2%GPQA62.1%SWE-Bench ProMIT$0.50$2.20Jun 2026
Moonshot AI1T (32B active)256K89.6%GPQA67.4%Terminal-BenchModified MIT$0.55$2.25Jun 2026
Moonshot AI1T (32B active)256K89.6%GPQA67.4%Terminal-BenchModified MIT$1.90$8.00Jun 2026
North Mini Code
Cohere250K61%SWE-Bench VerifiedJun 2026
Xiaomi1MMIT$1.31$2.61Jun 2026
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
NVIDIA550B (55B active)1M86.8%MMLU-Pro87%GPQA89%LiveCodeBenchNVIDIA Open Model License$0.50$2.20Jun 2026
MiniMax500K92.9%GPQA80.5%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.28$1.10Jun 2026
StepFun250K76.5%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.20$1.15May 2026
Command A Plus
Cohere125KCC BY-NC-4.0$2.50$10.00May 2026
Mistral AI128B256K77.6%SWE-Bench Verified$1.50$6.90Apr 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
NVIDIA30B (3B active)250K77.3%MMLU-Pro72.2%GPQA63.2%LiveCodeBenchNVIDIA Open Model License$0.11$0.42Apr 2026
DeepSeek284B (13B active)1M83%MMLU-Pro85%GPQA88%LiveCodeBenchMIT$0.089$0.18Apr 2026
DeepSeek1.6T (49B active)1M87.5%MMLU-Pro90.1%GPQA93.5%LiveCodeBenchMIT$0.35$0.74Apr 2026
Alibaba27B256K86.2%MMLU-Pro87.8%GPQA77.2%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.20$1.50Apr 2026
Xiaomi1M86.3%MMLU56.1%SWE-Bench ProMIT$0.11$0.28Apr 2026
Xiaomi1M89.4%MMLU78.9%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.40$0.80Apr 2026
Moonshot AI1T (32B active)256K84.6%MMLU-Pro90.5%GPQA92%HumanEvalModified MIT$0.15$0.60Apr 2026
Tencent250K87.4%MMLU87.2%GPQA74.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedTencent Hunyuan Community$0.063$0.21Apr 2026
Alibaba35B (3B active)256K85.2%MMLU-Pro86%GPQA73.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.11$0.80Apr 2026
Z.ai754B200K91.7%MMLU85.7%GPQA58.4%SWE-Bench ProMIT$0.30$2.15Apr 2026
Google26B (4B active)256K82.6%MMLU-Pro82.3%GPQA77.1%LiveCodeBenchGemma Terms of Use$0.060$0.30Apr 2026
Google31B256K85.2%MMLU-Pro84.3%GPQA80%LiveCodeBenchGemma Terms of Use$0.10$0.30Apr 2026
Google128K60%MMLU-Pro43.4%GPQA44%LiveCodeBenchGemma Terms of UseApr 2026
Google128K69.4%MMLU-Pro58.6%GPQA52%LiveCodeBenchGemma Terms of UseApr 2026
StepFun250K32.6%Terminal-Bench HardApache 2.0$0.10$0.30Apr 2026
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B
NVIDIA30B (3B active)250K79.8%MMLU-Pro76.1%GPQA87.2%LiveCodeBenchNVIDIA Open Model License$0.14$0.60Mar 2026
MiniMax200K81.8%MMLU-Pro89.8%GPQA79.9%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.18$0.72Mar 2026
MiniMax200K81.8%MMLU-Pro89.8%GPQA79.9%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.33$1.32Mar 2026
Mistral AI119B250K71.2%GPQA17.4%Terminal-Bench HardApache 2.0$0.15$0.60Mar 2026
Nemotron VoiceChat
NVIDIA125KNVIDIA Open Model LicenseMar 2026
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
NVIDIA120B (12B active)256K83.7%MMLU-Pro79.2%GPQA81.2%LiveCodeBenchNVIDIA Open Model License$0.050$0.25Mar 2026
Alibaba122B (10B active)256K86.7%MMLU-Pro86.6%GPQA72%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.12$0.92Feb 2026
Alibaba27B256K86.1%MMLU-Pro85.5%GPQA72.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.086$0.69Feb 2026
Alibaba35B (3B active)256K85.3%MMLU-Pro84.2%GPQA74.6%LiveCodeBenchApache 2.0$0.057$0.46Feb 2026
Alibaba9B256K82.5%MMLU-Pro81.7%GPQA65.6%LiveCodeBenchApache 2.0$0.040$0.15Feb 2026
Sarvam 30B
Sarvam AI30B125K85.1%MMLU66.5%GPQA70%LiveCodeBench$0.020$0.10Feb 2026
Alibaba397B (17B active)256K87.8%MMLU-Pro88.4%GPQA76.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.17$1.03Feb 2026
MiniMax200K85.2%MMLU-Pro85.2%GPQA75.8%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.19$1.24Feb 2026
MiniMax200K85.2%MMLU-Pro85.2%GPQA75.8%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.11$0.48Feb 2026
Z.ai744B200K96%MMLU94%GPQA94.2%HumanEvalMIT$0.30$1.90Feb 2026
StepFun250K84.4%MMLU-Pro83.5%GPQA74.4%SWE-Bench VerifiedApache 2.0$0.090$0.29Jan 2026
Z.ai200K75.2%GPQA59.2%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.040$0.30Jan 2026
Z.ai200K75.2%GPQA59.2%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.060$0.40Jan 2026
Moonshot AI1T (32B active)256K92%MMLU87.6%GPQA99%HumanEvalModified MIT$0.30$1.50Jan 2026
MiniMax230B (10B active)200K88%MMLU-Pro83%GPQA74%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.27$0.95Dec 2025
Z.ai200K84.3%MMLU-Pro85.7%GPQA73.8%SWE-Bench VerifiedMIT$0.15$0.80Dec 2025

Benchmark score color coding:

ExcellentTop tier
GoodAbove average
AverageSolid
PoorBelow average

1. Key Benchmarks Explained

To objectively compare open source LLMs, I use three central benchmark categories:

MMLU / MMLU-Pro: The Massive Multitask Language Understanding Benchmark tests general knowledge across 57 subjects (STEM, social sciences, humanities). MMLU-Pro is the more challenging variant with less contamination. Top models score 85-90% here.

MATH / GPQA: These benchmarks test mathematical and scientific reasoning. MATH-500 contains challenging math problems, while GPQA (Graduate-Level Physics Questions Answers) tests expert knowledge in biology, physics, and chemistry. Top models score 70-97% here.

HumanEval / LiveCodeBench: These benchmarks test code generation. HumanEval contains Python programming tasks, LiveCodeBench tests code performance with current, uncontaminated tasks. Top models score 60-90% here.

The table shows up to three benchmark scores per model; the small label under each badge tells you which benchmark it is. Older and niche models don't have every score, in which case you'll see a dash.

SWE-bench Verified shows how close the top open models have come to the proprietary flagships:

Open models within about 8 points of GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.8

Models:
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Kimi K2.6
Claude Opus 4.8
GPT-5.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro

Sources: DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind

The gap becomes even clearer on price. The leading open models deliver almost the same coding performance at a fraction of the API cost:

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Kimi K2.6: best price-performance in the scatter
Ideal: strong + cheap
DeepSeek
Moonshot AI
Anthropic
OpenAI
Google
Efficiency frontier (best price-performance)
Sources: official API price lists from DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google
|
CC BY 4.0
gradually.ai

2. Top Models of April 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro (released April 24, 2026) is the new leader. The 1.6 trillion parameter MoE activates only 49B per token, scores 87.5% on MMLU-Pro, 90.1% on GPQA Diamond, and 93.5% on LiveCodeBench. Same MIT license as the rest of the DeepSeek lineup, and it ships with native 1M-token context at roughly 27% of the inference FLOPs of V3.2.

Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI is the second-best open weight overall: 92% on HumanEval, 90.5% on GPQA Diamond, 96.4% on AIME 2026, with a 256K context window and native video input. Modified MIT license, 1T parameters MoE.

GLM-5.1 from Z.ai (formerly Zhipu) tops SWE-Bench Pro with 58.4%, beating GPT-5.4 (57.7%) and Claude Opus 4.6 (57.3%). The 754B-parameter MoE was trained entirely on Huawei Ascend chips and ships under the MIT license. The reasoning sibling, GLM-5, hits 96% on MMLU and 94% on GPQA, the highest knowledge scores in the open-source space.

Kimi K2.5 still posts the highest HumanEval score on any leaderboard (99.0) and leads on MATH-500 (98.0). It is the best open weight purely for code generation when latency matters less than peak quality.

DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B / 13B active) is the cost-efficient sibling of V4 Pro and the most practical choice when you want frontier-class quality on a single high-end GPU.

The previous generation is still very usable: GPT-OSS-120B (OpenAI's first open-weight model since GPT-2), DeepSeek R1, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking, and Llama 4 Maverick all remain strong, just no longer state-of-the-art.

Here are the five new top models side by side:

FeatureDeepSeek V4 ProKimi K2.6GLM-5.1Kimi K2.5DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeveloperDeepSeekMoonshot AIZ.aiMoonshot AIDeepSeek
Licenseall permissiveMITModified MITMITModified MITMIT
Parametersall Mixture-of-Experts1.6T (49B active)1T754B1T284B (13B active)
Runs locallye.g. with Ollama or LM StudioYesYesYesYesYes
Local hardware needsMulti-GPU or quantizedMulti-GPU or quantizedMulti-GPU or quantizedMulti-GPU or quantizedOne high-end GPU
Standout featureNative 1M-token context window256K context, native video inputTrained entirely on Huawei Ascend chipsLeads MATH-500 at 98.0Cost-efficient sibling of V4 Pro
YesPartialNo

3. LLM Licenses Explained

Here's an overview of the most commonly used licenses for open source LLMs.

MIT License

A very permissive open source license, similar to Apache 2.0. It allows unrestricted use, modification, and distribution of the LLM, including in proprietary programs, as long as the copyright notice is retained. DeepSeek V3 uses MIT with some restrictions for military use.

Llama 2 Community / Llama 3 Community

Meta released Llama 2 and Llama 3 under these licenses. They allow free use of the LLMs for research and commercial applications with up to 700 million monthly active users. The source code and model weights are freely available.

Qwen License / Qianwen LICENSE

Qwen models are released under various licenses. While smaller models are often licensed under Apache 2.0, larger models like Qwen2.5-72B have special license terms that allow commercial use with certain restrictions.

Apache 2.0

A very permissive open source license with minimal restrictions. It allows use, modification, and distribution of the LLM, including in proprietary programs, as long as the copyright notice is retained. It contains no copyleft clause.

CC BY-NC-4.0

A Creative Commons license that allows editing and sharing the LLM in any form, but not for commercial purposes. The author's name must be credited.

CC BY-NC-SA-4.0

Similar to CC BY-NC-4.0, but with the additional Share-Alike condition. This means forks or modified versions of an LLM must be distributed under the same conditions.

Non-Commercial

Here, using the LLM for commercial purposes is prohibited. However, what exactly counts as "commercial" is not always clearly defined or delimited.

Usually, "non-commercial" models are only released for research purposes or private use.

4. Using Open Source LLMs Locally on Your Own Computer

Using open source LLMs locally on your own computer is easier than you might think:

1. Download LM Studio

Download LM Studio from the website. It's free and available for Mac, Windows, and Linux:

LM Studio

2. Install and Open LM Studio

Next, install LM Studio on your computer and open it.

3. Download Your Desired Open Source LLMs

Now you need to download the open source LLMs you want to use in LM Studio.

Many popular LLMs are already on the home screen. To download an LLM, simply click the blue download button:

Download open source LLMs

To find specific open source LLMs, you can also use the search function:

Search open source LLMs

4. Important: Check System Requirements Before Downloading

Before downloading an LLM, you should check the system requirements.

Llama 3, for example, requires more than 8 GB RAM and 4.92 GB of free storage:

Open source LLM system requirements

5. Chat with the Open Source LLM

After downloading an open source LLM, you can use it directly in LM Studio.

Simply click on the speech bubble icon (?) in the left sidebar.

The user interface and settings options are reminiscent of the OpenAI Playground:

Chat with open source LLM

Frequently Asked Questions About Open Source LLMs

FH

Finn Hillebrandt

AI Expert & Blogger

Finn Hillebrandt is the founder of Gradually AI, an SEO and AI expert. He helps online entrepreneurs simplify and automate their processes and marketing with AI. Finn shares his knowledge here on the blog in 50+ articles as well as through his ChatGPT Course and the AI Business Club.

Learn more about Finn and the team, follow Finn on LinkedIn, join his Facebook group for ChatGPT, OpenAI & AI Tools or do like 17,500+ others and subscribe to his AI Newsletter with tips, news and offers about AI tools and online business. Also visit his other blog, Blogmojo, which is about WordPress, blogging and SEO.